Source: Original Site Post

  • @sakovkt Correct. Though, it’s one thing for christian equality under the purita

    @sakovkt Correct. Though, it’s one thing for christian equality under the puritans, and another for jewish undermining instead of equality by the marxists, bolsheviks, leninists, neo-marxists, pomos, anti-male feminists, pc-woke, anti-west, anti-white, anti-male. The entire program from beginning to end was a jewish one.

    it’s not clear at all that the christian women seeking legal equality and entry into the workplace were in any way ‘wrong’. Just the opposite. But there is a difference between legal equality and market meritocracy, and jewish attempt to produce a feminine, athoritarian, dysgenic world, where they function as aparasitic priesthood, like privileged women virtue signaling prosperity produced by their husbands, and where they are just free riders.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-01 17:05:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202892137088697

  • In other words, there is no need to war against males, physical capital by physi

    In other words, there is no need to war against males, physical capital by physical violence, no need to propose an alternative political order, or law – just undermine the female’s ability to self regulate,and male ability to limit them, and to produce adults by infantilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-01 13:45:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104853635647

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104419765141


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    HOW DID THE ENEMY UNDERMINE OUR WOMEN? Female empathy for children evolved to help them understand the children so that they can CORRECT them by preventing maladaption.But combined with female intuition to avoid all costs, woke-bolshevism encouraged women to do nothing to prevent maladaption, instead to encourage it. Evolution’s price of our continuous rapid discovery, innovation, adaptation, and evolution, was the need for increasing training of children thereby preventing variation from the minimum necessary for survival, cooperation, reproduction, and evolution. Woke=Devolution by Evasion. I’ve slowly come to understand that pervasive female mental illness is intentionally created and fostered by the jewish > marxist > bolshevik > leninist > neomarxist > anti-male-feminist > pomo >pc-woke repetition of promising that costs of training and adaptation can be avoided. Worse, that paternalism is a consequence of the longer and deeper maturity of males, who must establish limits to female hyperconsumption, neuroticism, panic produced by the amplification and extension of her nervous system over offspring. Else UNREGULATED selfishness that results. This also explains why women who have enough children to produce cognitive and emotional load are (a) happier (b) fulfilled, (c) stable. This does not mean all women are unstable. It means more than a third of women are unstable, and less than a third are stable. Now, I was raised during the 60’s and 70’s with the traditional pedestal of respect for women, and sexual equality. But the rise in female mental illness over my lifetime, by the false promise of freedom from self-regulation, child regulation, and freedom from the costs, reversed it. So this is another bit of knowledge I prefer not to have and doesn’t make me happy to understand. But it is what it is. And we are now stuck with Judaism > Bolshevism > Neo-Marxism-PC-Woke as warfare against civilization by a demographic evolved to destroy behavioral regulation. And this intuition, this effort, to maximize female cost evasion, and maximize hyperconsumption, free riding, parasitism, while avoiding all costs of production, explains the tendency for ‘attention-seeking, sex perversion, immorality, and criminality in the alien demographic. We are all bots. We are all born with slight variations (biases) in software. But we can create families, tribes, cultures, nations, civilizations that institutionalize MALADAPTION as a group evolutionary strategy. IOW, in the simplest of terms, the success of neo-marxism > postmodernism > anti-male feminism > pc-woke > white-male hate is simply to appeal to natural female biases to prevent their maturity causing infantilization and intergenerational collapse of training and adaptation.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104419765141

  • HOW DID THE ENEMY UNDERMINE OUR WOMEN? Female empathy for children evolved to he

    HOW DID THE ENEMY UNDERMINE OUR WOMEN?

    Female empathy for children evolved to help them understand the children so that they can CORRECT them by preventing maladaption.But combined with female intuition to avoid all costs, woke-bolshevism encouraged women to do nothing to prevent maladaption, instead to encourage it.

    Evolution’s price of our continuous rapid discovery, innovation, adaptation, and evolution, was the need for increasing training of children thereby preventing variation from the minimum necessary for survival, cooperation, reproduction, and evolution. Woke=Devolution by Evasion.

    I’ve slowly come to understand that pervasive female mental illness is intentionally created and fostered by the jewish > marxist > bolshevik > leninist > neomarxist > anti-male-feminist > pomo >pc-woke repetition of promising that costs of training and adaptation can be avoided.

    Worse, that paternalism is a consequence of the longer and deeper maturity of males, who must establish limits to female hyperconsumption, neuroticism, panic produced by the amplification and extension of her nervous system over offspring. Else UNREGULATED selfishness that results.

