Source: Original Site Post

  • Just Ignore the F-King Crazies

    Oct 23, 2019, 3:25 PM I don’t try to understand whacky behavior. I limit myself to understanding whacky arguments that poison the well so to speak. Some people are circumstantially crazy as a release valve – and we can usually understand those people quickly and let them pass. But there is no explanation for, and none required for ‘f-cking crazy’ other than ‘f-cking crazy’. Move along. Explaining f–ked up people is just another form of self aggrandizement. Don’t take the psychological bait. Improve yourself constantly. ignore the f-king crazies.

  • Just Ignore the F-King Crazies

    Oct 23, 2019, 3:25 PM I don’t try to understand whacky behavior. I limit myself to understanding whacky arguments that poison the well so to speak. Some people are circumstantially crazy as a release valve – and we can usually understand those people quickly and let them pass. But there is no explanation for, and none required for ‘f-cking crazy’ other than ‘f-cking crazy’. Move along. Explaining f–ked up people is just another form of self aggrandizement. Don’t take the psychological bait. Improve yourself constantly. ignore the f-king crazies.

  • Quotes from Google Achipelago

    Oct 23, 2019, 5:48 PM by Daniel Johns p71 – That is, the Google Archipelago is a commercial assemblage that acts increasingly like a state. p 73 – …”dangerous” – that is anyone to the right of Joseph Stalin. p 89 – Much has been made of Google’s historical ties to the U.S. intelligence community (IC) and military research agencies. p 119 – The members of the nebulous socially dangerous elements also included “bourgeois specialists”, who served the Communist regime and accounted for a significant percentage of the 700,000 deaths at the hands of the new Stalinist bureaucracy during this two-year period alone. p 125 – Only Google Marxism is capable of creating it, albeit in corporate socialist form. Google Marxism is the first system with the sufficient flexibility, scalability, connectivity and, with the release of 5G, speed to enable the distance-defying, mass, and small-scale niche production and distribution possibilities to enable a truly globalized system. p 128 – Imagine two worlds, one with you and one without you. What’s the difference between the two worlds? Maximize that difference. That is the meaning of your life. – Kai-Fu Lee, Making a World of Difference (2011) p 131 – In other words, the city of Darwin (Australia) may have traded away its citizen’s privacy, self-determination, and even its intellectual capacities, for economic security. p 138 – Diversity, equity and inclusion: this is the new language of totalitarianism. p 143 – A minority dictatorship always finds its most powerful support in an obedient army… – The Black Book of Communism p 165 – The articles detailed how New Knowledge itself created fake Russian bots as supporters of former Chief Justice Roy S. Moore of Alabama in the 2017 election for the US Senate – in order to give the impression that the Kremlin was behind the candidacy of Roy Moore! p 167 – New knowledge must be countered, not only with real knowledge, but with a metaphysics of truth. By this I mean not merely a rejuvenated quest for the truth, but more fundamentally the re-establishment of a framework or frameworks for knowing and approaching the truth. Such projects have generally been confined to philosophers but must now extend to the entire populace. p 196 – The rightwing-leftwing axis means nothing to me. Are they totalitarians or not? Totalitarianism is my enemy. p 198 – Socialism is just an ideology used by monopolists to eliminate competition. p 199 – If I were a preacher, I might say to the catastrophist left: the heat you’re sending is not from global warming, it’s the encroachment of hell. p 199 – The U.S. university system has reached such a decrepit state that one cannot but have grave doubts about its worth and justification for existing. p 202 – Thus, shortly after a revolution undertaken putatively (supposedly) on behalf of the working class for their control of society, Lenin ordered the first post-revolutionary striking government workers shot dead, and the murders were committed without hesitation.


