Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550065822 Timestamp) by Daniel Roland Anderson Several years ago, I was discussing how pilpul had transformed rule of law into rule by discretion. I was having the discussion with a Millennial who has never been to college. I showed him what the First Amendment actually said, and contrasted the text with the current interpretations. What he told me then goes right along with what John Mark says about the inability of the Right to conduct a reverse long march though the institutions: –“Lies mislead you little by little, but the truth slaps you in the face.”– No, we can’t do a long march to retake the Cultural Heights. But the fact is, we don’t have to. “[O]ur rise to victory will be much quicker than ours” I agree. —“I mention it because it is fresh in my mind. Justice Scalia’s scathing dissent in the Obergefell v. Hodges (gay marriage) case provides an insightful (and savage) analysis of the majority’s replacement of law with pilpul.”—Brad Lehman

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550065555 Timestamp) Um. They even steal our GENES. 😉

  • (FB 1550023467 Timestamp) ( humor )

    (FB 1550023467 Timestamp) ( humor )

  • (FB 1550023289 Timestamp) (humor)

    (FB 1550023289 Timestamp) (humor)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550076916 Timestamp) —-“One does not become a Propertarian. One only discovers, sooner or later, that one has always been one — that, by nature, one could not possibly be anything else.” —Savitri Devi (edited posthumously by Matt Lawlor)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550069323 Timestamp) —“SIEGE can be summed up as follows: – Don’t do protest marches. – Don’t think you can achieve anything with a political party. – Don’t think voting will change anything that is of true importance. – If you’re going to fight, don’t just throw rocks at cops and similar minor targets (including Antifa etc.), but plan your attacks carefully for maximum disruption of the system.” —Caduceus Mercurius The central problem for an insurrection capable of obtaining state capitulation, is maintaining supplies while denying the urban centers supplies. This turns out to be fairly simple.

  • (FB 1550075676 Timestamp) THOSE WHO GOVERN The Theologitariat claim you are shou

    (FB 1550075676 Timestamp) THOSE WHO GOVERN The Theologitariat claim you are should be governed by a moral religion. The Politariat claim you should be governed by their judgement. The Commentariat market that you should be governed by philosophy. The Economitariat that you should be governed by consumption. In practice you are governed by the Law, and all else is an attempt to subvert it. In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition. We are the men who Choose. So Choose.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550083882 Timestamp) –“Do you really have autism?”– A Friend I have an INTP personality and a ‘touch’ of aspergers. So no. I don’t have autism per se. I am very low on the autism spectrum. And even among aspies I am marginal. I have a tendency to obsessive thinking, a tendency to narrow interest, difficulty changing contexts, limited self and present awareness, and some difficulty empathizing with certain categories of emotion (insecurity and fear).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550068535 Timestamp) IT IS NOT THE LAW, BUT VIOLENCE THAT SAVES US —“Men in power are always gonna push the envelope to see what they can get away with; and those who invested in their regime are always going to cover for them – at least until it’s no longer profitable for them to do so – and perhaps after that if they have any loyalty or honour. What’s to be done in those cases? I’m curious what your solution is. It seems to me the problem is that men are corruptible, and any system can, and given enough time, will be corrupted by ignoble dishonest men. You’ll have to forgive me, but I’ve lost faith in legal systems, and higher ideals. It seems that all that matters to men is power. The only people who have seem to have any semblance of honour are military folks, which is why militarized fascistic society, where martial virtue is the civil ethic.”—Richard Heathen

    • Violence
    • Organized Violence
    • Law as a proxy for organized violence
    • Politics as a proxy for organized violence at scale
    • Markets as a proxy for universal violence at scale.
    • Knowledge as a proxy for universal violence at scale.
    • Genetic survival by violence and proxies for violence at every scale.

    If the court is restored to common law independence (tort) then the court is just a proxy for violence between those of different physical abilities, but equal rights to property. And if the law says men denied the proxy for violence, and licenses violence where such proxy denied, then men will happily use violence rather than court or politics as proxy. The only requirement necessary to do so is to restore the militia – most probably in a reform of the regimental system – such that they always have the power to exert violence in the personal and political scale, at personal. IT IS NOT THE LAW THAT PROTECTS US BUT THE PERSISTENT MARKET FOR VIOLENCE SERVED ONLY BY THE MARKETS FOR PROXIES FOR VIOLENCE.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550075235 Timestamp) ORIGINATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMON LAW —“Hey Curt, there’s a question I have been wrestling with for a while regarding your work. It’s about discretion versus judge discovery law. In common law I have understood the idea to be, that judges look at previous cases of decisions in similar incidents of parasitism and make informed judgements based on that history. But how are not the original, “inaugural” decisions with no historical precedence not entirely reliant on that said judge’s discretion? … Thanks in advance!”—Alex, your friend. A number of dependencies require clarification to answer this question: 0 – There is only one law in tort: reciprocity. 1 – The test of property is investment. 2 – The court is reluctant to transfer title (possession) and make itself a participant in a crime – which would harm the law, the people, and the profession. 3 – Because of evolution of our civilization, earlier cases are always more ‘rudimentary’, with law ‘cumulative’ (increasing in complexity with the complexity of the division of knowledge and labor) 4 – Judges are ‘informed’ by prior decisions so that they don’t have to do all the work all over again of being smarter than all other judges in all other matters (they consult the market for judgements). 5 – Because of the competition between judges over time in a multitude of similar cases, the market for decisions tends to resolve on constant judgements. (more than tends, actually) just as markets for goods resolve on prices, just as markets for scientific knowledge resolve on theories. 6 – Original criteria (sovereignty, reciprocity, property etc) developed over time, such that what we understand today (investment, reciprocity, voluntary transfer etc) is the result of the empirically cumulative record of judgements over time rather than design. (See the three books on the law in my reading list which discuss the ‘messy’ evolution of the common law.) … – Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law. … – Plucknett: A Concise History Of The Common Law. … – Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty. 7 – The common law evolved because of ancient western indo european (european) sovereignty, truth, duty, and militia (everyone fights) is the principle difference between civilizations, and because the west consists of kinship and shareholder militias federating into armies. HOWEVER 8 – The state began interfering (disintermediating) in the common law in the late middle ages in order to enforce the king’s policy when unifying territory. this is the primary reason for law codes: consolidation of different groups and territories by producing standard weights and measures of justice (conflict resolution). 9 – Under both Roman Law, Divine Right, and Democracy, legislatures have sought to corrupt common law (tort) into a single ‘non logical’ law. Rather than that tort always remains, and all legislation and regulation must maintain the law of torh (reciprocity). 10 – this was exacerbated by the juridical relativists (american) in the 1800’s particularly in response to the suppression of the south after the civil war, and in the 1900’s by the jewish and ne protestant attempt to undermine the constitution in order to bring about socialism. 11 – Worse, the american constitution would require: (a) An explicit declaration of reciprocity as the basis of all law. (b) The inviolability of tort and therefore reciprocity. (c) The binding of the legislature to tor (contract production not law production.) (d) The requirement that such law be strictly constructed (justified as adherent to tort, and reciprocity) (e) That any legislation (contract of the commons) pass the court as lawful (in other words, all legislation is immediately subject to suit) (f) That the court require legislators revise legislation found faulty, rather than ‘creating’ new legislation from the bench (not law). (Legislation must be returned to the legislature who has only so many days before (g) That the monarchy (or ‘president’ or ‘nobility’ or ‘people’ or whatever) possess rights of veto over any and all legislation. So, I think I have pretty thoroughly answered the question of the origination and method and means of correction. I hope this helps. Curt.