Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Example: Requirements for Violating P-Law of Speech

    —“Well, I’ve got a friend who’s really into manufacturing custom soaps. Let’s say she understates her soap expenses in a public space, because she’s embarrassed.”—

    [T]hat’s In public, but not to the public, ad not about matters public. In other words no attempt to use the coercive powers of government nor to undermine the law limiting them, nor to pollute the informational commons, upon which the people depend. 1) not regular speech, but political speech: in public to the public in matters public. 2) I would expect lawyers to handle those in our existing court system, although I have recommended specialization of the court system, similar to the european court system where family, criminal, private, and public suits are separated. 3) Lawyers and judges and court officials are just as prosecutable under P-law as anyone else. So I expect that to shake up the industry. Marxists, postmodernists, feminists, etc, go to jail. Silly people are just silly.

  • Fed Accusers Are Protecting Their Malinvestments and Resisting New Investments

    by John Mark, Apr 6, 2020, 11:37 AM My standard response to the fed-post accusation is to: a) mock anyone who says using 2A for its primary intended purpose is “bad” (were the founding fathers “feds”? lmao), and; b) demand they produce and articulate a solution: “What is your plan for when the Right can’t win any more elections?” Often these groups/individuals that countersignal are either consciously or subconsciously trying to hold on to their “market share” of right-wing audience – they have invested significantly in what they are doing, and many people even on the dissident right are still hoping in vain that there is some other way to win without force. P kinda makes everybody else look bad and threatens to make them irrelevant because we are a) describing the situation with brutal honesty (force or at least show of force will be necessary) while they are not, and b) P is so stunningly well thought out, with such thorough coverage and breakthrough insight both in explanatory power and recommended solutions, that it is impossible for anyone else on the Right to compete with. (Simply put, no other group has Curt on their team.) P also requires a decent amount of time investment to understand well enough to say “yeah, I get how this could work”. And time is something leaders have very little of – I have very limited time to invest in learning details about what other leaders/movements/packs are doing. We are also slaying the sacred cows of libertarianism/ancap etc., and correcting a bunch of failed strategies all around. (For example, we say persuasion & voting can’t be the Right’s primary strategy – but most groups on the Right are built around that primary strategy.) All this results in the leaders of other “packs” sometimes having an initial negative reaction toward us. One way to mitigate this without compromising on the truth, may be to invite people like this on my show and genuinely try to promote them (cuz many of them are doing great work in many ways), and then also ask them what they think of our basic solution proposals (policies etc, not in-depth P stuff), and have that discussion. Propertarians are the adults in the room on the Right. And we’re figuring out how to deal with/work with the other “packs”.

  • Fed Accusers Are Protecting Their Malinvestments and Resisting New Investments

    by John Mark, Apr 6, 2020, 11:37 AM My standard response to the fed-post accusation is to: a) mock anyone who says using 2A for its primary intended purpose is “bad” (were the founding fathers “feds”? lmao), and; b) demand they produce and articulate a solution: “What is your plan for when the Right can’t win any more elections?” Often these groups/individuals that countersignal are either consciously or subconsciously trying to hold on to their “market share” of right-wing audience – they have invested significantly in what they are doing, and many people even on the dissident right are still hoping in vain that there is some other way to win without force. P kinda makes everybody else look bad and threatens to make them irrelevant because we are a) describing the situation with brutal honesty (force or at least show of force will be necessary) while they are not, and b) P is so stunningly well thought out, with such thorough coverage and breakthrough insight both in explanatory power and recommended solutions, that it is impossible for anyone else on the Right to compete with. (Simply put, no other group has Curt on their team.) P also requires a decent amount of time investment to understand well enough to say “yeah, I get how this could work”. And time is something leaders have very little of – I have very limited time to invest in learning details about what other leaders/movements/packs are doing. We are also slaying the sacred cows of libertarianism/ancap etc., and correcting a bunch of failed strategies all around. (For example, we say persuasion & voting can’t be the Right’s primary strategy – but most groups on the Right are built around that primary strategy.) All this results in the leaders of other “packs” sometimes having an initial negative reaction toward us. One way to mitigate this without compromising on the truth, may be to invite people like this on my show and genuinely try to promote them (cuz many of them are doing great work in many ways), and then also ask them what they think of our basic solution proposals (policies etc, not in-depth P stuff), and have that discussion. Propertarians are the adults in the room on the Right. And we’re figuring out how to deal with/work with the other “packs”.

