(FB 1543418196 Timestamp) THE UNIQUENESS OF THE GRAMMARS by Bill Joslin (new, important idea) The development of various grammars of disambiguation defines the uniqueness of the west. A culture of martial raiders requires explicit technologies for maintain peaceful coexistence among dangerous people, as well as requires truthful reporting of battle situations for raiding to be successful. This leads to social value on truth – truthful reporting (reliability) and honest interactions to prevent in-group conflict (honesty). The result being the innovation of OATH (proto-contract) and competency (meritocracy). This I see as the initial step (or early) step toward disambiguation. Disambiguation of reporting on intention and ability. Incremental stages of growth for European peoples can be seen as the progress of disambiguation. Common law : Disambiguation of accountability and disambiguation of reciprocal consequences (punishment fit the crime) Contract: Disambiguation of terms of agreement and limits to commitment (Trade) Institutionalization of Law : Disambiguation of the application of power over a polis i.e. rule (isolation of discretionary rule) Science: disambiguation of external causal relations (Propertarianism – disambiguation of human action and human conflict) Disambiguation provides a commensurable measure in evaluating “western identity” for what belongs or doesn’t belong, or what needs to be corrected and how. So when Abrahamists conflate religion and western civilization (christianity, Jewish contribution, secular islam), or Aesthetics (spiritualists) propose that aesthetics undergirds civilization, or linguists propose language as the means to calculate power and distribution (GA) etc… all while stating they are “for the west”, I get confused and a bit uppity. Introduction of ambiguity is not what we do – its what we’ve been taught by those who’d see us gone or enslaved.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543416288 Timestamp) THE NEXT SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION (worth repeating) This persistent ‘error’ in the soft (projected) ‘sciences’, is, as far as my work goes, the central problem of thought in the 21st century. We are still trying to overcome the monopoly authoritarianism of Boas, Marx, Feud, Adorno et all, Derrida et al, and the feminists et al that sought to take advantage of the democratic novelty to obtain power. And the 21st century, beginning within the next decade, will consist largely of the transformation of the soft sciences into hard sciences reflecting groups rather than individuals – because the ‘individualism'(ideal) movement has failed. We evolved as a division of perceptual, cognitive, negotiative, and advocative labor across the generations, among members of kin groups functioning as an intertemporal network of ‘calculation’ of choices. The reason people are unhappy is the attempt to create ‘complete’ individuals instead of ‘complete’ kin groups. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
(FB 1543416435 Timestamp) UNDERSTANDING SCIENTIFIC PRAXEOLOGY: ECONOMIC INTUITIO
(FB 1543416435 Timestamp) UNDERSTANDING SCIENTIFIC PRAXEOLOGY: ECONOMIC INTUITIONISM
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543365508 Timestamp) The Great Intellectual Challenge of the 21st Century Do You Have A Healthy Personality? Researchers Think They Can Tell You regarding: https://psyarxiv.com/prdnf/ I am almost positive that the very idea of such a normative personality is yet another example of the freudian attempt at enforcing conformity. As far as I know big 5/6 + IQ personalities cluster in three groups, around what we’d conventionally call conservative male, ascendent male, and female stereotypes (that research is out this year). As far as I know the range of personality variations – including what we consider anti-social personalities – are useful to KIN GROUPS, and that the ‘industry’ is still ‘stuck’ in that bias of the industrial, freudian, monopoly-of-conformity of individuals and ‘individualism’ as an excuse for mandated conformity, rather than the historical division of perception, cognition, and labor and social (hierarchical) tripartism of kin groups. This persistent ‘error’ in the soft (projected) ‘sciences’, is, as far as my work goes, the central problem of thought in the 21st century. We are still trying to overcome the monopoly authoritarianism of Boas, Marx, Feud, Adorno et all, Derrida et al, and the feminists et al that sought to take advantage of the democratic novelty to obtain power. And the 21st century, beginning within the next decade, will consist largely of the transformation of the soft sciences into hard sciences reflecting groups rather than individuals – because the ‘individualism'(ideal) movement has failed. We evolved as a division of perceptual, cognitive, negotiative, and advocative labor across the generations, among members of kin groups functioning as an intertemporal network of ‘calculation’ of choices. The reason people are unhappy is the attempt to create ‘complete’ individuals instead of ‘complete’ kin groups. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543416288 Timestamp) THE NEXT SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION (worth repeating) This persistent ‘error’ in the soft (projected) ‘sciences’, is, as far as my work goes, the central problem of thought in the 21st century. We are still trying to overcome the monopoly authoritarianism of Boas, Marx, Feud, Adorno et all, Derrida et al, and the feminists et al that sought to take advantage of the democratic novelty to obtain power. And the 21st century, beginning within the next decade, will consist largely of the transformation of the soft sciences into hard sciences reflecting groups rather than individuals – because the ‘individualism'(ideal) movement has failed. We evolved as a division of perceptual, cognitive, negotiative, and advocative labor across the generations, among members of kin groups functioning as an intertemporal network of ‘calculation’ of choices. The reason people are unhappy is the attempt to create ‘complete’ individuals instead of ‘complete’ kin groups. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543321910 Timestamp) I make my own butter from heavy cream because I’m so allergic to whatever preservatives they put in it. And standing there with an electric mixer patiently I keep imagining thousands of years of women doing it by hand. And how much work that single task is – just one among the dozens of others required for survival. The endless physical work under agrarianism…. and the archaeological sites that show women’s knee joints and their wear.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543365508 Timestamp) The Great Intellectual Challenge of the 21st Century Do You Have A Healthy Personality? Researchers Think They Can Tell You regarding: https://psyarxiv.com/prdnf/ I am almost positive that the very idea of such a normative personality is yet another example of the freudian attempt at enforcing conformity. As far as I know big 5/6 + IQ personalities cluster in three groups, around what we’d conventionally call conservative male, ascendent male, and female stereotypes (that research is out this year). As far as I know the range of personality variations – including what we consider anti-social personalities – are useful to KIN GROUPS, and that the ‘industry’ is still ‘stuck’ in that bias of the industrial, freudian, monopoly-of-conformity of individuals and ‘individualism’ as an excuse for mandated conformity, rather than the historical division of perception, cognition, and labor and social (hierarchical) tripartism of kin groups. This persistent ‘error’ in the soft (projected) ‘sciences’, is, as far as my work goes, the central problem of thought in the 21st century. We are still trying to overcome the monopoly authoritarianism of Boas, Marx, Feud, Adorno et all, Derrida et al, and the feminists et al that sought to take advantage of the democratic novelty to obtain power. And the 21st century, beginning within the next decade, will consist largely of the transformation of the soft sciences into hard sciences reflecting groups rather than individuals – because the ‘individualism'(ideal) movement has failed. We evolved as a division of perceptual, cognitive, negotiative, and advocative labor across the generations, among members of kin groups functioning as an intertemporal network of ‘calculation’ of choices. The reason people are unhappy is the attempt to create ‘complete’ individuals instead of ‘complete’ kin groups. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1543287536 Timestamp) going live in two minutes https://t.co/rYJtbQfZYj
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543321910 Timestamp) I make my own butter from heavy cream because I’m so allergic to whatever preservatives they put in it. And standing there with an electric mixer patiently I keep imagining thousands of years of women doing it by hand. And how much work that single task is – just one among the dozens of others required for survival. The endless physical work under agrarianism…. and the archaeological sites that show women’s knee joints and their wear.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543262425 Timestamp) Well, given i) faith, ii) belief, iii) theory, iv) guess. What is the difference between those terms? Supernatural faith, philosophical belief, and scientific theory, ordinary language ‘guess’. What’s the difference?