Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Criticizing Conservative vs Libertarian Thinkers

    Mar 23, 2020, 5:19 PM Why can’t we criticize conservative thinkers? Because they’re either jurists who didn’t solve the underlying problem, historians that don’t propose any meaningful solutions, moralists that have failed to defeat the false promises of the left, theologians who do nothing but change seats on the sinking ship. It’s easier to criticize libertarianism because they’re less wrong in analysis, even if they’re more wrong in presumptions of man and possible solutions. You don’t learn much from saying ‘you said nothing actionable’. You learn more from saying ‘you said something only half actionable’.

  • What Conservative Doesn’t Pander

    Mar 23, 2020, 5:29 PM Seriously. Aside from Buchanan what conservative doesn’t pander? I follow Buchanan, VD Hansen, Murray, Sowell. I am a Hayekian but he’s gone. And I follow the sciences closely. If hayek knew what I knew he’d have done what I did. He was so damned close. Conservatism: rule of law, meritocracy, aristocracy Progressivism: arbitrary rule, equalitarianism, bureaucracy

  • What Conservative Doesn’t Pander

    Mar 23, 2020, 5:29 PM Seriously. Aside from Buchanan what conservative doesn’t pander? I follow Buchanan, VD Hansen, Murray, Sowell. I am a Hayekian but he’s gone. And I follow the sciences closely. If hayek knew what I knew he’d have done what I did. He was so damned close. Conservatism: rule of law, meritocracy, aristocracy Progressivism: arbitrary rule, equalitarianism, bureaucracy

  • An Example of A False Dichotomy

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:05 PM

    Are you a sheep or a wolf? Neither. I’m a hunter. Eat the sheep. Kill the wolf.

    (genius from james santagata) (the implication is strategic)

  • An Example of A False Dichotomy

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:05 PM

    Are you a sheep or a wolf? Neither. I’m a hunter. Eat the sheep. Kill the wolf.

    (genius from james santagata) (the implication is strategic)

  • No. We Tried to Defend from The Leftists by Surviving Their Failures

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:16 PM

    —“Yes. Anglo-American free market conservatives have destroyed America and the UK”—Lord Keynes

    Can you explain that to me because america was clearly destroyed by the postwar undermining of our civilization from within, financialization of the economy to defeat the soviets, export of industry to defeat the unions, attempt at expanding housing, to defeat the leftists. We have falsified the entire postwar anti-darwinian leftist program of marxism, socialism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and science denialism, and would have no civil conflict if not for immigration, nor resistance to automation. We could follow the japanese strategy of a homogenous polity gracefully automating our lack of need of labor. I don’t see anglos to blame here. I see only one mistake: conservative decision in the 80’s to let leftist programs fail was fine, but our failure to anticipate the immigrant hordes and their voting for a party of failed pseudoscience, sophistry, and undermining. In the end evidence won,but didn’t matter: hordes. Now there is only one question – whether we divorce, separate, and the conservatives return to our natural market eugenics and automation while we let the left fail, or we have a bloody civil war to defeat the failed left pseudoscience and sophism, despite the hordes. The Free Market Ideology (libertarianism) is another Jewish, not anglo, movement: Boas, Freud pseudoscience, Marx economic pseudoscience, cantor-bohr-keynes pseudomath, Adorno-Fromm Neo-Marxism, Derrida-postmodernism, Rand-Rothbard Libertarian, Trotsky-strauss-kristol neocon The Hayekian movement recommended empirical RULE OF LAW, and the prevention of the expansion of socialism arbitrary rule. The problem was the right lacked the science (evidence) to defeat the left false promise baiting into hazard. We have the science. The left was wrong. Period. This is the greatest pseudo scientific movement in history with a strategic and tactical repetition of the means by which rome was undermined by theological false promise just as the 20th was undermined by pseudoscientific false promise. The right could only wait for evidence. I know, because I was there, and this is how we discussed the problem of the age: Marxism had failed, the Great Society had failed, the oil crisis failure, and the failure in iran. We made a decision. Except for immigration we would have won. The left didn’t win by ideas.

  • No. We Tried to Defend from The Leftists by Surviving Their Failures

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:16 PM

    —“Yes. Anglo-American free market conservatives have destroyed America and the UK”—Lord Keynes

