Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @PoisonDartPepe Our ancestors dragged a world of ignorant, superstitious, people

    @PoisonDartPepe Our ancestors dragged a world of ignorant, superstitious, people out of a lifetime of violence, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, death in childbirth, chid mortality, early death, victimization by nature, and the tyranny of priests and warlords, under the presumption that they were untrainable, violent, brutal animals, unfit for civilization and cooperation, at high cost and tiny profit, and they hate us for it. Fine. Hate them back.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:18:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107227245158096682

  • RUSSIAN OPINION (a) the west is seen as decadent and in decline in much of the w

    RUSSIAN OPINION

    (a) the west is seen as decadent and in decline in much of the world. And a visit to america, or just viewing american streets on google maps will confirm that without much difficulty.

    (b) russians are frustrated because their economy was growing until 2014, but the consequences of handling the ukrainian revolution poorly have affected them disproportionately. Worse, all capital is being directed to moscow and st petersburg at the expense of the distant regions. (Again, this is a ‘gamble’ the russian government is taking, given that they expect a rapid collapse of the west – especially europe – witihn the near time horizon as demographic collapse hurts europe more so than the rest of the world.

    (c) the entire world is economically equilibrating ending 600 years of european advantage in genetic destribution, institutions, culture, science, and technology, so the entire world will gravitate toward greater state responsibility for the economic condition – which is what we mean by socialism – since socialism always fails, it simply means are more mixed economy favoring state protection of labor markets and prices.

    (d) We know what the future looks like and china has taught a very serious and uncomfortable lesson: the chinese are fascists not communists. They are imitating the national socialists not the communists, in every aspect of their society. IN doing so they are demonstrating that the fascists won the argument over the future economic model. Why? Because nationalism, ethonocentrism, heavy trade regulation, state as majority venture capitalism, and private sector as majority producer, is the optimum political model. The only difference is the degree of propaganda necessary to maintain the loyalty of the people to one another (nationalism, ethnocentrism), in proportion to the amount of stress that the people must endure while policy slowly take effect.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:23:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107225142902208525

  • Boost of @Stanleymitchell90 In America you have the White party, and the anti-Wh

    Boost of @Stanleymitchell90 In America you have the White party, and the anti-White party.

    The main difference is the White party is in denial about who they represent, and the anti-White party isn’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:51:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107225227049307022

  • @Ulrik_Pedersen If y’all made a list of policies and laws so that we could all d

    @Ulrik_Pedersen If y’all made a list of policies and laws so that we could all debate policies and laws, you’d have a case. The problem is you use NSDAP and NAZIs and National Socialism as buckets without making a bullet list of changes and refining it until it’s an actionable set of steps possible for institutions to implement. You odn’t need to make historical excuses for policies. Some of the NSDAP policies were shit and some of them were good. In particular the defense of the peole from the globalists was an important innovation, without going into communism, which destroyed the productivity of the private sector and private sector use of capital.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:50:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107225010565696368

  • FIXING FINANCIALISM NOT CAPITALISM How to fix the problem of financialism. We mu

    FIXING FINANCIALISM NOT CAPITALISM

    How to fix the problem of financialism.

    We must choose to fix the correct problem: You don’t conflate Capitalism(Rule of law – regulation) with Financialism(Absence of Rule of Law – regulation). Fixing financialism is easy. fixing capitalism is not possible. It’s impossible. Financialism is to capitalism as socialism is to capitalism: they are equally destructive.

    The problem is one of measuring balance sheets vs income statements of the state. (a) measure everything, (b) definancialize (c) organize an economy by competency not by wishful thinking.

    There exist a simple set of fundamental laws of competency, incentive, and measurement. Fundamentally these five rules are the levers of political economy:

    1) You choose either arbitrary rule by man and depend on credentialed or political competency, or rule of law, sovereignty, property, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets, and depended on demonstrated competency.

    2) You choose whether to use the state as the principle venture capitalist and socialize maximum gains at the cost of low returns on capital and high corruption, or you use the market as the principle venture capitalist and maximize the privatization of gains limiting corruption, or you choose something in the middle.

    3) You choose whether the state maximizes taxation from private performance, or maximizes returns from state investment – dividing the responsibility for capital formation between the state (long term) and the private sector (short term).

    4) You choose to fully account for all capital by fully accounting for costs, or you choose to account only for income (velocity) without accounting for capital, or you choose only to account for condition without accounting for income or capital.

    The optimum political economy is an intermixed (not mixed) economy of distribution of labor between state and private sector, separation of the monetary flow system into citizen consumption, zero interest from the treasury, liquidity distributed directly to consumers, and business credit outside the state. And to ‘gut’ the financial sector by moving it into the state, so that returns on state liquidity are used for redistribution by the state, while at the same time as maximizing national competition in international markets.

    Now, everyone will hate the truth, but the national socialists solved the problem as is china today.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:01:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107224819244003861

  • @SouthronAnarchist @RadioFreeNorthwest Distinction: natural right (necessary, ne

    @SouthronAnarchist @RadioFreeNorthwest Distinction: natural right (necessary, negative: what we must not do.), contractual right ( unnecessary, positive: what we agree to do if at all possible.) We use the word ‘right’ willy nilly, without distinquishing between a right we must have an a right we prefer to have. The only limit on contractual rights is the ability to pay for them.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 03:25:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107222317032877627

  • @shwazom kind of fond of hanging aggressively myself. Though, our midemeanor vs

    @shwazom kind of fond of hanging aggressively myself. Though, our midemeanor vs felony difference is a pretty bad means of demarcation. Instead, some crimes are predatory and some crimes are of rational passion, and some are of accident or stupidity, and we should demarcate those more clearly.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 03:06:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107222244622528745

  • @Sheaffer You may not know much about mental illness, but the inability to relia

    @Sheaffer You may not know much about mental illness, but the inability to reliably self care, danger to self or others, criminality, self medication and homelessness, are due to a narrow range of mental illnesses that aren’t a matter of opinion but demonstrated incompetence.

    I mean if we got serious about it, we’d have to incarcerate more than a third of women. But most of them are still capable of self care and aren’t a harm to others. 😉

    sorry. had to stick that in there…..

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 03:05:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107222238429881756

  • @JerryBruceD Dunno. Lack of clarity that relies on interpretation, can produce i

    @JerryBruceD Dunno. Lack of clarity that relies on interpretation, can produce interpretation that is unintended due to that lack of clarity. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 03:03:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107222229446579286

  • “What motivates you? I am trying to understand and it seems like you are fuelled

    – “What motivates you? I am trying to understand and it seems like you are fuelled by hate. ” — an idiot.

    It’s possible that if you are insufficiently evolved genetically, and insufficiently educated intellectually, that you may interpret a disgust response as fear, dislike, disdain, or hatred.

    It’s just disgust. Hypersensitivity to defect, parasitism, and disease.

    We find you disgusting.

    It’s not complicated.

    You’re disgusting.

    BTW: I’m “fueled by” (motivated by) sovereignty, reciprocity, proportionality, truth, duty, evolutionary adaptability, defeating the red queen. in other words, removing disgusting things from the universe. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 02:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107222214675714752