(FB 1550152574 Timestamp) Your ‘libertarianism’ changes rapidly once you have daughters. Your progressivism changes once you have to support a family. Your conservatism doesn’t change with daughters or families, or enterprises or nations.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550168014 Timestamp) —“The economics of language.”—Greg Hamilton
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550151705 Timestamp) —“Metaphysics. The art of obfuscating the obvious for 3,500 years.”—Noah J Revoy
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550170750 Timestamp) LOOKS LIKE WE DISCOVERED A NEW PROPERTARIAN 😉 —“A very good article. A few things came to mind. The boy who cried wolf is an excellent exercise in type I and type II logic errors. The variation of the villagers conflating âwolfâ with stray dogs reminded me of how overused the term âracistâ is or âwhite supremacistâ. They have no meaning. They at one time were used as a magic spell to whites to cough up money and resources. A real racist is not phased by the title and now, few that are accused of it are not as well – damage done. The worst of all is gaslighting because it works itâs way into the mind of the victim and they end up living in a perpetual stockholm syndrome – well, if done correctly. If not, it just drives a person mad.”—JWarren Prescott
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550152242 Timestamp) Language: a stream of continuous recursive disambiguation resulting in one or more transactions, resulting suggestion at a minimum, a contract for meaning at a on average and due diligence against error, bias, and deceit at a maximum.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550167736 Timestamp) —“CURT: WAS HEIDEGGER RIGHT ABOUT THE CURSE OF MATHINESS?”— —“While we’re on this. Wasn’t that one of Hiedegger’s points all along, too? Every philosopher after Plato and Aristotle, according to him, had gone in the wrong direction. Into the realm of proof, not truth or as Curt Doolittle said before, into the realm of mathematical operations, which is tautological by virtue. They called him a Nazi and proceeded to misinterpret and obfuscate his thoughts into the post-modern milieu. Am I off base here, or what?”— Gabriel Schmeiske Laport First: Congratulations, that’s very smart. And correct. “Mathiness” was a f–king curse we are still trying to get over. Just like christianity is a curse we are still trying to get over. Second: No. Heidegger and Hegel are not wrong in many of their assertions and observations (particularly hegel) they are just trying to solve the wrong problem by retaining german phenomenalism and retaining conflation of experience and existence. Heidegger tries to complete this project by reversing existence and experience. And thus heidegger brought the phenomenalist project to a dead end, just as frege kripke at all brought the anglo analytic project to a dead end. The problem is NOBODY UNDERSTANDS THEY WERE DEAD FUCKING ENDS… lol. The Ango model is superior for the aristocracy and upper middle class, it certainly appears that the Germans are optimum for pedagogy and the working classes. And it increasingly appears that the christians (italians basically) are optimum for the underclasses. And I cannot … (God damn. f—k!! Dammit!!!!!!) …find a way around this problem other than the traditional ‘teach them what you can and take them to their limits, with the law constraining each’. It’s obvious but I don’t want to admit it is the only solution.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550168014 Timestamp) —“The economics of language.”—Greg Hamilton
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550151705 Timestamp) —“Metaphysics. The art of obfuscating the obvious for 3,500 years.”—Noah J Revoy
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1550165110 Timestamp) byy Greg Hamilton Brilliant. Misuse of words to devalue them is inflation.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550167736 Timestamp) —“CURT: WAS HEIDEGGER RIGHT ABOUT THE CURSE OF MATHINESS?”— —“While we’re on this. Wasn’t that one of Hiedegger’s points all along, too? Every philosopher after Plato and Aristotle, according to him, had gone in the wrong direction. Into the realm of proof, not truth or as Curt Doolittle said before, into the realm of mathematical operations, which is tautological by virtue. They called him a Nazi and proceeded to misinterpret and obfuscate his thoughts into the post-modern milieu. Am I off base here, or what?”— Gabriel Schmeiske Laport First: Congratulations, that’s very smart. And correct. “Mathiness” was a f–king curse we are still trying to get over. Just like christianity is a curse we are still trying to get over. Second: No. Heidegger and Hegel are not wrong in many of their assertions and observations (particularly hegel) they are just trying to solve the wrong problem by retaining german phenomenalism and retaining conflation of experience and existence. Heidegger tries to complete this project by reversing existence and experience. And thus heidegger brought the phenomenalist project to a dead end, just as frege kripke at all brought the anglo analytic project to a dead end. The problem is NOBODY UNDERSTANDS THEY WERE DEAD FUCKING ENDS… lol. The Ango model is superior for the aristocracy and upper middle class, it certainly appears that the Germans are optimum for pedagogy and the working classes. And it increasingly appears that the christians (italians basically) are optimum for the underclasses. And I cannot … (God damn. f—k!! Dammit!!!!!!) …find a way around this problem other than the traditional ‘teach them what you can and take them to their limits, with the law constraining each’. It’s obvious but I don’t want to admit it is the only solution.