Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Return to The Teaching of Rule Rather than Submission

    RETURN TO THE TEACHING OF RULE RATHER THAN SUBMISSION (important idea) |RULE| Self > Family > Commons > Polity > Nation > Civilization > Mankind > Universe WE HAVE A CHOICE OF STRATEGY: Submission(Left-Female-Outcast Male) <-> or,… Consumption(libertarian- Ascendant Male) <-> or,… … Rule (Right-Established Male). ARISTOCRACY IS THE ULTIMATE PHILOSOPHY

  • Demand for Belief Is Demand for Deceit

    November 6th, 2018 7:31 AM “DEMAND FOR BELIEF IS DEMAND FOR DECEIT” (worth repeating) by Igor Rogov [W]hen they say “I believe women”, it does not mean that they believe women’ statements like a scientific truths, but that they feel something between religious revelatory experience -and- sing-along with real Paul McCartney. While participating in the “The Kavanaugh Show” you’d get that special warm sensation, as soon as you follow the tune (gospel), you feel it is true (true to the melody, no false notes) and you are a part of something bigger and better than you.

    [pullquote]Just as in the orchestra and chorus and, perhaps, the Church. It is not the Church of Jesus Christ, but one grand Church nevertheless.[/pullquote]

    (The Church of Belief in the Momentum of the Herd as a means of abandoning reason and feeling the elation of safety from predators (ie: reality) in the herd.)

  • When you pray you’re placing the debt on your own shoulders – cast a spell you are accounting for it.

    November 5th, 2018 10:40 AM

    –Well, all debts that aren’t enforceable are perceived. that’s what morality consists in.– CD

    –“I hear you though , debt placement is the difference you are going for?

    So when you pray you’re placing the debt on your own shoulders, cast a spell you are accounting for it. And also the difference is one was made legal by the church and one was made illegal by the church…..also most spellshapers have science (wonder is science), while prayershapers carry the burden of proof(wonder is Tao)”— James Lyons Sr. I (CD: well done)

  • The Scientific Explanation of The Spiritual

    November 5th, 2018 10:32 AM THE SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF THE SPIRITUAL

    —“What do you tell people who have had very spiritual experiences that they attribute to their religion? Tell them they just imagined it? I don’t see how that’s going to work.”— Mitchell Ryan

    They had the experience. They felt it. That it was produced by imagination is no different than if they imagine a ghost in the dark, or a car coming around a corner that isn’t there, or an argument with a loved one that didn’t or might happen. We feel all these things. We experience both the imagination of the context, the imagination of what might happen, or is happening, and the feeling of being in it, and we remember it. Our brains work all the time by filling in with memory or prediction the ‘model’ our senses are continuously composing for us out of sense, memory, and prediction, with continuous recursion of the context. Those Experiences existed. The conditions that cause them are either real or imaginary. We possess the ability to predict or forecast. That is the purpose of memory. We can predict all sorts of outcomes and then ‘feel them’ (imagine ourselves in them). The fact that you can imagine yourself in a ‘religious experience’ or imagine yourself as king arthur and feel that experience, is just a matter of context you imagine and practice. Most ‘intense’ experience I ever had was being very ill with a fever, reading a conan novel, and then experiencing myself in his place. it’s STILL the most intense experience I have had. Is it a religious experience, or is a religious experience just a different story in just a different dream? The question is only whether you are an addict reinforcing your addiction or not. Most of us no. Some of us yes. The question is whether you retain your agency (and experience) or retain your addiction in lieu of agency (and experience).

  • Why Do Our Brains Construct Two Opposing Explanations?

