Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • How to Counter Chinese Chest Beating

    —“USA independence: 1783 AD, Han dynasty: 206 BC–220 AD. can you do the math?”—金田ホトトギス @goldfieldcuckoo

    I can. And I can ask you, if china is surrounded by mountains, desert and ocean, and if china is so far away from Mesopotamia, Persia, and Islam, how did you manage to fail with so much time in so much safety? We began in 1500bc near ukraine and settled in poland, and spread in all directions from there. We had a dark age in 1200 bc to 800bc that destroyed the entire civilized world. Between 700bc and 300ad, in just four hundred years, the greeks invented politics, geometry, reason, science, the Antikythera, and the steam engine. Were it not for accidents we could have had the industrial revolution within two centuries. Next, we suffered the Jewish-Christian and Islamic Dark Age – and you didn’t. But again, we saved ourselves, and in just 600 years, explored and connected the world by trade, invented the calculus and all advanced mathematics, the logics, all the physical sciences, the social sciences, all technology, all medicine, and took man into space, and raised you out of ignorance, poverty, starvation and disease. You started in 2500bc. We started in 1500bc. So you had a THOUSAND YEARS in prehistory. We didn’t catch up until 800ad. We were viable from 800bc-100ad and were invaded. We had a dark age from 400ad-1400ad. You another THOUSAND YEARS in the middle ages. Why did you fail? (I know) You failed because Chinese people are ‘petty’, like women. You do face-before-truth, like women. Your pride is easily offended like women. You delay and deceive because you fear conflict like women. You feel the need for power instead of reciprocity – like women. You don’t trust – like women. You cheat – like women. You lie like women. Why? It’s genetic. You have low T. You hyper-evolved submissiveness and over-extended Neoteny. You are a nation of status conscious petty women, who must have consensus because you lack the honor and truth to negotiate compromise. This is why your plans to rule the world will fail. No one else has the knowledge or courage to say the truth to you. It is bad manners for my people to tell you this truth. The difference between races is the degree of neoteny and the sex-direction of it. Africans low neoteny high masculine. Chinese high neoteny, high feminine. Europeans are in the middle. Jews are medium neoteny high feminine very eugenic. Muslims are medium neoteny, feminine, very dysgenic. This is why you fail. You desire harmony. Harmony is the instinct of women. You are weak because you need consensus. You are slow because you need consensus and authority. We don’t care any longer. We learned our lesson this time Mankind is unfit for peerage. We need only ‘build a wall’ to keep out the barbarians. So there is no race to win with you. The only race is to godhood. And we have a very great advantage. Because we speak the truth. Because we have courage to do so. Because we are men.

  • Understanding Fascism in Context

    Nat’l Fascism was the expansion of Napoleon’s Pre-Industrial State and Military Total War, to post-industrial State, Military, Economic, Culture, and informational Total War against International Political, Economic, Cultural and informational extra-state total war of Jewish Communism. Like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Communism promised a universal government of the underclasses. The French invented pre-communist european state socialism, Italians post-communist intolerant State socialism in Fascism. Via the French, we forced the Germans into ACTING on it. 

    Napoleon.................Fascism...................Communism
Civilizational...............National................International
... Total War............... Total War...............Total War
... ... Pre-industrial..... ...Post-Industrial.........Post Ind......
... ... State..................State...................Extra-State
... ... Military...............Military..............................
... ... .........................Economic..............Economic
... ... .........................Cultural..............Cultural
... ... .........................Informational.........Informational
... ... .........................Political.............Political
... ... ..................................................Revolutionary
... ... External Offense.......Internal Defense......Internal Revolt.

  • Understanding Fascism in Context

    Nat’l Fascism was the expansion of Napoleon’s Pre-Industrial State and Military Total War, to post-industrial State, Military, Economic, Culture, and informational Total War against International Political, Economic, Cultural and informational extra-state total war of Jewish Communism. Like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Communism promised a universal government of the underclasses. The French invented pre-communist european state socialism, Italians post-communist intolerant State socialism in Fascism. Via the French, we forced the Germans into ACTING on it. 

    Napoleon.................Fascism...................Communism
Civilizational...............National................International
... Total War............... Total War...............Total War
... ... Pre-industrial..... ...Post-Industrial.........Post Ind......
... ... State..................State...................Extra-State
... ... Military...............Military..............................
... ... .........................Economic..............Economic
... ... .........................Cultural..............Cultural
... ... .........................Informational.........Informational
... ... .........................Political.............Political
... ... ..................................................Revolutionary
... ... External Offense.......Internal Defense......Internal Revolt.

  • Hayek’s Warning

    Apr 26, 2020, 9:37 PM via John John Stephens

    —“The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”— Friedrich August von Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

    CD: That’s really the lesson of the 20th. Hubris via pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial.

  • Hayek’s Warning

    Apr 26, 2020, 9:37 PM via John John Stephens

    —“The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”— Friedrich August von Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

    CD: That’s really the lesson of the 20th. Hubris via pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial.

  • Definition: Total War

    Apr 26, 2020, 10:03 PM Total war includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. (stage one – mobilized total war) Total war is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded, the differentiation between combatants and non-combatants diminishes, sometimes even vanishing entirely, due to the capacity of opposing sides to consider nearly every human resource, even that of non-combatants, to be a part of the war effort. (stage two – unrestricted total war) In the mid-19th century, scholars identified total war as a separate class of warfare.

