Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @WhitesAdvocate Idiocy. Whites don’t spend, don’t donate, don’t organize. Why? W

    @WhitesAdvocate Idiocy. Whites don’t spend, don’t donate, don’t organize. Why? White advocacy is a poor, underemployed, underclass movement, of largely outcast losers, that have low trust, that only invest in certainty, not possibility, and who lack knowledge to identify what is possible and certain. (In other words, conservatives express cowardice as need for certainty.)

    Who do white advocates fund? Shit-for-brains who mass market hope-as-cope under fascist, fundamentalist, or libertarian extremist fantasies. None of which are survivable. Any that develop enough income favor the status quo to maintain their income streams. So who do we have? We have one or two media personalities, one of whom might run for office. Meanwhile the enemy is finishing it’s takeover of the military and the police (just like I said) and they have taken over social media ( just like I said), and they are picking y’all off one at a time (just like I said), on a time frame targeted to the population collapse (just like I said), despite the collapse of westenr power (just like I said) managing the decline.

    The only survivable polity, economy, and military they fund, are complex, mixed economies, under rule of law, with professional bureaucracies. The best of these polities are ethnically homogeneous and SMALL. Because by being small, power distance is low, confilict is limited, redistribution is desirable rather than resisted, and the laboring, working, and lower middle class are an asset that can’t easily be expoloited, and even if so, debt and error are quickly self correcting.

    Why did we abandon y’all? Because (a) despite a committed following of 2M, we could only raise a few thousand dollars a month, (b) we discovered quite painfully that the number of good men was about 1 in 1000 – the rest are idiots. (c) Y’all are soo impulsive and angry and lacking in self control that you can’t be converted into a political movement. (d) you can’t be converted into a political movement because AS YOU JUST DEMONSTRATED you have false confidence in your competence. (e) you turn around and eat your own if we demonstrate political competency rather than primitive vulgarity (like you do.) So, who matters? The quiet, competent, middle class. Who is gonna die off? You. Because not even a meaningful number of your own race wants you.

    The instinct for self determination that is what creates the masculine conservative mind is a defect unless it can be organized into a common goal that has significant likelihood of succes – yet, by disintermediating the lower classes (you folk) from the upper classes (my folk), by appropriating the intersts of the upper classes (my folk) you are a leaderless mob lacking the talent or knowledge to organize either into a short term army of reformation, or a long term political movement of reformation.

    I search for rare competency. I seek to educate the silent and not overconfident. You’re not it. That’s fine. Keep failing. You will.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 19:28:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282726901960454

  • @WhitesAdvocate Self falsificationary statement. 😉 Math isn’t hard. Knowing wha

    @WhitesAdvocate Self falsificationary statement. 😉

    Math isn’t hard. Knowing what’s wrong with math (mathiness) is a bit hard. Knowing the difference between math, computation, operations, and cooperative transactions is hard. Knowing how to disambiguate all methods of computation (Grammars) isn’t hard. Knowing how to produce decidability across math, computation, operations, transactions, is fairly hard. Knowing how to construct formal law from that hierarchy is fairly hard. In other words, a single specialization tends to reiforce general ignorance, while comparative disciplines, in particular, comparison across all disciplines is quite hard becuase one must master every discipline. So, If you can’t comprehend it you can’t. Others can. Others do. And in particular some mathematicians do, and that is why we are reforming mathematics to merge it with computation and operation and reversing counter-revolution against mathematics that began with Cantor and the attempt to unify mathematics and logic by set theory instead of (obviously in retrospect) unifying mathematics, computation, algorithm, operations, and set (verbal logic), with operations devovling into math on one end, and into set (verbal) on the other, by the removal of dimensions of subjectively testable reality.

    The reality is that you’re a chimp by comparison. You can’t even imagine that P-Law is as great a leap as empiricism was over theology, or science over empiricism, and is as meaningful as was darwin to biology.

    That’s ok. I wouldn’t expect you to. However, I do understand that others do and do demonstrate that knowledge.

    “You are but a measure of your own ignorance.”

    Cheers. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 19:11:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282659385939047

  • ( … more … ) Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedu

    ( … more … )

    Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure are the operating system for government, and money is the resource it uses as influence.

