Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • All I see are women whining so that men will protect them.

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:01 PM

    –“Christians. Really, just take the reigns and rule already. I really don’t care how you do it if you’re trying. But you don’t seem to want to. So stop begging others to do it for you in the manner more to your liking without contributing to rule.”— Ospin88

    This is my underlying complaint about christians. I don’t believe them. All I see are women whining so that men will protect them. There was a reason it took the viking invasion and viking warriors to conduct the crusades. There was a reason the french couldn’t resist them. Christianity has only been strong when it wailing women handkerchief that inspires and licenses aryanism (heroic, expansionist, entrepreneurial, militarism). I am not the only person to say that christianity is a means of keeping the peasants pliable and working so that the aristocracy can afford expensive weaponry. Or that the only time christian banners fly is to legitimize aryanism. I mean, what separates a christian monarchy from a kingdom? The license of the church to use violence. If christianity s strong then christian men would be the first in line rather than constitutionalists and pagans, while docile christians show up and wave flags when the hard work is done. Give me a pope who defense europen civilization not the faith. Christianity is a third world religion.

  • Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM

    —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu

  • Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM

    —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu

  • Why the wealth of western civilization?

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:18 PM Why the wealth of western civilization? Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY

  • Why the wealth of western civilization?

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:18 PM Why the wealth of western civilization? Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY

  • These are the big questions of our age

    Feb 28, 2020, 8:09 PM To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud. There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed? Why didn’t china have a problem until marx? Why did india avoid the problem? Why is western civlization experiencing the problem? Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise? Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law? These are the big questions of our age. BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism. Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.

  • These are the big questions of our age

    Feb 28, 2020, 8:09 PM To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud. There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed? Why didn’t china have a problem until marx? Why did india avoid the problem? Why is western civlization experiencing the problem? Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise? Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law? These are the big questions of our age. BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism. Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.

  • This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law

    Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable, or they are not. Whether they are desirable or not, has no bearing on whether they are true or not.

    But, disapproving of, denying, or obscuring the true whether desirable or not, says far more about your character, ethics, morals, and mind than stating the true whether it is desirable or not. 😉 This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law, testimony and the demarcation between testifiable science and not – he completed transitioning the law’s into a science and operational logic – whether it is desirable or not. Just how it is.

  • This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law

    Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable, or they are not. Whether they are desirable or not, has no bearing on whether they are true or not.

    But, disapproving of, denying, or obscuring the true whether desirable or not, says far more about your character, ethics, morals, and mind than stating the true whether it is desirable or not. 😉 This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law, testimony and the demarcation between testifiable science and not – he completed transitioning the law’s into a science and operational logic – whether it is desirable or not. Just how it is.

  • The Politically-Incendiary-Bomb of Eugenics

    Feb 29, 2020, 11:37 AM by Anne Summers Are you ready? Here is the incendiary bomb of eugenics… If you want smarter people, we need to start to address the environmental issues that are reeking havoc on development. The stupid, the immature, the challenged, the weak, are very likely from the Molotov cocktails of various gene weakness/susceptibility and environmental poisons that were absent or minute for most of our species existence.