  • Definition: Total War

    Apr 26, 2020, 10:03 PM Total war includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. (stage one – mobilized total war) Total war is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded, the differentiation between combatants and non-combatants diminishes, sometimes even vanishing entirely, due to the capacity of opposing sides to consider nearly every human resource, even that of non-combatants, to be a part of the war effort. (stage two – unrestricted total war) In the mid-19th century, scholars identified total war as a separate class of warfare.

  • Is It True You Need a High Iq for P? (no)

    Apr 27, 2020, 9:37 AM

    —“If I remember correctly, you once stated that an IQ of 120 is required as a bare minimum for having the most basic understanding of Propertarianism. Is this correct? Be honest”—Korey Savoie

    I almost wouldn’t answer this because of ‘be honest’. WTF do you think I do all day? At great personal cost. lol 😉 THE INFLUENCE OF IQ 1 – IQ determines time and effort in learning something. 2 – Cost benefit prediction determines willingness to invest time and effort in learning the subject. 3 – Cost benefit prediction determines willingness to invest in the time and effort of assisting others in their learning of the subject. So when I say “You need x IQ to understand P” it’s in the context of learning the METHOD along with the group. The 140/150+ crowd can do it quickly. Others not. It is very hard to explain and apply the method. That seems to be a 130/140 requirement. But pretty much anyone can understand everything up to applying it, and I’m not sure other than theoretical mathematicians will understand the underlying logic. UNDERSTAND WHAT PART OF THE PROJECT? EVERYONE The psychology (acquisition) sociology (compatibilism), the Ethics (basic reciprocity, telling the truth), and politics (optimum government)? MOST EVERYONE The foundations of western civ in natural law? The group strategies of different civilizations? The history? The JQ/20th C attack on our civ? SOME The method? Reciprocity? Testimony, the grammars? The legal method? Strict construction of law? The constitution? FEW Applying and arguing with the method VERY FEW The operational description of brain and consciousness? The logical foundations? The geometry of thought?

    —“Excellent. For some reason I thought you or Bill or Brandon posted a few months ago that an IQ of 120 was required just to scratch the surface. I haven’t been tested, but I assumed mine to be somewhere in the 100-109.”— Korey Savoie

    It’s because if someone ARGUES with us, that requires we resort to using the METHOD and if they can’t use the method we can’t conduct an argument. So we can understand what it tells us, vs understand how to use it. You don’t need to undrestand calculus to understand most statistical diagrams. You do if you want to argue against those diagrams. You don’t need to understand operationalism to undrestand the findings of operational analysis using P-law. You do if you want to argue against those findings. Understanding WHAT vs understanding HOW.

  • Is It True You Need a High Iq for P? (no)

    Apr 27, 2020, 9:37 AM

    —“If I remember correctly, you once stated that an IQ of 120 is required as a bare minimum for having the most basic understanding of Propertarianism. Is this correct? Be honest”—Korey Savoie

    I almost wouldn’t answer this because of ‘be honest’. WTF do you think I do all day? At great personal cost. lol 😉 THE INFLUENCE OF IQ 1 – IQ determines time and effort in learning something. 2 – Cost benefit prediction determines willingness to invest time and effort in learning the subject. 3 – Cost benefit prediction determines willingness to invest in the time and effort of assisting others in their learning of the subject. So when I say “You need x IQ to understand P” it’s in the context of learning the METHOD along with the group. The 140/150+ crowd can do it quickly. Others not. It is very hard to explain and apply the method. That seems to be a 130/140 requirement. But pretty much anyone can understand everything up to applying it, and I’m not sure other than theoretical mathematicians will understand the underlying logic. UNDERSTAND WHAT PART OF THE PROJECT? EVERYONE The psychology (acquisition) sociology (compatibilism), the Ethics (basic reciprocity, telling the truth), and politics (optimum government)? MOST EVERYONE The foundations of western civ in natural law? The group strategies of different civilizations? The history? The JQ/20th C attack on our civ? SOME The method? Reciprocity? Testimony, the grammars? The legal method? Strict construction of law? The constitution? FEW Applying and arguing with the method VERY FEW The operational description of brain and consciousness? The logical foundations? The geometry of thought?

    —“Excellent. For some reason I thought you or Bill or Brandon posted a few months ago that an IQ of 120 was required just to scratch the surface. I haven’t been tested, but I assumed mine to be somewhere in the 100-109.”— Korey Savoie

    It’s because if someone ARGUES with us, that requires we resort to using the METHOD and if they can’t use the method we can’t conduct an argument. So we can understand what it tells us, vs understand how to use it. You don’t need to undrestand calculus to understand most statistical diagrams. You do if you want to argue against those diagrams. You don’t need to understand operationalism to undrestand the findings of operational analysis using P-law. You do if you want to argue against those findings. Understanding WHAT vs understanding HOW.

  • Tools of Deceit

    Apr 27, 2020, 12:19 PM |Falsehood -> Deceit|: … Ignorance -> Error > … … Bias->wishful_thiking > … … … Loading->framing > … … … … Suggestion->Obscurantism > … … … … … Sophistry->Idealism (verbal) > … … … … … … Magic ->Pseudoscience (physical) > … … … … … … … Occult-> Supernaturalism (imaginary) > … … … … … … … … Fiction (fabrication) > … … … … … … … … … Denial