Our People overthink these things. The FBI is looking for people who are showing signs of mental instability and signaling individual or group potential for violence. They’ve asked me to be careful what I say, precisely because of the number of mentally unstable young men out there in the current generations, who are easily influenced. They are biased against the right because we are constraining state power, in an era where (beginning with Clinton and Obama) the state became aware that the probability of civil war because of heterogeneity would rapidly increase, especially after the 1992 tipping point (which most of you won’t remember was ‘a thing’.) The right is an existential threat to the state actors, as well as the financial sector, and the globalist financial sector, and the globalist movement that is just a reformation of communist authoritarianism, which was just a secular pseudoscientific reformation of the authoritarian monotheistic supernatural religions. So don’t posture with macho and bravado about violence or crime, but frame all your actions as political, not violent or criminal. If you review the leaked information on federal communications monitoring, almost all of it is an attempt to discover Islamic terrorists transferring money, organizing, or planning some actions. I don’t have knowledge of post-jan6th changes, and the information they’re extracting from FB/Google etc hasn’t leaked enough that we know what’s happening there versus through the telcos (I have knowledge of those technologies and techniques). The inequality of protection under the law between left and right was pretty obvious in the licensing of Globalist-Soros-Antifa-BLM terrorism, and the prosecution of the right’s opposition to their terrorism. The treatment of jan6th as some conspiracy theory rather than a protest that as one percent of the severity of any of the left protests during the sixties is demonstrated evidence of the government’s intention to eradicate the right, rule of law, the constitution, Christianity, the American experiment in a majority middle class meritocracy, and the whole of anglo, germanic, and broader European civilization. We have a political case. But we also have both separatist, secessionist, and repetitions of the founder’s common-law suit against the state that created the USA as options., Its only once those are exhausted we must resort to force. Because it is only once we have exhausted those options that we hold the moral high ground. Why? Because we are fighting over the right to self-determination. And the only reciprocity (morality) possible is the reciprocal exchange of that right to self-determination by self-determined means. And that requires we produce separate territories, polities, and governments.
Source: Original Site Post
-
@sakovkt Agree other than as I said, the islamists intentionally adopted the mar
@sakovkt Agree other than as I said, the islamists intentionally adopted the marxist strategies and tactics, which might not be obvious from the current vantage point unless you lived through the 60’s.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-21 10:11:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107138979298358389
-
@RadioFreeNorthwest (Yep. And the moderator has to be vaguely as competent as th
@RadioFreeNorthwest (Yep. And the moderator has to be vaguely as competent as the debators. )
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-21 01:49:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107137006449965809
-
@DrLeadBasedPaint @RadioFreeNorthwest Neither does the right it seems … who ar
@DrLeadBasedPaint@RadioFreeNorthwest Neither does the right it seems … who are equally sheeple. It’s easy to develop trained marxist agitators who will show at any cost, and thousansd of BLM and antifa that will show at any cost, but ask a conservative and he’ll throw up 100 excuases for why he won’t show unless it’s certain that he won’t have to do anything other than claim victory by his presence.
Augustus was right.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-20 22:18:13 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107136174853805994
-
@sharkyrich @RadioFreeNorthwest @JohnYoungE @HAC1488 Who’s a neoconservative? Ne
@sharkyrich@RadioFreeNorthwest@JohnYoungE@HAC1488
Who’s a neoconservative? Neocon = Trotsky > Leo Strauss > New Left > Bell, Moynihan, Kristol, Wolfowitz, Perle, Kirkpatric etc. in the jewish-american foreign policy globalist activist movement. ie: the people that can’t mind their own business.
