Source: Original Site Post

  • How Gods Exist and Function

    by Curt Doolittle and Stephen Wells -by Stephen Wells: The mistake in reasoning of those who “give it up to God” is generally one of falsely assuming that any higher power operates like a magic wand. Author Napoleon Hill who spent years studying successful people noted that the spiritual difference of successful over non successful people was that successful people assigned their faith to God to provide solutions for for them to take action on themselves, rather than for God to simply make their problems go away. In short, God was to be found within their own subconscious and expressed by acting on their intuition, which itself was disciplined and directed by conscious thought and continuous action towards a clearly defined goal. -by Curt Doolittle [Y]es, this is the correct(scientific) definition of god. Gods exists as information.That information is trained into your intuitionThat training organizes and filters your intuition.Primarily it prevents self deception or, (and this is true) deception by your genes, old, and middle brains. And for very obvious reasons, anthropomorphizing that information is more effective at extracting truthfulness from your intuition than you are able to do without it – because intuition will let your genes influence you chaotically while anthropomorphized intuition falsifies your intuition (your auto association) to predict how that character would interpret your thoughts. In other words, we can use our social instincts to override our chaotic intuition by creating a framework for truthful prediction. This is pretty obvious once you think it thru. Our bodies and faculties are our only system of measurement. But since we are human and evolved consciousness with enough recursion to predict others’ actions, feelings, thoughts, and wants, we can use other people (archetypes) as systems of measurement as well. Is there a difference between what would god want me to do, what would Jesus want me to do, what would Gandalf or Aristotle, me to do, and what would my grandmother want me to do? No there isn’t other than a god is a proxy for your social order. Systems of measurement to provide a neural economy superior predictive power.

  • How Gods Exist and Function

    by Curt Doolittle and Stephen Wells -by Stephen Wells: The mistake in reasoning of those who “give it up to God” is generally one of falsely assuming that any higher power operates like a magic wand. Author Napoleon Hill who spent years studying successful people noted that the spiritual difference of successful over non successful people was that successful people assigned their faith to God to provide solutions for for them to take action on themselves, rather than for God to simply make their problems go away. In short, God was to be found within their own subconscious and expressed by acting on their intuition, which itself was disciplined and directed by conscious thought and continuous action towards a clearly defined goal. -by Curt Doolittle [Y]es, this is the correct(scientific) definition of god. Gods exists as information.That information is trained into your intuitionThat training organizes and filters your intuition.Primarily it prevents self deception or, (and this is true) deception by your genes, old, and middle brains. And for very obvious reasons, anthropomorphizing that information is more effective at extracting truthfulness from your intuition than you are able to do without it – because intuition will let your genes influence you chaotically while anthropomorphized intuition falsifies your intuition (your auto association) to predict how that character would interpret your thoughts. In other words, we can use our social instincts to override our chaotic intuition by creating a framework for truthful prediction. This is pretty obvious once you think it thru. Our bodies and faculties are our only system of measurement. But since we are human and evolved consciousness with enough recursion to predict others’ actions, feelings, thoughts, and wants, we can use other people (archetypes) as systems of measurement as well. Is there a difference between what would god want me to do, what would Jesus want me to do, what would Gandalf or Aristotle, me to do, and what would my grandmother want me to do? No there isn’t other than a god is a proxy for your social order. Systems of measurement to provide a neural economy superior predictive power.

  • Thinking Things Thru Is Scary

      —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan —“Faith without works is free riding. It’s a crime. ;)”—Curt Doolittle —“Faith without works is: 1 – Baiting into hazard for oneself in both religious and logical terms, 2 – Making an unfalsifiable promise to the commons (i.e believe in Jesus and be saved in afterlife), 3 – Parasitism on others within the higher-trust group of other faithful All of which are violations of reciprocity. Even though faith attempts to define reciprocity as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” it lacks the grammar to break it down to what it really means and how to apply it. P. solves that problem.”—James Dmitro Makienko

  • Thinking Things Thru Is Scary

      —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan —“Faith without works is free riding. It’s a crime. ;)”—Curt Doolittle —“Faith without works is: 1 – Baiting into hazard for oneself in both religious and logical terms, 2 – Making an unfalsifiable promise to the commons (i.e believe in Jesus and be saved in afterlife), 3 – Parasitism on others within the higher-trust group of other faithful All of which are violations of reciprocity. Even though faith attempts to define reciprocity as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” it lacks the grammar to break it down to what it really means and how to apply it. P. solves that problem.”—James Dmitro Makienko

  • Doolittle vs Dennett on Consciousness

    —“You know, P language reminds me of a direction I think Danial Dennett was going with how to study consciousness (Phenomenology), but P is more complete. It was in his book “consciousness explained”.”— Adam Jacob Robert Walker

    [Y]es, well we are all subject to the same information and converging on the same solution. And I’m just the one who put it all together first. Probably because I started with ai, programming and economics instead of philosophy and psychology. So as the neurological revolution unfolded over the past twenty years I had less of a paradigm shift than the other thinkers. And I don’t have pressure to publish. So I just kept working without anchoring myself.

    —“If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.”—Andrew M Gilmour

    Well done. very few people have that insight. Nice.

  • Doolittle vs Dennett on Consciousness

    —“You know, P language reminds me of a direction I think Danial Dennett was going with how to study consciousness (Phenomenology), but P is more complete. It was in his book “consciousness explained”.”— Adam Jacob Robert Walker

    [Y]es, well we are all subject to the same information and converging on the same solution. And I’m just the one who put it all together first. Probably because I started with ai, programming and economics instead of philosophy and psychology. So as the neurological revolution unfolded over the past twenty years I had less of a paradigm shift than the other thinkers. And I don’t have pressure to publish. So I just kept working without anchoring myself.

    —“If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.”—Andrew M Gilmour

    Well done. very few people have that insight. Nice.

  • Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, Slavery

    [Y]ou are sovereign in fact or you are not. You have liberty or freedom by permission. If you must ask permission you are a slave.

    —“You’re going to have to define liberty and freedom very specifically on this one.”—Rik Storey

    HistoricallyFreedom > completed service as a slave (mesopotamia), no longer a slave (europe), or never having been a slave(europe), exempt from arbitrary control, granted special privileges. (meaning: it is possible for one to NOT be free). Liberty > permission to retain local law and custom, from liber, in european religions who looked after and freed slaves. Those are the original meanings Liberty by permission (group), Freedom by permission (self).

  • Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, Slavery

    [Y]ou are sovereign in fact or you are not. You have liberty or freedom by permission. If you must ask permission you are a slave.

    —“You’re going to have to define liberty and freedom very specifically on this one.”—Rik Storey

    HistoricallyFreedom > completed service as a slave (mesopotamia), no longer a slave (europe), or never having been a slave(europe), exempt from arbitrary control, granted special privileges. (meaning: it is possible for one to NOT be free). Liberty > permission to retain local law and custom, from liber, in european religions who looked after and freed slaves. Those are the original meanings Liberty by permission (group), Freedom by permission (self).

  • The Qualia of Geometry Is Uniform

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour (core) If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.


    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.

  • The Qualia of Geometry Is Uniform

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour (core) If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.


    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.