(FB 1550017228 Timestamp) —“Less argument. More skull piles.”—Solomon Volodymyr
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550015538 Timestamp) Provide a solution, and leadership will emerge. If leadership emerges so will consensus. If Consensus emerges, so will action. If action emerges, then we will win. .
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550015538 Timestamp) Provide a solution, and leadership will emerge. If leadership emerges so will consensus. If Consensus emerges, so will action. If action emerges, then we will win. .
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550015417 Timestamp) CHANTING THE CORE 😉 Given: Any statement passes the tests of: – categorically consistent (identity) – internally consistent (Logically consistent) – externally correspondent (empirically consistent) – existentially consistent (operationally stated) – scope consistent (limits and full accounting) – rational (subjectively consistent – incentives ) – reciprocal (reciprocally subjectively consistent – exchanges) – with these warranties of due diligence, – within the limits of possible restitution, Therefore: – Any such display word or deed; – is free of imposition of costs, And Therefore; – free of retaliation. And Therefore; – it is truthful and moral. We can never know if a statement is true (“critical naturalism”). We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making. This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology: … “Testimonialism’: … … “The completion of the scientific method”, … … … or what some call … … … … ‘Critical Naturalism’.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550015417 Timestamp) CHANTING THE CORE 😉 Given: Any statement passes the tests of: – categorically consistent (identity) – internally consistent (Logically consistent) – externally correspondent (empirically consistent) – existentially consistent (operationally stated) – scope consistent (limits and full accounting) – rational (subjectively consistent – incentives ) – reciprocal (reciprocally subjectively consistent – exchanges) – with these warranties of due diligence, – within the limits of possible restitution, Therefore: – Any such display word or deed; – is free of imposition of costs, And Therefore; – free of retaliation. And Therefore; – it is truthful and moral. We can never know if a statement is true (“critical naturalism”). We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making. This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology: … “Testimonialism’: … … “The completion of the scientific method”, … … … or what some call … … … … ‘Critical Naturalism’.
-
(FB 1550014013 Timestamp) SHAMELESS PLUG
(FB 1550014013 Timestamp) SHAMELESS PLUG: https://rangerup.com/
-
(FB 1550014013 Timestamp) SHAMELESS PLUG
(FB 1550014013 Timestamp) SHAMELESS PLUG: https://rangerup.com/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550012939 Timestamp) One of the things that occurs when you run a consulting firm (which again, is simply an intelligence agency, that hires out contract labor) is that you get access to vast bodies of data in every field – because you can’t help not doing so. When you work with large data sets you learn quite a bit about different groups and such. Now, FB and Google have a near monopoly on this information (which I think we should take legal action to end). That said, every company of any scale has this stuff and if you are a db guy (me) you end up going through this data as part of the job. And fortune 400 companies have a lot of this data.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550012939 Timestamp) One of the things that occurs when you run a consulting firm (which again, is simply an intelligence agency, that hires out contract labor) is that you get access to vast bodies of data in every field – because you can’t help not doing so. When you work with large data sets you learn quite a bit about different groups and such. Now, FB and Google have a near monopoly on this information (which I think we should take legal action to end). That said, every company of any scale has this stuff and if you are a db guy (me) you end up going through this data as part of the job. And fortune 400 companies have a lot of this data.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550012137 Timestamp) NO PEDOPHILIACS ON MY PAGE PLEASE There are true arguments that are bad arguments. There are true arguments I don’t want to be associated with – largely permissiveness of impulse. —“…marriage and sex limits on age need to be eliminated. …. I made a logical argument … you aren’t open to criticism like you claim…”— A Member of the Tribe. Actually, you’re lying right? 1) I made the argument that you’re making at true but BAD argument that is not one I want made in my territory so to speak. (and I asked you to stop repeatedly.) 2) I’m saying you may possess a genetic defect that is fairly common in certain sub-groups that occurs comorbidly with higher risk of sexual identity problems, higher risk of sexual predation, higher affinity for engaging in pornography, gambling, moral hazard, and higher risk of schizotypal personality disorders. 3) I’m saying that by not dropping this argument you are demonstrating that (2*) is not only likely, but certain. 4) And you’re banned. Goodbye. It doesn’t matter if its true and I agree. I don’t want it here any more than I want a dog scratching its ass on my carpet It’s a dog. Dogs will do that. However, I don’t want to talk about it. Please take warnings seriously. Thanks