Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • HATE HINDERS THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERS WHO PRODUCE RESULTS Hate, like all negat

    HATE HINDERS THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERS WHO PRODUCE RESULTS

    Hate, like all negative emotions, is for those who are powerless to change the course of events. So ‘hate’ is merely your way of demonstrating your lack of agency, lack of competence, lack of courage, and unwillingness support others with greater agency, competence and willingness in an organized and frankly, more expensive, way of waging war against the enemy.

    Choose to war. Resolve to war. Identify a pack leader that is ‘good enough’ to move your demographic (interests) forward, by any means, and then switch or aggregate behind leaders that are even better as they emerge.

    YOU MUST GENERATE A MARKET FOR LEADERS BY FOLLOWING THEM.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 14:59:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429069798698581

  • @gaidhealtachd Hate is pre-cognitive. Conviction, resolution, planning, executio

    @gaidhealtachd Hate is pre-cognitive. Conviction, resolution, planning, execution are for those of us with cognition. We leave hate for those who lack it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 14:00:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102428838103532721

  • @tutu12345 @The_Misfit ( By the way : class vs grace. I have ‘class” – and too m

    @tutu12345@The_Misfit ( By the way : class vs grace. I have ‘class” – and too much of it by any measure. But I do not have ‘grace’ which is the word you were looking for. ) ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 12:39:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102428518837934877

  • @tutu12345 @The_Misfit 1) The posts here are copied from FB which has a differen

    @tutu12345@The_Misfit

    1) The posts here are copied from FB which has a different demographic distribution – and a decidedly hostile set of movements against conservatives and libertarians and entho-nationalists.
    2) My work is in the strict construction of natural law from the test of reciprocity, using economic concepts and terms. My insight is in the completion of the scientific method such that is provides defense by tests of due diligence in court. My objective is to create a constitutional reformation that restores our (western) civilization to the natural law our framers and our ancestors for the past 4500 years or longer have practiced and which gave us our ‘privileges’ of inheritance, so that we may hand it down as we did, rather than have it consumed by competitors and enemies; and to include policies in that constitution that solve material economic, political, and strategic problems of the day. My purpose is to complete the aristotelian-empirical and scientific revolution and therefore make public pursuit of abrahamism, marxism, postmodernism, feminism (rather than compatibilism), political correctness (truth suppression, falsity defense), and denialism (denying truth) constitutionally illegal and a tort by which every individual can prosecute these liars, deniers, sophists, pseudoscientists, and abrahamic (jewish,islamic, buddhist)
    3) Much of that work is non trivial, and unaccessible without significant effort, usually six months to two years, even for people with superior intelligence.
    4) I have a lot of ‘critics’ from the room temperature IQ crowd and the Island 120 crowd for whom authoritarianism, theology, moralizing, and bias-feeding, are the market test of ‘solutions’ – rather than a continuous record of demonstrated failure in the face of abrahamic deceits.
    5) I’m an unabashed, unapologetic, elitist, but dedicated to Noblesse Oblige on behalf of my people, but who has zero tolerance for polluting the informational and political commons by overconfident failed-right, failed-libertarian nitwits no matter how good their intentions.

    So, I”m not asking for you to like me. I am not asking you for friendship. I”m not asking for you to like my work. I’m presenting an option that is in scientific, logical, economic, and legal prose, that is ACTIONABLE, is in the interests of the vast majority, will WORK to produce those interests,, and can be FORCED into assent by a REVOLT by a small minority of men, willing to demand it under threat of violence, because the benefit of it is to most all other than the financial sector, entertainment sector, political sector.

    If you want a king, a general, an ideologue, a priest, a prophet go find one – and fail again. I get sh*t done. This is getting sh*t done.

    And who and what else have you got that’s more than wishful thinking, waiting for a miracle, a savior, and ‘more of the same’?

    That’s the net of it.

