Source: Original Site Post

  • We Must Think to Rule of Law and Paternalism

    Feb 10, 2020, 8:54 AM

    —“We must think beyond capitalism and socialism”–Nicholas J. Fuentes @NickJFuentes

    Nick: 1) It was a false dichotomy: to replace rule of law(Local Capitalism) vs Discretionary Rule (International socialism). Individual Sovereignty requires Rule of Law (of Reciprocity) Jury, Thang(Council),Senate, King, Markets in Everything. Tripartism requires three economies. 2) The three economies in Tripartism are Markets, Protected Markets(Guilds, Unions), Limited Markets, Non Market (Dependents). 3) Trust necessary to produce those markets requires ethnic homogeneity, 4) Ethnocentrism is the optimum military, political, economic,and social order. 5)The enemy always seeks monopoly under the pretense of possible equality. Our people have always sought empirical markets that provide direction for those lacking agency, freedom and protection for those with some, liberty for those with more, and excellents for those with most. 6) The enemy uses False Promise of Freedom from the consequences of Nature’s Laws (genetics), to Bait those lacking agency into Hazard (harm), to generate conflict, that undermines our means of cooperation by markets, limited markets, and non-market cooperation. 7) In the ancient world the Enemy used the monopolies of judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken, and islam to invade and destroy by supernaturalism. In the modern world the Enemy used the monopolies of Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Feminism, Postmodernism,by pseudoscience. 8) There is only one source of soverginty-in-fact, liberty, freedom, and subsidy: that is the organized use of warfare to defend the polity from alternatives – especially those that sell the impossible to destroy ethnicity, culture, civlization, by baiting into hazard.

  • Why Is Celebrity Dead: Because They Killed It

    Feb 10, 2020, 9:59 PM WHY IS CELEBRITY DEAD: BECAUSE THEY KILLED IT I’ll tell you why celebrity is dead, it’s because (a) there are no archetypes at the end of cultural marxism and postmodernism because they were designed to undermine and destroy them (b) there are no empathy, no heroics or heroic mythos in a heterogeneous or global audience (c) there is nothing scarce about people in the age of the internet. (d) there is nothing scarce about glamorizing the lower classes – you can’t guild a pig.

  • Why Is Celebrity Dead: Because They Killed It

    Feb 10, 2020, 9:59 PM WHY IS CELEBRITY DEAD: BECAUSE THEY KILLED IT I’ll tell you why celebrity is dead, it’s because (a) there are no archetypes at the end of cultural marxism and postmodernism because they were designed to undermine and destroy them (b) there are no empathy, no heroics or heroic mythos in a heterogeneous or global audience (c) there is nothing scarce about people in the age of the internet. (d) there is nothing scarce about glamorizing the lower classes – you can’t guild a pig.

  • The Final Iteration

    —“In the final iteration is it not the pawnbroker/ money lender > government bond issuer > central banker that puts the globalist corporatist cosmopolitan Davos man (haute bourgeoisie) above our ultimate line of national defense (national monarchs, national/local nobility, local militia)?”—Scott De Warren

  • “WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A VOTE?” (voting)

    Feb 11, 2020, 1:52 PM If you have juridical defense in matters private and public, but haven’t served, aren’t financially independent and responsible for yourself, haven’t had a family that you are responsible for, don’t run a company whose employees and capital you are responsible for, or haven’t run an enterprise whose employees, capital, and patterns of trade you are responsible for, or run a state whose entire economy you are responsible for, then why do you have a vote in any of those matters without having demonstrated sufficient ability to successfully hold that responsibility? If you haven’t served then why do you have free speech, ownership of property? If you haven’t had replacement number of children, then why do you also have a vote in matters of commons? If you haven’t employed dozens, then why do you also have a vote in matters of the economy? If you haven’t employed tens of thousands, why do you have a vote in matters international? If you haven’t governed a state, then why do you have a vote in matters of the state? About 1/5-1/4 of the population is informed enough to make choices. The rest are either biased to a political party, or dependent upon filtering propaganda and opinions of friends and family. We are all capable of different levels of intellectual resolution whether by level of ability, level of interests, level of knowledge, or constitution of character. We do not have standing in matters public today – only private. The state deprived us of the user of courts in matters public – we had to invent class action to circumvent that deprivation. But If you have juridical defense, in matters BOTH private AND public – called ‘universal standing’ – then you have defense against harmed by others private and political. But aside from defense why should you have any opinion on anything over which you cannot demonstrate comprehension, success, and responsibility? All government action is limited to coercion, either by informing/lying, bribery/deprivation, or force/defense. It is only the rule of law of reciprocity, the judiciary, the monarchy, and the military as last resort, that protects us from abuse of those levers of coercion. Combine rule of law of reciprocity, with demonstrated investment and capacity for participation, with demand for truthful reciprocal speech, with houses of the classes, with a monarchy as a judge of last resort – and democracy can work. But universal unearned franchise, political parties, single house majoritarianism, and devolution from rule of law to rule by legislation (or even rule by discretion) has proven too vulnerable to baiting the ignorant and unaccountable into hazard with false promise of circumvention of nature’s necessity for markets in everything.

