(FB 1550197719 Timestamp) —“No value in any discussion?That’s bold.”—Jeffrey Brown “No value in discussion when the subject is religion; when the means is sophism; when the difference is cowardice; when or the opponent lacks the knowledge to hold his position.” Is that better? …ok…
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
(FB 1550199156 Timestamp) HAVE WE PRUDENCE OR HAVE WE SUFFERED ENOUGH? by JWarren Prescott Will it be with a bang or with a whimper? A hard economic crash or a soft collapse? —âGovernments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.â— Have we prudence or have we suffered enough? -@[100013520984574:2048:JWarren Prescott]
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550197316 Timestamp) did you notice……[whatever]. eh. not really. everyone is giving us free advertising. the cucks will continue to cower, the men of agency and ability will come and we will continue to sort into packs based upon our levels of insecurity security and confidence.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
(FB 1550199062 Timestamp) NOT REALLY. THERE IS NO NEED TO DEBATE. by John Mark “Somebody (Curt or me or some other propertarian) needs to debate (whoever).” Not really. There is no “need” to debate. We’re selling a product in a sense. A fairly complete and polished one. Nobody else even has a product on the market, really. Apple & Samsung don’t “debate”, they just put out their products & let people analyze & decide for themselves. And in our “industry” there is no one else even competing in the market (for workable right-wing solutions). Everybody else is hoping for a strongman or wishing people would unite around their religion (won’t happen). I’m still waiting for someone who wants to debate or criticize to write a constitution. Until then they’re just giving our product free publicity. And unless they have a big audience that hasn’t already heard of us, why “debate” when we could get equivalent exposure more efficiently some other way (for me, making more videos). -John Mark
-
(FB 1550196383 Timestamp) via Greg Woodbury
(FB 1550196383 Timestamp) via Greg Woodbury
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550198920 Timestamp) yeah. well… libertarianism is evidence of delayed puberty
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550196283 Timestamp) You know when you’re having a meeting and trying to solve a problem, the idiots who say ‘we have to remember…” and they list the ways you can fail, to try to look smart and signal that they are adding value. when all they are doing is advertising that they’re dead weight and a waste of oxygen? Everyone knows how to fail. The only value one can add, is how to win. In other words, the cucked alt right. Either do – or don’t and stay silent.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550197719 Timestamp) —“No value in any discussion?That’s bold.”—Jeffrey Brown “No value in discussion when the subject is religion; when the means is sophism; when the difference is cowardice; when or the opponent lacks the knowledge to hold his position.” Is that better? …ok…
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550320635 Timestamp) WOW. —“I know that you love your people. What Doolittle has done is write down The White Law. His accomplishment is one of the greatest achievements in the history of humanity. It is the only life line we whites have to save ourselves. So have a little humility and a little gratitude, and pay your debt to your ancestors. Do the work. Join us. We all must do the work.”—Eric Grose …
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550247431 Timestamp) THE SIMPLE STRATEGY OF THE WEAK By: Rosenborg Predmetsky —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—- (via Brandon Hayes )