    Do you need to understand the science behind the law that makes all that operation of a complex political organization possible? No you don’t. But I and those like me do. We are the judges that will administer that law. WE have to understand it.

    What do you need to understand? You need to understand that this law is a science and that the judges defend against internal political enemies the way ‘every man a sheriff does against internal physical and social enemies, and as the military defends against external enemies.

    To do that you need to understand the paragraph that describes the European group strategy, the law of reciprocity and testimony, the list of demonstrated interests we call capital, the list of crimes that can be committed, and the rights, obligations, and inalienations under the law that demand we suppress those crimes in ourselves and others.

    Can you do that? Yes you can. It’s possible to write a set of posters you can stick on your wall. It will largely mirror your moral intuitions., Just like magical thinking, selfishness, lying, cheating, and stealing will largely mirror leftist intuitions.

    The problem I have is (a) getting you idiots to pay attention long enough to understand that (b) show up to make it happen (c) stay in the field long enough to bring it into fruition (d) not go all fundamentalist, or nazi and screw it up by making the people more afraid of your having any semblance of influence, than they are of a constitutional reformation.

    So I’ve done my job. It took seventy of the greatest men of the enlightenment to do it the last time. I’m stuck here doing it almost alone with a few others helping me. And you clowns are a train wreck of fail.

    So grow up, man up, and learn how to win. But don’t chastise me because I can’t make grownup thinking into a chocolate milkshake of sophistry and ideology for nitwits.

    Nitwits just need to show up and shut up, and if necessary ‘supply’ yourselves by the traditional method militia armies always do.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:32:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282271022124228

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    – “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you never make a point. A guy like you needs to follow a template, like 1. Briefly state conclusion 2. State context/motivation/problem. 3. Reason. 4. Re-state conclusion.” – Yes it is. Every day. That said… I make the point, I make the point over many posts, not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience. There is only one way to save our civilization it’s by showing up in mass. Showing up in mass requires a set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The young men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadership that fragments into personality cults – precisely because you lack the competency to do anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake. As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbskulls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the chances that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those from the future who don’t show and take the risk. I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementable solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for a rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left, center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states. And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution. Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable. The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly its geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self-interest against itself. (…more in comments)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654

  • “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you n

    – “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you never make a point. A guy like you needs to follow a template, like 1. Briefly state conclusion 2. State context/motivation/problem. 3. Reason. 4. Re-state conclusion.” –

    Yes it is. Every day. That said…

    I make the point, I make the point over many posts, not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience.

    There is only one way to save our civilization it’s by showing up in mass.
    Showing up in mass requires a set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The young men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadership that fragments into personality cults – precisely because you lack the competency to do anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake.

    As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbskulls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the chances that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those from the future who don’t show and take the risk.

    I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementable solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for a rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left, center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states.

    And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution.

    Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable.

    The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly its geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self-interest against itself.

    (…more in comments)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:31:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654

  • @WhitesAdvocate What do you need to understand? You need to understand that this

    @WhitesAdvocate What do you need to understand? You need to understand that this law is a science and that the judges defend against internal political enemies the way ‘every man a sheriff does against internal physical and social enemies, and as the military defends against external enemies.

    To do that you need to understand the paragraph that describes the european group strategy, the law of reciprocity and testimony, the list of demonstrated interests we call capital, the list of crimes that can be committed, and the rights, obligations, and inalienations under the law that demand we suppress those crimes in ourselves and others.

    Can you do that? Yes you can. It’s possible to write a set of posters you can stick on your wall. It will largely mirror your moral intuitions., Just like magical thinking, selfishness, lying, cheating and stealing will largely mirror leftist intuitions.

    The problem I have is (a) getting you idiots to pay attention long enough to understand that (b) show up to make it happen (c) stay in the field long enough to bring it into fruition (d) not go all fundamentalist, or nazi and screw it up by making the people more afraid of your having any semblance of influence, than they are of a constitutional reformation.

    So I’ve done my job. It took seventy of the greatest men of the enlightenment to do it the last time. I’m stuck here doing it almost alone with a few others helping me. And you clowns are a train wreck of fail.

    So grow up, man up, and learn how to win. But don’t chastize me because I can’t make grownup thinking into a chocolate milkshake of sophistry and ideology for nitwits.

