Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • No More Free Markets At The Expense of Affordable Family Formation

    —“This essay reminds me of the debate between charliekirk11 and Tucker Carlson about consecutives focussing on growth/free markets at the expense of things like affordable family formation.”— @Biorealism

    Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem. The unions were a vehicle for the radical left and libertarian economic warfare against them eliminated their treat to the polity. But there was no equal vehicle for ending the academy, media, state complex. Even so, the conservatives did win the moral debate holding down the state, and would have defeated the academy and media. In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.

    [pullquote]In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.[/pullquote]

    That said, history still proved them right by the evidence, because of individualism’s destruction of the family, and economic and military relative decline as resources(revenues) were devoted to financialization, the education problem, and redistribution to underclass and bureaucracy instead of financing of the intergenerational family. Even so, without immigration the right would have been proven right. The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family, economy, military, and law. The problem is that the eugenics movement needed to succeed to prevent regression to the mean. And the postwar ban on the subject made conservatism impossible to advance. So while the left engages in lie-deny-pseudoscience-and incrementalism, the right engages in not telling the truth and empty moralizing. And in all things – truth rules. Until the right uses truth it cannot defeat the lie-and-deny-pseudoscience and sophism of the left. This is why democracy is not survivable. It’s suicidal.

  • No More Free Markets At The Expense of Affordable Family Formation

    —“This essay reminds me of the debate between charliekirk11 and Tucker Carlson about consecutives focussing on growth/free markets at the expense of things like affordable family formation.”— @Biorealism

    Just to serve as resident nerd for a moment, the reason? Conservative intellectuals failed (like the church) to develop a ratio-scientific set of arguments to modernize their moral intuitions – so libertarians (economics) did – which only exacerbated the problem. The unions were a vehicle for the radical left and libertarian economic warfare against them eliminated their treat to the polity. But there was no equal vehicle for ending the academy, media, state complex. Even so, the conservatives did win the moral debate holding down the state, and would have defeated the academy and media. In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.

    [pullquote]In the rock-paper-scissors game of ideology, reason defeats supernaturalism, but pseudoscience beats reason. Without science to defeat pseudoscience conservatives lost the argument.[/pullquote]

    That said, history still proved them right by the evidence, because of individualism’s destruction of the family, and economic and military relative decline as resources(revenues) were devoted to financialization, the education problem, and redistribution to underclass and bureaucracy instead of financing of the intergenerational family. Even so, without immigration the right would have been proven right. The dirty secret of western success has always been soft eugenics of the family, economy, military, and law. The problem is that the eugenics movement needed to succeed to prevent regression to the mean. And the postwar ban on the subject made conservatism impossible to advance. So while the left engages in lie-deny-pseudoscience-and incrementalism, the right engages in not telling the truth and empty moralizing. And in all things – truth rules. Until the right uses truth it cannot defeat the lie-and-deny-pseudoscience and sophism of the left. This is why democracy is not survivable. It’s suicidal.

  • The Government? It’s Weak.

    —“Your little AR-15 isn’t going to do shit to protect you from the government — who has tanks and nuclear weapons. That is a pathetic fantasy.”—Matt Rogers @Politidope

    Matt. What will happen to urban centers without electricity, cash machines, cash, rail, and truck transport in the depth of winter or heat of summer? What happened in Baltimore, LA, St Louis? How many days before people with AR15’s don’t have to do anything but wait? Why will police do anything under those circumstances except stay in the barracks and defend themselves and their families? What makes you think the military will do anything at all against its own people? What happened each time they have? What will foreign powers do? Our soldiers have lost every 4GW war that they’ve fought. Why do you think they won’t lose this one? How long did the government last before collapsing due to violence in the 60’s? 3 Weeks. The USA’s standing in the world is predicated on an illusion of power rapidly dispelled. You see, you think of marches in the streets. We think of the gradual sieging of population centers dependent on trade networks, power, communication, and redistribution checks. It takes 500 men to end american dominance in the world in just 90 days. And then we come for enemies. The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice. Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose. There are at least 6M men like me. There are as many as 22M. There are less than 2M active forces, of which only 200k are available, and they cannot use combined arms on populations in population centers. Only two cities, NY and DC have police forces that can hold out for 3 days So do not speak in confidence of grave matters, as if you have any idea what you speak about. You want a revolution you are probably going to get one. And everyone knows it. You know what else they know? The right wing always wins in every simulation and war game. If you think you can get rid of guns door to door why don’t you think we can get rid of every illegal immigrant, and revoke the citizenship of every immigrant legal or not back to the 1965 Hart Cellar immigration act door to door? What will you do when those men with AR15’s get $2000 per person to deliver these illegals to work and deportation camps? Why do you think it’s not possible when the chinese are doing it today. We are done with you – and you’re sitting ducks.

