Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • THE ECONOMY IS THE THIRD ACTOR IN EVERY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A MAN AND WOMAN. by

    THE ECONOMY IS THE THIRD ACTOR IN EVERY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A MAN AND WOMAN.
    by Michael Churchill

    The problem seems like a sort of “time mismatch.” Men need women when the women are young, and women need men when the women are older. Obviously marriage was a compromise of these two needs. But the urgency of making the compromise in the first place lessens as a society gets richer. The economy is the third actor in every relationship between a man and woman.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:21:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576378137043808

  • WHEN IT”S NO LONGER “US” BUT “US AND THEM” You see, once it’s no longer “Us”, it

    WHEN IT”S NO LONGER “US” BUT “US AND THEM”

    You see, once it’s no longer “Us”, it’s us and them. And once it’s no longer us, but us and them, we don’t care about them, only us. Which is where we are right now. I don’t care about them. I’m willing to revolt, separate, trade, prosper, and speciate. But no longer willing to cohabitate under the same social, economic and political order. But if separation fails, then every less pleasant option is on the table. And frankly we’d kind of rather use the other options on the table – and have our retribution thanks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:21:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576376916547170

  • “Our hearts go out to the people of El Paso. Communities are organizing to fight

    —“Our hearts go out to the people of El Paso. Communities are organizing to fight back against the NRA. We will win.”–@justicedems

    Not only will you not win, you will produce the trigger event, that converts our political civil war with edge conflicts like right wing immigrant shootings, left school shootings (yes, they’re almost all democrats), left political assassinations (last year’s attacks on republicans), and Antifa violence (every month now) into full scale conflict and a bloody civil war worse than any in human history. The right wants the war. You’ll give it to them.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:21:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576376160283969

  • THERE WAS NO ENLIGHTENMENT OTHER THAN THE BRITISH —“The dirty little secret of

    THERE WAS NO ENLIGHTENMENT OTHER THAN THE BRITISH

    —“The dirty little secret of the German economists and philosophers was that their attack on economics originated out of racial, religious & nationalist bigotry & resentment toward British & American prosperity, ideas & culture” — the ideology behind the German empiricists. via TakingHayekSeriously @FriedrichHayek

    The British empirical revolution. Then the French (Rousseau’s Moral Literary), German (Kant’s secular theological), Jewish(Pseudoscientific: Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno), French again (Postmodern, Derrida, Foucault), and now Muslim(Fundamentalist) Counter Revolutions.

    There was no enlightenment other than the British – all others were counter revolutions against the empirical revolution. The Germans nearly restored our past, nearly brought about the second scientific revolution, but War sent Germany’s scientific treasure to America’s Treasury.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:16:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576355596028098

  • THE BATTLE ISN’T LOST. WE’RE JUST GETTING TO THE FUN PART! —-“Many people thin

    THE BATTLE ISN’T LOST. WE’RE JUST GETTING TO THE FUN PART!

    —-“Many people think that the fight for America is already lost. They couldn’t be more wrong. This is just the beginning of the fight for America and Europe. I am honored to head the fight to reclaim my country from destruction.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:14:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576348641008911

  • DOOLITTLE’S “SCAM” OR DOOLITTLE’S PLAN? —“A handful of observant readers of yo

    DOOLITTLE’S “SCAM” OR DOOLITTLE’S PLAN?

    —“A handful of observant readers of your page might notice the whole scam that you have going here at this point:
    You’re too much of a pussy even though you’re so full of ideology… Too much of a pussy to do the thing that you want to do so you get young impressionable men to listen to your words. They’ve got a little bit more piss and vinegar in them so they’ll actually go do the hard work for you without spending too much energy thinking about it. I don’t expect you to be so intellectually honest as to tell them all that’s what’s actually happening here right?”— Casey King, Jacksonville Florida.
    ( facebook.com/CaseyLKing)

    —“Has that not been the underlying strategy for war since the dawn of civilization?”—John Dabb

    Of course it is the underlying strategy for war since the dawn of civilization, and the dawn of man. He [Casey King] is just (like a woman) using GSRRM – in this case (a) a straw man, and (b) moralizing, and (c) shaming – because he doesn’t have an argument. Because dim people, lacking ability, experience, knowledge, and agency can only demonstrate disapproval and shaming and rallying – they have no other ability to work with.