    Vocabulary: Archipelago – n. A group of many islands in a large body of water asymptotic – adj. Relating to or of the nature of an asymptote asymptote – n. A straight line that is the limiting value of a curve; can be considered as tangent at infinity ableism – n. Discrimination in favor of the able-bodied ontology – n. The metaphysical study of the nature of being and existence ethos – n. (anthropology) the distinctive spirit of a culture or an era pathos – n. A feeling of sympathy and sorrow for the misfortunes of others simulacrum – n. An insubstantial or vague semblance ideology – n. An orientation that characterizes the thinking of a group or nation 2) Imaginary or visionary theorization Luddite – n. One of the 19th century English workmen who destroyed laborsaving machinery that they thought would cause unemployment 2) Any opponent of technological progress libidinal – adj. Belonging to the libido libido – n. (psychoanalysis) a Freudian term for sexual urge or desire elide – v. Leave or strike out conterminous – adj. Connecting without a break; within a common boundary ubiquitous – adj. Being present everywhere at once panoptic – adj. Broad in scope or content 2) Including everything visible in one view panopticon – An area where everything is visible putatively – adv. Believed or reputed to be the case [purportedly, supposedly] cognoscente(i) – n. An expert able to appreciate a field; especially in the fine arts cis hetero – n. urban dictionary – A heterosexual person whose gender aligns with what they were assigned at birth. cis – adj. Of or relating to people whose gender identity is the same as their birth sex; not transgender cisgender – adj. Of or relating to people whose gender identity is the same as their birth sex; not transgender Governmentality, approach to the study of power that emphasizes the governing of people’s conduct through positive means rather than the sovereign power to formulate the law. In contrast to a disciplinarian form of power, governmentality is generally associated with the willing participation of the governed. plebeian – adj. (disparaging) of or associated with ordinary, common people utopian – n. An idealistic (but usually impractical) social reformer Marxist Digitalista – Christian Fuchs is Professor at the University of Westminster in London. He is editor of the open access journal triple C – Communication, Capitalism & Critique – http://www.triple-c.at He publishes and speaks on the political economy of communications, digital media & society, media & society, information society theory, and critical theory. http://fuchs.uti.at Twitter @fuchschristian obstreperous (ob-strep′?r-?s, ?b-) – adj. Noisily and stubbornly defiant 2) Boisterously and noisily aggressive massifying – The act of making something massive for the sake of it. Usually in order to inflate one’s ego. probity – n. Complete and confirmed integrity; having strong moral principles perfervid (p?r-fûr′vid) – adj. Extremely or extravagantly eager; impassioned or zealous. nebulous – adj. Lacking definite form or limits bourgeois – adj. (according to Marxist thought) being of the property-owning class and exploitive of the working class bourgeois – n. A capitalist who engages in industrial commercial enterprise 2) A member of the middle class de facto – adj. Existing in fact whether with lawful authority or not raison d’être – Reason for being (French) collude – v. Act in unison or agreement, and in secret, towards a deceitful or illegal purpose niche (nich, nesh) – n. A position particularly well suited to the person who occupies it prelapsarian (pre′lap-sâr′e-?n) – adj. Theology Of or relating to the period before the fall of Adam and Eve. sentient – adj. Endowed with feeling and unstructured consciousness 2) Consciously perceiving epigones (ep′i-gon′) – n. A second-rate imitator or follower, especially of an artist or a philosopher. alacrity – n. Cheerful willingness; eagerness. 2) Speed or quickness; celerity. celerity – n. A rate that is rapid (archaic) jeremiad (jer′?-mi′?d) – A literary work or speech expressing a bitter lament or a righteous prophecy of doom. desideratus(a) (di-sid′?-ra′t?m, -rä′-) – Something considered necessary or highly desirable. totalitarianism – n. The principle of complete and unrestricted power in government digerati (dij′?-rä′te) – pl. n. People who are knowledgeable about digital technologies such as computer programming and design. sanguine – adj. Confidently optimistic and cheerful alliterative (?-lit′?-ra′tiv, -?r-?-) – adj. Having the same consonant at the beginning of each stressed syllable assonance – adj. The repetition of similar vowels in the stressed syllables of successive words peccadillos (pek′?-dil′o) – n. pl. A small sin or fault. anthropomorphic (an′thro·po·mor′phic) – adj. Suggesting human characteristics for animals or inanimate things ersatz (er′zäts′, er-zäts′) – adj. Artificial and inferior eugenics – n. The study of methods of improving genetic qualities by selective breeding (especially as applied to human mating) simulacrum (sim′y?-la′kr?m, -lak′r?m) – n. pl. An image or representation. 2) An unreal or vague semblance. nescience (nesh′?ns) – n. Ignorance (especially of orthodox beliefs) metaphysics – n. Philosophy – The branch of philosophy that examines the nature of reality, including the relationship between mind and matter, substance and attribute, possibility and actuality. prestidigitation (pres′ti-dij′i-ta′sh?n) – Skill or cleverness, especially in deceiving others. pusillanimous (pyo?o′s?-lan′?-m?s) – adj. Lacking in courage and manly strength and resolution; contemptibly fearful decrepit – adj. Worn and broken down by hard use obscurantism – n. A deliberate act intended to make something obscure obscure – adj. Not clearly understood or expressed