The terms neoconservative and paleoconservative were coined following the outbreak of the Vietnam War to provide names for the emergent divide in American conservatism between the (jewish) interventionists and the (white) isolationists.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-20 18:23:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107135252739120136
-
The Restoration of Marriage as A Business Venture
THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE (The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)
1. The historical reason for pairing off. (Hunter-Gatherer)
2. The historical reason for Marriage (agrarianism and property)
3. The Invention of Romanic Love (The Plague). Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.
4. The invention of Chivalry ( trade restoration, viking age, pre-state formation, )
5. The Invention of Female-On-A-Pedestal (Industrial Revolution)
6. Evolution of marriage relations and the value of the sexes and an Illustration of why the separation of church, law, and state are so important
7. The pre and postware capture of the church by the Jewish invasion of the academy, converting it from Christian cooperation to Jewish conflict and undermining
8. So we are stuck with the future where debt, economy, geostrategy, political systems, … and without a reformation that cannot be produced by an authority like the church, but must include the science, law, economics, AND moral narrative that makes us survive. Marriage is the first corporation, developed under agrarianism, which began the possibility of the accumulation of capital or what we call complex ‘property’, and the resulting far more complex common property that was then possible – the institutions of cultural production of cooperation destpie sex, class, age, family, clan, tribe and national differences. And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites. Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge. It’s just physics. Sorry. This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep. We have a lot of relationship mythology to unlearn – and most of it was developed during the victorian era, but not practiced until later, just like the chivalric nonsense wasn’t practiced until far later. These are class mythos sold to uplifted lower classes.
-
The Restoration of Marriage as A Business Venture
THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE (The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)
1. The historical reason for pairing off. (Hunter-Gatherer)
2. The historical reason for Marriage (agrarianism and property)
3. The Invention of Romanic Love (The Plague). Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.
4. The invention of Chivalry ( trade restoration, viking age, pre-state formation, )
5. The Invention of Female-On-A-Pedestal (Industrial Revolution)
6. Evolution of marriage relations and the value of the sexes and an Illustration of why the separation of church, law, and state are so important
7. The pre and postware capture of the church by the Jewish invasion of the academy, converting it from Christian cooperation to Jewish conflict and undermining
8. So we are stuck with the future where debt, economy, geostrategy, political systems, … and without a reformation that cannot be produced by an authority like the church, but must include the science, law, economics, AND moral narrative that makes us survive. Marriage is the first corporation, developed under agrarianism, which began the possibility of the accumulation of capital or what we call complex ‘property’, and the resulting far more complex common property that was then possible – the institutions of cultural production of cooperation destpie sex, class, age, family, clan, tribe and national differences. And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites. Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge. It’s just physics. Sorry. This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep. We have a lot of relationship mythology to unlearn – and most of it was developed during the victorian era, but not practiced until later, just like the chivalric nonsense wasn’t practiced until far later. These are class mythos sold to uplifted lower classes.
-
Curt: “Is Duggin Right About Religous Awakenings?” (no?)
CURT: IS DUGGIN RIGHT ABOUT RELIGIOUS AWAKENINGS? (NO?) There are no religious ‘awakenings’ only ‘reformations’ Communism is a reformation of Judaism, pomo-pc-woke-feminism is a reformation of Christianity. Islamism is a reformation of Islam using communist strategy and tactics. Buddhism is a reformation of Hinduism, and only the Japanese maintained the only ‘true’ and natural religion (ancestor worship). Duggin is hard to judge because he is vastly more sophisticated in his use of theology, philosophy, and science as means of rhetorical ideation than the rest of European thinkers (which is to be expected given Russian literary superiority) – but I doubt he’s right on Christianity. Religiosity declines faster and faster with every decade. So instead what’s occurring is we’re all seeking demand for another religious reformation. And we’re looking to the past for ideas and examples when it’s not surviving because we’re no longer ignorant agrarian peasants. The entirety of Christianity failed to reform in response to Empiricism and Darwin. We’ve had no Augustine (400s) or Aquinas (1200s) in the 1800’s and so the church was replaced by the academy, and the academy converted to marxism-neo-marxism-feminism-pomo-woke. In retrospect, we can see that the Catholics almost got it right, but that the church as a FORMAL institution was unable to reform because of its economic and careerist incentives, just as our current government and academy cannot reform because of their careerist incentives. The Orthodox remained a nationalist church, and outside of Byzantium, didn’t try to compete with greco-roman reason, did not compete with the state, and rule over the state, but assisted the state, and so avoided the Augustinian, Aquinian, and Natural Law Reforms. So it didn’t experience the protestant reformation, the Germanic Romantic movement that almost restored classicalism, nor postwar secular humanism. And so the Orthodox church is the only one to ‘survive’ into modernity. Unfortunately, the Germans were defeated by Napoleon, and the end of the monarchy was the end of European civilization because the monarchies (as opposed to the church) created a market for status by adversarial (competitive) excellence in the material world of military and economic technology and arts. Once we lose the monarchies we lose Europa – and are reduced to feminine caretaking, not competitive excellence, as the final deciding factor in social economic and political organization. In other words: stagnation and decline.
