Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Intuition Is Understood, Sorry. Its Not Complicated

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:13 AM

    —“Any thoughts on empiricism ever incorporating intuition into its epistemology? It is, though not yet understood, a sensory experience.”—Jarrod Marma

    I don’t make errors. Operational simplification: Sensation(nerves), perception(cortex), integration (entorhinal cortex), experience(hippocampal region), auto-association( hippocampal subregion), attention (thalamus), projection(frontal cortex), retention (prefrontal cortex), recursion (repeat). intuition = auto association (involuntary), free association(voluntary focus of attention) If you read testimonialism you will find that I’ve repeated it for years now. sense(stimulation), perception (disambiguation), auto-association, free association, hypothesis(reason), theory(empiricism), law(survival), recursion(partial falsification). The brain (you) consists of a nervous system consisting almost entirely of variations on one cell type (neuron) of different compositions for different functions, the most numerous variation of which is (surprisingly) inhibition of information, the most influential of which are one type which calculate information. We cannot make computers do the same thing at the same cost because in exchange for perfect memory, computers use fixed wiring and dynamic routing, where your brain uses both dynamic wiring and with it dynamic routing. So we have vast adaptability, and storage in exchange for recreation of memories through associations, whereas computers have precise recollection, l limited adaptability, and require far more physical storage because they have to store all the underlying sensory data. Current computer neural networks learn and no longer need to retain the sensory data they were trained with but they cannot be adapted to additional functions without training and re-structuring (yet). There are very good at single things so the future will likely consist of many basic functions performed by artificial neural networks, combined by a ‘grammar’ into a hierarchy of neural networks. our ‘grammar’ is spatial – because we must act. That does not mean computers will need a spatial grammar as well, because we might design it to act by different means – but I can’t conceive yet of an alternative other than property transactions, which are then handed off too another AI to act upon.

  • Intuition Is Understood, Sorry. Its Not Complicated

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:13 AM

    —“Any thoughts on empiricism ever incorporating intuition into its epistemology? It is, though not yet understood, a sensory experience.”—Jarrod Marma

    I don’t make errors. Operational simplification: Sensation(nerves), perception(cortex), integration (entorhinal cortex), experience(hippocampal region), auto-association( hippocampal subregion), attention (thalamus), projection(frontal cortex), retention (prefrontal cortex), recursion (repeat). intuition = auto association (involuntary), free association(voluntary focus of attention) If you read testimonialism you will find that I’ve repeated it for years now. sense(stimulation), perception (disambiguation), auto-association, free association, hypothesis(reason), theory(empiricism), law(survival), recursion(partial falsification). The brain (you) consists of a nervous system consisting almost entirely of variations on one cell type (neuron) of different compositions for different functions, the most numerous variation of which is (surprisingly) inhibition of information, the most influential of which are one type which calculate information. We cannot make computers do the same thing at the same cost because in exchange for perfect memory, computers use fixed wiring and dynamic routing, where your brain uses both dynamic wiring and with it dynamic routing. So we have vast adaptability, and storage in exchange for recreation of memories through associations, whereas computers have precise recollection, l limited adaptability, and require far more physical storage because they have to store all the underlying sensory data. Current computer neural networks learn and no longer need to retain the sensory data they were trained with but they cannot be adapted to additional functions without training and re-structuring (yet). There are very good at single things so the future will likely consist of many basic functions performed by artificial neural networks, combined by a ‘grammar’ into a hierarchy of neural networks. our ‘grammar’ is spatial – because we must act. That does not mean computers will need a spatial grammar as well, because we might design it to act by different means – but I can’t conceive yet of an alternative other than property transactions, which are then handed off too another AI to act upon.

  • Correctly Apportions Responsibility for The Failure of The West

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:23 AM LISA OUTHWAITE CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST —“Curt Doolittle, You personally do not. There is nothing MGTOW about you.

    <q>”…women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.”</q>

    This point, and the general spirit of the original post fell short in terms of fairly apportioning responsibility and, therefore, will have fallen short in terms of re-building legitimate male strength, which must be founded on a more serious appraisal of past mistakes and a full acknowledgement of the burden of blame. The:

    <q>”women have destroyed Western civilisation'</q>

    … argument has become almost a rallying call to less discerning, disenfranchised males and it’s in dire need of correction, or balance certainly, by more superintendent males.”— Lisa Outhwaite Correct.

  • Correctly Apportions Responsibility for The Failure of The West

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:23 AM LISA OUTHWAITE CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST —“Curt Doolittle, You personally do not. There is nothing MGTOW about you.

    <q>”…women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.”</q>

    This point, and the general spirit of the original post fell short in terms of fairly apportioning responsibility and, therefore, will have fallen short in terms of re-building legitimate male strength, which must be founded on a more serious appraisal of past mistakes and a full acknowledgement of the burden of blame. The:

    <q>”women have destroyed Western civilisation'</q>

    … argument has become almost a rallying call to less discerning, disenfranchised males and it’s in dire need of correction, or balance certainly, by more superintendent males.”— Lisa Outhwaite Correct.

  • The Majority of People Prefer Just Masters Over Personal Responsibility

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:27 AM by Peter Vey What’s that old saying? Where people choose comfort over freedom because they desire Just Masters over having to be responsible for their own decisions. Their conclusion is always narrow in scope and they aren’t capable of understanding what is true and just. The same morons will say that all leaders throughout time were evil or oppressive, when a little effort churns up the contrary—many leaders genuinely loved their people, and it showed.

  • The Majority of People Prefer Just Masters Over Personal Responsibility

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:27 AM by Peter Vey What’s that old saying? Where people choose comfort over freedom because they desire Just Masters over having to be responsible for their own decisions. Their conclusion is always narrow in scope and they aren’t capable of understanding what is true and just. The same morons will say that all leaders throughout time were evil or oppressive, when a little effort churns up the contrary—many leaders genuinely loved their people, and it showed.

  • Our Movement Will Achieve Critical Mass When….

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:36 AM I can stand on a stage, with a half dozen P-Teachers, present an idea, and have the audience and the teachers handle the question. We face one challenge that we are only now starting to overcome, and that until recently we needed to write P. It seems we can speak it now because we’re familiar enough with the method. So that conference, promoted, is what we will need. We need a poster with ‘all of P’ in logarithmic form. (I have it in the courseware. )

  • Our Movement Will Achieve Critical Mass When….

    Oct 30, 2019, 11:36 AM I can stand on a stage, with a half dozen P-Teachers, present an idea, and have the audience and the teachers handle the question. We face one challenge that we are only now starting to overcome, and that until recently we needed to write P. It seems we can speak it now because we’re familiar enough with the method. So that conference, promoted, is what we will need. We need a poster with ‘all of P’ in logarithmic form. (I have it in the courseware. )

  • John Mark Is the Political Face of Our Movement

    Propertarianism: Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization youtube.com Sure, I conceived of it. The lot of us completed it. But John is turning it from an intellectual to a political movement. He’s brilliant. And this one video is … this one video is … the entirety of the solution in comprehensible form. It’s the message. We have – research and development (me with others’ help) – education and training (SN folk) – marketing (john mark) – evangelism many many more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtD8sF8cKN0&

  • John Mark Is the Political Face of Our Movement

    Propertarianism: Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization youtube.com Sure, I conceived of it. The lot of us completed it. But John is turning it from an intellectual to a political movement. He’s brilliant. And this one video is … this one video is … the entirety of the solution in comprehensible form. It’s the message. We have – research and development (me with others’ help) – education and training (SN folk) – marketing (john mark) – evangelism many many more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtD8sF8cKN0&