  • Quotes from Google Achipelago

    Oct 23, 2019, 5:48 PM by Daniel Johns p71 – That is, the Google Archipelago is a commercial assemblage that acts increasingly like a state. p 73 – …”dangerous” – that is anyone to the right of Joseph Stalin. p 89 – Much has been made of Google’s historical ties to the U.S. intelligence community (IC) and military research agencies. p 119 – The members of the nebulous socially dangerous elements also included “bourgeois specialists”, who served the Communist regime and accounted for a significant percentage of the 700,000 deaths at the hands of the new Stalinist bureaucracy during this two-year period alone. p 125 – Only Google Marxism is capable of creating it, albeit in corporate socialist form. Google Marxism is the first system with the sufficient flexibility, scalability, connectivity and, with the release of 5G, speed to enable the distance-defying, mass, and small-scale niche production and distribution possibilities to enable a truly globalized system. p 128 – Imagine two worlds, one with you and one without you. What’s the difference between the two worlds? Maximize that difference. That is the meaning of your life. – Kai-Fu Lee, Making a World of Difference (2011) p 131 – In other words, the city of Darwin (Australia) may have traded away its citizen’s privacy, self-determination, and even its intellectual capacities, for economic security. p 138 – Diversity, equity and inclusion: this is the new language of totalitarianism. p 143 – A minority dictatorship always finds its most powerful support in an obedient army… – The Black Book of Communism p 165 – The articles detailed how New Knowledge itself created fake Russian bots as supporters of former Chief Justice Roy S. Moore of Alabama in the 2017 election for the US Senate – in order to give the impression that the Kremlin was behind the candidacy of Roy Moore! p 167 – New knowledge must be countered, not only with real knowledge, but with a metaphysics of truth. By this I mean not merely a rejuvenated quest for the truth, but more fundamentally the re-establishment of a framework or frameworks for knowing and approaching the truth. Such projects have generally been confined to philosophers but must now extend to the entire populace. p 196 – The rightwing-leftwing axis means nothing to me. Are they totalitarians or not? Totalitarianism is my enemy. p 198 – Socialism is just an ideology used by monopolists to eliminate competition. p 199 – If I were a preacher, I might say to the catastrophist left: the heat you’re sending is not from global warming, it’s the encroachment of hell. p 199 – The U.S. university system has reached such a decrepit state that one cannot but have grave doubts about its worth and justification for existing. p 202 – Thus, shortly after a revolution undertaken putatively (supposedly) on behalf of the working class for their control of society, Lenin ordered the first post-revolutionary striking government workers shot dead, and the murders were committed without hesitation.