-
Curt: “Is Duggin Right About Religous Awakenings?” (no?)
CURT: IS DUGGIN RIGHT ABOUT RELIGIOUS AWAKENINGS? (NO?) There are no religious ‘awakenings’ only ‘reformations’ Communism is a reformation of Judaism, pomo-pc-woke-feminism is a reformation of Christianity. Islamism is a reformation of Islam using communist strategy and tactics. Buddhism is a reformation of Hinduism, and only the Japanese maintained the only ‘true’ and natural religion (ancestor worship). Duggin is hard to judge because he is vastly more sophisticated in his use of theology, philosophy, and science as means of rhetorical ideation than the rest of European thinkers (which is to be expected given Russian literary superiority) – but I doubt he’s right on Christianity. Religiosity declines faster and faster with every decade. So instead what’s occurring is we’re all seeking demand for another religious reformation. And we’re looking to the past for ideas and examples when it’s not surviving because we’re no longer ignorant agrarian peasants. The entirety of Christianity failed to reform in response to Empiricism and Darwin. We’ve had no Augustine (400s) or Aquinas (1200s) in the 1800’s and so the church was replaced by the academy, and the academy converted to marxism-neo-marxism-feminism-pomo-woke. In retrospect, we can see that the Catholics almost got it right, but that the church as a FORMAL institution was unable to reform because of its economic and careerist incentives, just as our current government and academy cannot reform because of their careerist incentives. The Orthodox remained a nationalist church, and outside of Byzantium, didn’t try to compete with greco-roman reason, did not compete with the state, and rule over the state, but assisted the state, and so avoided the Augustinian, Aquinian, and Natural Law Reforms. So it didn’t experience the protestant reformation, the Germanic Romantic movement that almost restored classicalism, nor postwar secular humanism. And so the Orthodox church is the only one to ‘survive’ into modernity. Unfortunately, the Germans were defeated by Napoleon, and the end of the monarchy was the end of European civilization because the monarchies (as opposed to the church) created a market for status by adversarial (competitive) excellence in the material world of military and economic technology and arts. Once we lose the monarchies we lose Europa – and are reduced to feminine caretaking, not competitive excellence, as the final deciding factor in social economic and political organization. In other words: stagnation and decline.
-
MORRISON: “THE GOVERNMENT HAS THREE OPTIONS” — ” The government has three optio
MORRISON: “THE GOVERNMENT HAS THREE OPTIONS”
— “
The government has three options.1) **Repatriate* all the post 1965 immigrants and their families and rule that freedom of association is constitutional (it is) therefore nullifying this “protected class” bigotry of undesirables. [Fat chance]*
2) **Divide* the country up according to demographics and let people naturally self segregate. [Again fat chance tyrants don’t give up power]*
3) **Stay* the course and suffer the consequences.*
Every peaceful solution would be predicated on Whites still being beholden to federal reserve debt “money” and that is IMHO a deal breaker.
” — Doug Morrison @RadioFreeNorthwest
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-20 16:37:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107134834047410664