Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548195658 Timestamp) THE TRADE-OFF TRIANGLE OF CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES “Truth, Vs Face, Vs Gain.” …………………..(Europe)…………………. ……………………TRUTH…………………… ……………………/…………………………… …………………../……….. …………………. …………….FACE —— GAIN…………… (asia-west asia)………(afro-south west asia.)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548213602 Timestamp) —“You’ve been repeating that Rothbard is a liar recently though in the past you said he couldn’t have been a liar, just mistaken. What’s the lie?”— This is one of those deceptively simple questions on its face that once deflated and operationalized makes you question the frame in which we ask the original question. It depends on point of demarcation of agency vs tradition, intuition vs biology. … I(we) use a higher standard of intent: failure of due diligence. Do women know what they do when they sh-t test or is it biology? Did Rothbard and mises? What about those men that invented the tradition of lying (pilpul) both operated under? Is a carrier of a lie responsible? In law, one causes harm or not and is responsible for failure of due diligence, not intent, and must pay restitution for the failure of due diligence. If intentional an additional punishment is levied on top of the restitution. However the entire marx/rothbard/trotsky-strauss … set of anti-white movements, consist of a continuation of undermining the host civilization (‘revolutionary spirit’), the use of sophism(pilpul) and critique (straw manning an undermining) and authoritarianism (monopoly class interests) in opposition to western tripartism. So in the distribution between intent, failure of due diligence, carrier of lies, and a cognitive tradition of lying by sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and the biological drive of the female-biased mind to use gossip and undermining to undermine the hierarchy, … what is the distribution of rothbard’s guilt? With him, his culture, or his genome? So which standard of lie, or set of standards of lying, are we to use? The question is harder than at first appears. How could a man of that learning err so widely? Is he a fool or a liar, or a fraud? Women engage in conspiracies of common interest when they undermine, to the detriment of the host males. What does this say about rothbard mises, hoppe et al?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548360485 Timestamp) “IF YOU WON’T FIGHT YOU DON’T MATTER” (orwoll’s latest shot) OK. This is rather silly. Here is your entire argument: “I don’t think it’s gonna work. The government is scary. I don’t wanna take the risk. I don’t want you guys to take the risk. There won’t be enough of you to take the risk. I don’t care about my people or the future just the present. I’m gonna pretend that christ will save me. I don’t understand your stuff but I’m gonna call you a cult (religious) leader – even if I would’t call marxists, postmodernists, feminists, cults but philosophical movements. I don’t understand the policy demands, or the changes to the constitution and the laws and the practical results that they would produce. I wanna do nothing – just like we’ve been doing.” You don’t offer anything to counter the epistemology, formal law, the constitution changes, or the set of policies. you only say “I dunno but I am ignorant and scared and I don’t want anything to do with it.” Which I agree with. Because you don’t matter. You can thank us if we are successful.
    And virtue signal yourself if we are not. And unless you are going to offer something substantive this is not worth my time. So let’s run a test: Let’s see how everything plays out. 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548277311 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM’S INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT BY KASH VIKAAS. —“Propertarianism and its proxy testimonialism is the operational theory of critical naturalism (praxis). Naturalism was the dominant theory of modern idealism before postmodernism before grammatology (Derrida) appeared on the scene.”— Well, you know, in the context of grammatology, I also produced the table of the grammars which is sort of the Periodic Table of Speech. My view of Derrida and grammatology is that they’re just updating pilpul (sophism), for the same reason the rabbis invented pilpul (sophism) and the same reason plato invented idealism (sophism). So social construction from the postmoderns, and the prohibition of social construction (sophism) from propertarianism (critical naturalism).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548357673 Timestamp) —“The solution is for us to stop being reasonable. Stop compromising and start being intolerant and objective. The most intolerant win, and that needs to be us. Propertarianism gives us the tools to be totally intolerant and objective in our demands. This is the reason we are the Winning Right.”–Noah J Revoy