    Vocabulary: Archipelago – n. A group of many islands in a large body of water asymptotic – adj. Relating to or of the nature of an asymptote asymptote – n. A straight line that is the limiting value of a curve; can be considered as tangent at infinity ableism – n. Discrimination in favor of the able-bodied ontology – n. The metaphysical study of the nature of being and existence ethos – n. (anthropology) the distinctive spirit of a culture or an era pathos – n. A feeling of sympathy and sorrow for the misfortunes of others simulacrum – n. An insubstantial or vague semblance ideology – n. An orientation that characterizes the thinking of a group or nation 2) Imaginary or visionary theorization Luddite – n. One of the 19th century English workmen who destroyed laborsaving machinery that they thought would cause unemployment 2) Any opponent of technological progress libidinal – adj. Belonging to the libido libido – n. (psychoanalysis) a Freudian term for sexual urge or desire elide – v. Leave or strike out conterminous – adj. Connecting without a break; within a common boundary ubiquitous – adj. Being present everywhere at once panoptic – adj. Broad in scope or content 2) Including everything visible in one view panopticon – An area where everything is visible putatively – adv. Believed or reputed to be the case [purportedly, supposedly] cognoscente(i) – n. An expert able to appreciate a field; especially in the fine arts cis hetero – n. urban dictionary – A heterosexual person whose gender aligns with what they were assigned at birth. cis – adj. Of or relating to people whose gender identity is the same as their birth sex; not transgender cisgender – adj. Of or relating to people whose gender identity is the same as their birth sex; not transgender Governmentality, approach to the study of power that emphasizes the governing of people’s conduct through positive means rather than the sovereign power to formulate the law. In contrast to a disciplinarian form of power, governmentality is generally associated with the willing participation of the governed. plebeian – adj. (disparaging) of or associated with ordinary, common people utopian – n. An idealistic (but usually impractical) social reformer Marxist Digitalista – Christian Fuchs is Professor at the University of Westminster in London. He is editor of the open access journal triple C – Communication, Capitalism & Critique – http://www.triple-c.at He publishes and speaks on the political economy of communications, digital media & society, media & society, information society theory, and critical theory. http://fuchs.uti.at Twitter @fuchschristian obstreperous (ob-strep′?r-?s, ?b-) – adj. Noisily and stubbornly defiant 2) Boisterously and noisily aggressive massifying – The act of making something massive for the sake of it. Usually in order to inflate one’s ego. probity – n. Complete and confirmed integrity; having strong moral principles perfervid (p?r-fûr′vid) – adj. Extremely or extravagantly eager; impassioned or zealous. nebulous – adj. Lacking definite form or limits bourgeois – adj. (according to Marxist thought) being of the property-owning class and exploitive of the working class bourgeois – n. A capitalist who engages in industrial commercial enterprise 2) A member of the middle class de facto – adj. Existing in fact whether with lawful authority or not raison d’être – Reason for being (French) collude – v. Act in unison or agreement, and in secret, towards a deceitful or illegal purpose niche (nich, nesh) – n. A position particularly well suited to the person who occupies it prelapsarian (pre′lap-sâr′e-?n) – adj. Theology Of or relating to the period before the fall of Adam and Eve. sentient – adj. Endowed with feeling and unstructured consciousness 2) Consciously perceiving epigones (ep′i-gon′) – n. A second-rate imitator or follower, especially of an artist or a philosopher. alacrity – n. Cheerful willingness; eagerness. 2) Speed or quickness; celerity. celerity – n. A rate that is rapid (archaic) jeremiad (jer′?-mi′?d) – A literary work or speech expressing a bitter lament or a righteous prophecy of doom. desideratus(a) (di-sid′?-ra′t?m, -rä′-) – Something considered necessary or highly desirable. totalitarianism – n. The principle of complete and unrestricted power in government digerati (dij′?-rä′te) – pl. n. People who are knowledgeable about digital technologies such as computer programming and design. sanguine – adj. Confidently optimistic and cheerful alliterative (?-lit′?-ra′tiv, -?r-?-) – adj. Having the same consonant at the beginning of each stressed syllable assonance – adj. The repetition of similar vowels in the stressed syllables of successive words peccadillos (pek′?-dil′o) – n. pl. A small sin or fault. anthropomorphic (an′thro·po·mor′phic) – adj. Suggesting human characteristics for animals or inanimate things ersatz (er′zäts′, er-zäts′) – adj. Artificial and inferior eugenics – n. The study of methods of improving genetic qualities by selective breeding (especially as applied to human mating) simulacrum (sim′y?-la′kr?m, -lak′r?m) – n. pl. An image or representation. 2) An unreal or vague semblance. nescience (nesh′?ns) – n. Ignorance (especially of orthodox beliefs) metaphysics – n. Philosophy – The branch of philosophy that examines the nature of reality, including the relationship between mind and matter, substance and attribute, possibility and actuality. prestidigitation (pres′ti-dij′i-ta′sh?n) – Skill or cleverness, especially in deceiving others. pusillanimous (pyo?o′s?-lan′?-m?s) – adj. Lacking in courage and manly strength and resolution; contemptibly fearful decrepit – adj. Worn and broken down by hard use obscurantism – n. A deliberate act intended to make something obscure obscure – adj. Not clearly understood or expressed

