Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • What Does “Bait Into Hazard” Mean?

    —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean.  Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—

    If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.

  • The Origins of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy

    [M]others must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security. This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity. This wouldn’t be possible if we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood. So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms. The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances. We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty. And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake. And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information. And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy. As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity. Thus Endeth The Lesson  

  • The Origins of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy

    [M]others must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security. This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity. This wouldn’t be possible if we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood. So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms. The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances. We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty. And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake. And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information. And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy. As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity. Thus Endeth The Lesson  

  • No the Founders Didn’t Fail, the Church Failed – Repeatedly – Just as It Is Failing Today. We Are Trying to Restore Our Religion if Only in Defense

    [‪O]ne cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious, philosophical,or scientific reasons. Because you must defend the comforting lie by which you pay the cost of membership in the community of the faithful, and profess observance to the same rules as we simply because they are evidentiary empirically demonstrated laws of nature, whether or not a a deity imposed them. The founders advanced european civilization by advancing the aristotelian project, that advanced the law of our ancestors, using martial truth, truthful testimonial, warranty of that testimony, and test of that testimony before a jury of our peers. In other words, truth must be testifiable. But the founders were part of the first major phase of restoration of western civlization from semitic conquest by false promise, ignorance and deceit. So while between the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, So they lacked the knowledge The failure of the founders was trusting the church to teach the ignorant illiterate poor. The Church failed because it failed the reforms I am proposing whereby the natural law and Christian Love are stated in scientific terms, embedded in our law and the constitution constructed from it. So that the reason we obey the natural law, whether by i) command of a depotic evil selfish Semitic god, or ii) the good god of the Persians and romans Jesus transformed and merged into a jewish new testament god; or iii) or of Jesus himself as a philosopher speaking new wisdom literature in the only language the primitive peoples could understand, or iv) of Aristotle himself as the philosopher of truth creating new wisdom literature we call science, or v) the evidence of human success and failure throughout history: science and history of world jurisprudence. Because by putting the natural law and christian love and charity into the law of man, a constitution under that law, and into the education of people- the scientific, the rational, and the faithful act the same, according to an immutable natural law, the transgression of which licenses violence against them. Thereby eliminating all competition from hostile alien religions in scientific, rational, or theological form. Once embedded in our law, the ‘folk’ can govern, adapt, and evolve their religion, as they have for over a thousand years, and no church can fail them. And no competitor can usurp them. So just as the classes can cooperate economically despite different abilities interests, and means of storytelling because of the natural law, the classes can cooperate socially and politically despite different interests, abilities, and means of stories, under that law. Because the law is same for all parties – and all that differs is the story they use to measure theirs and others’ thoughts word and deeds. But the law – the system of measurement is the same regardless of language and grammar of storytelling that provides that system of measurement. [C]hristians are rather … politically incompetent …, because they practice a religion that failed to evolve like islam into a political religion, because their church failed to succeed at governing, as it was doomed to fail from the beginning. The jews, christians, and muslims, forever failed to grasp, that they were creating not a system of rule or civilization, but a system of rebellion against the indo european revolution, of truth, reciprocity, markets, meritocracy, and hierarchy, that created a natural division between the classes, increasing the power-distance between members previously able to directly address headmen and elders – even the corrupt headmen and elders of the semites. And that the consequences of jewish, christian, and muslim civilization was destruction of every single civilization it touches. Christianity succeed in the modern world after failing in the medieval, not succeeding because of anything christian, but because of european military, technology, literacy, commerce, and law that was made possible by the failure of the church to consolidate power among the monarchies, and thereby converting europe into semitic submission, corruption, ignorance and poverty. If anything, as most historians have stated before me, christianity served as a cover story for justifying restoration of European-Indo-Iranic Aryan Tradition of Conquest, that had conquered the world from spain to the borders of china, and made the indo european religion the largest in the world. We have proposed, I have proposed, a correction of this failure of christianity, and that is to complete the conversion of christianity to a European folk religion as we have seen in the american evangelical movement, and away from a semitic, despotic, religion specifically evolved to sell false promise to the underclass in the next world, as a means of their submission to despotism and ignorance in the living world. I propose restoring the churches to central function of family and education, but that these churches may choose to teach the scientific, philosophical, or supernatural versions of natural law and christian love and charity, and if we are lucky, and in addition, restore the debt payment we call worship to nature (heathen), our ancestors, and our heroes(pagan), for those of us who need a good spirit (nature) or a masculine god to rise to (heroes), as well as those of you who need a maternal feminine god to submit to (saints). Or you can in your folly, let happen to protestantism under islam what the catholics have let happen under jewish influence, and take your selfish egos, your arrogance, your un-christ-like intolerance, into extinction, like the jews and muslims have destroyed every great civlization that they have touched. You have only yourselves to blame for your arrogance.

