Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • NATURAL LEVEL OF PREDATION OF PASTORALISTS (like I said) —“Whole German tribes

    NATURAL LEVEL OF PREDATION OF PASTORALISTS

    (like I said)

    —“Whole German tribes, like the Cimbri, might coordinate for a singular migration for new territory, but for the exclusive pastoralist, their whole existence was migration. Groups such as the Goths and Vandals might settle down, and become primary producers again, but pure pastoralists probably required some natural level of predation and extortion upon settled peoples to obtain a lifestyle beyond marginal subsistence. Which is to say that some of the characterizations of Late Antique barbarians as ad hoc configurations might apply more to steppe hordes.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 02:42:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 02:39:00 UTC

  • The history of Southeast Asia, or perhaps more accurately the quasi-history of S

    —–The history of Southeast Asia, or perhaps more accurately the quasi-history of Southeast Asia since so many of the records are from China and elsewhere, indicates strong Indian influence in the period before 1000 AD. The standard model is that this is cultural diffusion. And by and large Southeast Asian peoples are are mostly indigenous. But, a non-trivial minority of their ancestry is recent, but pre-colonial, gene flow from the Indian subcontinent. Additionally, the imprint is easier to see in the Y chromosome than the mtDNA. The legends of marriages between Indian Brahmins and native princesses in places like Cambodia probably do reflect something real in the dynamics of the early Indianization.—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 02:37:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 02:26:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 17:51:00 UTC

  • WANT ONE: This overcoat (at this length, it’s technically a car coat) is bulletp

    https://www.bulletproofeveryone.com/product-page/the-logan-men-s-overcoatI WANT ONE:

    https://www.bulletproofeveryone.com/product-page/the-logan-men-s-overcoat

    This overcoat (at this length, it’s technically a car coat) is bulletproof for almost all handguns, looks exactly like my overcoat that cost three times as much.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 17:51:00 UTC

  • “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM” LOLZ By Giego Caleiro I hereby coin the term: “Argument Ad

    “ARGUMENT AD UTERUM” LOLZ

    By Giego Caleiro

    I hereby coin the term:

    “Argument Ad Uterum”

    A classical form of fallacious argument in which a fertile female, often a bipolar girlfriend, a feminist, or a pawn of leftwing ideology (NPC) threatens self-removal from a group, discussion, or event, as a means to socially sanction or control that which she, or anyone in the discussion, cannot argue against by legitimate means.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 17:40:00 UTC

  • far as I know universal suffrage has been the subject of criticism throughout al

    https://notesonliberty.com/2018/10/13/liberalism-democracy-and-polarization/As far as I know universal suffrage has been the subject of criticism throughout all of history, and the evidence of the 20th century that it provides little but the slow road to authoritarian redistributionism. The only reason that it’s been possible in the 20th century is the luxury of the returns on the debt possible under fiat money capitalism, at the cost of continuous dygenia (reduction of and now the reversal of, intergenerational human capital).

    There is a vast difference between those of us who understand both micro, macro, political, and human capital economics, and grasp that political systems are simply those we can afford in the moment, and nothing more. And that the only way to preserve the liberty created by western civilization is to continue the eugenic program of the ancient and medieval manorialists: meritocratic tripartism (slave-serf-freman-citizen-nobleman meritocracy) or the british invention of adding houses for each of the classes as they contribute to responsibility for management of the economy: Monarch, Landed Nobility (Regions), Commons (small business owners), and Church (proxy for the working classes). The mistake they made was not adding a new house for the working classes, and another for women upon their enfranchisement. This would let us continue the historical market for commons between the classes, rather than under liberalism(classical liberalism in the english speaking world).

    The result instead was underclass rule, and the use of propaganda and media to (lie to) use ideological hyperbole to obtain power by non-market means.

    Majoritarian democracy is and can only be, a monopoly. We had the nearly perfect government. Rule of law resulting in markets for commons, as well as markets for goods, services and information. However, the middle class seizure of power from the landed aristocracy, and the inclusion of the underclass as a means of opposing the rise of marxism-communism, merely kicked the political can down the road.

    And we are all standing around looking at that can wondering where to kick it next.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    RE: https://notesonliberty.com/2018/10/13/liberalism-democracy-and-polarization/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 17:27:00 UTC

  • DAY THE MAINSTREAM GETS CLOSER TO OPEN DISCOURSE ON REVOLUTION

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/12/can-our-modern-house-divided-remain-one-nation/EVERY DAY THE MAINSTREAM GETS CLOSER TO OPEN DISCOURSE ON REVOLUTION

    https://nypost.com/2018/10/12/can-our-modern-house-divided-remain-one-nation/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 17:04:00 UTC

  • IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN OR INTEND. —“Marxists believe…”— You’re co

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN OR INTEND.

    —“Marxists believe…”—

    You’re confusing what people intend, with the 1) method of argument (sophism, and self deception) 2) whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises, 3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce, 4) whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics.

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU “MEAN”.

    It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia.

    a) people were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them.

    b) the classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because there are only three means of organizing people: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction). And three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), conflated (egypt, mesopotamia.

    c) we do not, and the evidence is marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) lack the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort a feminist (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias.

    SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 16:58:00 UTC