  • Argumentum Ad Theologicum

    Oct 23, 2019, 6:20 PM (yes it’s possible. it’s just almost impossible) We all defend our investments. it’s irrational to think we won’t defend our investments. As long as that’s what we’re doing, it’s not ir-reciprocal. In my understanding, theology is just one of the grammars. it’s both conflationary, and fictionalist, using the supernatural fictionalism, but that doesn’t mean statements within it can’t be disambiguated, de-fictionalized, operationalized, and converted to statements of physical and natural law. We only come into conflcit when the disambiguated, defictionalized, operationalized, and tested for reciprocity exposes an involuntary transfer. When disambiguating, defictionalizing, nd operationalizing we take for granted we can test for: (a) identity (b) internal consistency, (c) rational choice, (d) and reciprocal rational choice, and possibly (e) full accounting … … Even if we cannot test for (f) external correspondence, (g) operational possibility, and (h) parsimony. … And within reciprocity we may test for (j) productivity, (k) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, and (l) involuntary transfer by externality, (m) and whether one has performed that due diligence, and (n ) whether one can perform restitution. So it’s not like we can’t largely test theological words. It’s mostly whether any argument demanding deduction that is dependent upon theological terms is possible. In other words, it may be possible to make ethical statements in theology it is however, extremely difficult to make arguments from them. It’s not impossible. It just appears very uncommon. There are many true and reciprocal statements in theology. There are very few if any true and reciprocal arguments. That’s the nature of the problem of fictional premises. Not much to do about it.

  • Argumentum Ad Theologicum

    Oct 23, 2019, 6:20 PM (yes it’s possible. it’s just almost impossible) We all defend our investments. it’s irrational to think we won’t defend our investments. As long as that’s what we’re doing, it’s not ir-reciprocal. In my understanding, theology is just one of the grammars. it’s both conflationary, and fictionalist, using the supernatural fictionalism, but that doesn’t mean statements within it can’t be disambiguated, de-fictionalized, operationalized, and converted to statements of physical and natural law. We only come into conflcit when the disambiguated, defictionalized, operationalized, and tested for reciprocity exposes an involuntary transfer. When disambiguating, defictionalizing, nd operationalizing we take for granted we can test for: (a) identity (b) internal consistency, (c) rational choice, (d) and reciprocal rational choice, and possibly (e) full accounting … … Even if we cannot test for (f) external correspondence, (g) operational possibility, and (h) parsimony. … And within reciprocity we may test for (j) productivity, (k) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, and (l) involuntary transfer by externality, (m) and whether one has performed that due diligence, and (n ) whether one can perform restitution. So it’s not like we can’t largely test theological words. It’s mostly whether any argument demanding deduction that is dependent upon theological terms is possible. In other words, it may be possible to make ethical statements in theology it is however, extremely difficult to make arguments from them. It’s not impossible. It just appears very uncommon. There are many true and reciprocal statements in theology. There are very few if any true and reciprocal arguments. That’s the nature of the problem of fictional premises. Not much to do about it.

  • Why Do Anglo Governments Last so Long?

    Oct 23, 2019, 6:25 PM It’s just much easier to reform a contract (constitution) that is adjudicated by an independent judiciary, than it is to reform a dictatorship, oligarchy, bureaucracy, or theocracy that lacks an independent judiciary and constitutional means of decision making given a division of powers, and fundamental rights especially to property. Most of western history is the difficulty in maintaining our rule of law from attempts to usurp it by the aristocracy, the theocracy, the burghers, and now the underclass communists, devoted, and socialists. A constitution if well written is an algorithm for the operation of a polity under falsification, tested before judges who are not involved in the operations of whatever function is in conflict.

  • Why Do Anglo Governments Last so Long?