    The Straw Man
    (a) You should run into public and so something dramatic, symbolic, and emotional (ie: be a woman).
    (b) otherwise you are immoral (irreciprocal, dishonest)
    (c) because, you are asking other men to run into the public and do something symbolic, and emotional (ie: be women).

    Reality, Repeated Daily
    (a) Doolittle’s Message is:
    … Never act until we all act
    (b) And
    … Act when we have;
    … … – a moral license (check)
    … … – a set of actionable demands (check)
    … … – a plan of transition (check)
    … … – a means of winning by insurrection (check)
    … When
    … … – we can rally sufficient starting numbers (~.1M-1M) (Check)
    … … – the overton window is over the conservative mean. (Almost)
    … Where
    … … – Our demands solve the problems of the era (check)
    … … – it’s immoral to fail to accept them (check)
    … … – giving us moral license for war to restore the constitution (check)
    … Therefore
    … … – We can negotiate and settle before violence.
    … … – Or, We can escalate to force negotiation
    … … – Or, We can escalate to force submission
    … … – Or, We can escalate into decimation.
    … Because
    … … – we are the largest army in the world by orders of magnitude.

    What is john doing?
    What are curt and ely doing?
    What are bill and the majority of Propertarians doing?

    See?

    But simpletons see the world through simpleton eyes.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:13:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576345942100282

  • IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE O

    IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE OF ITS ABSENCE.

    —“Haven’t you used the same ‘feminine’ approaches consistently to vilify the left.”—@adamszequi

    —“We don’t seek to undermine their arguments, because they don’t have any. We seek to expose their lack of arguments. We don’t need to vilify them, their actions when brought to light condemn them better then anything we could ever do.”—Noah Revoy @noahrevoy

    Adam, (All);

    1) It is one thing to shame the absence of argument, and another to shame because of its absence.

    2) If you encounter GSRRM (avoidance of argument) then respond with it, then repeat the central argument.

    3) Use their shaming as a vehicle for distributing information: illustration of their lack of argument, their inability to provide one, and the counter argument in Propertarian (natural law) to demonstrate their attempted fraud or deceit..

    4) Repeat this cycle until they give up, or all opportunity to spread the argument has been exhausted.

    – Cheers

    ( cc @stefanmolyneux
    Stefan uses the tolerant British(anglo) Technique of Wit.
    I use the intolerant technique of Prosecution.
    I have little ‘christian’ left in me.
    It’s suicidal.
    )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:13:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576343837518901

  • “CURT DOESN’T KNOW HISTORY, HE NEEDS TO READ A BOOK” to: @Gareth Martin I though

    “CURT DOESN’T KNOW HISTORY, HE NEEDS TO READ A BOOK”

    to: @Gareth Martin

    I thought you were going to present some counterfactuals. But no.

    I’m tracing the evolution of truthful speech on the one hand and competing forms of speech on the other. The premise is that this is because of accidents of western origin.

    Now, you can try to make some argument or other, but in general you’ve made two false ones.

    THE CODE OF HAMMURABI
    The code of hammurabi like the inquisition for that matter, were attempts to standardize punishments between heterogeneous groups within the “empire”, so that retaliation cycles (feuds) did not scale between those groups.

    THE PHOENICIAN GROUP STRATEGY
    The phoenicians originated either as southern semites on the southern persian gulf, or in situ from earlier northern semitic survivors of the climate crisis. It appears the latter but it is nearly impossible to separate out their genetics, other than to say that lebanese are an old people. same problem with greek aristocracy. We don’t have samples from enough individuals yet to know.