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548276335 Timestamp) FROM THE “OUCH” COMEBACKS DEPARTMENT by Mike Sheppard —-“Creating life requires a Male orgasm, but not a female one. If God doesn’t give a shi-t, why should I?”— ( CD: I observe the ‘sack reciprocity’ rule. Works for me. But … um…. Yeah, damn…. ouch. )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548349724 Timestamp) TERMINOLOGICAL SUBTLETY I use the spectra: Display (visible signals) … Word (sound/speech) … … Deed (action) Sense (stimuli) … Perception (stimuli with memory) … … Prediction (imagine) … … … Experience … … … … Memory (result) … … … … … Recursion … … … … … … Intuition … … … … … … … Free Association … … … … … … … … Thinking … … … … … … … … … Reasoning … … … … … … … … … … Calculating … … … … … … … … … … … Computing Imitation (physical) > … Empathy (emotional) > … … Sympathy (thought) >

  • (FB 1548276077 Timestamp) The mediterranean, the persian gulf, the ob river vall

    (FB 1548276077 Timestamp) The mediterranean, the persian gulf, the ob river valley, the black sea the caspian sea. There wasn’t just ONE great flood.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548342580 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN PARSIMONY GIVEN THE FOLLOWING Whereas life defends investment of

    1. Time,
    2. Effort,
    3. Resources,
    4. Forgone opportunity

    Where defended investments consist of:

    1. Self-Property – Body, Time, Actions, Memory, Concepts, Status, etc.
    2. Personal Property – Houses, Cars, “Things”, etc.
    3. Kinship Property – Mates, Children, Family, Friends, etc.
    4. Cooperative Property – Organizational and Knowledge ties.
    5. Shareholder Property – Recorded and Quantified shares. Citizenship.
    6. Common Property – Territorial and capital interests, Artificial Property.
    7. Informal Institutional Property – Manners, Ethics, Morals, Myths, Rituals.
    8. Formal Institutional Property – Religion, Government, Laws.

    Where reciprocity consists of:

    1. Productive
    2. Fully informed
    3. Warrantied
    4. Voluntary transfer
    5. Free negative externality.

    Where ir-reciprocity in action consists of: Action: 1. Murder 2. Harm

    3. Theft

    1. Fraud (in all forms)
    2. Free Riding (in all forms: Socialization of losses, Privatization of commons)
    3. Blackmail
    4. Rent Seeking.

    9. Conspiracy

    1. Propagandizing (Poisoning the well)

    11. Conversion (Poisoning the well)

    1. Immigration,
    2. Conquest
    3. Genocide

    And where ir-reciprocity in speech consists in: Speech 1. Intent to lie. 2. Intent to deceive. 3. Failure of due diligence against lying 4. Carrier of lies. 5. Carrier of tradition and culture of lies. 6. A genetic predisposition to lie. And Where truthful speech consists of:

    1. categorically consistent (identity)
    2. internally consistent (logic)
    3. externally correspondent (empirical)
    4. operationally consistent (existentially possible)
    5. rationally consistent (rational choice)
    6. reciprocally consistent (reciprocal rational choice)
    7. consistent within scope, limits, and fully accounting (complete)
    8. consistent across all those seven dimensions (coherent)
      And where:

    And where both Actions and Speech are limited by:

    1. limited to actions for which restitution(restoration) is possible.
    2. warrantied by sufficient resources to perform restitution.
    3. The function of the state is largely to serve as insurer of last resort against actions for which restitution is impossible, improbable, or beyond the means of the community to organize.

    And Where the function of the state is: And Where the function of the law is:

    1. The function of common natural law is to resolve differences.
    2. The function of legislation is to provide contracts for production of commons.
    3. The function of regulation is to administer operationalization of legislation, and the common law.

    And Where the difficulty in the present:

    1. No means of testing the legislation prior to its enactment.
    2. No means of returning legislation to the legislature.
    3. No means of approving regulation as expansion of legislation.
    4. No means of structurally limiting law, legislation, and regulation, to strict construction from reciprocity and therefore tests of computability (operational possibility).

    In other words, there are limits to what private insurers can do, and the case study is germany, which makes most use of insurance of any people. Cheers.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548426498 Timestamp) Got played: —“Apparently there is some guy named Aldi that says propertarians are losers. “— 1) Never heard of him. Can’t find him on FB or Google. 2) As far as I know this person does not exist. So I doubt that this will ever happen. lol 3) lol… aldi does not exist. but you had me going there for 24 hours wondering what I was missing…. well done. 😉