  • Dualism Is Part of The Job – so Is Trifunctionalism

    Apr 6, 2020, 11:48 AM [I] am a career entrepreneurial ceo. My family has been martial throughout history. I studied war more than any subject in my childhood. I have martial and entreprenrurial sensibilities. I have come to understand men must have martial-political, and entrepreneurial-craftsmen sensibilities, and possibly religious sensitivities to be whole. To maintain a trifunctional society we must have trifunctional sensibilities: martial, legal, religious I have no problem and find no contradiction in a personal relationship and care for you and your happiness, and a paternal relationship between you and the truth. I have never held to the premise that officers should not fraternize with the enlisted and executives with staff. Instead they should never cross certain lines any more than a parent should cross certain lines. We are parents and officers first, friends and comrades second, and only on those things outside of our parent-child, officer-enlisted aristocracy-producer relationships are permissible on social terms, or we are failing at all of them. Women have a hard problem with this. Men of ability and character don’t. Men lacking maleness in their training do.

  • Dualism Is Part of The Job – so Is Trifunctionalism

    Apr 6, 2020, 11:48 AM [I] am a career entrepreneurial ceo. My family has been martial throughout history. I studied war more than any subject in my childhood. I have martial and entreprenrurial sensibilities. I have come to understand men must have martial-political, and entrepreneurial-craftsmen sensibilities, and possibly religious sensitivities to be whole. To maintain a trifunctional society we must have trifunctional sensibilities: martial, legal, religious I have no problem and find no contradiction in a personal relationship and care for you and your happiness, and a paternal relationship between you and the truth. I have never held to the premise that officers should not fraternize with the enlisted and executives with staff. Instead they should never cross certain lines any more than a parent should cross certain lines. We are parents and officers first, friends and comrades second, and only on those things outside of our parent-child, officer-enlisted aristocracy-producer relationships are permissible on social terms, or we are failing at all of them. Women have a hard problem with this. Men of ability and character don’t. Men lacking maleness in their training do.

  • Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not.

    White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation.”

  • Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not.

    White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation.”

  • Packs and The Herd

    By Coach Noah Revoy, Apr 6, 2020, 5:23 PM [H]umans are either PACK orientated or HERD orientated. The HERD has a low consciousness hive mind, they are easily controlled, manipulated and spooked. The PACK is made up of highly conscious and capable individuals who choose to join the hierarchy for mutual benefit. HERDs form by “accident” when a sufficient number of herbivores gather in the same spot. Entry to the HERD is unearned. HERDs expand and multiply during good times. When trouble comes they turn on each other, abandoned the young, old, sick and weak. Thus the HERD gets thinned. PACKs form to hunt prey and to fight outsiders. To take advantage of opportunity or to deal with a threat. Entry to the PACK is earned. PACKs degenerate in the good times. They get fat and lazy. Hard times bring out the sharpness in the wolf. Struggle binds the pack together. If you are part of a PACK, then you are PACK orientated. If you are not in a PACK you are in a HERD. If you are alone, you are still in a HERD, you are just a little lost from the group, probably they left you behind. The HERD sacrifices those it leaves behind. As life gets harder we will see more men forming PACKs. Struggle brings out the wolf in men. The best men are already in PACKs, ready for the break down to signal the start of the hunt. The next best men are already looking to form or join a PACK. Will you be left behind?

  • Packs and The Herd

    By Coach Noah Revoy, Apr 6, 2020, 5:23 PM [H]umans are either PACK orientated or HERD orientated. The HERD has a low consciousness hive mind, they are easily controlled, manipulated and spooked. The PACK is made up of highly conscious and capable individuals who choose to join the hierarchy for mutual benefit. HERDs form by “accident” when a sufficient number of herbivores gather in the same spot. Entry to the HERD is unearned. HERDs expand and multiply during good times. When trouble comes they turn on each other, abandoned the young, old, sick and weak. Thus the HERD gets thinned. PACKs form to hunt prey and to fight outsiders. To take advantage of opportunity or to deal with a threat. Entry to the PACK is earned. PACKs degenerate in the good times. They get fat and lazy. Hard times bring out the sharpness in the wolf. Struggle binds the pack together. If you are part of a PACK, then you are PACK orientated. If you are not in a PACK you are in a HERD. If you are alone, you are still in a HERD, you are just a little lost from the group, probably they left you behind. The HERD sacrifices those it leaves behind. As life gets harder we will see more men forming PACKs. Struggle brings out the wolf in men. The best men are already in PACKs, ready for the break down to signal the start of the hunt. The next best men are already looking to form or join a PACK. Will you be left behind?

