Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @Xistance Yes. The problem is that they have to have given up FALSE HOPES like C

    @Xistance Yes. The problem is that they have to have given up FALSE HOPES like Civic Nationalism, Trump as Savior, Nazi rescue, or Christian Fundamentalist salvation, as the pipe-dreams of naive, uneducated, children. I kept my head down for a year while this continues to play out – because it’s deterministic that it will play out. Unfortunately because these dumb fucks are so arrogant and loud mouthed, we lost our optimum window of opportunity early last fall. So the ‘price’ of our ‘salvation’ by our own hands went up dramatically because of their childish, ignorant, arrogant, stupidity…. We are the only people, the only thought leaders, that have a solution. There is no other answer to survival of our people. None is possible. Becasue all political systems work by rules and that system of rules is called constitution, law, regulation, and policy which produced processes that must be followed in order to keep one’s job. There is no other solution. None. All these other dreams were childhood fantasies.
    Childhood ended with their defeat. Now maybe they are ready for adulthood.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-15 13:14:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106760323428063437

  • THEY ARE TURNING THE WEST INTO THE MIDDLE EAST @ORDER15 “The destruction of west

    THEY ARE TURNING THE WEST INTO THE MIDDLE EAST
    @ORDER15

    “The destruction of western civilization by reversal of prioritization for the aristocracy and middle class vs the working and dependent classes, by the false promise to those lower classes of and end to the illusion of oppression, rather than the necessary, unavoidable, evolution by natural selection for rates of adaptation required for continuous scientific, technological, economic, social, and political evolution.

    Western civilization is the most emotionally, psychologically, intellectually, socially, politically, and militarily costly civilization because of our bias for continuous evolution despite the ‘drag’ of the peasantry that resists the costs of adaptation and evolution in which they are the least capable of competing.

    So the Jewish left seeks to transform the world through globalism into one that is like south America, South Asia, the middle east, and Africa: people who are not only unwilling to pay the cost of civilization necessary to maintain relative prosperity but who are UNABLE to pay that cost because they are UNFIT for survival. Yes, really, that’s the issue.

    So the Jewish left wants (just like mothers) to maintain control over others and to profit from ‘caretaking’ of the unfit. In other words, Jews, Muslims, and foolish Christians are cancer upon this earth, and Abraham who invented the big lies of history that were institutionalized by the jews, is the devil, if there ever was one.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-15 13:09:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106760302884278288

  • @ORDER15 “The destruction of western civilization by reversal of prioritization

    @ORDER15 “The destruction of western civilization by reversal of prioritization for the aristocracy and middle class vs the working and dependent classes, by the false promise to those lower classes of and end to the illusion of oppression, rather than the necessary, unavoidable, evolution by natural seelction for rates of adaptation required for continuous scientific, technological, economic, social, and political evolution. Western civlization is the most emotionally, pschologically, intellectually, socially, politically, and militarily costly civilization because of our bias for continuous evolution despite the ‘drag’ of the peasantry that resists the costs of adaptation and evolution in which they are the least capable of competing. So the Jewish left seeks to transform the world through globalism into one that is like south america, south asia, the middle east, and africa: people who are not only unwilling to pay the cost of civlization necessary to maintain relative prosperity, but who are UNABLE to pay that cost because they are UNFIT for survival. Yes, really, that’s the issue. SO the jewish left wants (just like mothers) to maintain control over others and to profit from ‘caretaking’ of the unfit. In other words, Jews, muslims and foolish christians are a cancer upon this earth, and abraham who invented the big lies of history taht were institutionalized by the jews, is the devil, if there ever was one.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-15 13:08:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106760302283095767

  • Boost of @thuletide There are basically four issues that actually matter in mode

    Boost of @thuletide There are basically four issues that actually matter in modern politics:
    1. The worldwide genocide of Whites
    2. The destruction of the family
    3. The destruction of Christianity
    4. The rapidly encroaching totalitarian, China/USSR-style technocracy

    From our enemies’ perspectives, these are framed as:
    1. “Anti-racism” (anti-imperialism, post-colonialism, refugees, diversity, equity, inclusion, etc.)
    2. LGBT and feminism
    3. The destruction of Christianity (they don’t even try to disguise this one)
    4. Climate change, “COVID,” Smart Cities, “Sustainable Development,” etc.

