Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • CONTENT MODERATION We’re looking for an AI solution to the problem because of th

    CONTENT MODERATION

    We’re looking for an AI solution to the problem because of the sheer volume. And if we do that, let’s see what we can learn:

    The founder of moderation, Jim Rutt, gave us three categories we can tag as:

    1. manners(decorum), such as cursing, slurs, ad hom, and;
      … … We prohibit violations of manners.
    2. content(taboos), porn, violence, lawbreaking etc, and;
      … … We prohibit violations of taboos (content)
    3. bias(want, position, viewpoint) – spectrum of masculine merit to feminine non.
      … … We tag the biases, and explain their origin by doing so.

    And to this we can add (and Tag):

    1. testifiability (truth/falsehood) – can you claim this is true?
    2. reciprocity (morality/immorality) – can you claim this is moral/ethical?

    And to this we can add (and Tag):

    1. Methods of argument used (truth, deceit) – there are only so many.
    2. Sex Differences in deceit – and each is expressible as male or female bias because all biases as are all differences in humans, are the result of sex differences in perception, cognition, and valuation.

    And by tagging each ‘post’ we teach everyone on earth how to tell the truth thruth, and what is moral.

    So yes we can automate content moderation. And yes, we can automate some incentives to improve by doing so. But more importantly we can explain, by construction from first principles, not only our own arguments – but the opposition’s as well.

    And only then is ‘liberty’ – a state of reciprocity – possible. Because only then is a standard of weights and measures both existential, empirically demonstrated in vast numbers, but nearly universally understood. And as such we can trade between our moral biases. Largely: resources produced by those with more self regulation in ecchange for behavior (self regulation) by those with less self regulation.

    “A Surreptitious Universal Education In Morality”

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2022-11-21 17:04:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109382879805650484

  • @stefanmolyneux See what you’re trying to do, but we’re looking for an AI soluti

    @stefanmolyneux
    See what you’re trying to do, but we’re looking for an AI solution to the problem because of the sheer volume. And if we do that, let’s see what we can learn:

    The founder of moderation, Jim Rutt, gave us three categories we can tag as:

    1. manners(decorum), such as cursing, slurs, ad hom, and;
      … … We prohibit violations of manners.
    2. content(taboos), porn, violence, lawbreaking etc, and;
      … … We prohibit violations of taboos (content)
    3. bias(want, position, viewpoint) – spectrum of masculine merit to feminine non.
      … … We tag the biases, and explain their origin by doing so.

    And to this we can add (and Tag):

    1. testifiability (truth/falsehood) – can you claim this is true?
    2. reciprocity (morality/immorality) – can you claim this is moral/ethical?

    And to this we can add (and Tag):

    1. Methods of argument used (truth, deceit) – there are only so many.
    2. Sex Differences in deceit – and each is expressible as male or female bias because all biases as are all differences in humans, are the result of sex differences in perception, cognition, and valuation.

    And by tagging each ‘post’ we teach everyone on earth how to tell the truth thruth, and what is moral.

    So yes we can automate content moderation. And yes, we can automate some incentives to improve by doing so. But more importantly we can explain, by construction from first principles, not only our own arguments – but the opposition’s as well.

    And only then is ‘liberty’ – a state of reciprocity – possible. Because only then is a standard of weights and measures both existential, empirically demonstrated in vast numbers, but nearly universally understood. And as such we can trade between our moral biases. Largely: resources produced by those with more self regulation in ecchange for behavior (self regulation) by those with less self regulation.

    “A Surreptitious Universal Education In Morality”

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2022-11-21 17:04:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109382877364387705

  • Yes, it’s all “Marxism” where “Marxism” as we use it, refers to the reformation

    Yes, it’s all “Marxism” where “Marxism” as we use it, refers to the reformation of abrahamic supernatural religions of false promise in excahgne for social construction of an oppression narrative, into marxist pseudoscientific religions of false promise in exchange for social construction of an oppression narrative.

    –“So-called “Cultural Marxism” is not Marxist. To Marx our material conditions produce our ideologies, not the other way around. All of Marxism is built on that historical materialist, rather than idealist, assumption. It’s what makes Marxism Marxism, its defining characteristic.”– Bill Hickey

    First, Formal and informal institutions are in fact material conditions. This is the purpose of Hayek’s insights: So that we do not engage in self-deception as by Marx’s cherrypicking. Instead, in formation, institutions, habits, norms, and traditions are assets.

    Second, AFAIK, and this will take a bit of understanding: the female method of undermining, storytelling, and social construction (Sedition) > The Abrahamic religions (Supernaturalism) > The Marxist spectrum of religions (Pseudoscience) all use the same logical and persuasive METHOD.