    November 5th, 2018 10:25 AM —“Q: WHY DO OUR BRAINS CONSTRUCT TWO OPPOSING EXPLANATIONS?”— Question: “Why have our marvelous brains formulated two diametrically opposite explanations?” Answer: Cognitive Division of Labor: Predator (action, dominance, science) — vs.– Prey (mindfulness, submission, religion). Problem: Demand for mindfulness increases with uncertainty. Post tribal life removes resource uncertainty at the cost of social uncertainty (female herd equality, male pack hierarchy). Scale increases uncertainty. Production cycles decrease availability of positive reinforcement (status signals, fitness signals). Consumerism buys signals, at cost of increase in isolation. Diversity (market polity) increases isolation. Choices: (a) Personal Rituals: Stoicism (Self Authoring) > Sophism (Philosophy) > Pseudoscience (“Church of TED, Marxist Economics”) > Religion (Old Age) > Magic (New Age) > Occult (literature – post-reason). (b) Social Rituals: Hunting > Sport > Commerce > Civic Groups and Clubs > Politics > Religion (academy, media, cult) > Fringe Movements (outcasts) > Occult (‘escapists’). What’s the Underlying Problem?Neural Economy. (Physical Economy(Stress), Emotional Economy (Stress), Neural Economy(stress)). Regularity provides certainty and decreased neural cost. Plenty provides personal decrease in neural cost but increase in cost of collective coherence, consistency, correspondence, and (frame) decidability. In other words, manageable neural cost provides anti-fragility (mindfulness) and suppressed neural cost (infantilization) increases fragility. The problem we face satisfaction of demand for predatory ( consumption, acquisition, opportunity, signals/status) vs prey ( consumption, insurance, certainty, not-sticking-out/equality). Markets (Economy) in everything: Unfortunately we have constructed a cognitive model of monopoly under both universalist abrahamic religion, justificationary philosophy, universal democracy, legislation (rather than tort law), and constructivist mathematics (and positivist logic). Despite the fact that the uniqueness of western civilization’s ‘salvation’ of mankind from superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, endemic violence, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature – was the product of anti-monopoly “Markets in All Walks of Life” under individual sovereignty, tort law of reciprocity, evidentiary (testifiable) truth regardless of cost to face, status, dominance, or competence hierarchy, duty of the commons regardless of station, decision jury, judge and rule of law, leaving the only remaining method of cooperation “as markets in all aspects of life” that resulted in our innovations of reason, empiricism, and science. Ergo, between religion, philosophy, (and that counter-empiricism we call the ‘enlightenment’ and it’s capture of power) democracy, followed by the revision of monopoly Abrahamic Monotheism( judaism, christianity, and islamism), that we call Marxism(Pseudoscience), Socialism(Monopoly Property), Postmodernism (monopoly sophism), and Feminism (monopoly female control vs compromise familial control) – we repeated the same process as the ancient era (resulting in the destruction of every civlization of the ancient world) and attempted in the current era to undermine (destroy) that social order that made our salvation from natural condition possible: non-monopoly markets of competition (calculation) using discovery by trial and error at the cost of soft eugenics (suppression of the reproduction of those who force burden by moral hazard onto others). The questions are one of knowledge and one of choice. Lacking knowledge one cannot make a choice. Possessing knowledge what choice does one (or all) make? The answer is divided between the predator and pack’s preservation, or the prey and herd’s submission. 😉 Maybe that will add to the discourse. 😉 -Cheers

  • The End Result

    November 5th, 2018 9:20 AM THE END RESULT. [Y]ou see, I started at the very lowest possible level, and eliminated falsehood at every single incremental stage of complexity, and ended up with aesthetics religion and education last. It produces a single coherent, consistent, correspondent, existential, complete, system of thought from the subatomic world to the rational, calculative, and computational – and from Metaphysics, to Epistemology, to Psychology, to Ethics, to Sociology, to the Law, to Politics, to Group Strategy, to religion education and aesthetics. What narrative one produces to ‘teach’ unders that system of thought is constrained only by the same rules. Everyone wants the easy way out, which is to just ‘imagine’ from the top down. Truth is enough. The Natural Law is enough. A small number of revolutionaries are enough to impose the Law, that forces Truth, that causes the chain of consequences, that results in ethnocentrism, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, markets in everything, and transcendence of our people – and all others if they do the same – into the gods we imagine.

  • Tolkien Was Showing Us the Middle Way

    November 6th, 2018 8:48 AM

    –ADAM VOIGHT: “TOLKIEN WAS SHOWING US THE MIDDLE WAY”– —“Sauron is the sort of thing both Christians and Aryans can agree on and the Lord of the Rings is meant to show that. This is also the theme of CS Lewis’ “Abolition of Man”, where he speaks of the Tao instead of God. It is meant to be a Law of nature.”— Adam Voight

    [O]ur ancestral method is not us good vs them evil, but us ORDER and the universe CHAOS and unpredictable. This is the correct understanding of our relationship to our gods. They were undependable. Fickle. Hence we were SUPERIOR GODS ASCENDANT. When we mastered fire it put us equal to the gods. When we mastered metal it put us superior to the gods. That one lesson is THE lesson.