    These are the same four aspects of society targeted for destruction in the Communist Manifesto, published way back in 1848: The abolition of nationalism, family, religion, and private property (the latter being dictatorial centralization in the hands of the state).

    This is not to say that modern elites are ardent, ideology-bound Communists, who are secretly waving the hammer-and-sickle, but that the New World Order, one-world government conspiracy has had the same objectives for centuries.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-14 22:31:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107231674933783518

  • from apes to humans

    So, now to the transitionals. Have fun!

    F. Clark Howell, Early Man Time Life Library, 1980

    Francis M Clapham, Our Human Ancestors, 1976

    Handprint : Ancestral Lines

    Prominent Hominid Fossils

    Afarensis to habilis:

    OH 24 is in between A. afarensis and habilis OH 24

    KMNR-1813 KNM-ER 1813 brain size bigger than afarensis but smaller than habilis. Face looks more like habilis

    B Asfaw, T White, O Lovejoy, B Latimer, S Simpson, G Suwa, Australopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from Ethiopia Science 284: 622-629, 1999. All individuals are intermediate between A. afarensis and H. habilis.

    Jawbone Fossil Fills a Gap in Early Human Evolution

    “Dr. Spoor said in an email that he agreed with the hypothesis that the new Ledi-Geraru mandible “derives from Australopithecus afarensis, and at 2.8 million years shows morphology that is ancestral to all early Homo.””

    Habilis to ergastor:

    Oldovai:Bed I has Habilis at bottom, then fossils with perfect mixture of characteristics of habilis and erectus, and erectus at top. At bottom of Bed II (top of Bed I) have fossils resemble H. erectus but brain case smaller than later H. erectus that lies immediately above them. pg 81

    OH 13, 14 was classified by some anthropologists as H. habilis but others as early H. erectus. 650 cc

    D2700 from Dmasi has features of both hablis and erectus. Fossil Hominids: Skull D2700

    Koobi Fora: Another succession with several habilis up to 2 Mya, then transitionals, and then erectus at 1.5 Mya.

    Ergastor to sapiens:

    Omo Valley, Ethiopia: ~ 500,000 ya. mixture erectus and sapiens features Omo | Remains & Dating

    Omo-1: mix of erectus and sapiens

    Omo-2 “remarkable mixture of Homo erectus and Homo sapiens characteristics” F. Clark Howell, Early Man Time Life Library, 1980 pg. 70.

    Sale in Morrocco: skull discovered in 1971, ~300,000 ya. also shows erectus and sapiens features.

    Broken Hill skull: another skull with mixtures of erectus and sapiens features

    Tautavel, 200Kya: large brow ridges and small cranium but rest of face looks like H. sapiens.

    “We shall see the problem of drawing up a dividing line between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens is not easy.” Francis M Clapham, Our Human Ancestors, 1976 pg 65.

    Ngaloba Beds of Laetoli, 120 Kya: ~1200 cc and suite of archaic (erectus) features.

    Guamde in Turkana Basin, 180 Kya: more modern features than Ngaloba but in-between erectus and sapiens.

    Skhul, Israel: “posed a puzzle to paleoanthropologists, appearing to be almost but not quite modern humans”

    Skhul and Jebel Qafza caves: “robust” H. sapiens at 120 Kya that have brow ridges like ergastor but brain case like sapiens.

    Bouri http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0611_030611_earliesthuman.html First homo sapiens, actual paper: Nature

    Vertesszollos, 400 Kya. Teeth like H. ergastor but occipital bone like H. sapiens. brain ~ 1300 cc

    A Gibbons, Old skull has a new look. Science 280: 1525, June 5 1998. Primary article is: E Abbate et. al. A one-million-year-old Homo cranium from the Danakil (Afar) depression of Eritrea. Nature 393: 458-460, June 4 1998. Fossil with features intermediate between H. ergastor and H. sapiens.

