(F>) Herds, Compromisers, Pack Hunters, Solitary Hunters (<M), versus (F>) Psychotic, Solipsistic, Balanced, Analytic, Autistic (<M). With:
Trait differences are minor variations in the stage of the prey drive. And:
Biased by major variations in the differences of the sex drive.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:23:00 UTC
There is no steady state. Regression to the mean is only preventable through constant maintenance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:15:00 UTC
READ AND UNDERSTAND
by Brandon Hayes
Humans we are fractionating! This is obvious to those paying any attention. However, instead of being excited for the chance to speciate; we’re panicked; why?
Well, I’m going to venture a guess it has something to do with the reason the fractionation is taking place.
If you look at the chart (painstakingly put together I imagine) many of those groups are of the new abstract type mentioned above. They are groups basing their identity on their collective prejudiced opinions of out-groups.
I’ve written recently about empathy (and compassion) as poor out-group strategies as they favor an out-group over an in-group. However, the action to be taken in lieu of empathy isn’t combat! Nuance people, nuance!
Cooperation or non-interaction between groups is better (more positive results) than blind empathy (hurts the in-group) or conflict (destroys the weaker group). What the above paper labels as out-group learning, that’s understanding those not in your group, reduces prejudice by a significant margin. Who would have thought understanding those different than you makes you judge them less (typically)! <That’s sarcasm internet; of course this is the case.
People say don’t judge; this is like asking people not to think. Humans make judgments when they think; they don’t get to turn that off when it comes to humans (or groups of humans). Every man ought to be an adequate and fair judge of reality; it’s a duty.
We ought to welcome the speciation by creating groups based on in-group preference (mainly) and save the out-group prejudice for those acting to harm us (they exist but it’s not everyone who thinks a bit differently than you).
If we coalesce into one human race we lose our evolutionary advantages (as these are culture and geographic specific); we squander the human biological platform; we make a joke out of what evolution took 3.5 billion years to create. Just because we can become one, doesn’t mean it is the proper path. [Breeding all the dogs breeds together to make a “super dog” DOESN’T work < this is not how genetics works]
We can get along without destroying what made us evolutionarily viable. We can cohabitate in peace. Love should wane with each concentric kinship sphere; we should look to cooperate and create “win, wins”; what good is being human if we can’t transcend what makes us animal?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:14:00 UTC
https://medium.com/intellectual-explorers-club/memetic-tribes-and-culture-war-2-0-14705c43f6bbWELL DONE BUT THE TIME FOR UNDERSTANDING HAS PASSED
Regarding: https://medium.com/intellectual-explorers-club/memetic-tribes-and-culture-war-2-0-14705c43f6bb
Well done. This is perhaps the best work, and possibly the only meaningful work, I have seen on the ‘Tribes’. (I’ve written about the right tribes as a class hierarchy. I haven’t worked on the left’s Tribes but I suppose it’s obvious.)
By way of compliment, If I could add any value to your work at all, it’s:
a) As we grow wealthier (less constrained) we are all seeking divergence (specialization) that exercises our preferences rather than the predicted convergence on a uniform preference.
b) That we can AFFORD to diverge (specialize or speciate) because we are wealthy enough to produce commons serving our interests.
c) That the Tribes reflect the spectrum from the feminine (herd, proportionality, equality) to masculine (pack, reciprocity, meritocracy-hierarchy) reproductive strategies. And therefore we are both able to seek and it’s in our reproductive interests (and therefore our psychological demands, expressed as political demands) to seize the opportunity for speciation.
d) That majority Democracy, and particularly first-past-the-post majoritarian democracy (equality of vote) produces a monopoly of outcomes that favors the major party with cyclical rebellions against overreach by the minority party. That democracy provides only a means of resolving differences in priority but not difference in objectives. And these differences in objectives are not bridgeable because they are not arbitrary but genetic and immutable.
e) There that the only solution to such demand is not the fallacy of continuing to ‘understand and compromise’ when ‘demand’ for OPPOSING commons simply continues to increase, but to either separate (secession) or devolve the production of commons from the federal governments to the states, so that the nationalists (masculine packs), and globalists (feminine herds) can end the artificial constraint of monopoly democracy and develop commons more suitable to their reproductive interests.
Everyone thought they would win. The British-German belief in the aristocracy of everyone. The French-Ashkenazi murderers of aristocracy of a peasantry of everyone.
Everyone was wrong. And we have given up attempting to reconcile our differences.
And we are within a year or two of a civil war the scope of which has never been seen before if we continue to pursue a winner-takes-all strategy.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
( h/t: @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes] , @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin] )Updated Oct 2, 2018, 10:08 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:08:00 UTC
—“Yes they have far higher incidence of homosexuality. …
As far as I know homosexuality among theirs is more than double ( I assume it’s close to triple) that of ours. Plus, homosexuality goes up with decline in religious observance (or rather, religious observance declines with homosexuality).”—
The possibility that the genes for female expression are not suppressed would fit the high rates of inheritance. Hopefully that research will come out.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 21:30:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/43117184_299877033942527_8110452289979809792_o_299877030609194.jpg
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 21:07:00 UTC
—“Politically, socially, or otherwise: as fragmentation grows linearly, the surface area across which a coherent system must retain interfaces grows exponentially. This selection pressure tends to prune nuanced interfaces, and leave those that favor binary states of info sorting.” – Matthew Pirkowski
( via Brandon Hayes )
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 21:04:00 UTC
LIKE I SAID, THEY’RE ALL FEMALE AND THIS IS WHY
*Reverse dimorphism*
—“Another big study is going on at UCLA, this one of discordant for homosexuality. I believe this is the study that resulted from Sven Bocklandt’s work that found some extreme skewing of the X in a hefty % of mothers of gay men.
Bocklandt thought this might mean that epigenetics explained things, that in gay men, genes from the mother that we always thought silenced were turned on.
I don’t know the state of that very large study. Last I read, Bockandt had taken a job with a private genetics company. He had been working with Charles Roselli, the sheep guy up at Oregon State, I think it is, who is studying male-oriented rams. According to Bocklandt, Roselli gave him sheep brains to study.
I just checked the UCLA twin study site and it’s been changed to a facebook website. The remnants of the old site state:
Drs. Eric Vilain and Cisco Sánchez are currently doing a study using the DNA of identical male twin pairs where one is gay, and one is straight. Although these twins have the same DNA sequence, they might use those genes differently, and this different use might explain their difference in sexual orientation.
The lab is trying to identify which genes are regulated differently between the gay and straight twins. Please contact us if you’re interested in participating, or if you know of some twins might be interested.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 20:56:00 UTC
THE PROGRAM OF THE HERD
Let me help you.
If we enact the reforms I recommend, rents will be impossible, and THEY will seek greener pastures. If we enact the restitutions I recommend, THEY will be extricated from the United States. If they are deprived of rents and deprived of the united states, then GLOBALISM will be dead. Because globalism is THEIR program, just as all abrahamic religions are THEIR program. The program of the Herd.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 13:42:00 UTC
Updated Oct 2, 2018, 12:16 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 12:16:00 UTC