    So, Feminine > Abrahamic > Maxist undermining, sedition, and treason, combine masculine European systematizing (logic) with feminine Semitic undermining (resistance) and mythicism. That’s the ‘invention’ of the Jewish religion, the Abrahamic religions, and the Marxist religions.

    In other words, the reason female rallying, Abrahamism and Marxism succeed is by blaming (others) men (white european males, indo european civilization, paternalism) who discover and adapt to nature for the laws of nature, claiming thier oppression, rather than domestication.

    The interesting question posed by the success of Feminine(Universal)> Abrahamic(Ancient)> Marxist(Modern) sequence of seditious cults, is “Why are we so vulnerable to the feminine method of suggestion despite its untestifiability, unwarrantability, non-correspondence w/ reality?

    So the feminine > abrahamic > marxist cults of sedition, which evolved in the females as a means of organizing betas against alphas, to gain control over reproduction, promises the impossible violation of natural laws if rallying against men can be performed against nature.

    Now, I’ve decomposed their method down to a formal logic of its first causes and fully articulated the feminine> Abrahamic> Marxist means of warfare by sedition and treason using social construction of false promises. And it’s possible to outlaw like any other FRAUD or SEDITION.

    The answer is rather obvious: because it suggests that by consent to a social construction that denies the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe, that we can escape those laws (truth, scarcity, rational self interest, natural selection).

    Source date (UTC): 2022-11-21 16:29:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109382741489639310

  • “shows how Jews have played key roles throughout history in building liberal, ab

    -“shows how Jews have played key roles throughout history in building liberal, absolutist, monarchist and socialist regimes, offering their services in exchange for protection and opportunity–a “fatal embrace” that provokes organized anti-Semitism.”-
    amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/022629

    Source date (UTC): 2022-11-03 18:18:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109281246216284868

  • @19Covids @Haumibu1488 Ouch. So true it hurts. This is what happens when men sto

    @19Covids@Haumibu1488
    Ouch. So true it hurts.
    This is what happens when men stop taking responsibility for the commons and the polity by demanding limits by threat of, promise of, and use of, force.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-10-29 14:35:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109252057919600424

  • @erikcreature @Afterrthought @kingofallnads @JFGariepy @occdissent @ramzpaul @An

    @erikcreature@Afterrthought@kingofallnads@JFGariepy@occdissent@ramzpaul@AndrewAnglin

    You and those like you are the reason it’s worthless to engage on Gab.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-10-26 18:56:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109236099930352954

  • @erikcreature @Afterrthought @kingofallnads @JFGariepy @occdissent @ramzpaul @An

    @erikcreature@Afterrthought@kingofallnads@JFGariepy@occdissent@ramzpaul@AndrewAnglin
    Dislike if you want. It’s the answer. That’s the problem with reading continental philosophy. It’s only half as bad as theology. Everything can be interpreted differently. So you must understand the context to interpret the words. Nietzche is concerned with spirit (intuition). Why? German philosophy is phenomenalist and rational not scientific and legal like anglo analytic. Nietzsche couldn’t escape his german frame, because he didn’t recognize his german frame was theological behind its kantian rationalization of it.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-10-26 18:48:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109236067388029294

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109234790485821685

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @erikcreature @Afterrthought @kingofallnads @JFGariepy @occdissent @ramzpaul @AndrewAnglin Poetic form. Meaning your will.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109234790485821685

  • @erikcreature @Afterrthought @kingofallnads @JFGariepy @occdissent @ramzpaul @An

    @erikcreature@Afterrthought@kingofallnads@JFGariepy@occdissent@ramzpaul@AndrewAnglin

    Poetic form.
    Meaning your will.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-10-26 13:23:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109234790485821685

  • @kingofallnads @JFGariepy @occdissent @ramzpaul @AndrewAnglin @Afterrthought ISS

    @kingofallnads@JFGariepy@occdissent@ramzpaul@AndrewAnglin@Afterrthought

    ISSUE: Primitive environmental traumas whether from the climate, environment, flora and fauna, or ‘enemy peoples’, are offset by the extraordinary psychological defense provided by small, homogenous, bands and tribes. WHereas agrarian, industrial, and now technological societies reduce environmental traumas, but because of atomization, individualization, and alienation, maximizing de-socialization, trauma from familial and social relations with people have been radically amplfied. To no small degree, by the J-war on our institutions of cultural production, we have traded ignorance and mindfulness for knowledge and mental illness.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-10-25 16:37:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109229891456924196

  • THE BEHAVIORAL ECONOMCS OF RACE PREFERENCES EXPLAINED (for the long attention sp

    THE BEHAVIORAL ECONOMCS OF RACE PREFERENCES EXPLAINED

    (for the long attention span community)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkAUIdPcj7o

    Source date (UTC): 2022-10-23 19:11:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/109219172061297203