Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550433458 Timestamp) GENERATIONS OF WARFARE The concept of four “generations” in the history of modern warfare was created by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, for the purpose of an argument for “the changing face of war” entering into a “fourth generation”.

    1. First-generation warfare refers to Ancient and Post-classical battles fought with massed manpower, using line and column tactics with uniformed soldiers governed by the state.

    2. Second-generation warfare is the Early modern tactics used after the invention of the rifled musket and breech-loading weapons and continuing through the development of the machine gun and indirect fire. The term second generation warfare was created by the U.S. military in 1989.

    3. Third-generation warfare focuses on using Late modern technology-derived tactics of leveraging speed, stealth and surprise to bypass the enemy’s lines and collapse their forces from the rear. Essentially, this was the end of linear warfare on a tactical level, with units seeking not simply to meet each other face to face but to outmaneuver each other to gain the greatest advantage.

    4. Fourth-generation warfare as presented by Lind et al. is characterized by “Post-modern” a return to decentralized forms of warfare, blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians due to nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.

    (wiki)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550464674 Timestamp) FROM REDDIT —“Siege is trash… Curt Doolittle has the right formula for freeing us.”— Anon Anonymous, 02/16/19(Sat)12:06:56 Curt Doolittle is an overgrown spud with a hodgepodge of internal anguish and lack of impulse control, so the perfect leader for a band of mentally stunted, disenfranchised autists. Anonymous, 02/16/19(Sat)12:22:46 When young men fall for a Moses figure, they fall hard. They go all in. Whether it’s the Canadian with Maxine Bernier, the cult of Jordan Peterson, or Stephan Molyneux’s followers, they truly become fanatics. Their hero is beyond criticism and they will defend their “guy” at all costs. Here’s some advice to you: Don’t have heroes.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550433323 Timestamp) RELEVANCE OF ALL OUR RELIGIOUS TEACHINGS AND TRADITIONS —“Curt Doolittle , I would submit to you this fact, even if many Christians are nominal and not walking out all the prescribed teachings of their faith, the teachings are still sound and available for reference in order to keep some semblance of functionality for the greater society as a whole..”— Bab Sorgente Um. I would say that they (christians) would rather we institutionalize christianity in the constitution as the practice of the five rules of christianity, the natural law of reciprocity, and that no other religions counter to such may be tolerated, would give them sufficient license to show that their religion is in fact ‘True’ when taught as a mythology of wisdom literature, and only ‘false’ if they teach it as history. (because that is what most smart folk in the world think.) I am a christian in that it means property rights (ten commandments), the sacred (limits to my rights of expression action and thought), natural law (reciprocity), and jesus teaching (exhaustion of all possible opportunity for forgiveness for ingroup members). THIS IS THE STRATEGY BEHIND CHRISTIANITY. But the magic man nonsense for illiterates and morons so that they believe an omniscient and omnipotent yet never evident someone worth worshipping as a slavemaster loves them despite their low status low agency and low ability – is just that and nothing but fairy stories for slaves to tolerate their enslavement until death. So we are really in a question whether we continue the evolution of our religions of heathen, aryan, greco-roman, christian, philosophical and scientific into something we all can COMPROMISE UPON, or we can keep those individual religions and agree only on the scientific substance behind all our natural religions – the ~22 Laws.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550463973 Timestamp) WHICH KIND OF CHRISTIAN ARE YOU So the question is: 1 – Are you a scientific christian (science) 2 – Are you a normative christian (habit) 3 – Are you a philosophical christian (choice) 4 – Are you a supernatural christian (faith). I am a scientific christian.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550493700 Timestamp) Connor Whittle Apologies. Misinterpreted your comment. I’m dealing with a wave of newbies and criticism at the moment and didn’t connect your name to the comment and misinterpreted honest statement as criticism. Again. Apologies. -Hugs, Curt

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550463793 Timestamp) Deus Vult!!!!! Veritas Et Violentias!!!

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550464674 Timestamp) FROM REDDIT —“Siege is trash… Curt Doolittle has the right formula for freeing us.”— Anon Anonymous, 02/16/19(Sat)12:06:56 Curt Doolittle is an overgrown spud with a hodgepodge of internal anguish and lack of impulse control, so the perfect leader for a band of mentally stunted, disenfranchised autists. Anonymous, 02/16/19(Sat)12:22:46 When young men fall for a Moses figure, they fall hard. They go all in. Whether it’s the Canadian with Maxine Bernier, the cult of Jordan Peterson, or Stephan Molyneux’s followers, they truly become fanatics. Their hero is beyond criticism and they will defend their “guy” at all costs. Here’s some advice to you: Don’t have heroes.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550461054 Timestamp) THE SCIENCE OF RELIGIOSITY IN THREE POINTS Negative correlation between intelligence and religion. Greater negative correlation for dogma than behavior. In other words people demonstrate ethical behavior under the advice of the religion’s wisdom literature but ignore the dogma.

    1. First, intelligent people are less likely to (need to) conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma.

    2. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs.

    3. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

    In other words, we cannot NOT have some sort of intuitionistic training of some form. Women are biased toward greater demand for mindfulness out of genetics. The lower classes are biased toward greater demand for mindfulness out of ability. “RELIGION” SOLVES THE NEURAL ECONOMY PROBLEM BY SOLVING THE MINDFULNESS PROBLEM.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550463973 Timestamp) WHICH KIND OF CHRISTIAN ARE YOU So the question is: 1 – Are you a scientific christian (science) 2 – Are you a normative christian (habit) 3 – Are you a philosophical christian (choice) 4 – Are you a supernatural christian (faith). I am a scientific christian.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550460544 Timestamp) CAN IT BE DONE? —“…can be done?”— I”m positive. But that’s because we can unite people behind law and policy not ideology, philosophy, or religion, giving everyone a win but no one a monopoly. All win and nobody loses. Because People follow incentives. People online have an incentive to signal. Online is a video game of signaling – not the political market. Policy will unite the clans so to speak out of common interest. Because common interest in progress is better than defeat in pursuit of monopoly