Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43717966_10156700531312264_581626199

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43717966_10156700531312264_581626199

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43717966_10156700531312264_5816261990896631808_n_10156700531302264.jpg Collin Sleuth KnightGood times.Oct 11, 2018, 7:57 PMGiego CaleiroSays a dark enlightenment advocate :pOct 11, 2018, 8:57 PMCurt Doolittleah. well. Reaction against marxism/postmodernism/feminism is the the same as restoring abrahamic superstition. It’s a continuation of ending the abrahamic deceits.Oct 12, 2018, 4:29 AMJoe FossDidn’t we call them dark ages because we lacked some archeological and historical documents but have started filling the blanks in in recent decades?

    As far as I know, the church has done a lot to preserve and even advance a lot of the knowledge from the classical period until the Renaissance.Oct 12, 2018, 8:13 AMCurt Doolittleread wikipedia

    Petrarch

    —“The idea of a Dark Age originated with the Tuscan scholar Petrarch in the 1330s.[14][12] Writing of the past, he said: “Amidst the errors there shone forth men of genius; no less keen were their eyes, although they were surrounded by darkness and dense gloom”.[15] Christian writers, including Petrarch himself,[14] had long used traditional metaphors of ‘light versus darkness’ to describe ‘good versus evil’. Petrarch was the first to give the metaphor secular meaning by reversing its application. He now saw Classical Antiquity, so long considered a ‘dark’ age for its lack of Christianity, in the ‘light’ of its cultural achievements, while Petrarch’s own time, allegedly lacking such cultural achievements, was seen as the age of darkness.[14]

    From his perspective on the Italian peninsula, Petrarch saw the Roman and classical period as an expression of greatness.[14] He spent much of his time travelling through Europe, rediscovering and republishing classic Latin and Greek texts. He wanted to restore the Latin language to its former purity. Renaissance humanists saw the preceding 900 years as a time of stagnation, with history unfolding not along the religious outline of Saint Augustine’s Six Ages of the World, but in cultural (or secular) terms through progressive development of classical ideals, literature, and art.

    Petrarch wrote that history had two periods: the classic period of Greeks and Romans, followed by a time of darkness in which he saw himself living. In around 1343, in the conclusion of his epic Africa, he wrote: “My fate is to live among varied and confusing storms. But for you perhaps, if as I hope and wish you will live long after me, there will follow a better age. This sleep of forgetfulness will not last forever. When the darkness has been dispersed, our descendants can come again in the former pure radiance.”[16] In the 15th century, historians Leonardo Bruni and Flavio Biondo developed a three-tier outline of history. They used Petrarch’s two ages, plus a modern, ‘better age’, which they believed the world had entered. Later the term ‘Middle Ages’ – Latin media tempestas (1469) or medium aevum (1604) – was used to describe the period of supposed decline.[17]”—Oct 12, 2018, 9:14 AMJoe FossWouldn’t it have more to do with the collapse of the Roman Empire and barbarian invasions and less with religion running the world? Seems rash to attribute something so complex to a single root cause which might as well been tangentialOct 12, 2018, 9:20 AMJonathon PattersonThe biggest brained take.Oct 12, 2018, 9:23 AMCurt Doolittlereligion suppresses thought everywhere and at all times.Oct 12, 2018, 9:32 AMJoe FossI’m inclined to agree. Not a religious person myself, but I find atheists all too often up there with vegans in the “annoying cunts” category so I guess I soured on the entire groupOct 12, 2018, 10:07 AMMurphy CellDark ages never actually happened.Oct 12, 2018, 10:15 AMMurphy Cellhttp://blogs.bu.edu/core/2016/10/31/from-history-6-reasons-the-dark-ages-werent-so-dark/Oct 12, 2018, 10:18 AMPatrick HabetsYeah…. “Dark”…. Wow…

    Fortunately the enlightenment brought us ultimately “the good stuff”: like usury, materialism, libertarianism ending up in the glorious era of post-modernism.

    https://youtu.be/W4p7A0EtZqgOct 12, 2018, 11:26 AMPatrick HabetsIndirectly related, however perhaps clarifing to the above mentioned;

    https://youtu.be/yTiztUNrhhMOct 12, 2018, 11:35 AMBrett StevensCurt Doolittle Wikipedia is Red propagandaOct 12, 2018, 4:13 PMAyham NedalLol the Middle Ages weren’t dark.