  • No the Founders Didn’t Fail, the Church Failed – Repeatedly – Just as It Is Failing Today. We Are Trying to Restore Our Religion if Only in Defense

    [‪O]ne cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious, philosophical,or scientific reasons. Because you must defend the comforting lie by which you pay the cost of membership in the community of the faithful, and profess observance to the same rules as we simply because they are evidentiary empirically demonstrated laws of nature, whether or not a a deity imposed them. The founders advanced european civilization by advancing the aristotelian project, that advanced the law of our ancestors, using martial truth, truthful testimonial, warranty of that testimony, and test of that testimony before a jury of our peers. In other words, truth must be testifiable. But the founders were part of the first major phase of restoration of western civlization from semitic conquest by false promise, ignorance and deceit. So while between the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, So they lacked the knowledge The failure of the founders was trusting the church to teach the ignorant illiterate poor. The Church failed because it failed the reforms I am proposing whereby the natural law and Christian Love are stated in scientific terms, embedded in our law and the constitution constructed from it. So that the reason we obey the natural law, whether by i) command of a depotic evil selfish Semitic god, or ii) the good god of the Persians and romans Jesus transformed and merged into a jewish new testament god; or iii) or of Jesus himself as a philosopher speaking new wisdom literature in the only language the primitive peoples could understand, or iv) of Aristotle himself as the philosopher of truth creating new wisdom literature we call science, or v) the evidence of human success and failure throughout history: science and history of world jurisprudence. Because by putting the natural law and christian love and charity into the law of man, a constitution under that law, and into the education of people- the scientific, the rational, and the faithful act the same, according to an immutable natural law, the transgression of which licenses violence against them. Thereby eliminating all competition from hostile alien religions in scientific, rational, or theological form. Once embedded in our law, the ‘folk’ can govern, adapt, and evolve their religion, as they have for over a thousand years, and no church can fail them. And no competitor can usurp them. So just as the classes can cooperate economically despite different abilities interests, and means of storytelling because of the natural law, the classes can cooperate socially and politically despite different interests, abilities, and means of stories, under that law. Because the law is same for all parties – and all that differs is the story they use to measure theirs and others’ thoughts word and deeds. But the law – the system of measurement is the same regardless of language and grammar of storytelling that provides that system of measurement. [C]hristians are rather … politically incompetent …, because they practice a religion that failed to evolve like islam into a political religion, because their church failed to succeed at governing, as it was doomed to fail from the beginning. The jews, christians, and muslims, forever failed to grasp, that they were creating not a system of rule or civilization, but a system of rebellion against the indo european revolution, of truth, reciprocity, markets, meritocracy, and hierarchy, that created a natural division between the classes, increasing the power-distance between members previously able to directly address headmen and elders – even the corrupt headmen and elders of the semites. And that the consequences of jewish, christian, and muslim civilization was destruction of every single civilization it touches. Christianity succeed in the modern world after failing in the medieval, not succeeding because of anything christian, but because of european military, technology, literacy, commerce, and law that was made possible by the failure of the church to consolidate power among the monarchies, and thereby converting europe into semitic submission, corruption, ignorance and poverty. If anything, as most historians have stated before me, christianity served as a cover story for justifying restoration of European-Indo-Iranic Aryan Tradition of Conquest, that had conquered the world from spain to the borders of china, and made the indo european religion the largest in the world. We have proposed, I have proposed, a correction of this failure of christianity, and that is to complete the conversion of christianity to a European folk religion as we have seen in the american evangelical movement, and away from a semitic, despotic, religion specifically evolved to sell false promise to the underclass in the next world, as a means of their submission to despotism and ignorance in the living world. I propose restoring the churches to central function of family and education, but that these churches may choose to teach the scientific, philosophical, or supernatural versions of natural law and christian love and charity, and if we are lucky, and in addition, restore the debt payment we call worship to nature (heathen), our ancestors, and our heroes(pagan), for those of us who need a good spirit (nature) or a masculine god to rise to (heroes), as well as those of you who need a maternal feminine god to submit to (saints). Or you can in your folly, let happen to protestantism under islam what the catholics have let happen under jewish influence, and take your selfish egos, your arrogance, your un-christ-like intolerance, into extinction, like the jews and muslims have destroyed every great civlization that they have touched. You have only yourselves to blame for your arrogance.

