ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE ORRGSM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Orrgsm Is a Resource, Just Like Violence
ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE ORRGSM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.
-
Because of The Technique Used to Sell and Argue the Abrahamic Religions
—“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland
(Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule) [U]sing the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the old world, and the new world: marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism, with of course, fundamentalist islam persisting. It’s the female method of undermining, rather than western masculine truth and reciprocity. in effect the abrahamic method (undermining) is the primary competitor to european science and chinese reason. It is the art of lying. Study women’s conflict strategy.
—“I don’t see what that has to do with Abraham.”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland
Then maybe you don’t need to. Unless you want to learn the different means by which different civilizations conduct their propaganda (mythology) and group strategy then it’s not important for you. Just learn the technique, learn the technique of western truth, and every civilization employs a system of argument (persuasion) somewhere between european truth and abrahamic lying, with chinese closest to european, followed by hindustani, followed by buddhist followed by abrahamic (middle eastern, monotheistic, supernatural sophism, and its modern reformation in pseudoscience, and sophism). If we use the term rabbinical (who invented it) then we exclude christianity, islam, judaism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, postmodernism, feminism and denialism (political correctness) which are all constructed by the same means. So we use abahamic to encompass both the first generation of abrahamic sophisms (abrahamic religions) and the second generation (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism, political correctness). This (The Gramamars) is one of the foundational methodologies in propertarianism: 0. Enumeration, Serialization, Disambiguation, and Operationalization1. Testimonial Truth and The Grammars of truth and deceit2. Reciprocity, Demonstrated Interest3. Compatibilism4. Strict construction of law5. Perfect Government There is much more than that but that’s about all people can manage at one time.
-
Because of The Technique Used to Sell and Argue the Abrahamic Religions
—“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland
(Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule) [U]sing the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the old world, and the new world: marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism, with of course, fundamentalist islam persisting. It’s the female method of undermining, rather than western masculine truth and reciprocity. in effect the abrahamic method (undermining) is the primary competitor to european science and chinese reason. It is the art of lying. Study women’s conflict strategy.
—“I don’t see what that has to do with Abraham.”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland
Then maybe you don’t need to. Unless you want to learn the different means by which different civilizations conduct their propaganda (mythology) and group strategy then it’s not important for you. Just learn the technique, learn the technique of western truth, and every civilization employs a system of argument (persuasion) somewhere between european truth and abrahamic lying, with chinese closest to european, followed by hindustani, followed by buddhist followed by abrahamic (middle eastern, monotheistic, supernatural sophism, and its modern reformation in pseudoscience, and sophism). If we use the term rabbinical (who invented it) then we exclude christianity, islam, judaism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, postmodernism, feminism and denialism (political correctness) which are all constructed by the same means. So we use abahamic to encompass both the first generation of abrahamic sophisms (abrahamic religions) and the second generation (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism, political correctness). This (The Gramamars) is one of the foundational methodologies in propertarianism: 0. Enumeration, Serialization, Disambiguation, and Operationalization1. Testimonial Truth and The Grammars of truth and deceit2. Reciprocity, Demonstrated Interest3. Compatibilism4. Strict construction of law5. Perfect Government There is much more than that but that’s about all people can manage at one time.
-
Why We Need to Peacefully Separate and Let Eachother Go Our Separate Ways
[T]here are only a few directions the brain can evolve: 1) Neoteny (delay of maturity, retention of childlike features, giving more time for cognitive development). … a) developmental specialization (sense, physical, social, abstract), which for some reason we tend to vary in. … b) Prefrontal, cortical, inhibition (agency) – appears to be neotonic in origin. … c) Intelligence (I won’t get into that here) but there are many underlying variables including neocortical volume. The big 5/6 personality traits, and measured differences in brain volume and function can be described by these dimensions. 2) Sex: feminine and masculine, and this happens in early development. The differences in gender distributions of the big 5/6 (called ‘factors’, and their subfactors can be described by masculine and feminine differences, which are largely reduced to agreeableness, assertiveness, risk. We call these two resulting moral biases conservative (masculine pack) and liberal (feminine herd). And they reflect the different evolutionary strategies of males and females. Even so, all of us exist on a spectrum from the female mind to the male mind. There are pack (masculine minded) women, herd (feminine) minded men. Mental illness, anti social behavior, cognitive biases, moral intuition, use of language, vary consistently along this spectrum with very simple tests identifying the sex of the brain – regardless of sexual attraction, which is a developmental success or failure. One of the differences in cognitive biases between men and women is that men see differences and are slightly better at generalizing observations, and women the opposite at seeing similarity and individual empathy. This is our division of labor, and again – all of us are somewhere on this spectrum of masculine to feminine biases. And the cause of these differences is well understood, not only in hormones and developmental rehearsal of different biases, but in the structure of information processed in the brain, where one side (female) is language empathy and prey focused, and the other is action, objectivity, and predator focused. SO WHAT DO WE DO? We were speciating into regional human groups when we discovered farming. We were forced to compromise with each other during farming. Farming is over and we are now wealthy enough to pursue our genetic biases (interests, strategies) and so we must separate between masculine (suburban and rural hunters) and feminine (urban gatherers) and there is no reason not to. We are simply able to afford specialization. It’s time to return to speciation and stop fighting our instincts as different animals returning to speciation now that the agrarian era is over.
