Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542904517 Timestamp) —“The eternal struggle between blowhards growing lie-bubbles and mean pricks bursting them…”—Paweł Płachecki

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542996958 Timestamp) It’s a very simple idea: NO MORE LIES.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543005217 Timestamp) Understanding Charlemagne: The christians were useful to conquerors the same way jesuits were to western expansion, and jews today are useful to statists both foreign and domestic, and greeks were to romans: literary specialists, bureaucrats, propagandists, and spies, hiding under cover of non-violence. In other words, using the female means of conspiracy as a group strategy. Charlemagne was able to conquer effectively by the use of siege technology and technique, cavalry making it possible to cover large distances ( high transport cost), and most importantly, a willing conspiratorial HOSTILE bureaucracy. Now, what I want people to learn is the importance of conquest by a HOSTILE BUREAUCRACY SPREADING A CULT. In the western case we are occupied by that same cult under an anti-darwinian, innumerate, illiterate, ahistorical, religion: marxism, postmodernism, feminism, WHY: We put too many men to work in the work force and not enough of them in the militia and military. THEY WIN BY CONSPIRATORS HIDING BEHIND WORDS. We win by conspirators acting at war.

  • (FB 1542899278 Timestamp) I’m actually a fairly nice guy. But you know, when the

    (FB 1542899278 Timestamp) I’m actually a fairly nice guy. But you know, when the left retreats into socialism and shaming, the libertarian and right must retreat into fascism and threat. I restore that honesty to the discourse. So that’s what you’re seeing. Me restoring war (violence) to the discourse. It’s very hard to be a moral person and disagree with ‘markets in everything’.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542996202 Timestamp) JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM INVENTED THE MANDATE-OF IGNORANCE AND RULE UNDER IT. Science is founded upon the prehistoric european tradition of legal empiricism, and it’s non-adoption of eastern irrigation-system magianism. Aristotle invents pre-scientific thought. the british empirical thought. and anglo-american-german (less so french) scientific thought. With all of the west participating by the industrial revolution. The christians made near zero progress until the middle class re-evolved after the viking conquest, and restored commercial civilization through trade, giving rise to the germanic expansionary trade system, where the church had spent its efforts on local extraction of rents, and cumulative hoarding of europe’s capital, and the expansion of corruption. Furthermore, the lack of success of the church to do so in the slavic lands, the secession from church rule by the germanic states, and the state eviction of the church from rule by the americans, is the reason for the catholic, germanic, anglo-scandinavian, and slavic differences in perception of the good and evil of the church. There is a reason france is a cancer to europe and that is that she is the central advocate or the church’s method of rule, because the french state replaced the monarchical rule with church rule, and secularized it. Christians accomplished almost nothing throughout the christian period – and what little they did accomplish was despite the church not because of it. Jews accomplished absolutely nothing other than specialization in profiting from parasitic moral hazard, and survival because of it, until converted to aristotelianism. Muslims accomplished nothing except the conquest of superior people, the murder of their aristocracies, the centralization of their though leadership so that they could be converted to the religion of mandatory ignorance, the expansion of their underclasses, vast slave immigration and consanguineous reproduction, and the total destruction of every great civilization land-reachable in the ancient world.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543004881 Timestamp) THE STRUCTURE OF THE OTHER GREAT LIE: MONOTHEISM (POLITY) VS HEATHENISM (HEARTH) (important) I talk all the time about the lie of socialism vs capitalism instead of rule by man vs rule of law. But the equally common lie is that of heathenism (paganism) vs monotheism, instead of rule of law vs rule of lies. Our sovereignty > our law of tort > our reason > our empiricism > our science > our TESTIMONIALISM. We can converge on rule of law (science) or diverge by rule of men and their lies. Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Reason, Empiricism, Science, And Markets in Everything. The literary means (analogies) by which we teach these principles need no magic, no superstition, just education. Love of our own is enough. Truth is enough. Reality is enough for the gods we have become.