  • “The White Law” (Lex Europae)

    “THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE) (fully extended) [T]he european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. The Group Evolutionary Strategy of The European Peoples

    1. Maneuver: Rapid Adaptation
    2. The Use of Entrepreneurial Warfare,
    3. …. contractual conduct of warfare, Technological innovation, and maneuver.
    4. The Asymmetric returns of investments in the Returns on Commons.
    5. The Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Returns on Commons.
    6. The Returns on the domestication of animal man, such that some may rise to increase our numbers.
    7. The use of natural eugenics of direction the proceeds of production to the production of commons.

    The Oath: –“I shall not lie, steal, or show cowardice in battle, or may you(all) strike me dead.”— The Way: Excellence, and Beauty, Heroism, and Duty Truth and Contract Reciprocity, and Sovereignty Compatibility and Hierarchy Natural Law and Jury Producing: Markets in Everything And Natural Eugenics, With the direction of proceeds To the production of Commons Producing: The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the maximum quality of life, With maximum evolution, in the shortest possible time. Given: the limitations of man, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to the evolution of man, into the gods we imagine. Because: Every man is, a warrior, a craftsman, a sheriff, a judge, and a sovereign, and warranties all his peers, in the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. (undone)

  • “The White Law” (Lex Europae)

    “THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE) (fully extended) [T]he european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. The Group Evolutionary Strategy of The European Peoples

    1. Maneuver: Rapid Adaptation
    2. The Use of Entrepreneurial Warfare,
    3. …. contractual conduct of warfare, Technological innovation, and maneuver.
    4. The Asymmetric returns of investments in the Returns on Commons.
    5. The Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Returns on Commons.
    6. The Returns on the domestication of animal man, such that some may rise to increase our numbers.
    7. The use of natural eugenics of direction the proceeds of production to the production of commons.

    The Oath: –“I shall not lie, steal, or show cowardice in battle, or may you(all) strike me dead.”— The Way: Excellence, and Beauty, Heroism, and Duty Truth and Contract Reciprocity, and Sovereignty Compatibility and Hierarchy Natural Law and Jury Producing: Markets in Everything And Natural Eugenics, With the direction of proceeds To the production of Commons Producing: The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the maximum quality of life, With maximum evolution, in the shortest possible time. Given: the limitations of man, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to the evolution of man, into the gods we imagine. Because: Every man is, a warrior, a craftsman, a sheriff, a judge, and a sovereign, and warranties all his peers, in the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. (undone)

  • As Far as I Know, I’m Trying to Save Christianity

    [I] am pretty sure I’m trying to save Christianity – which is in rapid decline in the west – and restore Christianity as the church should have done, by restating the theological, in philosophical, rational, and scientific terms – and in doing so ending the criticisms of it, and the removal of it from its position as the state religion. But you know, if one’s faith cannot tolerate that it doesn’t matter how we hear and follow the message, that it’s the same message, then I would think something is wrong with with you: that you are neither christian nor good person. If one needs an evil and vengeful god to obey, and the threat of hell as defense against others, and his own nature; Or if one needs a loving Jesus as a parent and guide as defense against the hardship of reality, and to share that love with a community; Or if one wants a set of moral rules that can demand of himself and others to create a society in harmony; Or if someone says that the laws of nature find these moral rules the optimum for himself, others, and the polity and to capture that in law; Then it is against those same Christian rules to deprive people of that which they need in order to obey those rules. That is not Christian love. That’s selfishness and hatred. Thats Semitic Lying and despotism, that our ancestors escaped, not European Christian love that our ancestors sought to extract and preserve as a germanic religion of our people, instead of a means of oppression of the european people that kept them in ignorance, illiteracy, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death. Many men have reformed christianity over the centuries. Many recent men have tried to end. The modern church has needed an Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Locke, Smith, Hume, and our Founding fathers, and instead found jewish communism, jewish feminism, and jewish postmodernism, and an academy media, and state, under our own peoples desire for power, and jewish and now islamic undermining, seeking to destroy not only European christianity but european civlization, and european peoples, in a great genocide that the muslims and jews have brought to every other great civilization that existed in the ancient world. I do not want this job. But we must do these jobs out of duty, to preserve our people, and their way of life – that way of life that has dragged the rest of the world out of poverty, starvation hard labor, ignorance, tyranny, slavery, disease, and unnecessary death and suffering. We did this through our pre-christian traditions and law, and our christian traditions and faith. And the entirety of humanity is punishing us for our gifts. So Christians can help me adapt and restore Christianity and natural law and Aristotelian reason to our age, as the great men of our past have done, or out of arrogance, selfishness, spite, and envy, bring by not acting, end not only christianity but our entire civilization, our nations, and our race.

