Source: Original Site Post

(FB 1553030181 Timestamp) ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA –“I’d like to see you make a post on pædophilia. You smash every issue and I think this deserves attention. It’s not a waste of your time if you’re educating the whole following, not just me.”— Thanks for asking. This isn’t really a difficult question. And I might have to edit this abit for additional clarity, but here it is: –The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla.– WHEREAS

1. Definition
   … a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.

… b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia. The criteria therefore is: … i) obsessive or exclusive interest … ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age. … iii) by those 16 years of age or older … iv) and at least five years older.

1. Limits
   These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:
   … a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.
   … b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.
   … b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.
   … c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.
   … d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.
   … e) natural experimentation between pubescents.
   … f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.
   … g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.

2. Evidence
   … a) consumption of child pornography
   … b) obsession in attention, speech, collection
   … b) molestation
   … c) co-morbidity
   … … deficits in response inhibition,
   … … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.
   … … failed lateralization (ie: the’re feminine)
   … … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)

3. Causes
   “Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)
   … a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)
   … b) developmental trauma (Trigger)
   … c) brain trauma (Trigger)

4. Incurability
   The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.

AND WHEREAS; … a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity … b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm … d) Externality – produces vast externalities … d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible … e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court: … … Because the Law must: … … … Provide restitution … … … Provide punishment … … … Prevent repetition or expansion THEREFORE; It is the judgment of the law that:

1. Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.
2. Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution
3. To those incapable of self defense,
4. And unable to engage in reciprocity,
5. Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defense of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.
6. false accusation is:
   … a) harmful to the accused
   … b) exposes the accused to risk of death
   … c) produces vast externalities whether or not true
   … d) is closed to restitution

AND THEREFORE; Pedophiles who signal risk, by: … a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking) … b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography … c) molestation … d) association with one another … e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above Shall be permanently removed from the population by: … i) death by burning for molestation … i) death by hanging for all other violations … ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps) And; Whereas; … i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm; Therefore; … i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence. … ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence. AND WHEREAS, CONVERSELY ; THEREFORE … a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution. ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused. –This is the Law– –March 19, 2019– –COMMENTS– by James Fox Higgins The beauty of this piece of law is that: Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely. So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society. If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.

---