    I’d advise you to read a little about the Islamic Golden Age and the Carolingian Renaissance.Oct 12, 2018, 5:12 PMRichard NikoleyNOOOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION.Oct 12, 2018, 5:22 PMBreaker MorantThe dark ages probably wasn’t as bad as the crises leading to the RenaissanceOct 12, 2018, 5:44 PMCorey OvertonActually the churches and monasteries kept a good bit of essential knowledge alive during the dark ages.Oct 12, 2018, 5:44 PMCurt Doolittlewell, anything that CAN be red propaganda is. that doesn’t mean ALL of it is. ;)Oct 12, 2018, 6:43 PMChris WojtowiczAre the secular powers who pull the strings today really all that better at running the show? The 20th century was the bloodiest ever—largely due to secular conflicts. Nihilism and despair reign. Men everywhere fall into vice. Anything outside strict incontrovertible science is “just your opinion, man” and so the masses have forgotten everything about human nature. Give me back these “Dark Ages!”Oct 12, 2018, 11:45 PMDaniel Roland AndersonCurt Doolittle

    And it’s not like you can’t check the citations, eh?

    People are funny.Oct 13, 2018, 1:06 AMPatrick HabetsRichard Nikoley that’s deep! 👌Oct 13, 2018, 9:52 AMPatrick HabetsIt’s called “dark” for just one reason: labor was higher valued then usury. Furthermore the papal doctrine of the Byzantine dogma of “sicut judaeis non” prevented the manipulation of medieval (mainly Benedictine monastery) principalities. The Renaissance was Kick-started by usury, financed by Venetian moneylenders to the (shabbos goy?) De Medici in Florence. It’s that simple!

    In regard of the above mentioned the following hypothesis is perhaps interesting in the light of Ceasar’s true motivation of the Rubicon crossing…

    Keep in mind western society is structured upon “Roman” WRITTEN (Sic!) LAW…….

    https://youtu.be/FPfuFM-e8QQOct 13, 2018, 10:03 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 19:55:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43717966_10156700531312264_581626199

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43717966_10156700531312264_581626199

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43717966_10156700531312264_5816261990896631808_n_10156700531302264.jpg Collin Sleuth KnightGood times.Oct 11, 2018, 7:57 PMGiego CaleiroSays a dark enlightenment advocate :pOct 11, 2018, 8:57 PMCurt Doolittleah. well. Reaction against marxism/postmodernism/feminism is the the same as restoring abrahamic superstition. It’s a continuation of ending the abrahamic deceits.Oct 12, 2018, 4:29 AMJoe FossDidn’t we call them dark ages because we lacked some archeological and historical documents but have started filling the blanks in in recent decades?

    As far as I know, the church has done a lot to preserve and even advance a lot of the knowledge from the classical period until the Renaissance.Oct 12, 2018, 8:13 AMCurt Doolittleread wikipedia

    Petrarch

    —“The idea of a Dark Age originated with the Tuscan scholar Petrarch in the 1330s.[14][12] Writing of the past, he said: “Amidst the errors there shone forth men of genius; no less keen were their eyes, although they were surrounded by darkness and dense gloom”.[15] Christian writers, including Petrarch himself,[14] had long used traditional metaphors of ‘light versus darkness’ to describe ‘good versus evil’. Petrarch was the first to give the metaphor secular meaning by reversing its application. He now saw Classical Antiquity, so long considered a ‘dark’ age for its lack of Christianity, in the ‘light’ of its cultural achievements, while Petrarch’s own time, allegedly lacking such cultural achievements, was seen as the age of darkness.[14]

    From his perspective on the Italian peninsula, Petrarch saw the Roman and classical period as an expression of greatness.[14] He spent much of his time travelling through Europe, rediscovering and republishing classic Latin and Greek texts. He wanted to restore the Latin language to its former purity. Renaissance humanists saw the preceding 900 years as a time of stagnation, with history unfolding not along the religious outline of Saint Augustine’s Six Ages of the World, but in cultural (or secular) terms through progressive development of classical ideals, literature, and art.

