Source: Original Site Post

  • The Cost of Non European Civilizations to Themselves

    Feb 11, 2020, 7:32 AM

    —“Do you think being a european or not can be measured by the volume of the hazards of the externalities a person causes while coercing/persuading one’s self? And how the community constantly arranges to insure the externalities and and cover the damages?”— Mea Culba

    Non european communities seek to minimize stress of adaptation through relative equality and harmony – producing relative stasis – rather than adaptive competitive excellence – producing relative evolution, and the continuous distribution of the benefits of innovation and adaptation. Well, that’s the inverse of saying european civilization’s realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, identity, logic, rational choice, reciprocity, together that constrain our logics, sciences and laws, collected in the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the laws of testimonial thought and speech, place the highest burden on our conscientiousness and reason in exchange for eliminating frictions personal interpersonal political and external, and therefore the least frictions of innovation adaptation and evolution. We (europeans) evolve the fastest because we minimize the personal, interpersonal, social, political, and external hazards of falsehoods, each of which seeks to avoid the cost of stress required by continuous competition, innovation, adaptation, limited to reciprocal, truthful, and productive means.

  • Ruining Good Art Is Explicitly Written in The Goals for Communism

    Ruining Good Art is explicitly written in the goals for communism:

    23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.” https://www.citizenreviewonline.org/2010/Jun/communism.html —Alfred Wittmann

  • Ruining Good Art Is Explicitly Written in The Goals for Communism

    Ruining Good Art is explicitly written in the goals for communism:

    23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.” https://www.citizenreviewonline.org/2010/Jun/communism.html —Alfred Wittmann

  • Define: Determinism

    Feb 11, 2020, 7:49 AM All events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to human thought (will). We categorize this limitation as constraining causality to realism (the universe exists) and naturalism (causes are independent of human thought and human thought has no influence on causality except through action). Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. In science, determinism means that the universe demonstrates regularity and therefore we can identify general rules (laws of nature). I don’t pay much attention to philosophy – it’s mostly nonsense. If you can’t say it in testimony: math, logic, science, economics or law then it’s probably nonsense. And yeah. The vocabulary, grammar, and logic of economics includes psychology, sociology, politics, and group strategy.

  • Define: Determinism

    Feb 11, 2020, 7:49 AM All events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to human thought (will). We categorize this limitation as constraining causality to realism (the universe exists) and naturalism (causes are independent of human thought and human thought has no influence on causality except through action). Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. In science, determinism means that the universe demonstrates regularity and therefore we can identify general rules (laws of nature). I don’t pay much attention to philosophy – it’s mostly nonsense. If you can’t say it in testimony: math, logic, science, economics or law then it’s probably nonsense. And yeah. The vocabulary, grammar, and logic of economics includes psychology, sociology, politics, and group strategy.

  • “What’s Your Vision for Post Majoritarian America, Europe, Western Civilization?”

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:06 AM

    —“Do you wish to implement a caste system in America? And, if so what would it be regarding: racial based or social status based?”—Amit Patel

    Are parties castes? No. Are tribes castes? no. Are classes castes? Close but no – a class is alterable by demonstrated behavior, but a caste isn’t. The reason for european success in the ancient and modern world is sovereignty, and sovereignty requires markets in every aspect of life, and markets produce continuous adaptation and evolution without political consensus and intervention. I want to create markets in everything, where we may not seek to circumvent those markets in display word or deed without severe consequences. In politics i want to recreate the market between the classes for the production of commons – using houses of the classes in the traditional British european model. And a market for polities that produce those commons suitable to the needs of different people, in the traditional european model – particularly the hundreds of princedom’s in the german holy roman empire. For some of us we will prefer the English, Prussian, Germanic, orderly, clean, aesthetic, homogenous, redistributive, civil society where most of our investments are in the commons. For others they will prefer the ‘latin, catholic, leisurely, communal life of the family with state (feudal) responsibility for the commons. For others the individual they prefer the cosmopolitan (jewish) urban, high stimulation, high consumption, high opportunity, low responsibility, low investment in the commons. For others they will prefer the close membership and mutual insurance of the semitic hyper familial tribe, at the high cost of the many externalities, including demand for authoritarian religion and state.

  • “What’s Your Vision for Post Majoritarian America, Europe, Western Civilization?”

