Source: Original Site Post

  • Yes We Need Order Rather than Chaos

    (from Gab)

    —“Jefferson? We don’t need freedom, we need order”– @alternative_right

    [Y]es, but what order?

    1. Order of Truth, Science, Law and productive cooperation? (Rule of Law – Competition between men under the law of reciprocity.)
    2. Or order of Lies, Supernaturalism, Scripture and Parasitism – Rule by men? (Rule by Church Men – Priests)

    3. Or order of Fraud, Pseudoscience, Sophism and Parasitism – rule by men? (Rule by Dishonest Men – “You Know Who”)

    4. Or order of Force, Command, Whim, and Parasitism – rule by man? (Rule by Forceful Men – Military )

    Let me explain Jefferson’s context. 1. The Aristocratic order (taxation force), 2. The Priestly Order(lies, obedience and Tithes) and 3. The Commercial order (truth, tort, and trade). His understanding was natural law Natural law by rule of law. Rule of law producing a commercial order. A commercial order is a voluntary order. An order of meritocracy. Meritocracy meaning Natural Aristocracy. We haven’t replaced it with socializing. We’ve replaced it with DISORDER. We can have our order but we cannot have it by the simple means you intuit. Rules must exist, and rules free of human ‘discretion’ because in the end all human discretion ‘swims left’. Jefferson was (correctly) trying to create a THIRD WAY, free of the parasitism of the state and church – who were both tremendous parasites that kept our people in ignorance and poverty. The Enemy can bed defeated by law and prosecution without planting the seeds of another enemy. The natural law is the best civic religion ever invented by man. The natural law, the stoic method, and the Epicurean goals are the optimum personal religion. The Five Rules of Christianity, if limited to Kin, are the optimum method of producing harmony. The only cost one bears under the natural law is christian forgiveness. And Aryan Intolerance. Every Man a Sheriff.

  • Yes We Need Order Rather than Chaos

    (from Gab)

    —“Jefferson? We don’t need freedom, we need order”– @alternative_right

    [Y]es, but what order?

    1. Order of Truth, Science, Law and productive cooperation? (Rule of Law – Competition between men under the law of reciprocity.)
    2. Or order of Lies, Supernaturalism, Scripture and Parasitism – Rule by men? (Rule by Church Men – Priests)

    3. Or order of Fraud, Pseudoscience, Sophism and Parasitism – rule by men? (Rule by Dishonest Men – “You Know Who”)

    4. Or order of Force, Command, Whim, and Parasitism – rule by man? (Rule by Forceful Men – Military )

    Let me explain Jefferson’s context. 1. The Aristocratic order (taxation force), 2. The Priestly Order(lies, obedience and Tithes) and 3. The Commercial order (truth, tort, and trade). His understanding was natural law Natural law by rule of law. Rule of law producing a commercial order. A commercial order is a voluntary order. An order of meritocracy. Meritocracy meaning Natural Aristocracy. We haven’t replaced it with socializing. We’ve replaced it with DISORDER. We can have our order but we cannot have it by the simple means you intuit. Rules must exist, and rules free of human ‘discretion’ because in the end all human discretion ‘swims left’. Jefferson was (correctly) trying to create a THIRD WAY, free of the parasitism of the state and church – who were both tremendous parasites that kept our people in ignorance and poverty. The Enemy can bed defeated by law and prosecution without planting the seeds of another enemy. The natural law is the best civic religion ever invented by man. The natural law, the stoic method, and the Epicurean goals are the optimum personal religion. The Five Rules of Christianity, if limited to Kin, are the optimum method of producing harmony. The only cost one bears under the natural law is christian forgiveness. And Aryan Intolerance. Every Man a Sheriff.

  • The American Postwar Failure Financed by American Debt

    |PROCESS|Traditional Law (Constitutionalism) > Utility > Postwar Morality > Economics > Obama-chaos > Decline > Civil War. [W]e didn’t have a ‘bible’ of western civ beyond which no man may tread. That’s the beginning of the problem: tradition vs articulation of the science under our tradition. We didn’t organize against neoliberalism. We had no scientific answer to neo-liberalism (neo-marxism). We won against marxism simply by its demonstrated failure. We didn’t organize against immigration like we did against communism. That’s the problem first problem. We didn’t organize to achieve against islamic fundamentalism as we organized against communism. That’s the problem. Without immigration we would have won (a) Rule of law (b) economics, (c) social norms (d) religion and education. The only reason we lost so far is women voting, that suppressed the ability of men to defend against women’s voting patterns.

