Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM —“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always fram

    Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM

    —“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always framed as negative or wrong? I understand GSRRM would be wrong for a male. But isn’t there an appropriate application? Is it only among women? Should it have any reach beyond that? Please excuse if I’m out of line here. I ask in all sincerity.”— New Person

    by Brandon Hayes: Intellectual honesty will never be met with hostility here. 🙂 You’re simply mistaking things. In the case of stigma (scarlet letter) you’re talking about norms. Shaming to maintain order. GRSM is shaming to undermine order (create chaos). Shaming isn’t wrong. Subversion is. –The Propertarian Institute– ^He’s good. 😉 1 -So violence can be used to: … (a) violate law, or (b) enforce law. 2 – Shaming can be used to: … (a) subvert norms or enforce norms. 3 – The difference is: … (a) cost and severity of punishment must fit the crime. … (b) shaming is cheap to perform and to correct … (c) violence is expensive to perform and to correct. 4 – GSRRM (undermining) can be used to … (a) suppress truth … (b) undermine those who speak truth … (c) undermine societies that operate by trust and truth.

  • Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM —“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always fram

    Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM

    —“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always framed as negative or wrong? I understand GSRRM would be wrong for a male. But isn’t there an appropriate application? Is it only among women? Should it have any reach beyond that? Please excuse if I’m out of line here. I ask in all sincerity.”— New Person

    by Brandon Hayes: Intellectual honesty will never be met with hostility here. 🙂 You’re simply mistaking things. In the case of stigma (scarlet letter) you’re talking about norms. Shaming to maintain order. GRSM is shaming to undermine order (create chaos). Shaming isn’t wrong. Subversion is. –The Propertarian Institute– ^He’s good. 😉 1 -So violence can be used to: … (a) violate law, or (b) enforce law. 2 – Shaming can be used to: … (a) subvert norms or enforce norms. 3 – The difference is: … (a) cost and severity of punishment must fit the crime. … (b) shaming is cheap to perform and to correct … (c) violence is expensive to perform and to correct. 4 – GSRRM (undermining) can be used to … (a) suppress truth … (b) undermine those who speak truth … (c) undermine societies that operate by trust and truth.

  • Teaching Is a Three Year Vocational Program.

    Nov 10, 2019, 3:33 PM TEACHING IS A THREE YEAR VOCATIONAL PROGAM. 1 – Year Instruction Teachable Skills: +Planning, Continuous Revision. +Lesson Instruction (Teaching) +Assessment (where are my kids) Requires Natural Talent: +Environment (managing the classroom for learning) +Mentoring Teachers – Not to TEACH, but to filter people. 1 – year student teaching (apprenticeship) 1 – year mentored teaching (apprenticeship) Fundamental Problems: (a) teachers spend too much time alone. (b) they are not permitted to create order. (c) there are a limited group of people who can maintain their interest in running a classroom. (d) the method of reforming teaching will require radical reform of the method so that it consists of competitive games and includes multiple overlapping grades, and to decrease pressure on programming (indoctrination) and more emphasis on multiple-exposures over time.

  • Teaching Is a Three Year Vocational Program.

    Nov 10, 2019, 3:33 PM TEACHING IS A THREE YEAR VOCATIONAL PROGAM. 1 – Year Instruction Teachable Skills: +Planning, Continuous Revision. +Lesson Instruction (Teaching) +Assessment (where are my kids) Requires Natural Talent: +Environment (managing the classroom for learning) +Mentoring Teachers – Not to TEACH, but to filter people. 1 – year student teaching (apprenticeship) 1 – year mentored teaching (apprenticeship) Fundamental Problems: (a) teachers spend too much time alone. (b) they are not permitted to create order. (c) there are a limited group of people who can maintain their interest in running a classroom. (d) the method of reforming teaching will require radical reform of the method so that it consists of competitive games and includes multiple overlapping grades, and to decrease pressure on programming (indoctrination) and more emphasis on multiple-exposures over time.