  • As Far as I Know, I’m Trying to Save Christianity

    [I] am pretty sure I’m trying to save Christianity – which is in rapid decline in the west – and restore Christianity as the church should have done, by restating the theological, in philosophical, rational, and scientific terms – and in doing so ending the criticisms of it, and the removal of it from its position as the state religion. But you know, if one’s faith cannot tolerate that it doesn’t matter how we hear and follow the message, that it’s the same message, then I would think something is wrong with with you: that you are neither christian nor good person. If one needs an evil and vengeful god to obey, and the threat of hell as defense against others, and his own nature; Or if one needs a loving Jesus as a parent and guide as defense against the hardship of reality, and to share that love with a community; Or if one wants a set of moral rules that can demand of himself and others to create a society in harmony; Or if someone says that the laws of nature find these moral rules the optimum for himself, others, and the polity and to capture that in law; Then it is against those same Christian rules to deprive people of that which they need in order to obey those rules. That is not Christian love. That’s selfishness and hatred. Thats Semitic Lying and despotism, that our ancestors escaped, not European Christian love that our ancestors sought to extract and preserve as a germanic religion of our people, instead of a means of oppression of the european people that kept them in ignorance, illiteracy, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death. Many men have reformed christianity over the centuries. Many recent men have tried to end. The modern church has needed an Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Locke, Smith, Hume, and our Founding fathers, and instead found jewish communism, jewish feminism, and jewish postmodernism, and an academy media, and state, under our own peoples desire for power, and jewish and now islamic undermining, seeking to destroy not only European christianity but european civlization, and european peoples, in a great genocide that the muslims and jews have brought to every other great civilization that existed in the ancient world. I do not want this job. But we must do these jobs out of duty, to preserve our people, and their way of life – that way of life that has dragged the rest of the world out of poverty, starvation hard labor, ignorance, tyranny, slavery, disease, and unnecessary death and suffering. We did this through our pre-christian traditions and law, and our christian traditions and faith. And the entirety of humanity is punishing us for our gifts. So Christians can help me adapt and restore Christianity and natural law and Aristotelian reason to our age, as the great men of our past have done, or out of arrogance, selfishness, spite, and envy, bring by not acting, end not only christianity but our entire civilization, our nations, and our race.

  • Responding to Chomsky

    Questions

    1. The issues raised by identity politics are real and significant?  His distinction between “tactical choices” and “general positions”?
    2. That climate change is an existential threat?
    3. His assertion that the right is devoted to the destruction of units of organized society as evidenced by withdrawal from the Paris Agreement?
    4. How about his take on the extreme anti-war left of the 60’s?
    5. Public vs. private media? The Founders believing that the government should have an active role in the promotion of the free press?
    6. American libertarianism being the ultra right advocacy of private tyrannies?

    —A follower

      [A]ll political conflict in the west was made possible only by the inclusion of women into the franchise without providing them with a separate house, thereby preserving the ability of the classes to negotiate for their interests in honest public discourse, while adding the participation women who have opposing genetic interests and intuitions to that of men, as another class with yet another set of intersets. So, all political conflict consists of the unstated and political unpleasant: it’s just the eugenic masculine european right against dysgenic feminine and anti-european left and in the postwar period the suppression of eugenics has created the crisis of the age, and threatened to reverse all human civlization to another semitic dark age.