-
Why We Need to Peacefully Separate and Let Eachother Go Our Separate Ways
[T]here are only a few directions the brain can evolve: 1) Neoteny (delay of maturity, retention of childlike features, giving more time for cognitive development). … a) developmental specialization (sense, physical, social, abstract), which for some reason we tend to vary in. … b) Prefrontal, cortical, inhibition (agency) – appears to be neotonic in origin. … c) Intelligence (I won’t get into that here) but there are many underlying variables including neocortical volume. The big 5/6 personality traits, and measured differences in brain volume and function can be described by these dimensions. 2) Sex: feminine and masculine, and this happens in early development. The differences in gender distributions of the big 5/6 (called ‘factors’, and their subfactors can be described by masculine and feminine differences, which are largely reduced to agreeableness, assertiveness, risk. We call these two resulting moral biases conservative (masculine pack) and liberal (feminine herd). And they reflect the different evolutionary strategies of males and females. Even so, all of us exist on a spectrum from the female mind to the male mind. There are pack (masculine minded) women, herd (feminine) minded men. Mental illness, anti social behavior, cognitive biases, moral intuition, use of language, vary consistently along this spectrum with very simple tests identifying the sex of the brain – regardless of sexual attraction, which is a developmental success or failure. One of the differences in cognitive biases between men and women is that men see differences and are slightly better at generalizing observations, and women the opposite at seeing similarity and individual empathy. This is our division of labor, and again – all of us are somewhere on this spectrum of masculine to feminine biases. And the cause of these differences is well understood, not only in hormones and developmental rehearsal of different biases, but in the structure of information processed in the brain, where one side (female) is language empathy and prey focused, and the other is action, objectivity, and predator focused. SO WHAT DO WE DO? We were speciating into regional human groups when we discovered farming. We were forced to compromise with each other during farming. Farming is over and we are now wealthy enough to pursue our genetic biases (interests, strategies) and so we must separate between masculine (suburban and rural hunters) and feminine (urban gatherers) and there is no reason not to. We are simply able to afford specialization. It’s time to return to speciation and stop fighting our instincts as different animals returning to speciation now that the agrarian era is over.
-
Sovereigntarianism Requires Reciprocal Insurance: Love.
—“There is a lot of brotherly love and care for each other over here. That’s a very noble thing in a world of radical individualism.”– Noah J Revoy
[W]e talk about rule of law, but that’s our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, leftist evil. We mention sovereignty, which is the objective. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire.
-
Sovereigntarianism Requires Reciprocal Insurance: Love.
—“There is a lot of brotherly love and care for each other over here. That’s a very noble thing in a world of radical individualism.”– Noah J Revoy
[W]e talk about rule of law, but that’s our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, leftist evil. We mention sovereignty, which is the objective. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire.
-
Sovereigntarianism
[C]apitalism creates an economic market producing a war of all against all. Socialism creates a political market producing a war of all against all. Rule of law by Reciprocity, Reciprocal insurance of Sovereignty, and paying the high cost of Heroism and Excellence, Truth and Duty, and Paternalism and Charity, create the optimum polity without the extremes of capitalism or socialism at the cost of total suppression of the irreciprocal and false, under that rule of law by reciprocity and reciprocal insurance. Reciprocal insurance of SovereigntyRule of Law by ReciprocityHeroism and Excellence (Beauty)Truth and DutyPaternalism and Charity We create commons, accumulate capital, and its multipliers. The enemy consumes like locusts and creates only temporary economic velocity. These are very expensive commons because they require we trust one another to invest in a commons that will not be consumed – because every man is a father, sheriff, warrior, and if necessary, judge of the commons and will defend it. We must separate and return to speciation, or the consumption of accumulated material, institutional, informational, genetic, and planetary capital will be consumed by the enemy.
-
Sovereigntarianism
[C]apitalism creates an economic market producing a war of all against all. Socialism creates a political market producing a war of all against all. Rule of law by Reciprocity, Reciprocal insurance of Sovereignty, and paying the high cost of Heroism and Excellence, Truth and Duty, and Paternalism and Charity, create the optimum polity without the extremes of capitalism or socialism at the cost of total suppression of the irreciprocal and false, under that rule of law by reciprocity and reciprocal insurance. Reciprocal insurance of SovereigntyRule of Law by ReciprocityHeroism and Excellence (Beauty)Truth and DutyPaternalism and Charity We create commons, accumulate capital, and its multipliers. The enemy consumes like locusts and creates only temporary economic velocity. These are very expensive commons because they require we trust one another to invest in a commons that will not be consumed – because every man is a father, sheriff, warrior, and if necessary, judge of the commons and will defend it. We must separate and return to speciation, or the consumption of accumulated material, institutional, informational, genetic, and planetary capital will be consumed by the enemy.