    As far as we know they survived by pastoralism and fishing, but because they had the location and sufficient skill and organization, they were able to discount the shipping cost of Tin from the afghanistan route, and copper from the european route, and there is some evidence of local tin mining. So they capitalized in the ‘arms trade’ of the day (bronze was to the ancient world what oil is today. Waterways are still the cheapest method of transportation of heavy goods. They leveraged this wealth to create a coastal trading empire of city states.

    Agrarian societies are more expensive to tovern than naval (as the romans discovered when expanding into europe) because land is slow and costly to cover quickly but can be covered by foot soldiers rather rapidly (at 20m per day).

    So phoenicians like athenians and the british and unlike the persians and the germans and the spartans could concentrate wealth in capital with higher returns. But like jews, palestinians, and gypsies today they could not resist armies. They played Switzerland for the ancient empires precisely because they DIDN”T have capable armies, but were too useful as transporters. This utility ended when they competed with rome, that was, like the USA a combined marine and army power engaging in trade where possible, rule where possible, and predation where possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:11:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576338715045971

  • WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY

    WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY THAT BEHAVIOR.
    by Luke Weinhagen

    The left used these feminine techniques only because the techniques have proven effective against their opponents. Not because the left possesses any of the feminine virtues these manipulation techniques are effective at leveraging.

    We can not guilt the left, they feel no guilt.
    We can not shame the left, they feel no shame.
    We can not moralize the left, they hold no moral to leverage.

    Every manifestation of GRRSM shows up for the left as an alert to possible ostracism from the herd (why they always end up finding their way from all the others to “rally”).

    We do not use GRRSM to manipulate the left. We have absolutely no expectation of them changing their behavior.

    We use GRRSM against the left to remind each other it is ok to be disgusted by that behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:10:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576334220347874

  • RECIPROCITY: WE WILL BURN IT INTO THE STONE OF HISTORY SO THAT YOUR IRRECIPROCIT

    RECIPROCITY: WE WILL BURN IT INTO THE STONE OF HISTORY SO THAT YOUR IRRECIPROCITY NEVER OCCURS AGAIN.

    —“There are no laws of nature. Irreciprocity is not a law of nature. How do you explain the implacable irreciprocity of a consuming black hole”—

    (Yes, I realize this is too stupid for words, but let’s use it as a vehicle for an important lesson on the Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity, which is an extension of the Law of Nature: Entropy, Naturalism, Realism.)

    The physical world equilibrates (Entropy). It does not engage in reciprocity. The reason being it cannot choose to cooperate or not.

    Humans can choose always to (a) evade, (b) cooperate with, (c) prey upon, one another.

    Because of this ability we can (a)obtain the benefits of cooperation, (b) prey upon one another if we cannot, and (c) avoid those who would defeat us if we cannot survive the conflict.

    But because we have these wonderful things called memories we can also engage in credit and debt relations, presuming that minor ir-reciprocities accumulate in reciprocity. And we willingly participate in the production of commons within the limits of proportionality.

    But because we can be easily deceived, by abrahamic prose, with false promises of credit or debit, reward or punishment, then we can also cheat one another – fooling some people some of the time, for a short time, and many people most of the time for a long time – and everything in between.

    This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment: we punish irreciprocity, and disproportionality, and we do so no matter the cost, no matter how high the cost, because the possibility of a cheater amongst our midst the imitation of whom would lead to collapse of cooperation and the returns on cooperation is untenable for any cooperative (social) population.

    What do you think the means of retaliation for attempted genocide, politicide culture-cide, civlization-cide will be?

    Because you do not get to CHOOSE the value other people attach to race, nation, clan and kin, or political order, or civilizational or strategy for dragging mankind out of ignorance, poverty, mysticism, disease, hard labor, and dysgenia.

    There is only a common good until there isn’t.
    There isn’t
    So separate or war.
    I prefer war.
    Because I want to make certain that we burn it into the stone of history SO that your irreciprocity never occurs again.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:10:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576332903223785