THE LAW OF PUBLIC SPEECH [I]n public, to the public, in matters public, speak the truth regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public, limit your advocacy and demand to reciprocity, regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public limit others to speaking the truth regardless of cost, and advocacy of reciprocity, regardless of cost. Reciprocity and Truth regardless of cost are what the enemy cannot bear, and what the enemy undermines – because they are the foundation of western civilization. Why? Because truth and reciprocity are meritocratic and eugenic methods of competing in markets for sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. And because truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, and eugenics in sexual, social, economic, political, and military markets produce the fastest cooperation, innovation and adaptation that is possible for conscious beings. Superiority is Demonstrable.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Law of Public Speech
THE LAW OF PUBLIC SPEECH [I]n public, to the public, in matters public, speak the truth regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public, limit your advocacy and demand to reciprocity, regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public limit others to speaking the truth regardless of cost, and advocacy of reciprocity, regardless of cost. Reciprocity and Truth regardless of cost are what the enemy cannot bear, and what the enemy undermines – because they are the foundation of western civilization. Why? Because truth and reciprocity are meritocratic and eugenic methods of competing in markets for sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. And because truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, and eugenics in sexual, social, economic, political, and military markets produce the fastest cooperation, innovation and adaptation that is possible for conscious beings. Superiority is Demonstrable.
-
Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do.
YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.
—“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b
Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement. (a) Eugenics would work. (b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition. We don’t do it. SO STOP LYING. We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs. So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry. What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom? Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means. People like you are a cancer for mankind.
-
Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do.
YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.
—“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b
Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement. (a) Eugenics would work. (b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition. We don’t do it. SO STOP LYING. We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs. So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry. What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom? Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means. People like you are a cancer for mankind.
-
Are Women the Source Of, or Market For, Academic Pseudoscience and Sophism?
[W]ho produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism? Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.
-
Are Women the Source Of, or Market For, Academic Pseudoscience and Sophism?
[W]ho produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism? Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.
-
Yes Ethics (Interpersonal) Morality (Extrapersonal) Is a Scientific Law
(core) [S]cience absolutely positively can tell you about ethics and morality. And it has. Morality, including the moral instincts, consist in reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity consists of limiting our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer( trade, consumption, harm, destruction, loss) of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon demonstrated interests of others by externality. That’s morality. It’s got to be or evolution (physics) wouldn’t tolerate our existence as a species. There is no difference between physics (involuntary change), economics (productive cooperation), and morality (social cooperation), except we have memory so can invest in and borrow from one another across time (. All that varies is the level of immorality tolerated given the stage of development in the current military, political, and economic circumstances. So yes, science has told us what manners, ethics, morals, consist of. They cannot tell you what those range of actions will be in three years any more than economics can tell you that, because what constitutes reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, varies with the structure of production of polities, commons, goods, services, and information. So we absolutely positively know what the physical and natural laws consist of – because they’re the same – we can judge borrow from one another or invest in one another and punish one another for violating those investments and borrowings (thefts, parasitism, free riding), and we do so by moral intuition we call “altruistic punishment’ – the payment of high personal costs of punishment of others to preserve the high value of trust in cooperation (borrowing, investing) in one another, because of the impossible-to-replace returns on cooperation – wherever cooperation is reciprocal: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary, transfers, and free of negative externality. And good luck refuting that scientific claim – because you will not be able to without violating it. It’s a physical law of conscious, cooperative, species beyond which no conscious cooperative species can survive. Evil < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good Quod erat demonstrandum Thus endeth the lesson. fin.
-
Yes Ethics (Interpersonal) Morality (Extrapersonal) Is a Scientific Law
(core) [S]cience absolutely positively can tell you about ethics and morality. And it has. Morality, including the moral instincts, consist in reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity consists of limiting our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer( trade, consumption, harm, destruction, loss) of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon demonstrated interests of others by externality. That’s morality. It’s got to be or evolution (physics) wouldn’t tolerate our existence as a species. There is no difference between physics (involuntary change), economics (productive cooperation), and morality (social cooperation), except we have memory so can invest in and borrow from one another across time (. All that varies is the level of immorality tolerated given the stage of development in the current military, political, and economic circumstances. So yes, science has told us what manners, ethics, morals, consist of. They cannot tell you what those range of actions will be in three years any more than economics can tell you that, because what constitutes reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, varies with the structure of production of polities, commons, goods, services, and information. So we absolutely positively know what the physical and natural laws consist of – because they’re the same – we can judge borrow from one another or invest in one another and punish one another for violating those investments and borrowings (thefts, parasitism, free riding), and we do so by moral intuition we call “altruistic punishment’ – the payment of high personal costs of punishment of others to preserve the high value of trust in cooperation (borrowing, investing) in one another, because of the impossible-to-replace returns on cooperation – wherever cooperation is reciprocal: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary, transfers, and free of negative externality. And good luck refuting that scientific claim – because you will not be able to without violating it. It’s a physical law of conscious, cooperative, species beyond which no conscious cooperative species can survive. Evil < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good Quod erat demonstrandum Thus endeth the lesson. fin.
-
Our Offer of Forbearance
OUR OFFER OF FORBEARANCE By Luke Weinhagen (via Brandon Hayes) The lies end. Peace as it is understood today carries with it a payload of tolerance, an acceptance of the current state of things. This is not what we demand. The lies end. We extend to you some measure of forbearance as an opportunity to end your lies yourselves. Refuse this and we will end the lies. We appeal to you to choose well.
-
Our Offer of Forbearance
OUR OFFER OF FORBEARANCE By Luke Weinhagen (via Brandon Hayes) The lies end. Peace as it is understood today carries with it a payload of tolerance, an acceptance of the current state of things. This is not what we demand. The lies end. We extend to you some measure of forbearance as an opportunity to end your lies yourselves. Refuse this and we will end the lies. We appeal to you to choose well.