    Herto skulls: 160,000 years old. Close but not quite anatomically modern. Herto skulls (Homo sapiens idaltu)

    White T.D., Asfaw B., DeGusta D., Gilbert H., Richards G.D., Suwa G. et al. (2003): Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature, 423:742-7.

    BOU-VP-16/1 is an almost complete adult cranium (shown at right). It is large and robust, with a cranial capacity estimated at 1450 cubic centimetres, larger than most modern humans. The skull is long and high in lateral view, and White et al. (2003) list a number of features in which it is near or beyond the limit of modern humans (the occipital angle, mastoid height, palate breadth). Viewed from above, its length exceeds any from a sample of over 3000 modern humans, but one width measurement is below the modern human average. The brow ridge is not prominent and is within the modern human range. BOU-VP-16/2 consists of portions of another adult cranium which appears to have been even larger than the previous specimen.

    Bodo: Bodo | anthropological and archaeological site, Ethiopia “a 600,000-year-old cranium that is intermediate in shape between Homo erectus and H. sapiens…the Bodo specimen reveals a transitional morphology between early members of the genus Homo and modern humans. “

    Ergastor (erectus) to neandertal:

    Stenheim and Swanscombe, 250 Kya: called H. heidelbergensis but have characteristics of both ergastor (erectus) and neanderthal. Large brows and small cranium ( ~1200cc) but otherwise looks like neanderthal

    Petroloma skull (complete): brow ridges and low forehead like ergastor (erectus) but not quite as primitive but not as derived as sapiens or neanderthal. Back of head resembles sapiens. 250 Kya

    Ehringsdorf in Germany and Saccopastore in Italy: mixture ergastor (erectus) and early neanderthals, classed as archaic H. sapiens or H. heidelbergensis

    H. cepranensis: https://anthropology.ua.edu/blogs/dssimpson1/2015/10/22/homo-cepranensis-still-its-own-species/ “serves as a bridge between H. ergaster/erectus, and H. heidelbergensis”

  • from apes to humans

    So, now to the transitionals. Have fun!

    F. Clark Howell, Early Man Time Life Library, 1980

    Francis M Clapham, Our Human Ancestors, 1976

    Handprint : Ancestral Lines

    Prominent Hominid Fossils

    Afarensis to habilis:

    OH 24 is in between A. afarensis and habilis OH 24

    KMNR-1813 KNM-ER 1813 brain size bigger than afarensis but smaller than habilis. Face looks more like habilis

    B Asfaw, T White, O Lovejoy, B Latimer, S Simpson, G Suwa, Australopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from Ethiopia Science 284: 622-629, 1999. All individuals are intermediate between A. afarensis and H. habilis.

    Jawbone Fossil Fills a Gap in Early Human Evolution

    “Dr. Spoor said in an email that he agreed with the hypothesis that the new Ledi-Geraru mandible “derives from Australopithecus afarensis, and at 2.8 million years shows morphology that is ancestral to all early Homo.””

    Habilis to ergastor:

    Oldovai:Bed I has Habilis at bottom, then fossils with perfect mixture of characteristics of habilis and erectus, and erectus at top. At bottom of Bed II (top of Bed I) have fossils resemble H. erectus but brain case smaller than later H. erectus that lies immediately above them. pg 81

    OH 13, 14 was classified by some anthropologists as H. habilis but others as early H. erectus. 650 cc

    D2700 from Dmasi has features of both hablis and erectus. Fossil Hominids: Skull D2700

    Koobi Fora: Another succession with several habilis up to 2 Mya, then transitionals, and then erectus at 1.5 Mya.

    Ergastor to sapiens:

    Omo Valley, Ethiopia: ~ 500,000 ya. mixture erectus and sapiens features Omo | Remains & Dating

    Omo-1: mix of erectus and sapiens

    Omo-2 “remarkable mixture of Homo erectus and Homo sapiens characteristics” F. Clark Howell, Early Man Time Life Library, 1980 pg. 70.