  • So Yeah, It’s Actually True that Europeans Are Genetically Superior. so Now What?

    Nov 10, 2019, 4:47 PM

    —“Recent research not only confirms the existence of substantial psychological variation around the globe but also highlights the peculiarity of many Western populations. We propose that part of this variation can be traced back to the action and diffusion of the Western Church, the branch of Christianity that evolved into the Roman Catholic Church. Specifically, we propose that the Western Church’s transformation of European kinship, by promoting small, nuclear households, weak family ties, and residential mobility, fostered greater individualism, less conformity, and more impersonal prosociality. By combining data on 24 psychological outcomes with historical measures of both Church exposure and kinship, we find support for these ideas in a comprehensive array of analyses across countries, among European regions, and among individuals from different cultural backgrounds.”—

    Correct, which is what Emmanuel Todd has said for three decades and what HBD-Chick specializes in. Now, the reason the church did this was purely evil: so that it could break up the large landholding families and gradually acquire the land, so that by the end of the high middle ages, half the land in europe, and half the capital was dead, and the surpluses were being used to build cathedrals etc (20% of gdp in particular). So the way to look at it is, that he church failed as a political force, and t failed to build ‘corporate europe’ but in doing so in parallel with aristocratic Manorialism, they created a genetic meat grinder for familism, creating our high tolerance and high pro-sociality. Now, the argument is that this is (a) an existing northern european disposition, (b) exacerbated by the church and (c) brought to fruition by manorialism, which (d) eventually reacted against church corruption, producing protestantism, and the conversion of christianity into a folk religion (non-institutional) and therefore ending the Byzantine conquest of roman empire, and subsequent conquest of europe. So, now that we know we’re genetically unique and SUPERIOR, then how do we preserve those millennia of capital inheritance.

  • So Yeah, It’s Actually True that Europeans Are Genetically Superior. so Now What?

    Nov 10, 2019, 4:47 PM

    —“Recent research not only confirms the existence of substantial psychological variation around the globe but also highlights the peculiarity of many Western populations. We propose that part of this variation can be traced back to the action and diffusion of the Western Church, the branch of Christianity that evolved into the Roman Catholic Church. Specifically, we propose that the Western Church’s transformation of European kinship, by promoting small, nuclear households, weak family ties, and residential mobility, fostered greater individualism, less conformity, and more impersonal prosociality. By combining data on 24 psychological outcomes with historical measures of both Church exposure and kinship, we find support for these ideas in a comprehensive array of analyses across countries, among European regions, and among individuals from different cultural backgrounds.”—

    Correct, which is what Emmanuel Todd has said for three decades and what HBD-Chick specializes in. Now, the reason the church did this was purely evil: so that it could break up the large landholding families and gradually acquire the land, so that by the end of the high middle ages, half the land in europe, and half the capital was dead, and the surpluses were being used to build cathedrals etc (20% of gdp in particular). So the way to look at it is, that he church failed as a political force, and t failed to build ‘corporate europe’ but in doing so in parallel with aristocratic Manorialism, they created a genetic meat grinder for familism, creating our high tolerance and high pro-sociality. Now, the argument is that this is (a) an existing northern european disposition, (b) exacerbated by the church and (c) brought to fruition by manorialism, which (d) eventually reacted against church corruption, producing protestantism, and the conversion of christianity into a folk religion (non-institutional) and therefore ending the Byzantine conquest of roman empire, and subsequent conquest of europe. So, now that we know we’re genetically unique and SUPERIOR, then how do we preserve those millennia of capital inheritance.