    [S]o I think that Tolkien’s narrative, and Adam’s argument is best understood as the problem of a homogenous people against nature (our western way) and heterogeneous peoples against each other (the zoroastrian middle-eastern way). I mean we have evidence in our mythology of the pre-metal europeans and their religion, then the metal europeans and their religion, and that is the origin of the Vanir-Aesir divide. We have the western ascendance of the prophet figure of odin over the indo european ancestral gods, to create what we think of as nordic-germanic- pagan religion. And then we have the nordic-germanic-pagan of the Etru being overtaken by the Itals. And we have the southern adoption of the greek pantheon into the etru-italic thereby obscuring the ancient religion except for it’s ‘naturalism’ which the romans persisted. Then we had the imposition (by force) of a semitic And we have been trying desperately to restore our Natural Religion, and almost did so prior to the world wars. But after the world wars the Semites (marxism-feminism) and their co-conspirators the Parisians (postmodernism-feminism) and the Anglo Puritans (social democracy-feminism) worked desperately to destroy that restoration of our Natural Religion. All religion is political in nature, we just have so many layers of allegory and fraud and deception that it’s extremely difficult to untangle. REligion produces a group competitive strategy so that our many micro-decisions support that strategy, at very near zero cost, because many, many of our decisions are otherwise undecidable. As such religion teaches us that whenever possible, given any set of choices, among those that are in your self interest, then chose the decision that is ALSO in the common interest. This is the means by which the ‘decision economy of religion’ functions to advance – many times per day per person – the group: many micro payments into the commons. We can be an homogenous people against the vicissitudes of nature and transcend man into the stars and eternity or fall again victim to the heterogeneous people against the attempt at transformation, and the sedation of the many into a long sleep and hyper consumption decline by continuous regression of man into the abrahamic stupor of dysgenia, superstition, and ignorance. Ancestor Worship is an enrichment. Hinduism a subsistence. Buddhism is an illness. Abrahamism is a cancer. It is not that complicated. You just have to understand if you’re an addict. Some of us are not addicts. But those who are addicts are just as lost as those on opiates. Cheers

  • A Decade of Context

    November 6th, 2018 8:26 AM A DECADE OF CONTEXT [S]ee, what you didn’t understand (and I did) is that you get women into a movement by solving the religion question, so that they have a better herd to join, under protection of a better pack, both conveying better safety and better signals, at lower conflict and lower risk. The other thing you didn’t understand is that this century of revolution provided an opportunity to identify and divest ourselves (our people) of defectors, the defective, and the undesirable. We do not want all, we want only those who are not harmful to us. So, I solved for TRUTH. Truth is our group strategy. It is the ultimate group strategy, because it provides optimum commons, which produces optimum VELOCITY, which provides optimum Maneuver, which provides optimum adaptation and innovation. Truth resulted in Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, The Court-Judge-Jury, and markets in everything, and education in the methods of truth and deceit, the history of our people, of this earth, of this universe, and our transcendence into rulers of it all – leaving all others BEHIND. They fear being left behind. SO WORK TO LEAVE THEM BEHIND: RULE FOR TRANSCENDENCE. TRUTH IS ENOUGH. Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

  • The Abrahamic Method of Civilizational Destruction

    November 6th, 2018 8:02 AM THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD OF CIVILIZATIONAL DESTRUCTION (important concept) [I] refer to Abrahamism as a group (judaism->undermining, christianity->submitting, islam->conquering) because analysis of any SINGLE sub-religion obscures the function of the group of abrahamic religions as a force of destruction. Because those are the three stages of Abrahamism’s method of conquest of the aristocratic peoples by conversion and conquest of women and underclasses (those yet not ‘domesticated into agency’). Stage 1 – Small external population (vanguard) undermines the main by straw man criticism and ridicule of the organization and its categories relations and values (Judaism – GOSSIP: Reputation Destruction) Stage 2 – The population is undermined into submission by sale of a false promise – the verbal equivalent of a physical drug (Christianity – FRAUD: Selling a false promise ). Stage 3 – The major external population conquers the submitted through raiding the trade routes, immigration, conversion, and conquest and population replacement. (islam – FORCE). The consequence is the reversal of civilization of the hierarchical pack and the restoration of primitivism of the equalitarian herd. Only the west subsaharan africa, and the far east were able to resist the regression due to rates of underclass reproduction and raiding on aristocracy (judaism), culture (christianity), population and economy (islam). Understand the ancient enemy of mankind. Fear of being Left Behind > False Promise > Sophistry > Critique > Pilpul > Supernatural. Women are the most vulnerable because they evolved to be irrationally dependent upon the ‘cover’ of the herd. The underclass as well. the less capable classes out of utility. The middle class out of profit from it, and the upper class replaced by a priesthood (frauds) rather than a military (science). IT IS A VERY SIMPLE PROCESS ONCE UNDERSTOOD.

  • Return to The Teaching of Rule Rather than Submission

    RETURN TO THE TEACHING OF RULE RATHER THAN SUBMISSION (important idea) |RULE| Self > Family > Commons > Polity > Nation > Civilization > Mankind > Universe WE HAVE A CHOICE OF STRATEGY: Submission(Left-Female-Outcast Male) <-> or,… Consumption(libertarian- Ascendant Male) <-> or,… … Rule (Right-Established Male). ARISTOCRACY IS THE ULTIMATE PHILOSOPHY