    Sale in Morrocco: skull discovered in 1971, ~300,000 ya. also shows erectus and sapiens features.

    Broken Hill skull: another skull with mixtures of erectus and sapiens features

    Tautavel, 200Kya: large brow ridges and small cranium but rest of face looks like H. sapiens.

    “We shall see the problem of drawing up a dividing line between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens is not easy.” Francis M Clapham, Our Human Ancestors, 1976 pg 65.

    Ngaloba Beds of Laetoli, 120 Kya: ~1200 cc and suite of archaic (erectus) features.

    Guamde in Turkana Basin, 180 Kya: more modern features than Ngaloba but in-between erectus and sapiens.

    Skhul, Israel: “posed a puzzle to paleoanthropologists, appearing to be almost but not quite modern humans”

    Skhul and Jebel Qafza caves: “robust” H. sapiens at 120 Kya that have brow ridges like ergastor but brain case like sapiens.

    Bouri http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0611_030611_earliesthuman.html First homo sapiens, actual paper: Nature

    Vertesszollos, 400 Kya. Teeth like H. ergastor but occipital bone like H. sapiens. brain ~ 1300 cc

    A Gibbons, Old skull has a new look. Science 280: 1525, June 5 1998. Primary article is: E Abbate et. al. A one-million-year-old Homo cranium from the Danakil (Afar) depression of Eritrea. Nature 393: 458-460, June 4 1998. Fossil with features intermediate between H. ergastor and H. sapiens.

    Herto skulls: 160,000 years old. Close but not quite anatomically modern. Herto skulls (Homo sapiens idaltu)

    White T.D., Asfaw B., DeGusta D., Gilbert H., Richards G.D., Suwa G. et al. (2003): Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature, 423:742-7.

    BOU-VP-16/1 is an almost complete adult cranium (shown at right). It is large and robust, with a cranial capacity estimated at 1450 cubic centimetres, larger than most modern humans. The skull is long and high in lateral view, and White et al. (2003) list a number of features in which it is near or beyond the limit of modern humans (the occipital angle, mastoid height, palate breadth). Viewed from above, its length exceeds any from a sample of over 3000 modern humans, but one width measurement is below the modern human average. The brow ridge is not prominent and is within the modern human range. BOU-VP-16/2 consists of portions of another adult cranium which appears to have been even larger than the previous specimen.

    Bodo: Bodo | anthropological and archaeological site, Ethiopia “a 600,000-year-old cranium that is intermediate in shape between Homo erectus and H. sapiens…the Bodo specimen reveals a transitional morphology between early members of the genus Homo and modern humans. “

    Ergastor (erectus) to neandertal:

    Stenheim and Swanscombe, 250 Kya: called H. heidelbergensis but have characteristics of both ergastor (erectus) and neanderthal. Large brows and small cranium ( ~1200cc) but otherwise looks like neanderthal

    Petroloma skull (complete): brow ridges and low forehead like ergastor (erectus) but not quite as primitive but not as derived as sapiens or neanderthal. Back of head resembles sapiens. 250 Kya

    Ehringsdorf in Germany and Saccopastore in Italy: mixture ergastor (erectus) and early neanderthals, classed as archaic H. sapiens or H. heidelbergensis

    H. cepranensis: https://anthropology.ua.edu/blogs/dssimpson1/2015/10/22/homo-cepranensis-still-its-own-species/ “serves as a bridge between H. ergaster/erectus, and H. heidelbergensis”

  • FUNDAMENTALISM IS LIMITED TO FIRST ORDER CLAIMS

    FUNDAMENTALISM IS LIMITED TO FIRST ORDER CLAIMS

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 14:44:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106743690016307280

  • Fundamentalism Is Limited to First-Order Claims

    FUNDAMENTALISM IS LIMITED TO FIRST-ORDER CLAIMS
    No I’m not anti-christian so to speak, I’m anti-Abrahmism.
    — “Some atheists claim that religion is a comfort to simple minds too weak to tolerate a world without God, but perhaps I wonder if it is the other way around. Perhaps atheism is a comfort to those minds too fearful of what the existence of God would entail.” —
     
    Well, we have the science. Religiosity is determined by the demand for empathy over systematizing. And the reasons for this are simple neural economy of in utero developmental differences. Smarter people tend to be system thinkers, so the same emotional need is filled differently.
     
