(FB 1549242694 Timestamp) DEFINE SCIENCE AND SCIENTISM SCIENCE: As far as I know ; (a) that discipline we name science consist of performance of exhaustive due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit in one’s testimony of observation(specific fact) [sense], action(sequence of operations) [transformation], and proposition(general rule of declared precision) [speech]. (b) That science evolved from the ancestral european common law of tort (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty of truthful testimony before the thang/jury/senate/people, resulting in markets rather than monopolies in all aspects of life.) (c) And that this is the reason that reason, empiricism, physical science, and the evolution of western science into the world standard of truthful speech were unique to western civilization. It is not an accident that Aristotle, Bacon/ locke/ smith/ hume/ adams/ Jefferson studied law and debated or wrote constitutions. The law applied to material(property) disputes under sovereignty; science applied to information(knowledge) disputes under sovereignty. Science consists in the positive application of the law to promissory (testimonial) speech. Science and law are the same discipline, the first in defense of the private interest, and the second to defense of the public interest (commons).
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1549251148 Timestamp) SPENCER IN DEFENSE, PUNCHING RIGHT (FAIL) According to Richard: 1 – We aren’t going to have an uprising. (Its actionable, and testable. Except you already blew the opportunity.) 2 – An uprising can’t win. (except the state is certain we can, and the plan is actionable and criticizable.) 3 – A constitution won’t help us (Except that it’s actionable and criticizable) Instead… 4 – We need a new elite (Magic!!!! Yeah? Who?) 5 – We need a new spiritual awakening (Magic!!! With what? Inactionable.). Richard’s solution???? Wait some more until magic happens….. When you have crashed and burned and have nothing but empty wishful thinking, and ‘wait and see for a new messiah’ you clearly need to punch right to try to stay relevant. PROVIDE A SOLUTION, PROVIDE INCENTIVE, PEOPLE WILL ACT AND LEADERS WILL EMERGE DURING ACTION. 1 – A moral license (replacement, impoverishment) 2 – A set of demands (constitution) 3 – A plan of transition (incremental devolution) 4 – A means of altering the status quo (fragility) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tkejEvqhy4
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549232543 Timestamp) (Sorry all. Useless today. Guessing another day or two like this. Apologies for delays.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549242694 Timestamp) DEFINE SCIENCE AND SCIENTISM SCIENCE: As far as I know ; (a) that discipline we name science consist of performance of exhaustive due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit in one’s testimony of observation(specific fact) [sense], action(sequence of operations) [transformation], and proposition(general rule of declared precision) [speech]. (b) That science evolved from the ancestral european common law of tort (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty of truthful testimony before the thang/jury/senate/people, resulting in markets rather than monopolies in all aspects of life.) (c) And that this is the reason that reason, empiricism, physical science, and the evolution of western science into the world standard of truthful speech were unique to western civilization. It is not an accident that Aristotle, Bacon/ locke/ smith/ hume/ adams/ Jefferson studied law and debated or wrote constitutions. The law applied to material(property) disputes under sovereignty; science applied to information(knowledge) disputes under sovereignty. Science consists in the positive application of the law to promissory (testimonial) speech. Science and law are the same discipline, the first in defense of the private interest, and the second to defense of the public interest (commons).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549218635 Timestamp) ANOTHER REBUTTAL @Mark Wright When you get your panties out of the bunch, and cease being offended when something is over your head, and not spoon fed to you, then you might consider manning up and trying the hard work of mastering any of the logics. 😉 There is no grammar of the full scope of language that is more ‘clear’ than propertarianism. However, the training necessary to make use of that language precisely is non trivial. Ideology must be accessible to normies. Philosophy must appeal to intuitions. For those of us who do science, we understand that training is required. The reason being that anything sufficiently decidable to be labeled a ‘science’ must be reduced to a method of calculation (grammar) within which statements are ‘well formed’ (adhere to the grammar) such that they are decidable independent of appeal to intuition(philosophy) or sentiment (ideology). Learn to learn from your betters. They must invest in you. They way you compensate them for investing in you is sufficient respect and attention that it’s not a waste of their time. Cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549232543 Timestamp) (Sorry all. Useless today. Guessing another day or two like this. Apologies for delays.