  • The American Postwar Failure Financed by American Debt

    |PROCESS|Traditional Law (Constitutionalism) > Utility > Postwar Morality > Economics > Obama-chaos > Decline > Civil War. [W]e didn’t have a ‘bible’ of western civ beyond which no man may tread. That’s the beginning of the problem: tradition vs articulation of the science under our tradition. We didn’t organize against neoliberalism. We had no scientific answer to neo-liberalism (neo-marxism). We won against marxism simply by its demonstrated failure. We didn’t organize against immigration like we did against communism. That’s the problem first problem. We didn’t organize to achieve against islamic fundamentalism as we organized against communism. That’s the problem. Without immigration we would have won (a) Rule of law (b) economics, (c) social norms (d) religion and education. The only reason we lost so far is women voting, that suppressed the ability of men to defend against women’s voting patterns.

  • Hippocampal, Entorhinal, and Cortical Data Structures

      Well it’s… we have enough info now. The nobel was awarded for good reason. now we know how the brain matches all these fragments together into a coherent experience. Just like 3d computer games really: A very interesting sort of Geometry. Identity Provisioning – Rapid Neural Maturity (or genesis) – Unique Sequences Position – Location And Routes (Paths) – Objects – Spaces (grid) – Auto Associations (memories) Movement – Speed, – Distance – Time Orientation – Direction of movement In Environment, – Direction Of Turn, – Head Direction – Eye Direction State – Recursion (18-30 seconds) State Change – Various recursive information time spans. – (Backpropagation) Really. And what scares me is how little brain volume it takes to do all that

  • Hippocampal, Entorhinal, and Cortical Data Structures

      Well it’s… we have enough info now. The nobel was awarded for good reason. now we know how the brain matches all these fragments together into a coherent experience. Just like 3d computer games really: A very interesting sort of Geometry. Identity Provisioning – Rapid Neural Maturity (or genesis) – Unique Sequences Position – Location And Routes (Paths) – Objects – Spaces (grid) – Auto Associations (memories) Movement – Speed, – Distance – Time Orientation – Direction of movement In Environment, – Direction Of Turn, – Head Direction – Eye Direction State – Recursion (18-30 seconds) State Change – Various recursive information time spans. – (Backpropagation) Really. And what scares me is how little brain volume it takes to do all that

  • They Express Their World View

    by Andy Curzon [I] see Taleb as having had two useful insights – the Black Swan and antifragility (a cat vs a washing machine ‘n’all). Skin in the game was an offshoot (and rather obvious, although he backs it up with data sets), and fooled by randomness was hackneyed old material. It’s a funny journey that of the public intellectual (I’ve found similar with Peterson and Pinker recently) – they express ‘their worldview’, and people lap it up. And then they do it again. And again. And in different ways. And most people figure out they’re repeating themselves in different forms and move on.

  • They Express Their World View

    by Andy Curzon [I] see Taleb as having had two useful insights – the Black Swan and antifragility (a cat vs a washing machine ‘n’all). Skin in the game was an offshoot (and rather obvious, although he backs it up with data sets), and fooled by randomness was hackneyed old material. It’s a funny journey that of the public intellectual (I’ve found similar with Peterson and Pinker recently) – they express ‘their worldview’, and people lap it up. And then they do it again. And again. And in different ways. And most people figure out they’re repeating themselves in different forms and move on.

  • Ahmed Reda Says It Best

    AHMED REDA SAYS IT BEST

    —“A Propertarian is expected to (and must) use Mathematics (as a universal language of measurement), Science (as a universal language of testimony), Law and Economics (as a universal language of decidability), Natural history (as a universal language of evidence), Literature (as a universal language of meaning) and Mindfulness (as the means of preventing addictions). And a Propertarian is expected to (and must) demonstrate Agency in pursuit of political power, instead of fantasizing about it.”—Ahmed Reda

  • Ahmed Reda Says It Best

    AHMED REDA SAYS IT BEST

    —“A Propertarian is expected to (and must) use Mathematics (as a universal language of measurement), Science (as a universal language of testimony), Law and Economics (as a universal language of decidability), Natural history (as a universal language of evidence), Literature (as a universal language of meaning) and Mindfulness (as the means of preventing addictions). And a Propertarian is expected to (and must) demonstrate Agency in pursuit of political power, instead of fantasizing about it.”—Ahmed Reda