    — “I could tell you that eyes are just the result of sense organs evolving over time. That wouldn’t then suggest that they don’t actually see anything.” —
     
    Technically speaking eyes don’t ‘see’ they just sense information. ‘Seeing’ requires the organization of that information into edges, textures, fragments, objects, spaces, and boundaries into a model to predict where muscles can move our bodies – that happens in the brain.
     
    — “Way to miss the point. You can describe the activity any way you like.” —
     
    Not missing the point, but making one over your head, that others will recognize: the three categories of fictionalism (deceit by pseudoscience(magic) pseudo reason(sophistry) and supernaturalism(occult)) make use of that method of argument-substitute, and Abrahamism teaches it.
     
    I told you it was over your head. 😉 All deceit is constructed from the same set of techniques that use ambiguity(vs identity), grammatical tolerance, incomplete sentences(vs testable transactions) to suggest relations by analogy that they cannot testify to (and do not exist).
     
    So for example the liars paradox isn’t. It’s a lie created by design using an incomplete statement that violates the grammatical law of continuous recursive disambiguation. Idiomatic speech relies heavily on suggestion vs description. Languages differ in precision. Cultures do too.
     
    And because cultures do too, cultures are more vulnerable to an index between aggregate (normative) intelligence, institutional evoluton, the precision of language. So English > German > Russian > Hindu > Semitic > Sinic differences in context vs precision.
     
    It’s actually a tragedy, in that (a) the church failed to produce an Augustine or Aquinas in response to Darwin, Maxwell et all, given that the scholastics had nearly united laws of nature natural law and catholic mythology (b) the Marxist, neo-Marxists, pomo, woke cult WON.
     
    And worse, that you idiots can’t comprehend that trend, and are ignorant of the coherence of the laws of nature, natural law, economics, and evolution = and worse aren’t taught grammar, logic, rhetoric, and grammatical suppression of the cognitive biases.
     
    And worse, you are ignorant of the fact that while Jesus increasingly appears to be a fictional character in the Semitic mythicist tradition consisting of combined wisdom literature from Egyptian and Persian traditions, that “Jesus” solved the problem of cooperation at scale.
     
    If one ‘sciences’ Christian ethics (not dogma) it is the ‘scientific’ solution to the prisoner’s dilemma of trust development in a heterogeneous polity – and requires training since it is contrary to all human instincts.
     
    The consequences? (a) reduce familism and tribalism, (b) prepare people for middle-class ethics (trade), (c) provide a means for the lower classes to find status in Indo-European civilization which treats the lower classes as domesticated animals – integrating them into society.
     
    So I don’t mind that you’re an ignorant peasant that obsesses about nonsense if the consequence is that you behave as the ‘programmers’ intended you to behave. I only mind when you use Abrahamic deceit to pretend intellectual status instead of the social moral status it produces.
     
    As such Abrahamic theology is just wisdom literature that tells you how to behave. This is a first-order wisdom. It does not tolerate second-order deduction, induction, or abduction. It is not a system of reason or science, it is a system of analogy. To say otherwise is lying.
     
    I like to share knowledge and understanding with those capable of using it. You are just a tool that provides a frame for the distribution of that knowledge. You don’t matter other than that you’re a foil. This is why you have no meaning in life and your religion is dying.

  • Fundamentalism Is Limited to First-Order Claims

    FUNDAMENTALISM IS LIMITED TO FIRST-ORDER CLAIMS
    No I’m not anti-christian so to speak, I’m anti-Abrahmism.
    — “Some atheists claim that religion is a comfort to simple minds too weak to tolerate a world without God, but perhaps I wonder if it is the other way around. Perhaps atheism is a comfort to those minds too fearful of what the existence of God would entail.” —
     
    Well, we have the science. Religiosity is determined by the demand for empathy over systematizing. And the reasons for this are simple neural economy of in utero developmental differences. Smarter people tend to be system thinkers, so the same emotional need is filled differently.
     
