(FB 1551655186 Timestamp) THE LEFT AND THE OVERTON WINDOW GAG —“You ever see those gag videos where they rig of a backpack or a bike with a wire to a solid anchor then wait for someone to steal it? They take off running or peddling then get blasted off their feet when the wire runs out. I’ll admit to some chuckling imaging the lefties I know experiencing the emotional equivalent.”—Luke Weinhagen
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1551564510 Timestamp) BLAKE LIEBEL, GRAPHIC NOVELIST, LUNATIC, GETS 41M CIVIL PENALTY IN ADDITION TO LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE A Los Angeles judge has ordered Blake Leibel, a graphic novelist from a wealthy Canadian Jewish family to pay $41.6 million to the family of his slain fiancee, whom he brutally tortured and killed in 2016 just weeks after their daughter was born. ( Note: Olga was Ukrainian citizen of Persian (?) Descent) ) Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Bobbi Tillmon delivered the verdict after a bench trial in the wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Iana Kasianâs family against Blake Leibel, who carried out the gruesome slaying using a book he worked on years earlier as a blueprint. âThis murder didnât just kill one person, it really did kill the family, it shattered the family. And the family has had a hard time crawling back from this,â said Jake Finkel, an attorney representing Kasianâs family. Leibel, who is imprisoned in Tehachapi California, did not attend the trial, Finkel added, nor did an attorney or family member on his behalf. Leibel, a scion of a powerful Canadian family who once had a fledgling Hollywood career, was convicted last year of first-degree murder, aggravated mayhem and torture, and is now serving a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Before sheriffâs deputies arrested Leibel at the West Hollywood apartment he shared with Kasian, he had blocked doorways with mattresses and locked himself in a bedroom with Kasianâs mangled body. Prosecutors told jurors during Leibelâs trial that he had used a sharp object â perhaps the green paring knife or bloodied razor found in the coupleâs bathroom â as well as his bare hands to cut and rip pieces of Kasianâs scalp. Most of the blood had been drained from her body. She died of severe blood loss. Kasian was alive during much of the torture and died âa very slow, excruciating, painful death,â Deputy Dist. Atty. Beth Silverman said, adding that the killing was patterned after âSyndrome,â a graphic novel that Leibel helped create years earlier. Its cover shows a baby doll with a partially removed scalp. Leibel moved to California in 2004, after which he married, had a son and lived primarily off an allowance from his parents â installments that totaled $1.8 million over about seven years, according to legal documents filed after his motherâs death in 2011. He also worked on the animated series âSpaceballs,â based on the 1987 film by Mel Brooks, and collaborated with a team of writers and an illustrator to develop âSyndrome.â In July 2015, court records show, he filed for divorce from his wife and soon after, Kasian was pregnant. She called her mother, Olga, saying her longtime dream of becoming a parent was finally coming true, according to a declaration filed in the familyâs lawsuit. Prosecutors argued at the trial that Leibel was jealous of the attention Kasian gave to their newborn, Diana, when he killed her. Kasian grew up in Ukraine, where she worked for several years as an attorney prosecuting tax crimes. She immigrated to the U.S. in 2014. Finkel said the payout would help Olga Kasian raise her granddaughter, who turns 3 in May, the way Iana Kasian would have wanted. The pair live in Ukraine. âThe most precious thing to take away from a little girl, from a woman, is her mother. [Dianaâs] mother was taken away from her before she even got a real chance to learn about her, get to know her,â Finkel said. âAt one point, sheâs going to learn about the reality of her mother, and what happened to her, and her biological father and what he did to her mother.â https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake_Leibel
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551652461 Timestamp) SITE UPDATE: Nit: Fixed missing year on post search results.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551652765 Timestamp) —“A harmless man is no man at all.”—Holly Morrigan
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551645740 Timestamp) —“….I think this is just the Overton Window moving rapidly – which means by 2020 it’s gonna be ripped of the frame, since lefties are accelerating the other way.”—James Santagata Yep. Demographics are destiny. Window is moving fast.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551652461 Timestamp) SITE UPDATE: Nit: Fixed missing year on post search results.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551645681 Timestamp) COURSE UPDATE LAW103 – Foundations Really love the material, but I still am pretty under the weather. I just tried recording and I sound terrible between the wheezing and the sniffling…. lol. And so I won’t record until tomorrow I think. Mirroring the book. Really just copy, paste, simplify, and add assignments. It’s working out wonderfully. Very excited. hugs all And again. Apologies. My health does not like to cooperate no matter how excited I am. You are going to love this stuff because it is the very lowest level that I don’t cover on Facebook. #post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551645740 Timestamp) —“….I think this is just the Overton Window moving rapidly – which means by 2020 it’s gonna be ripped of the frame, since lefties are accelerating the other way.”—James Santagata Yep. Demographics are destiny. Window is moving fast.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551721702 Timestamp) TERRITORIAL DIFFERENCES POST THREE ON POLITICAL THEORY Apr 25, 2016, 12:35 PM What are the first things one should know in political theory?
- The first question of ethics is ‘Why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?’.
The first question of politics is “Why don’t me and mine kill you and yours and take your stuff?”
The first question of group evolutionary strategy is “How can we either kill them and take their stuff, or prevent them from killing us and taking our stuff?”
- The answer to all three questions is the same: “Because **cooperating in a division of labor **is productive and can continue to produce mutual returns while conflict is costly and and results only in net consumption. Over time those who cooperate have more numbers, are healthier, have better industry, technology, and warfare than those who don’t.
- So, how do we organize group evolutionary strategy, politics, ethics, production and reproduction, so that we can out-compete, or at least say at pace with, competitors, given the people, their abilities, the territory and its resources that are at our disposal?
- Answering this question requires facing a very unpleasant fac****t, that the problem we face is** human capital **(talents) and that every person at the bottom of the curve drastically reduces the effectiveness of every person at the middle and top of the curve. In other words, it matters more that you don’t have impulsive, aggressive, idiots than it does that you have calm geniuses. So by and large nations in colder climates were more successful at killing off the undesirables through winters and starvation, than those in the warmer climates.
- So we see many different group evolutionary strategies dependent upon human capital, territory, and resources. The most obvious are
* the hierarchical and authoritarian irrigated flood-river valleys * the aggressive tribal steppe and desert regions * the egalitarian forest and river regions. * the equalitarian polar peoples * Each of these main groups produce different political systems in order to make use of the territory and means of production available to them. Those that do not make good use of territory and means are displaced, conquered, or exterminated by those that do. * All groups require: * A method of organizing reproduction (usually marriage) * A method of organizing production (an economy) * A method of organizing norms (usually religion/education) * A method of producing commons (government) * A method of holding territory (army) * There are two economic poles available and all make use of one part of the spectrum or another, and all economies resulting in some variant on the mixed economy: * Propertarian / Libertarian / Capitalist / High Trust / High Innovation – Why? No corruption in theory. Incentives work. But no competitive commons are produced, so it doesn’t work. * Mixed Economy of Consumer capitalism with some authoritarian commons production. Incentives work and commons possible. * Authoritarian / Totalitarian / Socialist / Low Trust / Low Innovation – Why? high corruption, no incentives, and it doesn’t work. * All governments are corrupt but if a people are successful at implementing rule of law it is possible to protect the economy using the courts from excessive interference by the government monopoly. * The method of deciding ( making excuses for ) which commons is produced rather than some other commons is a matter of local dispute. But it is actually a question of competition with other states, and it is only very wealthy states that choose luxuries rather than necessities. * That is about all there is to political theory.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
(FB 1551721737 Timestamp) TERRITORIAL DIFFERENCES POST TWO