Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545229595 Timestamp) THE DRIVE OF MEN TO ACT VS TO DREAM AND CHIT CHAT Of self interest, opportunity to profit, and material change, it is very unlikely that ‘spiritual’ anything will drive men as much. We know this from all of history. Spirit makes men chatter. Opportunity makes men war. We go to war for opportunity. We stay at war because we love it, and we stay in formation because we love the men next to us.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1545227927 Timestamp) —-“Curt are you a fan of Spengler? As far as I’ve read him and his followers (Yockey, Toynbee, Blaga, etc.), his philosophy seems rather opposed to yours in many ways. I’m rather surprised that I haven’t seen you dismiss his work as “critique”.”—Connor Creegan Um. Yes he failed as many have failed, to produce a solution. The germans COULD NOT produce a solution. It is the origin of their defect. Yes he writes in annoying german sentimental, phenomenalistic prose, that misses its catholic ancestors. Whether we call it ‘critique’ or ‘criticism’ is something that I would have to re-read him to judge. That said, just as reading Hegel is a pain in the ass, reading Spengler is a pain in the ass. But that doesn’t mean one shouldn’t take the insights of hegel and spencer and turn them into insights.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545229339 Timestamp) أنا أسف. لا أستطيع ترجمة هذه الكلمات إلى العربية. من الصعب للغاية ترجمة المفردات مع الاحتفاظ بمعنى النص. سلام IS PROPERTARIANISM SOMEHOW CONSERVATISM? The term “propertarian” refers to a ‘criticism’ of libertarians, rule-of-law advocates, ’empiricists’, and ‘materialists’, made in the mid-twentieth century. So I intentionally ‘appropriated’ the criticism ‘propertarian’ as a definition: ‘propertarianism’. All propertarianism is reducible to is a demand for individual Sovereignty, which requires Rule of Law, which then requires, truth, duty, reciprocity, and property. Which then requires markets in everything. Which includes courts that resolve differences empirically, by demanding truth, reciprocity, and property. Leaving the ‘preferential and good’ to the individual sovereign’s choice. This “Sovereignty” or “Sovereigntarianism” results in western hierarchical (market) Aristocracy (monarchy, aristocracy, nobility, burgher, craftsman, laborer, serf, slave, and ‘wild man’) and the institutions of an independent judiciary, a monarch as a judge of last resort, a jury, or’ thang’ or senate or parliament, or multiple houses of parliament, and a militia. So yes, Propertarianism consists of the previously unwritten philosophy of (traditional) western civilization. And as such it consists of libertarian(intellectual), classical liberal(political), and conservative (military). And as such, yes it is a ‘conservative’ (aristocratic) philosophy.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545226721 Timestamp) —“So the French enlightenment was inspired by the Anglos? That’s news to me :o”— A Friend Then you really don’t understand that what we have learned to call “the enlightenment” is a counter-revolution against anglo empiricism, which is an extension of anglo law. (Not to dismiss Descartes contribution.) The ‘enlightenments’ were all attempts to use anglo empiricism to displace the power of the church, while at the same time, preserving the folk culture and group strategy of the people. We are still going through the counter-revolution against the empirical enlightenment – the last century and a half was the jewish revolt. This century is the muslim revolt combined with the jewish. And we are currently in the process of constructing a counter revolution against the jewish and muslim (universalist, semitic, feminine, dysgenic) by the european (nationalist, european, masculine, eugenic).

  • (FB 1545228227 Timestamp) A WONDERFUL IMAGE BY NICHOLAS ROY (pls thank Nicholas

    (FB 1545228227 Timestamp) A WONDERFUL IMAGE BY NICHOLAS ROY (pls thank Nicholas Roy)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545226425 Timestamp) You don’t know your history. Religions spread because society HAS BROKEN DOWN or because conquerors want to BREAK THEM DOWN so that they can be controlled. I don’t make mistakes. It’s part of my charm. … Well, not that I have any charm – so, really, it’s because testimonialism puts extraordinary constraints on one’s ability to make excuses.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545228102 Timestamp) ( I have the benefit of looking back at thinkers in history through the lens not only of science, but of propertarianism, and from that position on the shoulders of giants that came before me, plus my little step stool, the whole of it fits together in rather obvious puzzle pieces. Like all improvements in calculation from language through math, through reason, through science, through propertarianism (natural law), everything is much simpler once we have a grammar to understand it with. )

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1545227927 Timestamp) —-“Curt are you a fan of Spengler? As far as I’ve read him and his followers (Yockey, Toynbee, Blaga, etc.), his philosophy seems rather opposed to yours in many ways. I’m rather surprised that I haven’t seen you dismiss his work as “critique”.”—Connor Creegan Um. Yes he failed as many have failed, to produce a solution. The germans COULD NOT produce a solution. It is the origin of their defect. Yes he writes in annoying german sentimental, phenomenalistic prose, that misses its catholic ancestors. Whether we call it ‘critique’ or ‘criticism’ is something that I would have to re-read him to judge. That said, just as reading Hegel is a pain in the ass, reading Spengler is a pain in the ass. But that doesn’t mean one shouldn’t take the insights of hegel and spencer and turn them into insights.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545226721 Timestamp) —“So the French enlightenment was inspired by the Anglos? That’s news to me :o”— A Friend Then you really don’t understand that what we have learned to call “the enlightenment” is a counter-revolution against anglo empiricism, which is an extension of anglo law. (Not to dismiss Descartes contribution.) The ‘enlightenments’ were all attempts to use anglo empiricism to displace the power of the church, while at the same time, preserving the folk culture and group strategy of the people. We are still going through the counter-revolution against the empirical enlightenment – the last century and a half was the jewish revolt. This century is the muslim revolt combined with the jewish. And we are currently in the process of constructing a counter revolution against the jewish and muslim (universalist, semitic, feminine, dysgenic) by the european (nationalist, european, masculine, eugenic).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545226425 Timestamp) You don’t know your history. Religions spread because society HAS BROKEN DOWN or because conquerors want to BREAK THEM DOWN so that they can be controlled. I don’t make mistakes. It’s part of my charm. … Well, not that I have any charm – so, really, it’s because testimonialism puts extraordinary constraints on one’s ability to make excuses.