(FB 1552523847 Timestamp) RESPONSE TO PILPUL AS CRITICISM OF P-LAW/LOGIC 1) You did not make an argument as to demarcation – meaning you made no argument as to anything other than self opinion. 2) You have not stated any ideologies and certainly no methodologies, (there aren’t any) 3) You have not answered how one would solve the problem of limiting interpretation to application. 4) You misrepresented in your experience offered as evidence as other than an opinion. It is an experience if you describe it (“i don’t know i only know” but an opinion if you offer it as argument (“in my experience… therefore”). 5) You instead practiced one of the techniques of Pilpul (semitic invention of lying via justification via scriptural interpretation) by solving for a presumption of reasonableness (trustworthiness) as a means of baiting into hazard – which is the principle means of deception I am working to dutifully exterminate. 6) And if “in conclusion, I have no issue being held liable for what I say” then you are exactly the target audience, because you just demonstrated the problem of men who think they are honest when they are merely vehicles for the transmission and propagation of the very disease of the mind that travels under the pretense of religion: abrahamism: false promise, baiting in to hazard, pilpul to justify, critique to straw man and undermine, GRRSM to avoid, solving for pragmatism, or consent, or reasonableness rather than truth and reciprocity, and the culmination of all these techniques to profit from the incremental destruction of host civilizations. You are, in your confidence, evidence of the crime I wish to, and hopefully shall, prosecute, and the education I wish to introduce as the completion of the scientific method. So that no more such pretenses may be practiced upon this earth for eternity, and the dark age of the abrahamists – the cancer that has cost us two thousand years, will be finally left behind forever.
Source: Original Site Post
-
(FB 1552576600 Timestamp) THE PERIODIC TABLE OF SPEECH There are a few fundament
(FB 1552576600 Timestamp) THE PERIODIC TABLE OF SPEECH There are a few fundamental innovations in Propertarianism 1 – The Dimensional warranty of due diligence 2 – The Periodic Table of speech (Grammars) 3 – The Operational language and grammar in ePrime 4 – The Method of producing serialized Definitions (Disambiguation) 5 – Property in toto and the completion of the anarchic program in a reduction of social science to statements of changes in the state of ‘property’ (interests). -update- (correct link to pdf version: https://curtdoolittle.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/periodic-table-of-speech-draft2-2.pdf )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552522887 Timestamp) —“@Curt Doolittle do you not know what a Value-Added Tax is?”— Yes. It is a compound tax (many points of taxation), and a variation on the sales tax (one point of taxation), and like sales taxes is one of the most regressive taxes known to man, particularly because of the distortion it places on the world pricing systems. Conversely, an income tax is the most progressive because unlike sales or vat taxes it provides the least if not zero distortion of world pricing systems that work against the interests of established (advanced) polities. The superior alternative to VAT is import-export (trade) tax and policy, which fosters ingroup (home) trade. There is one reason to employ a VAT: in very low trust countries with very low tax compliance (greece, italy, china), it creates the greatest opportunity for state intervention into private industry thus solving the problem of asymmetric information enabling avoidance. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to help all of you folk for whom doing so makes you useful idiots to those who have destroyed our civilization thru confusing a temporary period of pre and post war wealth with a durable competitive advantage – one which we no longer have. And which folk like you merely assist in perpetuating out of ignorance. Stalin’s useful idiots still reign.