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542993442 Timestamp) It is extremely clear that among the masculine and feminine biases – in particularly the need for community – favors the verbal, illusory, feminine, and conformist in some pools, and the actionable, existential masculine, and disruptive in others. Gender biases expressed at group levels at all scales. What is not clear is how absolutely rare the disruptive is – nor how – counter to intuitions – it’s the most important evolutionary trait for any civilization.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542998681 Timestamp) —Furthermore, the lack of success of the church to do so (govern) in the slavic lands, the secession from church rule by the germanic states, and the state eviction of the church from rule by the americans, is the reason for the catholic, germanic, anglo-scandinavian, and slavic differences in perception of the good and evil of the church.—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542993121 Timestamp) THE MURDEROUS JEWS, CHRISTIANS,AND MUSLIMS —“The Greek-Roman world was not…converted to a new religion, but compelled to embrace it.” The Emperor Theodosian issued a series of decrees or rescripts in the years 341, 345, 356, 381, 383, 386 and 391 CE. They effect of these orders was to “suppress all rival religions, order the closing of the temples, and impose fines, confiscation, imprisonment or death upon any who cling to the older [Pagan] religions.” The period of relative religious tolerance in the Roman Empire ended as Pagan temples were seized and converted to Christian use or destroyed. Priests and Priestesses were exiled or killed. Christianity and Judaism became the only permitted religions. In Spain, bishop Priscillian, who taught some Gnostic beliefs was the first person to be condemned as a heretic and executed by his fellow Christians on religious grounds. The church used the power of the state to begin programs to oppress, exile or exterminate both Pagans and Gnostic Christians. By the end of the century, Pagan temples had been either destroyed or recycled for Christian use. Pagan worship became punishable by death. But government toleration was not without its cost. The Emperor Constantine and later political rulers demanded a major say in the running of the church and in decisions on its beliefs. “—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542998602 Timestamp) SPECTRUM OF TESTIMONIES (TRUTH) (Nutshell version of Testimonialism) [T]AUTOLOGICAL TRUTH: That testimony you give when you promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity. [A]NALYTIC TRUTH: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth). [I]DEAL TRUTH: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.) [T]RUTHFULNESS: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. [H]ONESTY: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. [D]emonstrated Preference: – Evidence of intuition, preference, opinion, and position as demonstrated by your actions, independent of your statements [O]pinion: (justificationism) – a justified uncritical statement given the limits of one’s knowledge about external questions. [P]osition: (criticism) – a theoretical statement that survives one’s available criticisms about external questions. [P]reference (rational expression) : a justification of one’s biases (wants). [I]ntuition: (sentimental expression) – an uncritical, uncriticized, response to information that expresses a measure of existing biases (priors). DUE DILIGENCE NECESSARY FOR TESTIMONY (TRUTH) [D]ue Diligence necessary for Warranty that our Testimony is Truthful. 1) Have we achieved identity? Is it categorically consistent? 2) Is it internally consistent? Is it logical? Can we construct a proof(test) of internal consistency? 3) Is it externally correspondent, and sufficiently parsimonious? Can we construct a proof (test) of external correspondence. 4) Is it existentially possible? Is it operationally articulated? Can we construct a proof (test) of existential possibility? And is it free of imaginary content when we articulate it as such? 5) Is it limited? Do you know it’s boundaries (falsification) 6) Is it fully accounted? Do we account for all costs to all capital in all temporal and inter-temporal dimensions? (Have we avoided selection bias?) Can we construct a proof (test) of full accounting? (Is information lost or artificially gained?) 7) Is it morally constrained? Does it violate the incentive to cooperate? (Meaning, are all operations productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of negative externality of the same criterion?) D]EMAND for TRUTH: True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship True enough for me to feel good about myself. True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results. True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me. True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values. True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values. True regardless of all opinions or perspectives. Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal. WARRANTY (‘SKIN IN THE GAME’) Your ability to warranty is limited to that for which you can perform restitution. So, completing the cycle with Demand, your ability to perform restitution determines the depth of and limit of that which you can testify to. TRUTH IS A WARRANTY OF DIFFERENT DEGREES.