(FB 1549735909 Timestamp) OUR LANGUAGES DETERMINE OUR ORGANIZATIONS OF RESISTANCE AND REBELLION Western people have always been tripartite: Fight (rule), Pray (administer), Work (produce), and never developed semitic monopoly (submission to an abstraction). In our past we had celtic, anglo-saxon, and anglo-saxon-nordic of the common people, anglo-saxon (norman) french of the political class, and the latin and greek of the educated classes. We had the hearth religion of the common people, the christianity, aryanism and law of the political class, and the law, christianity and philosophy of the educated classes. When we developed the middle classes, we had the hearth religion of the common people, upward migration of participation into christianity and the law, upward participation participation of the middle and upper classes into law and philosophy, and the gradual exit of classes from christianity, leaving the academy as the survivor of the church, and the church a social group for the lower classes. This is because law is and philosophy are rational, and therefore problems calculable, and as division of labor increases, complexity arises, wealth is created, demand for consistent rules that limit bad behavior (risk) is amended by greater demand for adaptation, and needs to reason and calculate the continuous unknown in a world of continuous risk offset by continuously improving returns. All language consists of measurements(nouns, names) and operations(verbs, actions) resulting in calculations (statements, promises) which accumulate into transactions (sentences, paragraphs, arguments), that produce a contract for reciprocal consistency (meaning). Today we have islam and judaism for the enemy, christianity for those indoctrinated, a range of subjective moralizing for those not so (Gossiping, Shaming, Ridicule, Rallying), the combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and deceit in marxism,socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and anarchic denialism, for those indoctrinated by the academy, the allegorical use of literature by the academy, the archaic remnants of philosophical rationalism (the academic version of religion), the law in natural(right), limited(classical), and unlimited(left) forms, the pseudosciences (social) and sciences (physical.) We have many grammatical paradigms (vocabulary, rules of disambiguation into transactions that I call the ‘grammars’) for use across and within our classes, and with greater or less frequency in different regions, because of origins of regional peoples, and consequent internal migrations. THE HERD ALL SPEAKS THE SAME LANGUAGE. THE PACKS DONâT. JULY 22, 2018 The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) â as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the leftâs parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes â and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs donât.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549744761 Timestamp) THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION. (repost) We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your believe in what can be accomplished. Some within the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549735766 Timestamp) THE CRIME HAS BEEN DONE. THE BOOMER PUNISHMENT AWAITS —“Sorry boomer prophets, in order to fix our society after you wrecked it we had to use all your retirement money and take all your second homes and 3rd cars and boats to afford it. The rest will still have retirement though.”—James Knowles 😉 relish the opportunity.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549744661 Timestamp) —“Instead of teaching us to provide for ourselves, boomers gave us a dystopian multiracial nightmare, crippling debt, crushing anomie, political powerlessness and much more. But hey, we should be grateful because we have i-phones, right?”— Victor Blanc
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549735651 Timestamp) WHY CALLS FOR REVOLUTION AND CIVIL WAR —“Can you explain this call to violence, revolution, or civil war?”—Justin Ptak If enough people talk about it the general discourse changes sufficiently to discuss alternatives to the status quo.) Same as ‘the best way to prevent a war is to be ready to crush any opponent easily at all times”. The best way to bring an opponent to the negotiating table is the certainty (lower risk) that it is better than the alternative.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549744572 Timestamp) Savior myths are comforting. But that’s all they are.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549735389 Timestamp) TOTAL NUMBER OF SPENCER MENTIONS IN MY DB (there is one more I remember doing a grid of alt right classes) I don’t punch right unless a punch is thrown first. But start a fight with me and my position is ‘defeat an enemy completely and permanently’ Here is my position and it has been my position since at least 2016. And before 2016 I thought politics wasn’t worth my time. — EXCERPT OF POSITIONING STATEMENT 01.29.2017– Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now: Spencer is working on WN, (wn) The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt) RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt) PJW is working on media criticism. (new) Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there) Mike is working “within the system” (new) I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new) This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals. And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments. The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions. THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION. We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your believe in what can be accomplished. Some within the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine —-PACK LANGUAGES VS HERD LANGUAGE— The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Donât. JULY 22, 2018 The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) â as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the leftâs parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes â and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs donât. —MENTIONS OF SPENCER— Note that in every case it is either respectful or I’m sharing a post by someone else that is general interest that merely mentions him. SHARED Feb 3, 2019, IN RESPONSE TO SPENCER https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156961844687264 SHARED Dec 29, 2018, 12:28 AM RESPONSE TO SPENCER/MARK https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156880177817264 SHARED: Apr 17, 2018, 7:29 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156293552552264 SHARED Jan 14, 2018, 9:55 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156039108437264 SHARED Mar 18, 2017, 2:55 PM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155141283657264 SHARED Jan 29, 2017, 8:26 AM https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264 JAN 28th 2017 VIA CERNOVICH https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549744557 Timestamp) @Victor Blanc Well, I mean: —“Lacking better alternatives, I’d become NatSoc/Fascist if it meant survival, and with the exception of Propertarianism, not much else is being provided (or at least popularised) in way of solutions.”—Victor Blanc That’s my argument as well. “Show me something better.”
-
(FB 1549747544 Timestamp) HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS (Do not treat all our p
(FB 1549747544 Timestamp) HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549744392 Timestamp) HERE – LET ME HELP YOU: ——> Available Resources ———> Conditions ————> Strategy —————> Logistics ——————> Tactics ———————> Training and Experience ————————> Fitness —————————> Kinship Distance. 😉