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:06 AM

    —“Do you wish to implement a caste system in America? And, if so what would it be regarding: racial based or social status based?”—Amit Patel

    Are parties castes? No. Are tribes castes? no. Are classes castes? Close but no – a class is alterable by demonstrated behavior, but a caste isn’t. The reason for european success in the ancient and modern world is sovereignty, and sovereignty requires markets in every aspect of life, and markets produce continuous adaptation and evolution without political consensus and intervention. I want to create markets in everything, where we may not seek to circumvent those markets in display word or deed without severe consequences. In politics i want to recreate the market between the classes for the production of commons – using houses of the classes in the traditional British european model. And a market for polities that produce those commons suitable to the needs of different people, in the traditional european model – particularly the hundreds of princedom’s in the german holy roman empire. For some of us we will prefer the English, Prussian, Germanic, orderly, clean, aesthetic, homogenous, redistributive, civil society where most of our investments are in the commons. For others they will prefer the ‘latin, catholic, leisurely, communal life of the family with state (feudal) responsibility for the commons. For others the individual they prefer the cosmopolitan (jewish) urban, high stimulation, high consumption, high opportunity, low responsibility, low investment in the commons. For others they will prefer the close membership and mutual insurance of the semitic hyper familial tribe, at the high cost of the many externalities, including demand for authoritarian religion and state.

  • Restoring Beauty

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:08 AM

    —-“As a carpenter/tradesman, I’m mostly disappointed in the decline of architecture. It would be much more rewarding to build beautiful structures, to say nothing of the furtherance of learning involved to do it. As beneficial as the “assembly line” model of building has been to economics, I believe it has been equally detrimental in that it has lowered basic educational requirements to attaining, and retaining, employment. Combine this with the governments takeover of educating our children, and you have the masses being minimally educated to do menial tasks. All the while they’re being spoon-fed woefully one sided, jingoistic propaganda. But I digress… #BeautyMatters “—Marc Kaller

    It’s something trump is trying to put thru in government architecture. It’s something I’ve put in the constitution. Efficiency in the aesthetic is a dirty word. 😉

  • Restoring Beauty

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:08 AM

    —-“As a carpenter/tradesman, I’m mostly disappointed in the decline of architecture. It would be much more rewarding to build beautiful structures, to say nothing of the furtherance of learning involved to do it. As beneficial as the “assembly line” model of building has been to economics, I believe it has been equally detrimental in that it has lowered basic educational requirements to attaining, and retaining, employment. Combine this with the governments takeover of educating our children, and you have the masses being minimally educated to do menial tasks. All the while they’re being spoon-fed woefully one sided, jingoistic propaganda. But I digress… #BeautyMatters “—Marc Kaller

    It’s something trump is trying to put thru in government architecture. It’s something I’ve put in the constitution. Efficiency in the aesthetic is a dirty word. 😉

  • “What Is Your Ideology?”

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:35 AM

    —“So, what is your political ideology? I mean I know you’re right wing. But, what are you? A Nationalist-Socialist or Libertarian Civic Nationalist?”— Amit Patel

    I am none of those things – all of which i consider excuses for obtaining power under democracy to circumvent markets. I am ‘right wing’ only in the sense that I am intolerant of violations of the laws of nature and the natural law of reciprocity. I am an Aryan(european branch of indo-europeans): transcendence of man into gods through competitive heroism, demonstrated excellence, speaking truth, and creating beauty. I am a European Sovereigntarian: Markets in everything: Let A Thousand Nations Bloom. I am an Aristotelian: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, I am a Jeffersonian libertarian: a written constitution of natural law, with transactional procedural modifications. I am a Constitutional Monarchist favoring multi-house governments as markets for the classes. I am a Manorialist: natural eugenics – home before children, family as the central unit of society, bring capital to people not people to capital. I am a Conservative: Bear your own costs, externalize no cost, purely empirical government, change by evidence not by hypothesis. I am a National(kinship) Socialist: direct the maximum proceeds to the production of capitalizing (not consumptive) commons. I am a Kinship Christian: humility in ones never ending pursuit of virtue, exhaust all opportunities for forgiveness before abandoning it, and demonstrate personal acts of charity at personal cost. I am a Kinship Pagan: we owe a debt to nature, our ancestors known and named, and known as heroes, and known only as archetypes (gods), and are responsible to them for preserving their investments in making us, just as those that follow us are responsible for preserving our investments in them. I am a universalist: any people that wishes european civilization’s benefits can adopt them if they try – or not if they choose not to. The Laws of Nature The Natural Law Self Determination Our Transcendence into gods Sovereignty to do so A Universal Militia The Oath of Reciprocal Insurance A constitution of the natural law Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities. A Judicial Priesthood A monarchy as a judge of last resort A Cabinet Houses for the classes (three or four) … Territory … Industry … Family … (Dependents) Local Priority in Legislation, regulation, norm. Professionalized (Privatized) Education