    Q: His distinction between “tactical choices” and “general positions”? (Context, Activism)

    [T]here is always room for new solutions consisting of trades between the classes, to compensate for vast almost unimaginable differences in ability between the classes, and the vast differences in productivity and value to mankind between the classes. There is never room for shaming, ridiculing, moralizing, psychologizing, gossiping, rallying, undermining, and reputation destruction for the vast genetic differences, vast productive differences, and vast value differences between the classes. Either an individual or group is engage in falsehood, irreciprocity, and particularly institutional irreciprocity we call ‘rent seeking’, or political rent seeking we call ‘corruption’, regardless of the proportionality of their returns on ability and effort, wherein we can take that individual or group to court for fraud and theft, or theft by rent seeking or corruption – or we can offer an exchange of trade by political negotiation for what we want, as long as we have something to offer. But without the other parties engaging in fraud, theft, rent seeking or corruption, the only reason a people have ‘wants’ is because they have failed to produce eugenically enough, and have failed to invest in their offspring enough, and failed to engaging in manners, norms, ethics, morals and commons enough, that they cannot themselves engage in fraud, theft(reallocation), or redistribution (rent seeking, corruption). You have less than others in a market economy because you and your family have chosen poorly. So how can you choose less poorly? Well you can demand rule of law instead of socialism. You can not seek redistribution, rent-seeking, or corruption. You can not engage in lying, fraud, theft, conspiracy. And you can ‘clean your room, clean your house, clean your hard, clean your neighborhood, and clean your city, clean your nation, and clean your government of human parasitic filth. Or you can do what islam does, and christianity encourages, which is reduce everyone in every civilization possible to the same low genetic, cultural, ethical, moral standard – and remain equal in superstition, ignorance, poverty and disease, and blame others for your condition.

    2. Q: That climate change is an existential threat?

    [T]here is no threat from climate change, per say, it a byproduct of a threat to the planet due to over population of the underclasses outside of the first world, now invading the first world, and reversing genetic evolution, reversing institutional, cultural and knowledge evolution, and engaging in hyper-consmption to do so. In fact there is nothin dangerous to this planet and the ecosystem which extensive sterilization and universal one child policies will not solve in a few generations. There are no environmental problems that are not the result non-western people failing to repeat the western miracle of soft eugenic reduction of the underclasses through manorialism, requirement for property and income before marriage and reproduction, and the redistribution of reproduction from the underclasses that are genetic cultural informational, institutional, and genetic dead weight on man and planet.

    3. Re: That the right is devoted to the destruction of units of organized society

    [T]he right is devoted to the expansion of market economies and with it the eugenics that occur from the exchange of the value of reproduction to consumption. The right was stopped from the american eugenic program because of Hitler (even if he was right), and because the Nazi movement came after increases in underclass voting, and therefore it was impossible to restore institutional eugenics to compensate for new rates of reproduction. Instead, europe has gone from IQ parity with the Ashkenazi, and IQ superiority to asia, to rapidly approaching second if not third world intelligence levels – thus declining american productivity, financialization of the economy, and rapid underclass immigration to compensate for taxing the middle class out of reproductivity, all to maintain economic velocity, and as a consequence the generation of demand for redistribution and authoritarian state – ending western miracle of rule of law and markets in everything made possible by developing a ratio of talent to market productivity, because the underclasses are not competitive in the world economy given the present much higher standard of living in the western world.