    This also explains why women who have enough children to produce cognitive and emotional load are (a) happier (b) fulfilled, (c) stable.

    This does not mean all women are unstable. It means more than a third of women are unstable, and less than a third are stable.

    Now, I was raised during the 60’s and 70’s with the traditional pedestal of respect for women, and sexual equality. But the rise in female mental illness over my lifetime, by the false promise of freedom from self-regulation, child regulation, and freedom from the costs, reversed it.

    So this is another bit of knowledge I prefer not to have and doesn’t make me happy to understand. But it is what it is. And we are now stuck with Judaism > Bolshevism > Neo-Marxism-PC-Woke as warfare against civilization by a demographic evolved to destroy behavioral regulation.

    And this intuition, this effort, to maximize female cost evasion, and maximize hyperconsumption, free riding, parasitism, while avoiding all costs of production, explains the tendency for ‘attention-seeking, sex perversion, immorality, and criminality in the alien demographic.

    We are all bots. We are all born with slight variations (biases) in software. But we can create families, tribes, cultures, nations, civilizations that institutionalize MALADAPTION as a group evolutionary strategy.

    IOW, in the simplest of terms, the success of neo-marxism > postmodernism > anti-male feminism > pc-woke > white-male hate is simply to appeal to natural female biases to prevent their maturity causing infantilization and intergenerational collapse of training and adaptation.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-01 13:44:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107202104419765141

  • @TheObsoleteMan It doesn’t matter. The value of a monarchy is infinite to wester

    @TheObsoleteMan It doesn’t matter. The value of a monarchy is infinite to western civilization and if the brits hadn’t stupidly put sovereignty in partliament instead of the law, then the monarchy could easily fix the great problems of the day. In america we learned: the presidency is the worst option of presidient, prime minister, or monarchy.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-31 18:16:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107197507990371600

  • Three Great “Reliefs” since August: 1) Reversing logic and first principles maki

    Three Great “Reliefs” since August: 1) Reversing logic and first principles making P communicable, 2) Realization that I don’t have to cover(teach) every subject in order to enumerate its first principles 3) resulting in losing the stress ofextemporaneous speech.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-31 17:44:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107197383518286597

  • THE PRICELESSNESS OF A MONARCHY Unfortunately, british nitwits have too limited

    THE PRICELESSNESS OF A MONARCHY

    Unfortunately, british nitwits have too limited a comprehension of the British invention of rule of law, the modern state, the empirical, agrarian, commercial, financial,industrial revolutions to understand the priceless value of a monarchy, which they abuse daily out of marxist envy.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-31 17:19:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107197284586385248

  • MORE ON FREE WILL Free Will is a moral and legal term not a scientific one, and

    MORE ON FREE WILL

    Free Will is a moral and legal term not a scientific one, and trying to apply it to the sciences without understanding it’s meaning is the source of confusion and endless sophistry.

    Free Will is a moral and legal term meaning, that at the scale of human action, given human knowledge and incentives, we possess the freedom to make just or unjust choices, speak justly or unjustly, and to take just or unjust actions.

    So philosophically it’s a moral question. But its origin is in law: we are responsible for our actions, because it is possible for us to be responsible for our actions, because we are marginally indifferent in our potentional for action within the limits of moral and legal constraints.

    IOW Free Will refers to a narrow scope of behavior, not to what it is possible to think, say or do.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-31 17:14:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107197265630337298

  • @NotReallyFrench Yes, again though, free will is a moral term not a scientific o

    @NotReallyFrench Yes, again though, free will is a moral term not a scientific one, and trying to apply it to the sciences without understanding it’s meaning is the source of confusion and endless sophistry. The Free Will term is a moral and legal term meaning, that at the scale of human action, given human knowledge and incentives, we possess the freedom to make just or unjust choices, speak justly or unjustly, and to take just or unjust actions. So philosophically it’s a moral question. But its origin is in law: we are responsible for our actions, because it is possible for us to be responsible for our actions, because we are marginally indifferent in our potentional for action within the limits of moral and legal constraints.

    IOW Free Will refers to a narrow scope of behavior, not to what it is possible to think, say or do.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-31 17:13:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107197261938535666

  • @Nationalist7346 (well done)

    @Nationalist7346 (well done)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-31 13:44:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107196441118078491

  • The legal requirement that you may not export the cost of your offspring onto ot

    The legal requirement that you may not export the cost of your offspring onto others (moral hazard) is that you may not export your failure to pay the cost of reproduction onto others (free riding). Again, rights, obligations, AND inalienatinos.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-30 18:07:29 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107191812091020785