  • Definition: Parsimony

    Nov 13, 2019, 9:21 AM DEFINITION: PARSIMONY “Lowest cost across all dimensions testable by man” EXPANSION – Given human faculties: sense, disambiguation (constant relations), perception(integration-prediction), auto-association-prediction, attention-prediction (will), recursion-prediction, and release of actions; – And dimensions of tests of constant relations: free associative, categorical, logical, empirical, operational, rational choice, reciprocal rational choice, completeness; Parsimony must refer to: “Lowest Cost”, expanded to:

    • the lowest cost (least information), description of a chain of causation
    • surviving tests of: entropy, realism, naturalism, operationalism,

    • and;

    • bounded rational self interest:

    • in the seizure of opportunity,
    • from the field of identified opportunities,
    • given the opportunity cost of the opportunity,
    • determined by competition for the greatest return in the shortest time for the least effort, with the greatest certainty at the lowest risk,
    • to the point of disequilibrium and subsequent re-equilibration,

    • eliminating the opportunity from the field of opportunities.

    • and

    • reciprocity (repeating the above) is the only productive rather than parasitic (costly) means of interaction.
      (- although parasitism and predation are profitable means of interaction, they are consumptive not productive.)

    The difference between: – Testimony (due diligence by self), – Coherence(consistency by audience), – Parsimony(competition by market), … is grammatical (point-of-view), and an application of and conformity to, – the law of epistemology (free association-idea-> hypothesis-surviving > theory-surviving > application-surviving) I can fuss with this a bit to make it as tight as reciprocity and testimony, or any of the other definitions, but ‘skeptical subjective testing against Occam’s Razor serves as the colloquial reduction.

  • Definition: Parsimony

    Nov 13, 2019, 9:21 AM DEFINITION: PARSIMONY “Lowest cost across all dimensions testable by man” EXPANSION – Given human faculties: sense, disambiguation (constant relations), perception(integration-prediction), auto-association-prediction, attention-prediction (will), recursion-prediction, and release of actions; – And dimensions of tests of constant relations: free associative, categorical, logical, empirical, operational, rational choice, reciprocal rational choice, completeness; Parsimony must refer to: “Lowest Cost”, expanded to:

    • the lowest cost (least information), description of a chain of causation
    • surviving tests of: entropy, realism, naturalism, operationalism,

    • and;

    • bounded rational self interest:

    • in the seizure of opportunity,
    • from the field of identified opportunities,
    • given the opportunity cost of the opportunity,
    • determined by competition for the greatest return in the shortest time for the least effort, with the greatest certainty at the lowest risk,
    • to the point of disequilibrium and subsequent re-equilibration,

    • eliminating the opportunity from the field of opportunities.

    • and

    • reciprocity (repeating the above) is the only productive rather than parasitic (costly) means of interaction.
      (- although parasitism and predation are profitable means of interaction, they are consumptive not productive.)

    The difference between: – Testimony (due diligence by self), – Coherence(consistency by audience), – Parsimony(competition by market), … is grammatical (point-of-view), and an application of and conformity to, – the law of epistemology (free association-idea-> hypothesis-surviving > theory-surviving > application-surviving) I can fuss with this a bit to make it as tight as reciprocity and testimony, or any of the other definitions, but ‘skeptical subjective testing against Occam’s Razor serves as the colloquial reduction.

  • Human Faculties

    Nov 13, 2019, 9:28 AM 

    1. sense (neurons-nerves)
2. disambiguation (constant relations - cortex),
3. perception(integration-prediction - cortex),
4. intuition (auto-association-prediction) (hippocampus-cortex + valuation(emotion))
5. attention (attention-prediction) (thalamus-hippoampus-cortex),
6. will (recursion-prediction) (prefrontal, thalamus, hippocampus, cortex)
7. and release of actions;

  • Human Faculties

    Nov 13, 2019, 9:28 AM 

    1. sense (neurons-nerves)
2. disambiguation (constant relations - cortex),
3. perception(integration-prediction - cortex),
4. intuition (auto-association-prediction) (hippocampus-cortex + valuation(emotion))
5. attention (attention-prediction) (thalamus-hippoampus-cortex),
6. will (recursion-prediction) (prefrontal, thalamus, hippocampus, cortex)
7. and release of actions;