  • The Beautiful Feminine Vision of Christians – and How to Restore It to The Masculine

    Apr 9, 2020, 10:58 AM

    —“Hi Curt… I haven’t done the deep dive into Propertarianism yet, but have watched a number of video’s through John Mark’s Youtube. I am more of a Theocracy based, Freedom to do good, Republic oriented person. But from what I have seen thus far… The proposed expression of Propertarianism can run in harmony with these ideals. Thanks for thinking outside the traditional boxes, and inside a practical and diverse people filled world!”— George Reninger

    Thanks. And thanks for being one of the few people that understands the difference between the freedom to do good (faith), and the constraint on doing bad (law). -hugs.

    —“Thank you for the Affirmation Curt… I have a vision in me, to see the establishment of an Alliance, Like NATO, but among Individuals, Communities & Nations globally (Including Armies) that Covenantally affirm their alignment with the ONE God, His TWO Values of loving God & Neighbor, as well as His TEN governing Commandments regarding ownership affirmations, boundaries & related reciprocities. This could form a “Life, Liberty & Property Grounded” Commonwealth of Nations!”—George Reninger

    This is a beautiful vision. It’s a beautiful vision until you travel the world and meet people with influence, wealth, political, and military power, who have very different visions that are completely hostile to yours. The faithful like women, by design, live in an echo chamber – even when they travel the world. I never, ever, ever, make the mistake that ‘community of faith’ scales beyond those who know one another personally. Just as female cognition fails beyond those who know one another personally, just as male cognition succeeds largely beyond those who know one another personally. This goal of harmony is the same reason women fail in politics. It is why the church always failed as a political system, and why neither jews nor islam can produce a political system but why the jews remain dependent upon host populations just as females upon males. And why the muslims cannot organize anything beyond a family, or family business, a government other than tribal despots, or a military capable of other than small group acts of terrorism. The family, neighborhood, local church community, and village does not scale. Gods, evolution of us, divided the female and male cognition for reasons. Because for every man like you that seeks consensus, peace and harmony – there are men like me who seek power, to bend man, beast, animal, plant, world and universe to our will. And the moment people like you are marginally successful with your vision, the men like me in competing cultures, states, empires, and civilizations will conquer you for your folly. This ever has been and every will be. Because God left us with these rules: the laws of nature, the natural law of man, the christian law of love, and the evolutionary law of transcendence. There is no steady state. No condition of eternal peace. The faithful like the woman, seeks steady state free of competition. And steady state means you are just a human herd – food for the Red Queen of evolution, because you have forgotten, and denied, that God gave us the evolutionary law of transcendence, and set us in competition with one another, so that those of use who defied that law would be eradicated by those that obey that law. In fact, I would make the rather obvious argument that the abrahamic faiths exist for the sole purpose of denying God’s laws of transcendence – which is why jews accomplished noting until integrated into Aristotelian Empiricism of Europeans, and the muslims consumed and destroyed every civilization of the ancient world – and are now threatening to destroy ours. Because christians like the female, share this violation of God’s Law of Evolutionary Transcendence. This denial of one of the four sets of god’s laws is why christianity is failing among the educated classes and is devolving into a folk religion and has lost its chances – possibly forever – as a political religion. Christianity will either adapt to the necessity of Trifunctionalism: the competitive compatibility between the military, the judicial, and the faith, or it will continue to be the cause of its decline, because it is too selfish to obey one of god’s laws: the organized use of violence by the militia, to defend the faith, it’s people, and the law that together are the only people on this earth who have transcended man out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and the chaos of a natural world that has given us but twelve thousand years of respite, but otherwise has sought to exterminate us with regularity. Love does not conquer all. Love serves only integrate the conquered into loving one another in conformity of god’s laws revealed by god’s hand – not scripture written by men. The unconquered are the enemy of our people, of our god, of god’s law of transcendence, and as a consequence of mankind, and our destiny to sit at the hand of the father of us all.