(FB 1542051210 Timestamp) The state is either a corporation at the expense of the kin group, or a family that has no other concern but the kin group. The state is not the problem – the corporation is. Restore the perfect government: rule of law, judiciary, monarchy, houses for the classes, and a church that educates people in the mindfulness of the parenting of generations, the stoic virtues, martial fitness, the natural law, the means of calculation, and the skills of transformation we call ‘the trades’.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542066101 Timestamp) My argument is always the same. Separate the feminine/r-selected/herd/dysgenic pool from the masculine/k-selected/pack/eugenic pool. We are wealthy enough to afford the production of preferred but DIFFERENT commons, and if the dysgenic herd wants to produce their preferred commons and the eugenic pack wants to produce their preferred commons the only thing preventing both achieving their goals is the current monopoly commons. The solution is to separate (secede) and devolve normative regulation and commons production to the groups and let them speciate. The question MIGHT be race, but it’s not. It’s genetic strategy. The dysgenic and the eugenic. I’m perfectly happy if you folks want to construct india and brazil as long as those of us who want otherwise continue the western tradition of eugenic social order and continuous production of prosperity.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542050487 Timestamp) (humor, truism, irony) —“The oppression of libertarians is just the free market in action. Violence is a service. Their tax dollars are a good.”—John Edward lolz
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542069024 Timestamp) Ok. Stupid meter overloaded. Time for movies.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542050623 Timestamp) —“Why do we allow areas of the country with the highest crime rates hold such sway in statewide and national elections? If your locals elect govt that can’t suppress violent crime, your per capita ability to govern the nation as a whole is demonstrably deficient, like a child.”— Steve Pender
-
(FB 1542062393 Timestamp) HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS RE
(FB 1542062393 Timestamp) HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH â @hbdchick the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)… …tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)… …another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of common arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne… …these furrows were the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually… …the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place… …however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ â¦): …the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added, (oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.) …and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added, here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History⦠by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.) …and the outcome of all this, i think (theorize)? and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows. btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-geograph.org.uk-_640050.jpg â¦); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 â¦); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM â¦): and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm ⦠oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their common property regimes (i.e. collective village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because… …of its collective nature wheat plus oats and rye. (^_^) SEE: (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603 â¦. nw “core” european wheat farming WAS collective for something like 500-1000 years (depending on region). afaics, the diff ofc is who one is collective with: family? or unrelated individuals? http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542066101 Timestamp) My argument is always the same. Separate the feminine/r-selected/herd/dysgenic pool from the masculine/k-selected/pack/eugenic pool. We are wealthy enough to afford the production of preferred but DIFFERENT commons, and if the dysgenic herd wants to produce their preferred commons and the eugenic pack wants to produce their preferred commons the only thing preventing both achieving their goals is the current monopoly commons. The solution is to separate (secede) and devolve normative regulation and commons production to the groups and let them speciate. The question MIGHT be race, but it’s not. It’s genetic strategy. The dysgenic and the eugenic. I’m perfectly happy if you folks want to construct india and brazil as long as those of us who want otherwise continue the western tradition of eugenic social order and continuous production of prosperity.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542050487 Timestamp) (humor, truism, irony) —“The oppression of libertarians is just the free market in action. Violence is a service. Their tax dollars are a good.”—John Edward lolz
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542059859 Timestamp) ( jeez don’t get pissed at me if I’m short with you in email or text or whatever. I’m sort ’cause I can’t be anything else. FB provides a lot of context. i can see previous conversations, see the context of the comment, and grab a quick look at your profile. In email and other media i am flying blind. And I’m awfully prolific and I can’t spend five minutes figuring out ‘who are you and what the heck are you talking about’. I just want to know what you want and what you need me to do.)
-
(FB 1542062393 Timestamp) HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS RE
(FB 1542062393 Timestamp) HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH â @hbdchick the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)… …tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)… …another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of common arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne… …these furrows were the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually… …the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place… …however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ â¦): …the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added, (oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.) …and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added, here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History⦠by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.) …and the outcome of all this, i think (theorize)? and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows. btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-geograph.org.uk-_640050.jpg â¦); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 â¦); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM â¦): and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm ⦠oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their common property regimes (i.e. collective village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because… …of its collective nature wheat plus oats and rye. (^_^) SEE: (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603 â¦. nw “core” european wheat farming WAS collective for something like 500-1000 years (depending on region). afaics, the diff ofc is who one is collective with: family? or unrelated individuals? http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603