    Petrarch wrote that history had two periods: the classic period of Greeks and Romans, followed by a time of darkness in which he saw himself living. In around 1343, in the conclusion of his epic Africa, he wrote: “My fate is to live among varied and confusing storms. But for you perhaps, if as I hope and wish you will live long after me, there will follow a better age. This sleep of forgetfulness will not last forever. When the darkness has been dispersed, our descendants can come again in the former pure radiance.”[16] In the 15th century, historians Leonardo Bruni and Flavio Biondo developed a three-tier outline of history. They used Petrarch’s two ages, plus a modern, ‘better age’, which they believed the world had entered. Later the term ‘Middle Ages’ – Latin media tempestas (1469) or medium aevum (1604) – was used to describe the period of supposed decline.[17]”—Oct 12, 2018, 9:14 AMJoe FossWouldn’t it have more to do with the collapse of the Roman Empire and barbarian invasions and less with religion running the world? Seems rash to attribute something so complex to a single root cause which might as well been tangentialOct 12, 2018, 9:20 AMJonathon PattersonThe biggest brained take.Oct 12, 2018, 9:23 AMCurt Doolittlereligion suppresses thought everywhere and at all times.Oct 12, 2018, 9:32 AMJoe FossI’m inclined to agree. Not a religious person myself, but I find atheists all too often up there with vegans in the “annoying cunts” category so I guess I soured on the entire groupOct 12, 2018, 10:07 AMMurphy CellDark ages never actually happened.Oct 12, 2018, 10:15 AMMurphy Cellhttp://blogs.bu.edu/core/2016/10/31/from-history-6-reasons-the-dark-ages-werent-so-dark/Oct 12, 2018, 10:18 AMPatrick HabetsYeah…. “Dark”…. Wow…

    Fortunately the enlightenment brought us ultimately “the good stuff”: like usury, materialism, libertarianism ending up in the glorious era of post-modernism.

    https://youtu.be/W4p7A0EtZqgOct 12, 2018, 11:26 AMPatrick HabetsIndirectly related, however perhaps clarifing to the above mentioned;

    https://youtu.be/yTiztUNrhhMOct 12, 2018, 11:35 AMBrett StevensCurt Doolittle Wikipedia is Red propagandaOct 12, 2018, 4:13 PMKevin WuAll eras have had religion, and all future eras will too.Oct 12, 2018, 4:51 PMCurt Doolittlewe have one now: marxism-postmodernism-social democracyOct 12, 2018, 4:56 PMKevin WuBingo.Oct 12, 2018, 4:57 PMAyham NedalLol the Middle Ages weren’t dark.

    I’d advise you to read a little about the Islamic Golden Age and the Carolingian Renaissance.Oct 12, 2018, 5:12 PMRichard NikoleyNOOOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION.Oct 12, 2018, 5:22 PMJosey WalesThe dark ages probably wasn’t as bad as the crises leading to the RenaissanceOct 12, 2018, 5:44 PMCorey OvertonActually the churches and monasteries kept a good bit of essential knowledge alive during the dark ages.Oct 12, 2018, 5:44 PMCurt Doolittlewell, anything that CAN be red propaganda is. that doesn’t mean ALL of it is. ;)Oct 12, 2018, 6:43 PMChris WojtowiczAre the secular powers who pull the strings today really all that better at running the show? The 20th century was the bloodiest ever—largely due to secular conflicts. Nihilism and despair reign. Men everywhere fall into vice. Anything outside strict incontrovertible science is “just your opinion, man” and so the masses have forgotten everything about human nature. Give me back these “Dark Ages!”Oct 12, 2018, 11:45 PMDaniel Roland AndersonCurt Doolittle

    And it’s not like you can’t check the citations, eh?

    People are funny.Oct 13, 2018, 1:06 AMPatrick HabetsRichard Nikoley that’s deep! 👌Oct 13, 2018, 9:52 AMPatrick HabetsIt’s called “dark” for just one reason: labor was higher valued then usury. Furthermore the papal doctrine of the Byzantine dogma of “sicut judaeis non” prevented the manipulation of medieval (mainly Benedictine monastery) principalities. The Renaissance was Kick-started by usury, financed by Venetian moneylenders to the (shabbos goy?) De Medici in Florence. It’s that simple!

    In regard of the above mentioned the following hypothesis is perhaps interesting in the light of Ceasar’s true motivation of the Rubicon crossing…

    Keep in mind western society is structured upon “Roman” WRITTEN (Sic!) LAW…….

    https://youtu.be/FPfuFM-e8QQOct 13, 2018, 10:03 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 19:55:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43717966_10156700531312264_58162619

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43717966_10156700531312264_58162619

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43717966_10156700531312264_5816261990896631808_n_10156700531302264.jpg Collin Sleuth KnightGood times.Oct 11, 2018 7:57pmGiego CaleiroSays a dark enlightenment advocate :pOct 11, 2018 8:57pmCurt Doolittleah. well. Reaction against marxism/postmodernism/feminism is the the same as restoring abrahamic superstition. It’s a continuation of ending the abrahamic deceits.Oct 12, 2018 4:29amJoe FossDidn’t we call them dark ages because we lacked some archeological and historical documents but have started filling the blanks in in recent decades?