    Nitwits just need to show up and shut up, and if necessary ‘supply’ yourselves by the traditional method militia armies always do.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:29:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282259422278268

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282223412964301

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @WhitesAdvocate I make the point, I make the point over many posts not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience. There is only one way to save our civilizatoin it’s by showing up in mass. Showing up in mass requries set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The youung men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadershp that fragments into personality cults – precisely becuase you lack teh competency tod o anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake. As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbsculls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the cahnces that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those fromthe future who don’t show and take the risk. I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementalbe solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left , center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states. And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution. Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable. The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly it’s geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self interest against it self. Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure are the operating system for government, and money is the resource it uses as influence. Do you need to understand the science behind the law that makes all that operation of a complex political organization possible? No you don’t. But I and those like me do. We are the judges that will administer that law. WE have to understand it. (more below)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282223412964301

  • @WhitesAdvocate I make the point, I make the point over many posts not just one.

    @WhitesAdvocate I make the point, I make the point over many posts not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience.

    There is only one way to save our civilizatoin it’s by showing up in mass.
    Showing up in mass requries set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The youung men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadershp that fragments into personality cults – precisely becuase you lack teh competency tod o anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake.

    As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbsculls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the cahnces that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those fromthe future who don’t show and take the risk.

    I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementalbe solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left , center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states.

    And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution.

    Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable.

    The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly it’s geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self interest against it self.

    Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure are the operating system for government, and money is the resource it uses as influence.

    Do you need to understand the science behind the law that makes all that operation of a complex political organization possible? No you don’t. But I and those like me do. We are the judges that will administer that law. WE have to understand it.

    (more below)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:20:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282223412964301

  • @MarylandTeamWhite Short answer is yes. Long answer is that It creates the possi

    @MarylandTeamWhite Short answer is yes. Long answer is that It creates the possibility for self determination by self determined means, and specifically for ethnostates, which I assume is what would be the driving force for separation and reformation. However, since we must accept the geostrategic necessity of preserving the territorial integrity of north america under a single military and trade system, it allows for the formation of various city states and states with different preferences. In other words, we convert the ‘leftwing’ cities into city states, and isolate them from infecting the rest of the contry.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:35:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282049079767334

  • (… more … ) And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t k

    (… more … )

    And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t know. And we didn’t (until now with P-Law) understand the ‘science’ of our group strategy, institutions, traditions, norms, rituals. And now that we know that science we can TRAIN the ‘otherwise unfit’ into it.

    And we can do so because there is no religious, philosophical, moral, or scientific argument against P-Law, because P-Law is just the explanation of the universal law of all the sciences: of all existence.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:31:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282032002644133

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282022650660535

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    THINKING:”How do I teach others how to think about all existence, life, thought, feeling, and behavior operationally – by construction from first principles – by disambiguation into first principles?” Well, you list the first principles and gradually learn(habituate) the process. I don’t think there is any magic to it. It’s like anything else. People may want a single insight like they get with ideology or philosophy or theology. But P-Law is in the same categorical hierarchy as math, programming, (P-Law,) formal (Verbal) logic. You have to PRACTICE it. It’s the same with my work. Newbs find something I write or say and then jump to some conclusion that’s false. Or they complain that it’s incoherent or complex or word salad. The answer is you learn math, programming, P-law, and formal logic by STUDY not by immediate insight. That said, given the four sciences: Formal(Logics), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary, why would we expect that truth and law, the logic of cooperation and morality, economics and politics, groups and group evolutionary strategy to require less study than the other sciences? Now the fact that P-Law requires work, doesn’t mean that you have to understand the science to use the products of it any more than you have to understand quantum mechanics to use the transistors in your cell phone. You have to understand the OUTPUTS of P-Law Science. The output of P-Law is expressible as the group evolutionary strategy of the european people when written in p-law. Why? Because the reason europeans invented reason, math, science, technology, and medicine so disproportionately vs all other civs, is that strategy=law=science. That translates to individual responsibility, rather than clan, religion, or state responsibility. Responsibility provides mindfulness, and mindfulness tolerance for the tragedy of nature’s laws, and the only means of overcoming that tragedy as mastery of and application of those laws for our benefit, by not seeking to avoid, but to conquer those laws. So of course, Europeans would not only invent mathematical realism, reason, law proper, philosophy, science and epicureanism, but government, technology, and medicine. The only problem? Many can’t bear that responsibility, lacking ability, agency, and training. So we could as the ancients tried, pay the high cost of training mindfulness or we can pay the cost of NOT training mindfulness – which is what allowed our invasive JChristianity and the destruction of the ancient World, like we allowed Judaism-marxism-pomo-pc-woke in the modern. And so, my overall point here is that we cannot have an advanced (aristocratic, responsible, evolutionarily adaptive) civilization without paying the cost of training those who are not naturally fit for it, or in families naturally fit and able to train it. (…more in comments…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282022650660535