    — “I could tell you that eyes are just the result of sense organs evolving over time. That wouldn’t then suggest that they don’t actually see anything.” —
     
    Technically speaking eyes don’t ‘see’ they just sense information. ‘Seeing’ requires the organization of that information into edges, textures, fragments, objects, spaces, and boundaries into a model to predict where muscles can move our bodies – that happens in the brain.
     
    — “Way to miss the point. You can describe the activity any way you like.” —
     
    Not missing the point, but making one over your head, that others will recognize: the three categories of fictionalism (deceit by pseudoscience(magic) pseudo reason(sophistry) and supernaturalism(occult)) make use of that method of argument-substitute, and Abrahamism teaches it.
     
    I told you it was over your head. 😉 All deceit is constructed from the same set of techniques that use ambiguity(vs identity), grammatical tolerance, incomplete sentences(vs testable transactions) to suggest relations by analogy that they cannot testify to (and do not exist).
     
    So for example the liars paradox isn’t. It’s a lie created by design using an incomplete statement that violates the grammatical law of continuous recursive disambiguation. Idiomatic speech relies heavily on suggestion vs description. Languages differ in precision. Cultures do too.
     
    And because cultures do too, cultures are more vulnerable to an index between aggregate (normative) intelligence, institutional evoluton, the precision of language. So English > German > Russian > Hindu > Semitic > Sinic differences in context vs precision.
     
    It’s actually a tragedy, in that (a) the church failed to produce an Augustine or Aquinas in response to Darwin, Maxwell et all, given that the scholastics had nearly united laws of nature natural law and catholic mythology (b) the Marxist, neo-Marxists, pomo, woke cult WON.
     
    And worse, that you idiots can’t comprehend that trend, and are ignorant of the coherence of the laws of nature, natural law, economics, and evolution = and worse aren’t taught grammar, logic, rhetoric, and grammatical suppression of the cognitive biases.
     
    And worse, you are ignorant of the fact that while Jesus increasingly appears to be a fictional character in the Semitic mythicist tradition consisting of combined wisdom literature from Egyptian and Persian traditions, that “Jesus” solved the problem of cooperation at scale.
     
    If one ‘sciences’ Christian ethics (not dogma) it is the ‘scientific’ solution to the prisoner’s dilemma of trust development in a heterogeneous polity – and requires training since it is contrary to all human instincts.
     
    The consequences? (a) reduce familism and tribalism, (b) prepare people for middle-class ethics (trade), (c) provide a means for the lower classes to find status in Indo-European civilization which treats the lower classes as domesticated animals – integrating them into society.
     
    So I don’t mind that you’re an ignorant peasant that obsesses about nonsense if the consequence is that you behave as the ‘programmers’ intended you to behave. I only mind when you use Abrahamic deceit to pretend intellectual status instead of the social moral status it produces.
     
    As such Abrahamic theology is just wisdom literature that tells you how to behave. This is a first-order wisdom. It does not tolerate second-order deduction, induction, or abduction. It is not a system of reason or science, it is a system of analogy. To say otherwise is lying.
     
    I like to share knowledge and understanding with those capable of using it. You are just a tool that provides a frame for the distribution of that knowledge. You don’t matter other than that you’re a foil. This is why you have no meaning in life and your religion is dying.

  • @Nationalist7346 self determiniation is a right because otherwise no one else ha

    @Nationalist7346 self determiniation is a right because otherwise no one else has that right. Ethnonationalism is the optimum strategy. Anti-ethnonationalism has been the strategy of the jewish war against european institutions of cultural production. As such it cannot be denied. That said, we cannot deny the opposite to those who feel otherwise (which will be virtue signaling liberals).

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 00:57:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106740440756691797