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 12:36:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102428508887157566

  • DISAMBIGUATING SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PSEUDOSCIENCE (excerpt from the introduc

    DISAMBIGUATING SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PSEUDOSCIENCE
    (excerpt from the introduction)

    —I used the aristotelian categories from the discipline of philosophy partly to compete with, and correct the traditional discipline of philosophy, by completing the demarcation between truth (science), philosophy (choice), and the sophism and pseudoscience (error, fraud, deceit) – particularly in metaphysics – that occupies the vast majority of what passes for philosophical prose.—

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:14:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426298672610158

  • Jun 26, 2019, 9:22 AM HARSH WORDS – THE MEANING OF CONSERVATIVE The disgust resp

    Jun 26, 2019, 9:22 AM
    HARSH WORDS – THE MEANING OF CONSERVATIVE

    The disgust response produces hypersensitivity to ‘defects’. That’s what Conservative means. And conservatism demands aristocracy. Because aristocracy creates a meritocratic, eugenic, society, that suppresses DEFECTS.

    We aren’t different but equal – we’re different and in our differences either inferior or superior because the inferior carry a higher genetic load of DEFECTS.

    Stop arguing on their terms. They’re disgusting. They’re disgusting because they carry heavy loads of genetic defects. Genetic defects are harmful to the society, polity, nation, and mankind.

    Is it harsh? Yes. Is it true? Yes.

    Truth is enough.

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:14:29 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426297573419465

  • WHY DO KIDS SHIT TEST PARENTS? —“Kids ‘Shit-Test’ Parents. Whyyyyy? … Becaus

    WHY DO KIDS SHIT TEST PARENTS?

    —“Kids ‘Shit-Test’ Parents. Whyyyyy? … Because the world is dangerous and they need proof that their parents are strong enough to protect them.”— Michelle German and Noah Revoy

    DEFINITION
    “Shit-Test”: Asking a question or making a statement designed to product a reaction from you, that demonstrates your fitness to entertain, learn from, cooperate with, serve, provide, protect, or mate with. In simple terms it is a test of your relative position in the competence, social, economic, political, or dominance hierarchy. A test of your market value.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:14:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426296008006100

  • WHY ARE WE DIFFERENT? We have to maintain a militia, control of territory, and t

    WHY ARE WE DIFFERENT?

    We have to maintain a militia, control of territory, and the high trust that makes possible our high returns on our production of commons. They don’t. They parasitically feed off those that do. Make sure you’re using full accounting. Gypsies can’t, They can’t, and women can’t, build a society, polity, nation, civilization. They require hosts to feed upon.
    .
    .
    .
    ๐Ÿ˜‰ Just how it is. Truth is enough.
    Edit

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:13:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426294423875746

  • INTELLIGIBILITY AND THOSE OF LOW AGENCY by Noah J Revoy P will always be harder

    INTELLIGIBILITY AND THOSE OF LOW AGENCY
    by Noah J Revoy

    P will always be harder for women and low value men to grasp because of the positive understanding of the value of violence that is required to learn P.

    In the blue pilled democratic fantasy women have equal power to men in the commons with none of the responsibilities. In the red pilled P reality women and weak men have very little power and far more responsibilities.

    – Women who are not attached to a strong man who belongs to a strong male hierarchy have no real power.

    – Men who are not valuable enough to enter into a male hierarchy have no real power.

    Unattached women and low value men will never admit their vulnerable state. Instead they will seek to maintain the failing status quo until it is no longer possible. They will never admit P is right, not even to themselves, which would cause existential dread.

    Therefore to them it must remain unintelligible.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:13:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426292683104911

  • by Martin ล tฤ›pรกn The universe is governed by physical laws that govern interacti

    by Martin ล tฤ›pรกn

    The universe is governed by physical laws that govern interactions of articles. Provided quantum mechanics really is nonsense, or at least, within limits or particle formation, they are deterministic.

    An emergent property of these interactions is life (nature). Life is a process of replication and everything that derives from it (variation, competition, positive and negative selection, adaptation, hierarchies, symbiosis, supply, demand…). Interactions of replicators are governed by natural laws that are probabilistic, expressed in bell curves and pareto distributions, described by game theory.

    In this view, what Curt discovered is a specific natural law, the natural law of reciprocity which describes what criteria does an interaction have to fulfill in order to be reciprocal (symbiotic) not just between the parties involved but the entire group (no negative externality).

    The reason such interactions are preferable is due to the outsized benefits of cooperation that make us into a fitter group, better able to compete with other groups. The rule of law of reciprocity then enforces reciprocal interactions by increasing the cost of every alternative.

    Does this make sense?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:12:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426291390109091