  • ( … more … ) And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t

    ( … more … )

    And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t know. And we didn’t (until now with P-Law) understand the ‘science’ of our group strategy, institutions, traditions, norms, rituals. And now that we know that science we can TRAIN the ‘otherwise unfit’ into it.

    And we can do so because there is no religious, philosophical, moral, or scientific argument against P-Law, because P-Law is just the explanation of the universal law of all the sciences: of all existence.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:29:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282023437449991

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282000785842669

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    WHY I KEEP USING THE TERM “P-LAW” P-complete – Wikipedia “In computational complexity theory, a decision problem is P-complete (complete for the complexity class P) if it is in P and every problem in P can be reduced to it by an appropriate reduction.” Ergo: **All existence can be explained by reduction to the first principles of evolutionary computation. In other words, anything that can exist can be reduced to a formal description in P-Law.** I abandoned the term ‘propertarianism’ since it applied only to the original system of measurement in morality. I kept the “P-” for P-Completeness. And because ‘-ism’ implies a p philosophy, and P-Law is a formal logic: a science that unifies the logics and sciences. Ergo P-Law is P-Complete.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282000785842669

  • THINKING:”How do I teach others how to think about all existence, life, thought,

    THINKING:”How do I teach others how to think about all existence, life, thought, feeling, and behavior operationally – by construction from first principles – by disambiguation into first principles?” Well, you list the first principles and gradually learn(habituate) the process.

    I don’t think there is any magic to it. It’s like anything else. People may want a single insight like they get with ideology or philosophy or theology. But P-Law is in the same categorical hierarchy as math, programming, (P-Law,) formal (Verbal) logic. You have to PRACTICE it.

    It’s the same with my work. Newbs find something I write or say and then jump to some conclusion that’s false. Or they complain that it’s incoherent or complex or word salad. The answer is you learn math, programming, P-law, and formal logic by STUDY not by immediate insight.

    That said, given the four sciences: Formal(Logics), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary, why would we expect that truth and law, the logic of cooperation and morality, economics and politics, groups and group evolutionary strategy to require less study than the other sciences?

    Now the fact that P-Law requires work, doesn’t mean that you have to understand the science to use the products of it any more than you have to understand quantum mechanics to use the transistors in your cell phone. You have to understand the OUTPUTS of P-Law Science.

    The output of P-Law is expressible as the group evolutionary strategy of the european people when written in p-law. Why? Because the reason europeans invented reason, math, science, technology, and medicine so disproportionately vs all other civs, is that strategy=law=science.

    That translates to individual responsibility, rather than clan, religion, or state responsibility.

    Responsibility provides mindfulness, and mindfulness tolerance for the tragedy of nature’s laws, and the only means of overcoming that tragedy as mastery of and application of those laws for our benefit, by not seeking to avoid, but to conquer those laws.

    So of course, Europeans would not only invent mathematical realism, reason, law proper, philosophy, science and epicureanism, but government, technology, and medicine. The only problem? Many can’t bear that responsibility, lacking ability, agency, and training.

    So we could as the ancients tried, pay the high cost of training mindfulness or we can pay the cost of NOT training mindfulness – which is what allowed our invasive JChristianity and the destruction of the ancient World, like we allowed Judaism-marxism-pomo-pc-woke in the modern.

    And so, my overall point here is that we cannot have an advanced (aristocratic, responsible, evolutionarily adaptive) civilization without paying the cost of training those who are not naturally fit for it, or in families naturally fit and able to train it.

    (…more in comments…)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:29:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282022650660535