    Can you explain that to me because america was clearly destroyed by the postwar undermining of our civilization from within, financialization of the economy to defeat the soviets, export of industry to defeat the unions, attempt at expanding housing, to defeat the leftists. We have falsified the entire postwar anti-darwinian leftist program of marxism, socialism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and science denialism, and would have no civil conflict if not for immigration, nor resistance to automation. We could follow the japanese strategy of a homogenous polity gracefully automating our lack of need of labor. I don’t see anglos to blame here. I see only one mistake: conservative decision in the 80’s to let leftist programs fail was fine, but our failure to anticipate the immigrant hordes and their voting for a party of failed pseudoscience, sophistry, and undermining. In the end evidence won,but didn’t matter: hordes. Now there is only one question – whether we divorce, separate, and the conservatives return to our natural market eugenics and automation while we let the left fail, or we have a bloody civil war to defeat the failed left pseudoscience and sophism, despite the hordes. The Free Market Ideology (libertarianism) is another Jewish, not anglo, movement: Boas, Freud pseudoscience, Marx economic pseudoscience, cantor-bohr-keynes pseudomath, Adorno-Fromm Neo-Marxism, Derrida-postmodernism, Rand-Rothbard Libertarian, Trotsky-strauss-kristol neocon The Hayekian movement recommended empirical RULE OF LAW, and the prevention of the expansion of socialism arbitrary rule. The problem was the right lacked the science (evidence) to defeat the left false promise baiting into hazard. We have the science. The left was wrong. Period. This is the greatest pseudo scientific movement in history with a strategic and tactical repetition of the means by which rome was undermined by theological false promise just as the 20th was undermined by pseudoscientific false promise. The right could only wait for evidence. I know, because I was there, and this is how we discussed the problem of the age: Marxism had failed, the Great Society had failed, the oil crisis failure, and the failure in iran. We made a decision. Except for immigration we would have won. The left didn’t win by ideas.

  • Neural networks naturally organize according to energy costs

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:37 PM

    —” A recent theory, based on thermodynamics in physics, suggests that neural networks in a healthy brain naturally organize together according to energy costs into a sufficient number of connection “microstates” that lead to consciousness. Too many or too few microstates and the brain loses its adaptability, processing powers, and sometimes the ability to keep itself online.”—

  • Neural networks naturally organize according to energy costs

    Mar 23, 2020, 11:37 PM

    —” A recent theory, based on thermodynamics in physics, suggests that neural networks in a healthy brain naturally organize together according to energy costs into a sufficient number of connection “microstates” that lead to consciousness. Too many or too few microstates and the brain loses its adaptability, processing powers, and sometimes the ability to keep itself online.”—

  • The Intermarium Begins. (I Am Thrilled)

    Mar 24, 2020, 9:08 AM Europe’s plan to checkmate Russia youtube.com No one can defeat russia in a land war until china chooses to defeat russia in a land war. No one can afford to conduct other than an economic war against russia because of the nuclear arsenal (that we should never have taken from Ukraine.) But … could russia HOLD ukraine? Russia has too small a population and too small an economy to compete as a world power by other than monopolizing the territorial resources to fund and build military prowess – which in and of itself always provides host peoples with extraordinary technological advantage – over time. This is one of the secrets of american success. the military industrial complex performs the majority of basic competitive research. If russia stays on trend, uses resources to accumulate military and technological power, then restores the fabulous russian education system, and continues putin’s program of incrementally expanding rule of law into the economy, the future requires only the limitation of islam ,the reconquest of the southeast (kazakhstan), until nato abandon’s turkey, and russia is free to pursue southward. It is possible to negotiate with ukraine for east of the dnipr. The west of ukraine is too european for russia, and will join the intermarium (three seas initiative). The balance of resources in russia, and rule of law, agrarian production, in the intermarium (three seas), and the eventual end of the need for nato given french existing arms, germania’s necessity of rearmament, and the intermarium’s rearmament should provide a balance of powers across europe. Naturally the UK, USA, Australia with mexico as labor force and canada as resource provider will form a pseudo-anglo block. South americans will eventually solve their problems and form a block. China, india, and three or four islams will form different blocks. and africa, at some point will form a block and the end of the globalist project will be over with and we will return to historical norms EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S SUB-CIVILIZATIONSGreater Anglosphere UK 68m USA 330m (200m really) Canada 37m Australia 25m

    NZ 4.6m

    ~464m (340m?) Greater Scandinavia Protestant Europe: Finland 5.5m Norway 5.3m Sweden 10m Denmark 5.8m Netherlands 17.4m Germany 83m

    And yes, Italy North. 60.5m GDP $2.07 trillion USD (2018)

    ~187.5m Catholic West Europe France 66m Spain 46.4 Portugal 10.2

    South Italy …

    ~110.4m Intermarium(three seas) Austria 9m Bulgaria 7m Croatia 4m Czech Republic 11m Estonia 1.3m Hungary 10m Latvia 2m Lithuania 3m Poland 38m Romania 20m Slovakia 5.4m

    Slovenia 2m

    ~213m 470,649 square mile.

    European Ukraine: ~30m. ~160,000sq m

    30m Russia 144m GDP: $1.66 trillion USD

    Belarus 10m

    ~154m ~6,601,670 sq m. (Russia is VAST) So russia has a vast territory, a medium population and only 1.6T in gdp. Italy has a third of the population of russia and a third more gdp. What does that mean? Russia has a cheaper labor force to use in a military. But it can’t afford a military with that labor force. Can italy be a world power? Can russia be a world power? No.