    Oct 23, 2019, 6:25 PM It’s just much easier to reform a contract (constitution) that is adjudicated by an independent judiciary, than it is to reform a dictatorship, oligarchy, bureaucracy, or theocracy that lacks an independent judiciary and constitutional means of decision making given a division of powers, and fundamental rights especially to property. Most of western history is the difficulty in maintaining our rule of law from attempts to usurp it by the aristocracy, the theocracy, the burghers, and now the underclass communists, devoted, and socialists. A constitution if well written is an algorithm for the operation of a polity under falsification, tested before judges who are not involved in the operations of whatever function is in conflict.

  • While There Are Many Good Social and Personal Consequences of The Religion, Christianity Failed Us Politically

    I love christian manners: “god bless you” et all. I am equally happy with ‘the gods’ instead of ‘god’, and equally unhappy and hostile to the other semitic gods. I love christian ethics. and I love christian behavior. And I love the church experience. And i love it’s role in birth, adulthood, marriage, care-taking, suffering, and death. I wish it still retained juris over the matters of the family. And My experience with education by the church was far superior to that of the state – by orders of magnitude. Personally I would prefer a military experience more suitable to males. And I know some would value sports, or arts, or commercial experiences. And I know I would prefer to find old gods, heroes, artists, scientists, and saints in my Church with Jesus but one among them. And I would find prayer to them more valuable than to those I find feminine. And yes I would prefer the stoic method of discipline rather than submission to a semitic god. I would prefer we celebrate love our heathen(nature) and pagan(masculine) as well as christian (feminine) holidays. But that said, while there are many good social and personal consequences of the religion, christianity failed us politically – it had to – the church could not survive the restoration of aristotelianism and its consequences no matter how hard the theologians tried. And worse, the church failed to reform. And the catholic church’s pope has now our declared the church our enemy. Orthodoxy is too weak in the west. Protestantism thankfully has evolved into a folk religion, especially with the advent of American evangelicals. I think I understand where this will lead and it is beautiful. But first we must solve real problems that are unavoidable: ending another conquest by hostile alien political systems masquerading as religions. Ending the destruction of our civilization by the second attempt at undermining us using the abrahamic methods of deceit – this time in secular prose, as well as fundamentalist semitic prose. And second we must solve the failure of our religion to merge the aristotelian-legal, moral-rational-political, masculine religion, and feminine religion.  

  • While There Are Many Good Social and Personal Consequences of The Religion, Christianity Failed Us Politically

    I love christian manners: “god bless you” et all. I am equally happy with ‘the gods’ instead of ‘god’, and equally unhappy and hostile to the other semitic gods. I love christian ethics. and I love christian behavior. And I love the church experience. And i love it’s role in birth, adulthood, marriage, care-taking, suffering, and death. I wish it still retained juris over the matters of the family. And My experience with education by the church was far superior to that of the state – by orders of magnitude. Personally I would prefer a military experience more suitable to males. And I know some would value sports, or arts, or commercial experiences. And I know I would prefer to find old gods, heroes, artists, scientists, and saints in my Church with Jesus but one among them. And I would find prayer to them more valuable than to those I find feminine. And yes I would prefer the stoic method of discipline rather than submission to a semitic god. I would prefer we celebrate love our heathen(nature) and pagan(masculine) as well as christian (feminine) holidays. But that said, while there are many good social and personal consequences of the religion, christianity failed us politically – it had to – the church could not survive the restoration of aristotelianism and its consequences no matter how hard the theologians tried. And worse, the church failed to reform. And the catholic church’s pope has now our declared the church our enemy. Orthodoxy is too weak in the west. Protestantism thankfully has evolved into a folk religion, especially with the advent of American evangelicals. I think I understand where this will lead and it is beautiful. But first we must solve real problems that are unavoidable: ending another conquest by hostile alien political systems masquerading as religions. Ending the destruction of our civilization by the second attempt at undermining us using the abrahamic methods of deceit – this time in secular prose, as well as fundamentalist semitic prose. And second we must solve the failure of our religion to merge the aristotelian-legal, moral-rational-political, masculine religion, and feminine religion.