    As far as I know, the church has done a lot to preserve and even advance a lot of the knowledge from the classical period until the Renaissance.Oct 12, 2018 8:13amCurt Doolittleread wikipedia

    Petrarch

    —“The idea of a Dark Age originated with the Tuscan scholar Petrarch in the 1330s.[14][12] Writing of the past, he said: “Amidst the errors there shone forth men of genius; no less keen were their eyes, although they were surrounded by darkness and dense gloom”.[15] Christian writers, including Petrarch himself,[14] had long used traditional metaphors of ‘light versus darkness’ to describe ‘good versus evil’. Petrarch was the first to give the metaphor secular meaning by reversing its application. He now saw Classical Antiquity, so long considered a ‘dark’ age for its lack of Christianity, in the ‘light’ of its cultural achievements, while Petrarch’s own time, allegedly lacking such cultural achievements, was seen as the age of darkness.[14]

    From his perspective on the Italian peninsula, Petrarch saw the Roman and classical period as an expression of greatness.[14] He spent much of his time travelling through Europe, rediscovering and republishing classic Latin and Greek texts. He wanted to restore the Latin language to its former purity. Renaissance humanists saw the preceding 900 years as a time of stagnation, with history unfolding not along the religious outline of Saint Augustine’s Six Ages of the World, but in cultural (or secular) terms through progressive development of classical ideals, literature, and art.

    Petrarch wrote that history had two periods: the classic period of Greeks and Romans, followed by a time of darkness in which he saw himself living. In around 1343, in the conclusion of his epic Africa, he wrote: “My fate is to live among varied and confusing storms. But for you perhaps, if as I hope and wish you will live long after me, there will follow a better age. This sleep of forgetfulness will not last forever. When the darkness has been dispersed, our descendants can come again in the former pure radiance.”[16] In the 15th century, historians Leonardo Bruni and Flavio Biondo developed a three-tier outline of history. They used Petrarch’s two ages, plus a modern, ‘better age’, which they believed the world had entered. Later the term ‘Middle Ages’ – Latin media tempestas (1469) or medium aevum (1604) – was used to describe the period of supposed decline.[17]”—Oct 12, 2018 9:14amJoe FossWouldn’t it have more to do with the collapse of the Roman Empire and barbarian invasions and less with religion running the world? Seems rash to attribute something so complex to a single root cause which might as well been tangentialOct 12, 2018 9:20amJonathon PattersonThe biggest brained take.Oct 12, 2018 9:23amCurt Doolittlereligion suppresses thought everywhere and at all times.Oct 12, 2018 9:32amJoe FossI’m inclined to agree. Not a religious person myself, but I find atheists all too often up there with vegans in the “annoying cunts” category so I guess I soured on the entire groupOct 12, 2018 10:07amMurphy CellDark ages never actually happened.Oct 12, 2018 10:15amMurphy Cellhttp://blogs.bu.edu/core/2016/10/31/from-history-6-reasons-the-dark-ages-werent-so-dark/Oct 12, 2018 10:18amPatrick HabetsYeah…. “Dark”…. Wow…

    Fortunately the enlightenment brought us ultimately “the good stuff”: like usury, materialism, libertarianism ending up in the glorious era of post-modernism.

    https://youtu.be/W4p7A0EtZqgOct 12, 2018 11:26amPatrick HabetsIndirectly related, however perhaps clarifing to the above mentioned;

    https://youtu.be/yTiztUNrhhMOct 12, 2018 11:35amRyan PétrequinPolitics is a religious phenomenon.Oct 12, 2018 11:44amBrett Stevens@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] Wikipedia is Red propagandaOct 12, 2018 4:13pmKevin WuAll eras have had religion, and all future eras will too.Oct 12, 2018 4:51pmCurt Doolittlewe have one now: marxism-postmodernism-social democracyOct 12, 2018 4:56pmKevin WuBingo.Oct 12, 2018 4:57pmAyham NedalLol the Middle Ages weren’t dark.

