Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1544325270 Timestamp) WATCH!!!!!!

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544310847 Timestamp) by Alex Macleod The magical yellow vest is great, because it has no significance or association (not even the motoring association really) and is anonymous, anyone can ‘take up arms’ under this banner, for any purpose, and it can deflect all the accusations thrown at known flags and regalia of left or right or centre. The powers are much diminished in their ability to ‘know your enemy’.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544310847 Timestamp) by Alex Macleod The magical yellow vest is great, because it has no significance or association (not even the motoring association really) and is anonymous, anyone can ‘take up arms’ under this banner, for any purpose, and it can deflect all the accusations thrown at known flags and regalia of left or right or centre. The powers are much diminished in their ability to ‘know your enemy’.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1544393014 Timestamp) THE GERMANIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity: A Sociohistorical Approach to Religious Transformation —“While historians of Christianity have generally acknowledged some degree of Germanic influence in the development of early medieval Christianity, Russell goes further, arguing for a fundamental Germanic reinterpretation of Christianity. This first full-scale treatment of the subject follows a truly interdisciplinary approach, applying to the early medieval period a sociohistorical method similar to that which has already proven fruitful in explicating the history of Early Christianity and Late Antiquity. The encounter of the Germanic peoples with Christianity is studied from within the larger context of the encounter of a predominantly “world-accepting” Indo-European folk-religiosity with predominantly “world-rejecting” religious movements. While the first part of the book develops a general model of religious transformation for such encounters, the second part applies this model to the Germano-Christian scenario. Russell shows how a Christian missionary policy of temporary accommodation inadvertently contributed to a reciprocal Germanization of Christianity.”— https://www.amazon.com/Germanization-Early-Medieval-Christianity-Sociohistorical/dp/0195104668/

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544308437 Timestamp) WE BEAR THE BURDEN Under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule (worth repeating)

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1544393014 Timestamp) THE GERMANIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity: A Sociohistorical Approach to Religious Transformation —“While historians of Christianity have generally acknowledged some degree of Germanic influence in the development of early medieval Christianity, Russell goes further, arguing for a fundamental Germanic reinterpretation of Christianity. This first full-scale treatment of the subject follows a truly interdisciplinary approach, applying to the early medieval period a sociohistorical method similar to that which has already proven fruitful in explicating the history of Early Christianity and Late Antiquity. The encounter of the Germanic peoples with Christianity is studied from within the larger context of the encounter of a predominantly “world-accepting” Indo-European folk-religiosity with predominantly “world-rejecting” religious movements. While the first part of the book develops a general model of religious transformation for such encounters, the second part applies this model to the Germano-Christian scenario. Russell shows how a Christian missionary policy of temporary accommodation inadvertently contributed to a reciprocal Germanization of Christianity.”— https://www.amazon.com/Germanization-Early-Medieval-Christianity-Sociohistorical/dp/0195104668/

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544308437 Timestamp) WE BEAR THE BURDEN Under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule (worth repeating)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544392745 Timestamp) —“For me Testimonialism is one of the easier concepts in Propertarianism. Much of what you speak about requires a lot more reading, whereas Testimonialism is easy to get if you work with automation, have experience with programming, have read a bit of philosophy of science, have an IQ above two SDs, and has a touch of aspieness.”— Singular Speech lol 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544306457 Timestamp) A PROFOUND LESSON IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING —“Curt, First of all, I’ll correct a point you make that is actually mistaken. It’s commonly made by leftists in connection with the First Amendment: …”The rule of law does not protect the people other than it limits the state, under the courts, to actions permitted in the constitution…”… No, it also obliges the state to protect its citizens from infringement of rights posed by others. … Two, the constitution is not absolutist. It is not law that encodes in itself as law indelibility. That being said, although I am not a constitutional law expert, I believe that it does enshrine a set of principles that cannot be controverted by subseq…See More —“…rule of law…obliges the state..”—- Does it? Read the constitution and find that. You wont. And its very interesting that you wont. The inference is in the preamble, and in the second paragraph of the declaration. Why? under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule. The rule the left has sought to restore. By circumventing the constitution via the weakness in it: the supreme court’s ability to make law. “Every man a citizen, a sheriff, a warrior, a sovereign”. We are not continental serfs, or obliged britons. We are americans – and the state but a service like any other we consume. and if that is no longer the case, then we are equally permitted under our declaration and constitution to replace this government which restores our rule and revokes rule from that government-become-ruler. Curt Doolittle

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544392745 Timestamp) —“For me Testimonialism is one of the easier concepts in Propertarianism. Much of what you speak about requires a lot more reading, whereas Testimonialism is easy to get if you work with automation, have experience with programming, have read a bit of philosophy of science, have an IQ above two SDs, and has a touch of aspieness.”— Singular Speech lol 😉