Apr 22, 2020, 12:40 PM by JWarren Prescott The propertarian circle is a eclectic collection of great people who share a common interest in preserving the elements of civilization that precisely maintain that civilization. Namely, western civilization. The propertarian community has become its own commons that is revered by all – even if they either don’t fully understand all the elements, logic or constructs or even if they might disagree – it is still respected. This is our commons – some are hard at work plowing new areas for our commons and some are happy basking in the grass for the time being. It doesn’t matter, at some point, all of us will be needed to defend it – not just this intellectual commons, but the very civilization in which we talk about saving. So if you have come to the commons to find relief from the soul-destroying, lying pilpul-laden post-modernist hellscape, rest up and find the ongoing conversation restorative. If you are already on the frontlines of the battlefield, you will find allies here, and if you are the curious intellectual, it will be the most stimulating as your core premises are challenged and exercised in both pleasurable and uncomfortable ways.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Point of Demarcation Is Individual vs Political
Apr 22, 2020, 2:15 PM There are good people in every group. There are bad people in every group. What matters is whether the good or the bad people in every group advance their, and their group’s interest to integrate into our natural law – or whether they resist integration in to our Natural law; or use resistance movements to seek bribes to conform to our natural law; or seek parasitism by taking advantage of our vulnerability – our tolerance – under our natural law. Our Natural Law is empirical and it tells us we aren’t intolerant enough. If it’s interpersonal then exhaust tolerance (christianity). If it’s political then zero tolerance (Doolittle). It’s not a difficult disambiguation, demarcation, distinction, difference. 😉 Be intolerant. Otherwise you’re committing fraud by not paying to cost of maintaining the commons, under pretense your convenience is a conviction. It’s not. It’s fraud. Be intolerant.
-
The Point of Demarcation Is Individual vs Political
Apr 22, 2020, 2:15 PM There are good people in every group. There are bad people in every group. What matters is whether the good or the bad people in every group advance their, and their group’s interest to integrate into our natural law – or whether they resist integration in to our Natural law; or use resistance movements to seek bribes to conform to our natural law; or seek parasitism by taking advantage of our vulnerability – our tolerance – under our natural law. Our Natural Law is empirical and it tells us we aren’t intolerant enough. If it’s interpersonal then exhaust tolerance (christianity). If it’s political then zero tolerance (Doolittle). It’s not a difficult disambiguation, demarcation, distinction, difference. 😉 Be intolerant. Otherwise you’re committing fraud by not paying to cost of maintaining the commons, under pretense your convenience is a conviction. It’s not. It’s fraud. Be intolerant.
-
Statism vs Anti Statism
Apr 22, 2020, 4:23 PM Her: “….” (I don’t want to bear and raise kids – I want to hyper-consume, socialize and virtue signal) Him” “….” (I don’t want to wage slave and pay taxes – I want to raid, r-pe and pillage) The only difference is one requires the state and one the absence of it. State, Government, Judiciary, Market, Marriage, Family are the compromise between the genders. These compromises are the equilibrium under which we all get the best we can get even if some or many of us could get better at the expense of others. There is a reason all civil wars begin with an excess of unmarried males. Incentives.
-
Statism vs Anti Statism
Apr 22, 2020, 4:23 PM Her: “….” (I don’t want to bear and raise kids – I want to hyper-consume, socialize and virtue signal) Him” “….” (I don’t want to wage slave and pay taxes – I want to raid, r-pe and pillage) The only difference is one requires the state and one the absence of it. State, Government, Judiciary, Market, Marriage, Family are the compromise between the genders. These compromises are the equilibrium under which we all get the best we can get even if some or many of us could get better at the expense of others. There is a reason all civil wars begin with an excess of unmarried males. Incentives.
-
Don”t Blame the Beast for Being a Beast
Apr 22, 2020, 4:47 PM
—“We could use a whole lot less of these types in America. Years of Marxism brainwashing and social engineering through media/Hollywood has made many forget what made us great in the first place. Also what keeps us going as a people and world powerhouse.”—Western Man @Fight4TheWest
if you give rats a rat-utopia this is what they’ll do. Women and underclasses do not have centuries of vocabulary, bodies of thought, norms, traditions, institutions, to domesticate their impulses once freed from household labor, any more than men did freed from hunter-gathering. Don’t blame the semi domesticated animal. Blame the trainer who is a rare domesticated animal. We’re to blame. Aristocracy is bred like horses. And we failed to make an aristocracy of everyone without doing the breeding first, or developing the training first, before letting them out of the stables.
-
Don”t Blame the Beast for Being a Beast
Apr 22, 2020, 4:47 PM
—“We could use a whole lot less of these types in America. Years of Marxism brainwashing and social engineering through media/Hollywood has made many forget what made us great in the first place. Also what keeps us going as a people and world powerhouse.”—Western Man @Fight4TheWest
if you give rats a rat-utopia this is what they’ll do. Women and underclasses do not have centuries of vocabulary, bodies of thought, norms, traditions, institutions, to domesticate their impulses once freed from household labor, any more than men did freed from hunter-gathering. Don’t blame the semi domesticated animal. Blame the trainer who is a rare domesticated animal. We’re to blame. Aristocracy is bred like horses. And we failed to make an aristocracy of everyone without doing the breeding first, or developing the training first, before letting them out of the stables.
-
How It Begins
Apr 22, 2020, 5:33 PM By James Dmitro Makienko This is exactly how Arab Spring started nearly ten years ago – and Maria’s father predicted it ten years before it happened – looking at the dynamic of unemployment among young men in middle eastern countries. When young men have no opportunities in economic, intellectual or sexual marketplaces they take their talents to the marketplace of violence. It is a high-risk – high reward (or rate of return) enterprise. They form packs to see if they can equalize, distribute and reduce high risk (i.e learn basic squad tactics). Then it scales. Squads -> platoons -> companies -> battalions -> regiments -> brigades(or divisions) – > corps -> armies -> state. They keep using violence to get returns while there is an economic incentive for them to do so, or until they meet far greater violence that they cannot easily overcome. And this is how the new elite eventually emerges. Through their merit of how they balance violence, economics and scalability.
-
How It Begins
Apr 22, 2020, 5:33 PM By James Dmitro Makienko This is exactly how Arab Spring started nearly ten years ago – and Maria’s father predicted it ten years before it happened – looking at the dynamic of unemployment among young men in middle eastern countries. When young men have no opportunities in economic, intellectual or sexual marketplaces they take their talents to the marketplace of violence. It is a high-risk – high reward (or rate of return) enterprise. They form packs to see if they can equalize, distribute and reduce high risk (i.e learn basic squad tactics). Then it scales. Squads -> platoons -> companies -> battalions -> regiments -> brigades(or divisions) – > corps -> armies -> state. They keep using violence to get returns while there is an economic incentive for them to do so, or until they meet far greater violence that they cannot easily overcome. And this is how the new elite eventually emerges. Through their merit of how they balance violence, economics and scalability.
-
Compassion Is an Individual Action, Not a Collective One
Apr 22, 2020, 5:38 PM by Matt MacBradaigh One can only be compassionate as an individual action, not a collective one. When one tries to extend collective compassion, what happens is recipient (a small segment of society) benefits irreciprocally at the expense of others. Examples: “Compassion” for repeat criminal offenders, “It’s not their fault; it’s the system. Blah blah blah” is at at the expense of those whom are the next repeat criminal offender’s victims. It’s total LACK of compassion for everyone else to satisfy ones feelz. It’s actually downright selfish. “Compassion” for the poor leading to voting for government to take other’s money instead of giving your own, and then engaging in GSRRM to shame anyone who balks at being stolen from.