-
(FB 1552574419 Timestamp) As far as I know we are very close to submission to th
(FB 1552574419 Timestamp) As far as I know we are very close to submission to the inescapable necessity, that the physics of the universe at existential scale is complete, and that no forces or interactions exist or can that we do not know of. Moreover that modifying our ‘stories’ such that they, our experiences, our thoughts, and actions work ever closer to those rules. In other words, a majority of people demonstrate preference for the results even if a minority demonstrate preference for what produces those results. Worse, that we evolved our language, cooperation in a division of labor, and all our works, in a period of very short ‘safety’ here on this earth, and here in this place in the universe. We do not have any luxury of ‘free riding’ on this world or the universe. But it is this particular difference between those of us who seek to consume(relax) above all else, and those of us who seek to produce(achieve) above all else, that separates our understanding of the world. As far as I can determine, we all seek to create stories that are discordant with that universe for a host of reasons – all of which are reducible to our desires being contrary to it. Because we survive and prosper by the same means as does all life: the seizure of opportunity to resist entropy.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552483548 Timestamp) The number of people who use the word proof without knowing ‘proof of what?’ The number of people who use the term NAP without knowing the answer to “aggression against what?’ The number of people who use the term ‘moral’ without knowing the answer to ‘define moral’. These are term of convention – half truths. We use as if we have even the vaguest idea what they men other than to justify a prior.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552524197 Timestamp) (was able to go to the store today. but put me right out again. hopefully one more day of this and I’ll be able to work.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552425769 Timestamp) most of us eventually claim we can normalize to ones and zeroes. but not enough of us realize that we can normalize to human faculties.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552523847 Timestamp) RESPONSE TO PILPUL AS CRITICISM OF P-LAW/LOGIC 1) You did not make an argument as to demarcation – meaning you made no argument as to anything other than self opinion. 2) You have not stated any ideologies and certainly no methodologies, (there aren’t any) 3) You have not answered how one would solve the problem of limiting interpretation to application. 4) You misrepresented in your experience offered as evidence as other than an opinion. It is an experience if you describe it (“i don’t know i only know” but an opinion if you offer it as argument (“in my experience… therefore”). 5) You instead practiced one of the techniques of Pilpul (semitic invention of lying via justification via scriptural interpretation) by solving for a presumption of reasonableness (trustworthiness) as a means of baiting into hazard – which is the principle means of deception I am working to dutifully exterminate. 6) And if “in conclusion, I have no issue being held liable for what I say” then you are exactly the target audience, because you just demonstrated the problem of men who think they are honest when they are merely vehicles for the transmission and propagation of the very disease of the mind that travels under the pretense of religion: abrahamism: false promise, baiting in to hazard, pilpul to justify, critique to straw man and undermine, GRRSM to avoid, solving for pragmatism, or consent, or reasonableness rather than truth and reciprocity, and the culmination of all these techniques to profit from the incremental destruction of host civilizations. You are, in your confidence, evidence of the crime I wish to, and hopefully shall, prosecute, and the education I wish to introduce as the completion of the scientific method. So that no more such pretenses may be practiced upon this earth for eternity, and the dark age of the abrahamists – the cancer that has cost us two thousand years, will be finally left behind forever.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552425604 Timestamp) We would produce a world of much better thinkers if we taught normalization after venn diagrams. And asked people to normalize various statements. sets are trivial. normalizations falsify the problem of sets
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552522887 Timestamp) —“@Curt Doolittle do you not know what a Value-Added Tax is?”— Yes. It is a compound tax (many points of taxation), and a variation on the sales tax (one point of taxation), and like sales taxes is one of the most regressive taxes known to man, particularly because of the distortion it places on the world pricing systems. Conversely, an income tax is the most progressive because unlike sales or vat taxes it provides the least if not zero distortion of world pricing systems that work against the interests of established (advanced) polities. The superior alternative to VAT is import-export (trade) tax and policy, which fosters ingroup (home) trade. There is one reason to employ a VAT: in very low trust countries with very low tax compliance (greece, italy, china), it creates the greatest opportunity for state intervention into private industry thus solving the problem of asymmetric information enabling avoidance. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to help all of you folk for whom doing so makes you useful idiots to those who have destroyed our civilization thru confusing a temporary period of pre and post war wealth with a durable competitive advantage – one which we no longer have. And which folk like you merely assist in perpetuating out of ignorance. Stalin’s useful idiots still reign.