    I’d advise you to read a little about the Islamic Golden Age and the Carolingian Renaissance.Oct 12, 2018 5:12pmRichard NikoleyNOOOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION.Oct 12, 2018 5:22pmJosey WalesThe dark ages probably wasn’t as bad as the crises leading to the RenaissanceOct 12, 2018 5:44pmCorey OvertonActually the churches and monasteries kept a good bit of essential knowledge alive during the dark ages.Oct 12, 2018 5:44pmCurt Doolittlewell, anything that CAN be red propaganda is. that doesn’t mean ALL of it is. ;)Oct 12, 2018 6:43pmChris WojtowiczAre the secular powers who pull the strings today really all that better at running the show? The 20th century was the bloodiest ever—largely due to secular conflicts. Nihilism and despair reign. Men everywhere fall into vice. Anything outside strict incontrovertible science is “just your opinion, man” and so the masses have forgotten everything about human nature. Give me back these “Dark Ages!”Oct 12, 2018 11:45pmDaniel Roland Anderson@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle]

    And it’s not like you can’t check the citations, eh?

    People are funny.Oct 13, 2018 1:06amPatrick Habets@[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley] that’s deep! 👌Oct 13, 2018 9:52amPatrick HabetsIt’s called “dark” for just one reason: labor was higher valued then usury. Furthermore the papal doctrine of the Byzantine dogma of “sicut judaeis non” prevented the manipulation of medieval (mainly Benedictine monastery) principalities. The Renaissance was Kick-started by usury, financed by Venetian moneylenders to the (shabbos goy?) De Medici in Florence. It’s that simple!

    In regard of the above mentioned the following hypothesis is perhaps interesting in the light of Ceasar’s true motivation of the Rubicon crossing…

    Keep in mind western society is structured upon “Roman” WRITTEN (Sic!) LAW…….

    https://youtu.be/FPfuFM-e8QQOct 13, 2018 10:03am

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 19:55:00 UTC

  • “Modern dogs are part of the extended phenotype of indo europeans.”—Alba Risin

    —“Modern dogs are part of the extended phenotype of indo europeans.”—Alba Rising

    lolz;

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 19:41:00 UTC

  • by @[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley] The problem here is that it’s crucial

    by @[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley]

    The problem here is that it’s crucially important what values you’re acting (or fighting, or kicking teeth) FOR.

    There is no virtue in combat for the sake of combat. That’s for Fight Club and everyone knows what the first rule of Fight Club is.

    So, everyone fights. Everyone has a degree of blood lust. Everyone wants to kick in the teeth, bash heads and…

    “Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.” — H. L. Mencken

    But for what? Let’s be somewhat explicit in dialectic fashion: thesis —> Antithesis —> Synthesis.

    REPUBLICAN THESIS (loosely, not all-inclusive)

    – Traditional American Dream

    – Traditional American Values including core familial values

    – Traditional forms of child learning, typically including light religious indoctrination

    – Raising sons and daughters to embrace traditional familial male and female roles

    – Know-How, Do It Yourself Self sufficiency, including pride as a virtue to be reluctance to ask for help

    – Business, productivity, entrepreneurship, wealth building

    – Minimal government interference

    – Tough on true crime (murder, kidnapping, rape, theft, fraud, etc.)

    – Charity and missionaryism

    – Closed borders; be selective and cherry pick immigrants

    DEMOCRAT ANTITHESIS

    – The American Dream leaves too many poor, uneducated, and genetically IQ handicapped behind and you should feel ashamed of that

    – Traditional family values hold down girls and women from reaching their true potential intellectually, academically, and independent financially

    – Traditional child rearing tends to empower male children and handicap female children such that they are dependent on males

    – Self sufficiency, know-how, and self dealing, etc. in the trades disadvantages the poor, uneducated, IQ handicapped and so collective bargaining through unions on the private and public levels are necessary, as is affirmative action to award the less fortunate at the expense of penalizing the naturally selected

    – Capitalism in general places the means of production and prosperity in the hands of entrepreneurs who may not be market driven but politically driven, so fascism is necessary (quibbles I’m sure, but state control through vast regulation of quasi-private enterprise IS what fascism IS)

    – Maximum governmental regulation (fascism) is necessary and the best means of producing that outcome is through political rent-seeking behavior, turning market entrepreneurs into political entrepreneurs

    – Criminal prosecution is a tool used by the right to control the underclasses

    – Grassroots charity comes with ideological strings attached, usually religious and so, this too ought to be a secular and state team effort with corporate charity and United Nations oversight rather than individuals and small groups seeing a need and assuaging it to their abilities

    – Open borders; lift the poor and underprivileged

    …Not all-inclusive, such as, strong feminist activism, queer agenda, transgender stuff, etc.