  • “WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A VOTE?” (voting)

    Feb 11, 2020, 1:52 PM If you have juridical defense in matters private and public, but haven’t served, aren’t financially independent and responsible for yourself, haven’t had a family that you are responsible for, don’t run a company whose employees and capital you are responsible for, or haven’t run an enterprise whose employees, capital, and patterns of trade you are responsible for, or run a state whose entire economy you are responsible for, then why do you have a vote in any of those matters without having demonstrated sufficient ability to successfully hold that responsibility? If you haven’t served then why do you have free speech, ownership of property? If you haven’t had replacement number of children, then why do you also have a vote in matters of commons? If you haven’t employed dozens, then why do you also have a vote in matters of the economy? If you haven’t employed tens of thousands, why do you have a vote in matters international? If you haven’t governed a state, then why do you have a vote in matters of the state? About 1/5-1/4 of the population is informed enough to make choices. The rest are either biased to a political party, or dependent upon filtering propaganda and opinions of friends and family. We are all capable of different levels of intellectual resolution whether by level of ability, level of interests, level of knowledge, or constitution of character. We do not have standing in matters public today – only private. The state deprived us of the user of courts in matters public – we had to invent class action to circumvent that deprivation. But If you have juridical defense, in matters BOTH private AND public – called ‘universal standing’ – then you have defense against harmed by others private and political. But aside from defense why should you have any opinion on anything over which you cannot demonstrate comprehension, success, and responsibility? All government action is limited to coercion, either by informing/lying, bribery/deprivation, or force/defense. It is only the rule of law of reciprocity, the judiciary, the monarchy, and the military as last resort, that protects us from abuse of those levers of coercion. Combine rule of law of reciprocity, with demonstrated investment and capacity for participation, with demand for truthful reciprocal speech, with houses of the classes, with a monarchy as a judge of last resort – and democracy can work. But universal unearned franchise, political parties, single house majoritarianism, and devolution from rule of law to rule by legislation (or even rule by discretion) has proven too vulnerable to baiting the ignorant and unaccountable into hazard with false promise of circumvention of nature’s necessity for markets in everything.

  • Feb 13, 2020, 9:33 AM –“I believe an alternative name for Corded Ware culture w

    Feb 13, 2020, 9:33 AM

    –“I believe an alternative name for Corded Ware culture was ‘Battle Axe’ culture but political correctness won the day.”–Arno Kæland

  • Feb 13, 2020, 9:33 AM –“I believe an alternative name for Corded Ware culture w

    Feb 13, 2020, 9:33 AM

    –“I believe an alternative name for Corded Ware culture was ‘Battle Axe’ culture but political correctness won the day.”–Arno Kæland

  • From an Insightful Dispute Between Africans and Americans on Twitter

    Feb 15, 2020, 12:53 PM (Content Warning!!!) (This might be offensive!!!) This conversation is important. Why? Because we still find disputes between the more developed more rational and scientific, and less developed civilizations – particularly indian, islamic, jewish, and african. And we still find disputes between the classes: theological-occult-sophistry, marxist-postmodernist-feminist pseudoscience, and those of us in confucian-aristotelian civilizations (science and reason). While the dispute between Protestant-Catholic-Russian, Chinese, korean-japanese, and even christian pacific is limited to what is in our interest and in our preferences, and in our political organization and social responsibility that is the limit of our variation. We are all aristotelians now. But we have also succeeded at soft eugenics. So here is the (content warning!!!) dispute between an african referring to ‘african epistemology’ instead of ‘justification for group strategy’. And what I assume are members of the anglosphere explaining european epistemology. “Whiteness” is the pejorative term used by the african fellow to refer to the group strategy of western civlization. So “Whiteness” = “Racism” and use of Whiteness ~= A Marxist Critique. —“WHITENESS: Whiteness questions African epistemology simply because there’s no room in their normative framework to process this! I bet there’s a non-African you know who is an “expert” on African matters.”— —“Is there ever a scenario in which a white person questioning the thought in your head might do so because the thought itself, regardless of its origin, is nonsensical, unkind, and/or disturbing–in theory?”— —“No. And even you asking that is whiteness in action because you seem to think that white people can read other people’s thoughts.”— —“So in your opinion, any thought originating from a white person is automatically invalidated, correct?”— · —“That’s not what I’m saying. Understand “whiteness” devoid of race. Whiteness is an ideology of domination. Its diabolical. Its anti- spiritual. Its anti-human. The more need to have it understood, deconstructed and demystified.”— 1) Whiteness = Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism(Science), Reciprocity and Truth Regardless of Cost(Natural Law), Voluntary Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities(Meritocracy), and suppression of underclass reproduction. 2) Whiteness = Profiting from the domestication of animal man into civilized man using science, natural law, meritocracy, suppression of underclass reproduction, and direction of those savings to the production of the high returns on high trust commons. 3) Whiteness = The fastest means of evolving man into gods we imagine by the use of the most adaptive artistic, intellectual, economic, social political means possible, under the most prosperous, peaceful, and enjoyable means possible. 4) Whiteness = The means by which we dragged mankind kicking and screaming, one civilization and generation at a time, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, hunger, starvation, disease, suffering, early death, and victimhood under an uncaring universe. 5) Whiteness = Aristocracy, Elitism, Heroism, Excellence, Beauty, Truth, Reciprocity, Duty. And the reason you hate “Whiteness” is because you cannot meet that standard of excellence. It is because your genes cannot lie, like your mind and your words. 6) But here is the test: While only europeans could have invented Whiteness, any people can practice “Whiteness” if they are willing to suppress the reproduction of the underclasses – which for some nations constitutes the vast majority of the people – so it’s politically impossible or impractical. 8) Whiteness is the desire to transcend into gods, and not to devolve into animals again. Whiteness (white man’s burden) was our desire to profit from dragging mankind with us into godhood under the presumption that we could all be equal. But you rejected us – and we agreed. Edit