[I]n simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Why Women Defect
[I]n simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.
-
Try to Understand My Strategy….
[I] really don’t want to be more popular. I want P to be popular. I want US to be popular as a movement. John is doing a great job. the first generation of guys is now frighteningly competent. We have new a new guys that are doing a good job. The more it’s about ‘me’ the less it’s about ‘us’ and I want P to be about US not me. They can Alinsky-me. They can’t alinsky all of us.
-
Try to Understand My Strategy….
[I] really don’t want to be more popular. I want P to be popular. I want US to be popular as a movement. John is doing a great job. the first generation of guys is now frighteningly competent. We have new a new guys that are doing a good job. The more it’s about ‘me’ the less it’s about ‘us’ and I want P to be about US not me. They can Alinsky-me. They can’t alinsky all of us.
-
All of These Statements Are True
—“Physics is too hard for physicists.”—Mathematician —“Economics is too hard for economists”—Physicist —“Social science is too hard for social scientists”—Economist —“Psychology is too hard for psychologists”–Behavioral economist
“Philosophy is too hard for philosophers” – Sociologist — via Kevin Wu “Philosophy is too hard for philosophers” – literally every specialized knowledge field– via Matt Vujovic
-
All of These Statements Are True
—“Physics is too hard for physicists.”—Mathematician —“Economics is too hard for economists”—Physicist —“Social science is too hard for social scientists”—Economist —“Psychology is too hard for psychologists”–Behavioral economist
“Philosophy is too hard for philosophers” – Sociologist — via Kevin Wu “Philosophy is too hard for philosophers” – literally every specialized knowledge field– via Matt Vujovic
-
Ownership of the Name Aryan… sigh
In the scholarly literature aryanism refers to the culture of the indo european expansion from russia-ukraine, using militaristic, expansionist, hierarchical, paternal, sky worshipping, horse riding peoples consisting of the european and iranic branches, resulting in the european, armenian, iranic, indo-iranic peoples. europeans and indians want to appropriate this name exclusively, but as far as I know all of use evolved from the two or three different subraces that adopted this culture.
-
Ownership of the Name Aryan… sigh
In the scholarly literature aryanism refers to the culture of the indo european expansion from russia-ukraine, using militaristic, expansionist, hierarchical, paternal, sky worshipping, horse riding peoples consisting of the european and iranic branches, resulting in the european, armenian, iranic, indo-iranic peoples. europeans and indians want to appropriate this name exclusively, but as far as I know all of use evolved from the two or three different subraces that adopted this culture.
-
Organizing a Movement
—“We need Organization. There are people everywhere that will feel refreshed after learning this all and jump right on.”—Jeff Carlson
We will create a political party as the means of organizing The other ‘organizations’ will follow. If we have organic growth we create three wings: educational, political, and militial. If we have time we take the IRA strategy of two wings: political and militial. If we run out of time, we resort to Mao’s strategy of a single wing Political-Militial. In all cases we need a political organization since the world is currently organized to facilitate them and the publicity is free. But it’s time dependent.
-
Organizing a Movement
—“We need Organization. There are people everywhere that will feel refreshed after learning this all and jump right on.”—Jeff Carlson
We will create a political party as the means of organizing The other ‘organizations’ will follow. If we have organic growth we create three wings: educational, political, and militial. If we have time we take the IRA strategy of two wings: political and militial. If we run out of time, we resort to Mao’s strategy of a single wing Political-Militial. In all cases we need a political organization since the world is currently organized to facilitate them and the publicity is free. But it’s time dependent.