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549161980 Timestamp) 4NEWBS – THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS (repost) THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS 1 â A POST âââââââââ THIS MEANS I WROTE IT FOR YOU TO READ AS AN ARGUMENT (this cues you to important stuff) And this is the body text here. Particularly if I break it into paragraphs. ââthis is quoting someone elseââ –this is quoting myself– ⦠this ⦠⦠is a ⦠⦠⦠series that you might want to learn. |SERIES|: This > Is > A > Dimensional > Definition SUBHEADING And more text goes here. Subheadings cue you to the content. Signature Line I use the signature line for myself. So that I can search for the posts I want to publish on my web site later. So they are sort of a âstamp of approvalâ. 2 â A NOTE OR SKETCH âââââââââ this doesnât have header, isnât broken into paragraphs, and doesnât even use init-caps, so itâs just a record from elsewhere or quick thought or observation, or a work in progress â rumination. 3 â A PERSONAL OPINION âââââââââ (this doesnât have a header, is in parenthesis and in all lower case, which means itâs possibly something to ignore ⦠because itâs not an argument. itâs just an opinion or feeling.) 4 â A DIARY ENTRY âââââââââ (diary entry) this is something I wrote for myself that is unfiltered, and likely includes very personal feelings of my own, or on the state of my thinking, and not something that you will probably want to read unless the psychology that I operate under is of some interest to you or other. =========================== Closing: I work in public, partly to conduct experiments. I am personally open in public because this prevents people attributing psychological motivations to me that I donât have. I create conflict in order to run tests. The purpose of running a test is to attempt to create a proof. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549218635 Timestamp) ANOTHER REBUTTAL @Mark Wright When you get your panties out of the bunch, and cease being offended when something is over your head, and not spoon fed to you, then you might consider manning up and trying the hard work of mastering any of the logics. 😉 There is no grammar of the full scope of language that is more ‘clear’ than propertarianism. However, the training necessary to make use of that language precisely is non trivial. Ideology must be accessible to normies. Philosophy must appeal to intuitions. For those of us who do science, we understand that training is required. The reason being that anything sufficiently decidable to be labeled a ‘science’ must be reduced to a method of calculation (grammar) within which statements are ‘well formed’ (adhere to the grammar) such that they are decidable independent of appeal to intuition(philosophy) or sentiment (ideology). Learn to learn from your betters. They must invest in you. They way you compensate them for investing in you is sufficient respect and attention that it’s not a waste of their time. Cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549161419 Timestamp) It is extremely hard to concoct a myth, parable, or fairy tale. Try it. You will inevitably leave behind forensic evidence. So this is one of the means by which we identify those who write history from oral tradition, those who write myth and legend and those who write it as fictions whole cloth. It is terribly easy to detect historical fabrication by forensic investigation of the narrative composition and the history of each fragment.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549161980 Timestamp) 4NEWBS – THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS (repost) THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS 1 â A POST âââââââââ THIS MEANS I WROTE IT FOR YOU TO READ AS AN ARGUMENT (this cues you to important stuff) And this is the body text here. Particularly if I break it into paragraphs. ââthis is quoting someone elseââ –this is quoting myself– ⦠this ⦠⦠is a ⦠⦠⦠series that you might want to learn. |SERIES|: This > Is > A > Dimensional > Definition SUBHEADING And more text goes here. Subheadings cue you to the content. Signature Line I use the signature line for myself. So that I can search for the posts I want to publish on my web site later. So they are sort of a âstamp of approvalâ. 2 â A NOTE OR SKETCH âââââââââ this doesnât have header, isnât broken into paragraphs, and doesnât even use init-caps, so itâs just a record from elsewhere or quick thought or observation, or a work in progress â rumination. 3 â A PERSONAL OPINION âââââââââ (this doesnât have a header, is in parenthesis and in all lower case, which means itâs possibly something to ignore ⦠because itâs not an argument. itâs just an opinion or feeling.) 4 â A DIARY ENTRY âââââââââ (diary entry) this is something I wrote for myself that is unfiltered, and likely includes very personal feelings of my own, or on the state of my thinking, and not something that you will probably want to read unless the psychology that I operate under is of some interest to you or other. =========================== Closing: I work in public, partly to conduct experiments. I am personally open in public because this prevents people attributing psychological motivations to me that I donât have. I create conflict in order to run tests. The purpose of running a test is to attempt to create a proof. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine