@Sqpatrick Havent. Just skimmed it. I’d have to see the original. The phrasing and concepts are iconsistent with the understanding of the time. Knowlege stated is inconsistent with the time. But that could be the work of the translator ‘creatively’ translating it. That said, it’s almost certainly a 19th or 20th century creation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 16:15:23 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106964878831335777
A PAGAN(HEATHEN), A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT
I am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen.
I am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.
I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.
I am a Warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with joy, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.
And that is the objective of heroes, demigods, and gods. We leave the rest for ordinary men.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 15:04:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106964598511440849
THE LAW OF MAN, NATURE, AND NATURE’S GOD.
1) The Defeat of Entropy, by the transendence into gods, by the maximization of rate of evolution, by the maximization of discovery, innovation and adaptation, by the maximization of competition, by the maximization of cooperation, …
2) … by the universal insurance, of the self-determination, by self-determined means, by exchange of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, by reciprocity in display word and deed, limiting all to markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, …
3) … polities and war, at the cost of the continuation of natural selection, by the suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrating unfitness for those markets, by failure of self-determination by self-determined means under sovereignty and reciprocity in those markets.
4) Where reciprocity consists in productive, fully informed, warrantable and warrantied, liable, and restitutable, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others.
5) Where demonstrated interests consist of cost born by action or cost of forgone action, to construct an interest, without imposing a cost upon the prior demonstrated interests of others.
6) Where the tragedy of the law of man, nature,and nature’s god, is born by the eradication of personal hatred, the extension of personal love to all with promise of sovereignty and reciprocity, the exhaustion of personal forgiveness and personal charity before punishment or war.
7) This is the law of man, nature, and nature’s god, discovered by European Men, and the reason for the disproportionate rate of evolution of superiority in discovery, invention, and adaptation, and the conditions of western civilization above those of others who did not.
8) But as in all laws of the universe, once discovered by any they are available to all. And those who obey those laws of the universe will benefit in degree of consistency with that obedience, and those who do not will suffer in degree with that disobedience.
9) For this is not a law of man, or men, or a philosophy, of man or men, but an inescapable eternal law of nature, of the universe, and the universe’s god.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 14:48:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106964535630922756
@Greenstone20 Agree. Just a thought though: Rubin, Lindsay, and I are intuitionistically classical liberals in the sense of both freedom and freedom from authority – and a lack of desire to USE authority ourselves. How we understand the world despite those two intutions varies greatly.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-17 16:00:10 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106947832057515012
@Graphic Is that an honest question? Romans.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-17 14:28:40 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106947472274251483
LOYALTY AND INTEGRATION VS DISLOYALTY AND UNDERMINING
– ” It’s evident throughout all of history. Our Iliad vs. their Tanakh. Our recognition of honor and valor on both sides vs their destruction of idols and records and post-hoc slander. ” – Martin Štěpán @WorMartiN
They are female. Cognitively, socially, politically, strategically female. That’s why they’re incompatible AND why we’re vulnerable.
Female Warfare by Undermining and Exculsion (cancelling) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (dark ages) > fundamentalism > Islamism > communism > neo-marxism > postmodernism > pc-woke > anti-white > anti-male.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-17 14:28:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106947470076876520
WHY DID WE INTEGRATE OTHERS GODS?
Loyalty. Loyalty to one another eliminates the need for identical cognitive frames.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-17 14:19:19 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106947435538949346
WHY DO WE ERECT STATUES TO FALLEN ENEMIES?
Why do we erect statues to fallen enemies? To demonstrate loyalty. Loyalty is the only means of overcoming differences in frame: religious(emotional), rational(practical), or political (necessary). So despite our trifunctionalism, Europeans maintained loyalty to one another.
Our civilization depends on loyalty to the commons that other civilizations do not practice (and cannot). So we honor the enemy if they demonstrated loyalty. And we dishonor the enemy if they don’t.
Why? Because any group that demonstrates loyalty can be integrated into our civilization. And any group that does not demonstrate loyalty cannot be integrated into our civilization. This is why jews and Muslims and many others cannot integrate. They practice kin or cult loyalty, not POLITICAL LOYALTY.
Loyalty eliminates the need for cognitive monopoly of frames. This is a core reason for the success of western civilization: by maintaining trifuctionalism we maintain competition between cognitive frames, increasing innovation, adaptation, evolution, … using loyalty.
This loyalty is possible largely because we were unable to concentrate production like the river civilizations, but able to organize states, unlike the steppe civilizations. So we evolved in a Goldilocks zone, that made continuous recursive innovation adaptation and evolution.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-17 14:18:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106947431092825277
Well, everyone focuses on my analysis of taboo subjects, but not that the end result is rule of law, suppression of irreciprocity, deceit, fraud, and oppression, trade, separation as the solution to conflict, and that love is the only means of tolerating the laws of nature.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-17 14:15:59 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106947422413172664
@CSAFD EXPLANATION: Our civilization depends on loyalty to the commons that other civilizations do not practice (and cannot). So we honor the enemy if they demonstrated loyalty. And we dishonor the enemy if they don’t. Why? Because any group that demonstrates loyalty can be integrated into our civlization. And any group that does not demonstrate loyalty cannot be integrated into our civilization. This is why jews and muslims and many others cannot integrate. They practice kin or cult loyalty, not POLITICAL LOYALTY.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-17 14:08:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106947394046720813