—“Solving the Female Question (FQ) I sense is more important than the Religious or Christian Question. I appreciate this line of research.”—Bryan Nova Brey —“The Cog-Fem and Female\Herd persuasion\argument suppression stuff is still what I’ve gotten the most value out of from this circle. So I strongly suspect you’re correct.”—Grant Cameron McPhee —“Not everybody is religious, I have yet to meet a man who is interested in celibacy and doing his own laundry”—Ryan Williams
Source: Original Site Post
-
Solving the Female Question (FQ) is More Important.
-
“Woman have a right. It’s simple property rights.”— Frankie Hollywood @TheReal
—“Woman have a right. It’s simple property rights.”— Frankie Hollywood @TheRealFMCH
Actually, it’s the most difficult question of law. Rights are exchanged. So no it’s not a property right. Its irreciprocal. So no it’s not a right of any kind. Instead it’s decided by consequences. And because we coddle women. We don’t hold them responsible for their actions. We allow them to murder. Conversely we don’t coddle men and we hold them accountable. We allow women to murder and fail to take responsibility for their actions because they historically pursue risky abortions, murder their infants, or mistreat their young, reduce their marriage value, remain in poverty, and externalize all those harms on the rest of us. It has nothing to do with rights. Its an arbitrary judgement of the lesser of two horrible evils.
-
“Woman have a right. It’s simple property rights.”— Frankie Hollywood @TheReal
—“Woman have a right. It’s simple property rights.”— Frankie Hollywood @TheRealFMCH
Actually, it’s the most difficult question of law. Rights are exchanged. So no it’s not a property right. Its irreciprocal. So no it’s not a right of any kind. Instead it’s decided by consequences. And because we coddle women. We don’t hold them responsible for their actions. We allow them to murder. Conversely we don’t coddle men and we hold them accountable. We allow women to murder and fail to take responsibility for their actions because they historically pursue risky abortions, murder their infants, or mistreat their young, reduce their marriage value, remain in poverty, and externalize all those harms on the rest of us. It has nothing to do with rights. Its an arbitrary judgement of the lesser of two horrible evils.
-
It’s Never Enough for Them.
—“So why do lefties default to socio-economics when debating “equality”? That’s not the definition.”—Quinn Patrick
They have escalated from equality of defense under the law, to equality of access, to equality of opportunity, to equality of outcomes. And we cannot yet internalize that the left is cognitively female and unconsciously hyper-consumptive with NO END OF WANTS. It’s never enough for them. They’re parasites.
-
It’s Never Enough for Them.
—“So why do lefties default to socio-economics when debating “equality”? That’s not the definition.”—Quinn Patrick
They have escalated from equality of defense under the law, to equality of access, to equality of opportunity, to equality of outcomes. And we cannot yet internalize that the left is cognitively female and unconsciously hyper-consumptive with NO END OF WANTS. It’s never enough for them. They’re parasites.
-
Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious
—“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle (repost)
-
Unite the Libertarian, Conservative, and Religious
—“I can only unite the libertarian, conservative, and religious if I restore responsibility of the militia of every able bodied man to bear the cost of the organized use of violence to enforce our demand for sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, excellence and beauty, jury and law, family and kin, commons and capitalization as the central objects of social organization and political policy. To do that we require an intellectual vanguard. The classical libertarians have always been our intellectual wing, the conservatives decidedly anti-intellectual, and the religious conservatives hostile to the intellectual. I have to deprive the libertarian intellectual class of false promise of freedom from the cost of organized violence in a universal militia of kin, and to together we must bear the cost of depriving the left of freedom from the cost of hyper-consumption and dysgenic reproduction and the hedonism of the individual’s maximization of consumption as the central object of policy and social organization. The left is cancerous growth of man on both this planet, mankind, man’s future, and the possibility of the transcendence of man into the gods we might yet be.”— Curt Doolittle (repost)
-
The Marriage of Masculine Aristocracy and Feminine Christianity
—“Love all the work you’ve done with John Mark. I’m just learning more about propertarianism, so far I’m pretty impressed. I hope your alliance with Christians are not just one of convenience. I think there’s a lot to be achieved with reformation Christendom that lines up nicely with the biblical model of good government.”—
We are all western and as such we are all christian. We just practice our christianity differently. Of our ‘five religions’ christianity is the lowest in my priority and it’s the highest in others. Those religions are, in order of their evolution: Heathen Nature and Ancestors, Pagan Heroes, Aristotelian Science, Christian Deism, and Enlightenment Humanism. Masculine(Dominance) < Paganism < Heathenism < Aristotelianism <- Humanism -> Christianity > The Feminine (Submission) But the age of religious rule never came to be in the west, never could come to be, and never can come to be. The faithful required an aristocracy in Rome. They required an aristocracy in the middle ages. And they required and aristocracy in modernity. And the faith was far more corrupt than the state or burghers could ever seek to be. The faith teaches one to be a good citizen for the aristocracy. For those of us who are aristocracy first and christian second, we understand this is necessary. Christians have always been conquered and destroyed without the aristocracy. Why? Christianity is a feminine religion. The aristocracy could USE christianity to justify their aryanism. But christianity was spread by women and slaves, and even today is largely a religion of the lower classes, not the upper. So, western civilization is a marriage of masculine (dominant) aristocracy and feminine (submissive) christianity. And this is our (my) solution: to continue delivering to caesar and to Jesus as we have in the past.
-
The Marriage of Masculine Aristocracy and Feminine Christianity
—“Love all the work you’ve done with John Mark. I’m just learning more about propertarianism, so far I’m pretty impressed. I hope your alliance with Christians are not just one of convenience. I think there’s a lot to be achieved with reformation Christendom that lines up nicely with the biblical model of good government.”—
We are all western and as such we are all christian. We just practice our christianity differently. Of our ‘five religions’ christianity is the lowest in my priority and it’s the highest in others. Those religions are, in order of their evolution: Heathen Nature and Ancestors, Pagan Heroes, Aristotelian Science, Christian Deism, and Enlightenment Humanism. Masculine(Dominance) < Paganism < Heathenism < Aristotelianism <- Humanism -> Christianity > The Feminine (Submission) But the age of religious rule never came to be in the west, never could come to be, and never can come to be. The faithful required an aristocracy in Rome. They required an aristocracy in the middle ages. And they required and aristocracy in modernity. And the faith was far more corrupt than the state or burghers could ever seek to be. The faith teaches one to be a good citizen for the aristocracy. For those of us who are aristocracy first and christian second, we understand this is necessary. Christians have always been conquered and destroyed without the aristocracy. Why? Christianity is a feminine religion. The aristocracy could USE christianity to justify their aryanism. But christianity was spread by women and slaves, and even today is largely a religion of the lower classes, not the upper. So, western civilization is a marriage of masculine (dominant) aristocracy and feminine (submissive) christianity. And this is our (my) solution: to continue delivering to caesar and to Jesus as we have in the past.
-
Encyclopedia Britannica
I dont know how many times I read through the entire Encyclopedia Britannica but I am pretty sure it’s the best general education you can still get. The question is, can we recreate ‘european thinking’ and ‘european sense making’ now that the (((program))) to undermine european thinking and sense making has been as successful using the second abrahamic revolution in deceit as it was in the first abrahamic revolution in deceit.