  • The Government? It’s Weak.

    —“Your little AR-15 isn’t going to do shit to protect you from the government — who has tanks and nuclear weapons. That is a pathetic fantasy.”—Matt Rogers @Politidope

    Matt. What will happen to urban centers without electricity, cash machines, cash, rail, and truck transport in the depth of winter or heat of summer? What happened in Baltimore, LA, St Louis? How many days before people with AR15’s don’t have to do anything but wait? Why will police do anything under those circumstances except stay in the barracks and defend themselves and their families? What makes you think the military will do anything at all against its own people? What happened each time they have? What will foreign powers do? Our soldiers have lost every 4GW war that they’ve fought. Why do you think they won’t lose this one? How long did the government last before collapsing due to violence in the 60’s? 3 Weeks. The USA’s standing in the world is predicated on an illusion of power rapidly dispelled. You see, you think of marches in the streets. We think of the gradual sieging of population centers dependent on trade networks, power, communication, and redistribution checks. It takes 500 men to end american dominance in the world in just 90 days. And then we come for enemies. The roman empire like the american was destroyed in about seventy years, by the same people by the same method. Fool us once shame on you. We will not be fooled twice. Either we end the liberal program and fundamentalism like we did communism, or we lose 100m people. Choose. There are at least 6M men like me. There are as many as 22M. There are less than 2M active forces, of which only 200k are available, and they cannot use combined arms on populations in population centers. Only two cities, NY and DC have police forces that can hold out for 3 days So do not speak in confidence of grave matters, as if you have any idea what you speak about. You want a revolution you are probably going to get one. And everyone knows it. You know what else they know? The right wing always wins in every simulation and war game. If you think you can get rid of guns door to door why don’t you think we can get rid of every illegal immigrant, and revoke the citizenship of every immigrant legal or not back to the 1965 Hart Cellar immigration act door to door? What will you do when those men with AR15’s get $2000 per person to deliver these illegals to work and deportation camps? Why do you think it’s not possible when the chinese are doing it today. We are done with you – and you’re sitting ducks.

  • Education, Decidability, Demand, and the Baumol Effect

    I don’t think I did a good enough job in the long interview with John Mark when I discussed the overuse of college education producing inflationary costs throughout the economy, and like minimum wage laws creating permanent class differences for no good reason other than ability to absorb losses (costs). Most education is junk.

  • Education, Decidability, Demand, and the Baumol Effect

    I don’t think I did a good enough job in the long interview with John Mark when I discussed the overuse of college education producing inflationary costs throughout the economy, and like minimum wage laws creating permanent class differences for no good reason other than ability to absorb losses (costs). Most education is junk.

  • We Must Accumulate Law like we do Accounting Entries.

    AI will probably lie a lot, because so many games require that, but it’s not unrealistic to think it will lie less to itself. …  Humans are trapped at a cognitive level that depends upon buying into their own bullshit. … They’re generally so bad at lying they have to become deception zombies. – Nick Land (Outsideness)

    The degree to which we are dependent upon whatever set of paradigms in whatever set of narratives, we use for our network of decidability, is something between humbling and humiliating – which only increases my conviction that we must accumulate Law like we do accounting entries. Debits (acts) and Credits (revisions) continuously trying to maintain a positive balance sheet of human behavior, shipping new products of law as fast as parasites invent new means of imposing costs upon others.

  • We Must Accumulate Law like we do Accounting Entries.

    AI will probably lie a lot, because so many games require that, but it’s not unrealistic to think it will lie less to itself. …  Humans are trapped at a cognitive level that depends upon buying into their own bullshit. … They’re generally so bad at lying they have to become deception zombies. – Nick Land (Outsideness)

    The degree to which we are dependent upon whatever set of paradigms in whatever set of narratives, we use for our network of decidability, is something between humbling and humiliating – which only increases my conviction that we must accumulate Law like we do accounting entries. Debits (acts) and Credits (revisions) continuously trying to maintain a positive balance sheet of human behavior, shipping new products of law as fast as parasites invent new means of imposing costs upon others.

  • More on John Mark Interview Notes

    John sent me seventeen questions, only about nine of them that I thought I needed to respond to prior to the interview.  I just shared these notes because some of you find them useful. Please enjoy the video.  -Curt

  • More on John Mark Interview Notes

    John sent me seventeen questions, only about nine of them that I thought I needed to respond to prior to the interview.  I just shared these notes because some of you find them useful. Please enjoy the video.  -Curt