(FB 1542559032 Timestamp) THE HIERARCHY OF LIMIT TESTS (SH-T TESTS) 1) children test the limits of mothers 2) women test the limits of men 3) men test the limits of other men 4) mankind tests the limits of nature.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542555189 Timestamp) (all advertising is good advertising) 😉
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542558043 Timestamp) IDEALS VS LIMITS by Bill Joslin The notion of “ideal and unlimited” pertains to moral foundations asserted as universal and well… An ideal…. Opposed to the notion that all concepts exist with in limits (boundaries and context). By doing so, following a moral foundation which doesn’t acknowledge proper conditions which allows that action to exist has said action producing different and often opposite effects (ideal morals often result in immoral outcomes )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542555094 Timestamp) I SEE ARISTOCRACY (FAMILY) NOT PATRIARCHY (MALE) Where you see patriarchy(male) I see aristocracy (family), with female and offspring via-positiva generating demand (Problems) and testing limits, and male and peers via-negativa fulfilling demand (Solutions) and limits.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542557719 Timestamp) GOVERNING IS SIMPLE IF TRUTHFUL AND DIFFICULT IF DECEITFUL AND CORRUPT by JG Garner Agreed. Black and white. Dark or light. North or south. East or west. I read a book a few years back. A book well known to many. I will paraphrase the general idea. The author wrote governing is not hard. It is easy. The corrupt make it complicated. The compromised make the waters murky. Itâs simple. Is it good for the nation? Is it good for the economy? Does it weaken us? Do we want those convicted of the most heinous crimes to still breath. As long as they live, they could be amongst us âfree menâ again. Iâve provided a small paragraph on an entire chapter. But you get my point. Things should be pretty cut and dry. In the criminal justice system we now look at the accused in a sympathetic view. Was his life hard? Did his parents beat him? Ect. The only thing we need to unwind is was a crime committed? Did the accused commit said crime? Is the victim dead or injured.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542552724 Timestamp) THE OUTSTANDING QUESTION: CAN IT BE DONE? —“I do not think German philosophy was a reaction to empiricism.”—Aaron Kahland —“Thinking Kant’s love affair with Rousseau being a German reaction to Anglo liberalism – secular Christian apologetics”—Bill Joslin I mean, british empiricism begins back in the 1090’s and within two hundred years becomes explicit under roger bacon. and by the 1600’s under Francis bacon all but complete. leading to hobbes, lock, hume, smith, et al. The bacons were jurists applying law to modern thought. Instead, Germans less so with leibnitz but certainly with wolff and kant continued the scholastic tradition of apriorism independent of empiricism, and when that failed moved to experientialism, and finally to the nonsense of marx and heidegger. These people were theologians applying theology to modern thought. The great questions, which dogs my work, are: (a) is this internal world of the germans and external world of the anglos genetic or cultural (linguistic, traditional, normative, literary, institution) or a mixture of both? (b) Given the difference between british (shallow), american (constitutional) and the german (metaphysical) moral depth be TAUGHT by design, and by what methods can it be taught. Because it appears to require both an institutional method of teaching AND sufficient immersion in the culture to produce the general disposition, and; (c) how can we teach as such while also training the opposite (sun tzu, machiavelli, grand strategy) that this “piety” or ‘moralism’ is a utility and a choice not a truth? Because it is the LATTER PROBLEM that seems to be the issue, not the former. In other words, today you talk to germans and they are convinced of this ‘nonsense’ that they have a special history rather than did the logical thing as all other peoples in history have done. (and arguably were in the right in both wars). Brits are in a virtue spiral of death for the same reason. Americans are incrementally defeated by their women for the same reason. And as far as I can tell it is christianity underneath that causes these failures – because it is ideal and unlimited, rather than limited and real (limits of tolerance and forgiveness)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542557522 Timestamp) THE NATURAL ORDER by Bill Joslin Patriarchy is older than humans. Patriarchy evolves naturally because nature rewards ability and action (and nothing else). Patriarchy is driven by female sexual selection in all animals (including humans until the counter culture). Females with offspring produce demands (food, protection, shelter etc). Males provide supply (build shelters, provide protection, find food etc) and limits to consumption. Men are better equipped to secure communities (and nations) than women. Further to that men are expendable (do not produce children, can mate in seconds then die etc – where as women need gestation time and to raise children i.e. expensive) thus men are a better choice for dangerous work (protections, hunting, high-risk occupations). Women who chose men who are better able to provide and this increase their likelihood to survive. Those who choose differently will not thrive. Those men better disposed to these task will rise above others. This results in patriarchy. Patriarchy will always rise, if not explicitly it will be implicit (even the modern feminist manifestation only exists because of the support by a stack of powerful men ) When our laws take in consideration natural phenomena and also what undergirds these phenomena (survival strategies) then a proper patriarchy will be restored. A proper aristocracy will be restored. Islam won’t do this. Why? It’s a River Delta survival strategy adapted to a desert people (raider’s strategy). It scales up well, but crumbles under its own weight and tends to destroy human flourishing. Anglos got it right – velocity via natural law (judge discovered law), empiricism and shallow -via negativa- moral foundations (which results in velocity). This produces the best survival strategy Where this has failed has been universalism and idealistic moral foundations both of which are a result of Abrahamic rhetoric – the first middle eastern invasion of Europe .
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542551183 Timestamp) REVERSING LOW RATES OF REPRODUCTION —“I would like to hear your opinion on that. What are your suggestions to reverse low fertility rate? How much are you concerned about this? Any idea on how to improve incentives for women to have more children?”—-Paulo Eduardo Marques If you reverse the disincentives to middle class reproduction and reverse the incentives for underclass reproduction and you reverse immigration, restore the family as the insurer as a unit of measure, and zone areas of economic opportunity for families then the problem will sort itself out.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542556527 Timestamp) The only measure is zero tolerance.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542550908 Timestamp) THE GENEALOGY OF ANTI-WHITE HATE SPEECH (the historical evolution of the art of fraud) anglophobia (anglos) anglophobic anglophobe … teutophobia (germanics) … teutophobic … teutophobe … … blancophobia (whites) … … blancophobic … … blancophobe … … … androphobia (men) … … … androphobic … … … androphobe … … … … naturophobia (darwin, genetics, gender, race) … … … … naturopohbic … … … … naturophobe … … … … … denial (truthophobia) … … … … … denialism (truthophobic) … … … … … denialist (truthophobe) … … … … … … sophistry (fraud by verbalism) … … … … … … sophism … … … … … … sophist … … … … … … … idealistry (platonistry) (fraud by ideal) … … … … … … … idealism (platonism) … … … … … … … idealist (platonist) … … … … … … … … pseudoscientry (fraud by falsehood) … … … … … … … … pseudoscience … … … … … … … … pseudoscientist … … … … … … … … … fictionalistry (fraud by fiction) … … … … … … … … … fictionalism … … … … … … … … … fictionalist … … … … … … … … … … deception (fraud by deception) … … … … … … … … … … deceit … … … … … … … … … … deceiver … … … … … … … … … … … lying (outright lying) … … … … … … … … … … … lie … … … … … … … … … … … liar