(FB 1551109543 Timestamp) “Truth or GSRRM” See what I did there?
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551125235 Timestamp) You will end up with us. Otherwise you will be irrelevant. Democratic Socialist -> Mainline Democrat -> Classical Liberal -> Libertarian -> Anarcho Capitalist -> Dark Enlightenment > Propertarian (Nomocracy) <- National Socialism <- National Fascism <- Democratic Socialist (loop). Nationalism …………… Civ Nat …………………….Globalism Nat Soc…………….Classical Liberal …………………Socialist Rule of Law …….Rule of Legislation……Rule by Discretion
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551140162 Timestamp) MESSING WITH PEOPLE IS A PRIMARY FORM OF COMPENSATION —“Curt’s not a cult leader. Though I think he has some fun messing with people.”—Kelly Nosliw “Some” vastly understates it. It’s sort of my primary means of compensation. 😉
- hugs
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551109509 Timestamp) They have to use GSRRM because the truth is antithetical to their paradigms and frames.
-
(FB 1551124759 Timestamp) CULT!!!! . “Sigilum Militum De Iuris Naturae”
(FB 1551124759 Timestamp) CULT!!!! . “Sigilum Militum De Iuris Naturae” .
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551140045 Timestamp) —“I’m still undecided on curt though”– anon Like fine wines, strong scotch, dark beer, and italian espresso, my work is an ‘acquired’ taste. 😉 Once you understand that I’m playing a game of king of the hill to teach competitive men by means of dominance play you’ll get it. But you have to have the guts for the game so to speak. Some people can’t stand the heat, and therefore can’t stay in the kitchen. That doesn’t mean they won’t consume the tasty cooking that results from it. Demonstrated preference is what it is. 😉 Cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551108856 Timestamp) ARCHIVES Yes. I am very conscious that I am leaving behind my ‘notebooks’ in the public sphere. This prevents ‘interpretation’ of the work in the future, by a network of interrelated arguments from multiple directions using multiple iterations. Most scholars do this but on paper. We’re past the paper generation. Also, it provides a very detailed record of the history of development of the ideas.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551123344 Timestamp) —“My understanding is that the media just makes it cheaper to Replicate lies faster so you pay less money to get to 1000 times lying becomes truth.”— Giego Caleiro
-
(FB 1551139715 Timestamp) THE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?” Answering
(FB 1551139715 Timestamp) THE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?” Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol —“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that: Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership. Empirically, Given The Possible Series: 1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense ) 2. Consensual Property. (normative property – reciprocal defense) 3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense) It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control. Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means. In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it. Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome. In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females. The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression. That is, I think, the argument. Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value. In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong. Always and everywhere. “Veritas Et Violentia”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551107367 Timestamp) Seceded. Impoverish. Starve. Conquer. Replace.