    4. Re: How about his take on the extreme anti-war left of the 60’s?

    [T]he war against communism is largely the cause of the crisis of western civilization, largely because the jewish intellectuals could obtain a foothold in overthrowing Russia that they could not obtain in other western countries. Then the could use Russia as the economic and military asset with which to destroy western civilization’s invention of Aristotelian reason, roman banking, templar banking, the Hanseatic League, the european age of sail, the empirical revolution, the scientific revolution, and the restoration of western civilization after the jewish, christian and islamic destruction and reduction to ignorance superstition poverty and dysgenia of every great civilization of the the ancient world by false promise of equality to women, slaves, underclasses and the dim and ignorant. The anti-war left was an intentional migration of the left wing from fomenting class warfare between the working and the middle classes, due to the worldwide failure of marxism and communism evident by 1960. The communists under the Frankfurt school had early recognized the impossibility of undermining the rule of law, and open economy of western civilization because it was raising humanity out of poverty so rapidly. The first use of undermining America in the Russian model was labor, then Frankfurt against art values history, and culture, then the Postmodern revolution by french jews under Derrida, which was used by Alinsky and others to transform the anti-war movement’s effort to undermine western defeat of communism and underclass reversal of eugenic and market civilization, to generation of identitarian conflict between races, regions, and to open the American doors via the immigration act to underclasses to help in undermining western civlization as they had undermined Slavic civlization and set them back two hundred years – and cost humanity 100M deaths. although we should note that the left would have failed in every single lie and false promise if not for radical immigration and the taxation of the middle classes out of reproduction. Now, within the past few years we have: (a) ended the pseudoscientific lie of the blank slate showing yes our differences are genetic not environmental (reversing boazianism); (b) ended the pseudoscientific lie of uniformity of cognition or other than rationality of human action (reversing freudianism); (c) ended the pseudoscientific lie that the genders are not profoundly different(reversing feminism); (d) ended the indifference of intelligence and character (postmodern, and feminist denialism); (e) and this year we are ending the indifference between the races and subraces. (e) And I”m in the process of ending the entire Abrahamic program of false promise, baiting into hazard, profiting from hazard, plausible deniability of blame due to the victim’s volition (instead of european warranty of due diligence, and your involuntary liability for those statements), using the abrahamic methods of pilpul (sophism) and critique (straw manning and undermining) – rather than providing a reciprocally beneficial alternative, and engaging in trades for mutual benefit, without tempting humans into hazard, causing their hazard, and profiting from the harm you did to them. ie: alcohol dealing, drug dealing, prostitution, pornography, usury, the pseudosciences (marxism, boazianism, fruedianism, frankfurtian critique), sophism (postmodernism) and denialisms (feminism) … … And the very big one: the myth that people are oppressed rather than converted from semi domesticated animals into fully domesticated animals the same way we domesticated every plant and animal: by controlling reproduction thru limiting reproduction to those that created value rather than loss, and culling from the herd those that created loss: shrills(women), gossips (women), liars(both), prostitutes (women), thieves(both), the risky, lazy, violent and disruptive (men), brigands(men), through aggressive use of punishment, public punishment, hanging everyone possible, asylums(mostly women), prisons(mostly men), men in war, winter starvation of the lazy, and a many people through endless recursive plagues.

    5. Public vs. private media? The Founders believing that the government should have an active role in the promotion of the free press?

    [T]he government had no interests in a free press, and while the second amendment had no debate whatsoever, because it was so obvious, the freedom of the press was the subject of hottest debate, and their inability to separate truthful from untruthful, speech because of the lingering presence of theology, and because they wanted to preserve the various protestant sects and their liberty in faith, they felt it necessary. The post office like the postwar highway system had nothing to do with freedom of speech it had everything to do with politics, war, holding new territory, and commerce, because time delays on this huge continent were a serious problem not satisfied until the telegraph. (My contribution is to repair this deficiency in our law by incorporating the criteria for reciprocal and truthful speech in public to the public on matters public.).

    6. RE: American libertarianism being the ultra right advocacy of private tyrannies?

    [T]he dominance and defensive position of corporations exists because of the excesses of labor as the industrial revolution kicked in, and the alliance of excess labor immigrated after the revolution kicked in, particularly after 1890 and up until the depression, with the communists, that put labor and industry at odds in politics. This is why businesses left the country. Instead of asking for defense against loss, the unions asked for premiums on labor that destroyed depression, postwar industrial international competitiveness, and forced companies to exit the USA labor market. It is one thing to not lose your job because your supervisor is a scumbag, or your business is trying to save nickel for shareholders, and another to extract pensions, high salaries, and benefits not available to the middle classes who are logarithmically more productive and valuable to the rest of the polity. But again labor was sold a false promise by communists using the abrahamic method of deceit to play upon their ignorance by casting genetic differences and economic realities as if they were family morality tales. The problem today has nothing to do with corporations which overpay everyone in very role because of the economic affects of concentration of markets in cities. It has everything to do cheap immigrant labor driving down unskilled and semi-skilled wages, and the financial system which again, takes advantage of false promise, baiting into hazard, justification using pilpul, and critique to distract you by calling it a business problem. There is absolutely no reason you pay interest on a house, a car, education, appliances, even clothes and furniture. Entertainment and food if you pay for with interest you deserve the hell you put yourself into – because your bad (defective, undomesticated) animal genes are showing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeWWz4y1coU