    In terms of the dialectic synthesis, that’s libertarianism. Strong on markets, self-sufficiency, entrepreneurship, minimal government interference, private charity…but also live and let live on the social issues.

    The question is, without the Republican and Democrat labels, the memes, the Media, entertainment, and Hollywood narrative crafting either way, which set of values do you more viscerally identify with that the other?

    Hey, Curt Doolittle, your stream of consciousness and/or sweat and tears lists are always more comprehensive than mine. Anything to add, retract, nuance, etc?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:29:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PMJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018, 6:49 PMJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018, 7:08 PMJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018, 7:16 PMCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018, 7:31 PMSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018, 7:37 PMCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018, 7:44 PMAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018, 7:47 PMCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.

    Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.

    “During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018, 8:20 PMChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018, 8:39 PMHoward Van Der KlauwIgor Rogov exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018, 8:40 PMJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018, 10:58 PMAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018, 1:52 AMJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018, 8:03 AMMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018, 10:21 AMKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018, 1:49 AM—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PMJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018, 6:49 PMJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018, 7:08 PMJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018, 7:16 PMCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018, 7:31 PMSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018, 7:37 PMCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018, 7:44 PMAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018, 7:47 PMCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.

    Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.

    “During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMAmir MetzgerSome lawyers are the most fucked up people in existence, no questionOct 11, 2018, 7:52 PMIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018, 8:20 PMChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018, 8:39 PMHoward Van Der KlauwIgor Rogov exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018, 8:40 PMJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018, 10:58 PMAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018, 1:52 AMJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018, 8:03 AMMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018, 10:21 AMKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018, 1:49 AM—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43684184_10156700426027264_42420961

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43684184_10156700426027264_42420961

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018 6:43pmJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018 6:45pmAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018 6:49pmJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018 7:08pmJohnathon FashI’m just happy they didn’t misquote you. cheers mate. you deserve it.Oct 11, 2018 7:14pmJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018 7:16pmAlba RisingCurt you’re gonna get arrested. :/

    Maybe it’s different in the US but I was detained for much much less.Oct 11, 2018 7:19pmAlba RisingAlthough getting arrested would be great for your philosophy I would prefer you are not.Oct 11, 2018 7:21pmCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018 7:31pmSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018 7:37pmCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018 7:44pmAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018 7:47pmCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.

    Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018 7:50pmJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.

    “During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018 7:50pmCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018 7:50pmClaire AdelsteinSome lawyers are the most fucked up people in existence, no questionOct 11, 2018 7:52pmIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018 8:20pmChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018 8:39pmHoward Van Der Klauw@[596399623:2048:Igor Rogov] exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018 8:40pmJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018 10:58pmAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018 1:52amJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018 8:03amMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018 10:21amKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018 1:49am—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC

  • THE SIMPLE, UNIVERSAL ANSWER TO THE LEFT —“I am to the point where I simply sa

    THE SIMPLE, UNIVERSAL ANSWER TO THE LEFT

    —“I am to the point where I simply say, “You are stealing from us various things that we value. Everything you say is an excuse to steal. If you don’t think you’re stealing, that makes no difference because *we* believe you’re stealing. And our patience for it is at an end. So you need to think very carefully about who would win a civil war.”— John Mark

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 17:47:00 UTC

  • POSTMODERN, CRITIQUE, PILPUL: HICKS, MACDONALD, AND DOOLITTLE Understanding of P

    POSTMODERN, CRITIQUE, PILPUL: HICKS, MACDONALD, AND DOOLITTLE

    Understanding of Postmodernism spreads via Hicks. Critique by Macdonald. I do the entire history of Pilpul (sophism), Critique(gossip), the Fictionalisms (pseudoscience, pseudorationalism-sophism, and supernaturalism-occultism) and their use as vehicles for loading, framing, overloading, and suggestion for the purpose of generating moral hazard that can be profited from by fraud. This includes Abrahamism, Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism. Now, we know what the left does now and how they do it – and we have produced a science out of testimony to stop it. The only challenge left is extending the law of involuntary warranty from goods and services to speech – thereby limiting public speech to that which is warrantable, and restoring defamation. This will reverse the century and a half of the industrialization of lying.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 17:34:00 UTC