(FB 1547831782 Timestamp) —“women lie and pretend to be what they used to be before in the past, whereas men lie and pretend to be what they will be in the future (or what they hope to become in an alternate universe or in their fantasy).”— (psychology today.)
Source: Original Site Post
-
(FB 1547829857 Timestamp) YA WANNA BET THIS MORON DOESN”T QUESTION BUT ACCUSES,
(FB 1547829857 Timestamp) YA WANNA BET THIS MORON DOESN”T QUESTION BUT ACCUSES, OR ENGAGES IN GSRM?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548005846 Timestamp) UM. YOU WANT A PROPHET, OR EQUIVALENT? SORRY. I don’t want to appeal to anyone. I don’t want to be popular. I don’t even want attention. I want to present a constitution that solves real problems, and then foment a revolt in order to demand their solution. I am unimportant. There is NO REASON people need to undrestand propertarianism any more than quantum mechanics or algebraic geometry, or the body of extant law and its reasoning. The intellectual work is for intellectuals and jurists in defense of that constitution. There is however, every reason for COMMON people to fight for a better life and the end to political conflict and social strife. I only need to convince some number of them that this will solve the problems that they face. Because only a small number who will fight is necessary.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547866028 Timestamp) UPDATE: I have 660 open friend requests, and about 60 slots open on this account. This pass I’m taking everyone with military experience, people with lots of shared connections, and ‘promoters’ when I run across them.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547998199 Timestamp) OBJECTIVES —“Curts objective is civil war”– Curts objective is constitutional reform, in order to save our people and our civilization, and quite possibly mankind. The threat of civil war is the only means to bring it about, just as the threat of civil war in the 60’s, and 30’s were the only means to bring it about. The more certain the war, the more rapid the capitulation of the state. The point is to make a war so certain and so frightening that the state capitulates and we implement the changes to the constitution restoring natural law.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548005504 Timestamp) EMERGENT RELIGION: A MARKET COMPETITION —“I donât think I have the stamina for trying to formulate how weâd construct a religion operationally.”–Curtus Maximus I can define the terms. I think it’s entirely possible. Because it was at one time. And it can be again. It’s actually liberating to understand religion: Narrative(Strategy), Education, Ritual, Oath, Debt – to one another across time. Creating all that is an interesting mission. Like I said, I might consider it after publishing The Law. (Assuming I live long enough.) —“I think the proper thing to do would involve subjecting them all to falsification and letting them compete in the market for religions.”—Curtus Maximus Exactly. Shared vision brother. 😉
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1547998043 Timestamp) OVERLOADING VS OVERWHELMING —“Curt engages in Overloading”— OMG… Rhetorical “Overloading” requires forcing appeal to intuition. I do the opposite. I seek to ELIMINATE the possibility of appealing to intuition and force decidability by knowledge and reason. It’s called exhaustive argumentation. The fact that you are overloaded and CAN’T appeal to intuition and I don’t ASK you to, is the opposite of the technique of overloading to cause appeal to intuition. . I agree that I engage in overWHELMING. But ‘overloading’ requires one force another to appeal to intuition rather than reason. (this is why sophism works). If you had the vaguest idea how important my work is you would not make these errors of equality of action rather than inequality of consequence. For example, the fool says ‘violence is bad’, and the wise man says ‘violence is a resource put to ends good or bad’.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548004848 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM FALSIFIES DOGMAS, IDEOLOGIES, PHILOSOPHIES, AND RELIGIONS. (worth repeating) Dogma requires a via positiva. Science and law are only via-negativas. Like many people, y’all want a religion or a philosophy instead of a science, logic, and law. I don’t do via-positivas like philosophy and religion. I just do via negativa: what is false and immoral. That leaves universes of non-false, non-immoral possibilities. The question is, why do you want false and immoral possibilities? Science(actions), logic(words), and mathematics (measurements) are not dogmas. THEY FALSIFY THEM. Propertarianism (vitruvianism, acquisitionism, propertarianism, testimonialism, and the algorithmic natural law) is not a religion, a philosophy, or an ideology or a but a science, logic, system of measurement, and body of law – and not a dogma. IT FALSIFIES THEM. YOU MIGHT THINK SCIENCE IS A POSITIVA. IT ISN’T. IT’S A NEGATIVA: A MARKET COMPETITION FOR SURVIVAL FROM FALSIFICATION.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1547981973 Timestamp) Russian Folk Tales. https://russian-crafts.com/russian-folk-tales.html You distinguish a people by the lessons of their folk tales. Russians are ethnic europeans.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548003536 Timestamp) CRITICISMS OF THOSE UNABLE TO MANAGE FALSIFICATIONISM (MARKETS) —-“AFAIK, right now, you need more than motive (“incentive to deceive or defraud”) to prosecute.”—B Quimby You need harm and motive (incentive). You need an involuntary imposition of costs against a demonstrated investment of another(others) – harm. You need means, motive, opportunity. The current argument in legal reform, is that you also need intent or failure of due diligence in order to prevent the police, prosecutors, and judges from driving you to self incrimination. —“Your position would sound a lot stronger to me if you demonstrated awareness that your epistemological standard might be incomplete, and in spite of this, that you are willing to sacrifice truths that don’t fit said standard.”—B Quimby As far as I know propertarianism (in total) is epistemologically complete. That is in no small part because it is falsificationary (via negativa) not (false) justificationary (via positiva), and as such all via positiva (possibilities) are the result of free association and all ‘truth’s survival from competition. In other words, you dont need to excuse your possible worlds (imaginings) just warranty that you have performed due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, fictionalism, and deceit. —“Or, just demonstrate awareness that dogma can be harmful too, but that you are making a conscious choice to be dogmatic, b/c anything less will breed more harm.”— B Quimby Dogma requires a via positiva. Science and law are only via-negativas. Like many people, y’all want a religion or a philosophy instead of a science, logic, and law. I don’t do via-positivas like philosophy and religion. I just do via negativa: what is false and immoral. That leaves universes of non-false, non-immoral possibilities. The question is, why do you want false and immoral possibilities? Science(actions), logic(words), and mathematics (measurements) are not dogmas. THEY FALSIFY THEM. Propertarianism (vitruvianism, acquisitionism, propertarianism, testimonialism, and the algorithmic natural law) is not a religion, a philosophy, or an ideology or a but a science, logic, system of measurement, and body of law – and not a dogma. IT FALSIFIES THEM.